Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to wonder why books aren't important anymore?

56 replies

Makipuppy · 03/12/2009 12:19

We've just got back from viewing one of the two state schools in the area for DN who will be starting there in January. This one has 1400 pupils and an excellent Ofsted report. I was amazed at the broad swathes of computers and the facilities for sports, drama, technology, woodwork, music, design etc. but fairly underwhelmed by the library. A nice room, with about 10 units holding, so we were told, 7k books which I don't actually think is very many at all. When I asked her she said they relied on donations. Why would they rely on donations in a school that clearly has the budget for amazing facilities?
Anecdotally, the last donation was from Ian McKellan who updated their gay literature from 1999. Surely this is all a bit haphazard?

Am I the only one that thinks books are a more reliable source of knowledge than the Internet?

OP posts:
Ewe · 03/12/2009 17:09

always - absolutely agree with you, I use my university e-catalogue loads. Online resources are great too if used properly but unfortunately I don't think in many cases by secondary school students they are!

My concern is more people typing "subject X" into Google and clicking the first thing that comes up i.e. Wikipedia and taking the contents of it as fact when it is in fact user driven content that is usually correct but not always. Likewise for the thousands of blogs, forum posts out there.

Sorry Makipuppy, we've gone a bit off topic!

Hulababy · 03/12/2009 17:35

Bear in mind there may well be books in other area too. In the school I work at there is the library, but then every classroom has a large book browser of fiction and non fiction books, plus topic books in the rooms.

The school I am at pays a large sum of money annuallly to belong to the LEA library scheme. Once a year librarians from the LEA come in and sort the library out, and they will remove older books and bring in new ones so the stock is changing reasonably regularly.

Also each teacher is able to visit the LEA library and take out clas sets, plus individual boos, for use with their classes. These are changed much more regularly and are often linked to specific topics, but include fiction and non fiction.

At our school each class visits the library weekly to take out and change one library book.

Makipuppy · 03/12/2009 17:39

Humn, what was that? Sorry I was reading my book...

OP posts:
Makipuppy · 03/12/2009 17:42

that's really interesting Hulababy, I hadn't thought there might be more books elsewhere. And I'm sure getting children into the habit of visiting their local library is ultimately better than having a library in the school.

OP posts:
pointydogg · 03/12/2009 17:48

Unfortunately lots of local authorities and schools think new technology and sports facilities are the bees' knees. Books are Not In Fashion. It is short-sighted, yes.

It depends on having staff at the school willing to make a fuss about books.

WebDude · 10/12/2009 14:05

"I'm sure getting children into the habit of visiting their local library is ultimately better" - very true, except that library opening hours are now "under threat" in some areas, and even libraries themselves, because of local government budget cuts.

As far as I remember, libraries are covered by law requiring there to be facilities, but not 'sacrosanct' in the way that various other 'front line' services are.

Something to keep on the lookout for - closures because of purse string tightening.

I know there is this 'Freedom of Information' Act in force, but try getting details off your local council about numbers of staff, management structure, and how many of the senior staff get 100,000+ a year and you will probably draw a blank, wherever you live (if you don't, I'd like to be proved wrong about the degree of secrecy generally surrounding council staffing etc).

On the council sites I've looked at, if they include minutes of meetings, they give a list of attendees and then in the notes of who said what, giving only job titles (no list of real name vs job title). In the contact section of sites, the council officers and staff are not listed, just the councillors as the 'public facing' people, along with their e-mail and phone number etc, so it seems like a closed shop, staff hiding behind job titles when they e-mail etc, etc, to me.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page