My ex-husband got a contract mobile phone for our son when he was 5 years old.
The ex-husband lives 200 miles away and spends the majority of his working life travelling so is only really contactable by mobile.
He got a contract mobile for our son so they could contact each other via phone and text, thus maintaining their bond without it being a financial burden on me.
For this I truly thank him. I have a mobile, but I have my own life to deal with on that mobile that I pay for with my own wages. I also have a landline, which again, I pay for with my own wages. As a single parent I need to watch my money.
Our son ONLY uses his mobile to contact me when he is with his Dad or to contact his Dad when he is with me (DS is now 11 years old - you work out how much it could have cost ME for him to phone his Dad 5+ times a week for the past 6 years - and also, our younger DD also uses the phone to chat to her Dad - she is 8)
My DS never takes his phone out - it has a place in the kitchen drawer when not in use. It can only be used to phone his Dad.
To be honest, it has been invaluable. I simply could not have afforded for our children to call their Dad on an almost daily basis to a mobile or a city 200 miles away for years.
So that is the arguement to alnyone saying kids should not have mobiles - in general I agree - but in this instance I really do not know how I would finacially cope had my DS not had a contract mobile for both his and DD's use.
WRT downloading without permission - My DS never DL's on his mobile and always asks permission to DL anything on the net so I dont know. If he DID, I would probaly go with the confiscate method - or just leave it to the ex-husband to deal with when he sees the bill lol
xxx