It is an open secret amongst the industry that MJ was in fact a paedophile with an attraction to pre-pubescent boys.
His "people" as you mentioned would continually advise MJ not to be so public about his relationship with that poor child JOrdy Chandler whose own famiy were happy to rent to MJ - it kaes all sorts
It's one thing to "innocently" sleep with young boys who are not your own son - but if it was so innocent how was Jordy Chandler able to to describe the strange unique mark MJ had in his penis?
If there are people out there wicked enough to rent out their son to a paedo then I don't doubt there are people wicked enough to accuse somebody in his position of something so heinous in an attempt to make money out of him.
My point is, that I believe there was enogh evidence to show that he was commiting these crimes but not enough to lead to a conviction. As he thankfully never raped any of these poor boys there wasn't any physical evidence and the type of molestations he was accused of are difficult to prove as a conviction relies on witness statements.
With the power and money behind MJ it is quite clear that he and his record company would be able to afford he top lawyers who could easily pick holes in a childs witness statement, pariculary a child that is traumatised and may struggle to remember the details that a prosection relies on fo success.
So it only takes one bad apple who is lying to cast reasonable doubt over the the chidlren who were telling the truth.
Come on sunshine, do you honestly think the police would have raided his home and even taken the case as far as it went if they didn't feel they had enough evidence for conviction?
The jurors can only convict someone if they believe they are guilty beyond all reasonable guilt. I remember after the case the jurors were distraught as they believed MJ was guilty but the evidence was not technically backing up the case.
Jesus Juice FFS!