Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be gutted not to be going to friend's wedding?

42 replies

Stigaloid · 23/07/2009 16:22

My friends are getting married this year in Autumn. They are a lovely couple whom i have known 5 years and DH at least 12. They came to our wedding and are having about 8 page boys and flowergirls at their wedding. It will be a wonderful event although it is a 6 hour drive away, so a bit of a slog. Anyway - it falls on the weekdn after our anniversary so thought we would make a long weekend of it. Booked ourselves into a junior suite at lovely country house hotel so DS could sleep in living area and we could have bedroom. Booked spa treatments (manicure and make up) for morning of as will be as big as a house as will be 7.5 months pregannt at time so wanting to look slightly attractive as opposed to heffer like. Only to be told 'no kids'. Now i completely respect the couple's decision to not have children - it is afterall their wedding. And i understand that them involving all their godchildren as page boys and flowergirls (there are 8 of them!) may be enough. We thought about it and thought - well why not DS and I attend the service and reception and leave at the sit down meal time. I can take DS back, arrange a babysitter and return for the evening dance. They said 'no way' no kids at all at any of it. Am so sad. The flowergirls and and boys are the same age as DS so there will be children his age there. We aren't asking for them to spend money on us for food or anything.

Anyway - looks like DH will have to go on his own, which means yet another weekend of me looking after DS on my own and as we have hit the terrible twos and i am knackered from pregnancy, isn't the eaiest of tasks.

I know they have every right to make any decision they wish for their big day. Am just absolutely gutted to be missing out on being there and sharing the day with them.

Hugs please.

OP posts:
littlestarschildminding · 23/07/2009 18:43

Could you afford a weekend cm or nanny? Im a registered cm in London who does this kind of thing at weekends either at mine (roughly £150 for sat am-sun pm) or at yours roughly £200....

If you were to use someone like me (there are quite a few nannies/ cms who do this) you have the reassurance of ofsted reg , crb, first aid, checkable refs..I am very used to looking after children who don't know me very well (I normally try and meet up a few times first) and we have a great time.

Obviously its quite expensive and you may not be able to afford it (sorry if I offend).

Just something to consider. I cover 25miles of ealing just incase you are local.... sixpetitfleurs at yahoo dot co dot uk

Feelingforty · 23/07/2009 19:47

stigaloid, don't go - say you'd love to come but can't do with without DC as you have no one to look after him. {{virtual cup of tea & there, there}}

helips - I took my DD2 to a wedding when she was 6 weeks old. She spent her time either sleeping or feeding (as I knocked back the wine !) I'm sure you baby won't count as children, after as no seat/dining plan/meal will be needed there will be no extra cost for the bride & groom.

helips · 23/07/2009 19:58

Thats a good point feelingforty, I will get dh to speak to his friend, would be a shame to miss out...

woozlet · 23/07/2009 22:34

Hmm, I think as you have to travel that distance that your ds should be invited. But of course it's their wedding and I can see that 8 kids might be enough at a wedding, and if yours was invited then others would probably have to be too....

Shitty situation though, no real advice so have a hug!!

sayithowitis · 23/07/2009 23:52

They clearly have no thought for how difficult this is for you, given that you have already tried to compromise only to be told 'no' by the miserable gits happy couple, so in those circumstances I am afraid that at this point I would be refusing the invitation on behalf of the whole family. They have made it clear they don't really want you there. if they did, they would have given some thought to your difficulties with appropriate childcare such a long way from home. In any case, when I was 7.5 months pg, I certainly did not want my DH that far away in case anything happened with the baby. Ater all, a labour with second DC could all be over in the time it would take him to get back home to you.

Ozziegirly · 24/07/2009 04:06

When I got married I was young and selfish and basically none of my friends had children (although various rellies did).

I was all haughty about my fancy London wedding and whined to my Mum that I didn't want any children there. She put me in my place, said I had loved weddings as a child, that my rellies would be really upset not to bring them along.

So children came.

And were the total life and soul of the wedding, being lovely, well behaved, telling me I looked "like a fairy princess" and generally being fab guests.

I was totally wrong and admit that - I was swept away in the moment of thinking I was the most important person in the world on that one Saturday.

No real point to my story apart from to say that it's a shame if your children can't go - but that brides seem to go bonkers. I did and I am really normal normally.

Feelingforty · 24/07/2009 08:40

I don't thnk this couple don't want Stigaloid, they have just said no children.

It's their day, their choice & of course it's another mouth to pay for (so maybe £20-£50+ for his meal?). Perhpaps they didn't want the other 8 children, but due to family pressures have to invite them.

I was invited to a wedding a few years ago which meant we'd have to fly somewhere, stay the night before & the day of the wedding. We could have taken DD, but we'd have had to pay her flight & it probably would have cost almost £500 !! We gave it a miss.

Sometimes people get carried away & assume everyone is going to fall in with their plans no matter how inconvenient.

(off to change my name to something with contrary in it !)

Stigaloid · 24/07/2009 08:53

Awww thanks for the tea and sympathy ladies. I am making peace with my decision not to go and am happy for DH to go - I know it will be a very special event and am glad he will be there to represent us all.

Plus with the money we have saved i have managed to wangle a promise for a decent pair of shoes!

Silver linings and all that! x

OP posts:
sayithowitis · 24/07/2009 10:46

Feelingforty, given that Stigaloid had already offered to go for the ceremony and leave , taking her Ds with her, before the meal, there is no way they are thinking about the cost of feeding another person. They have made it clear that they don't want her to go IMO. In that circumstance, I am afraid that none of us would go as neither of us would accept an invitation this type of event where one of us was so clearly being excluded.

Feelingforty · 24/07/2009 12:56

sayithowitis - you've no idea what they are thinking, so I think it's a little unkind & unnecessary to point out the possibility that stigaloid is unwanted.

Some people just don't want kids, period.

Stigaloid, enjoy those new shoes !

FWIW we are off to a wedding in August. We weren't going to take the DC to the wedding & then we found out it's no kids anyway. Great stuff, lots of wine & dancing & no worrying about littlies

Stigaloid · 24/07/2009 13:14

hmm yes well i am trying to look positively at the no kids rule and hope it isn't too personal a demand - either way DH will be going and if they do have other kids there then so be it. I like them alot but a 12 hour round trip with a toddler and being pregnant plus spending a honk of money on a country house hotel and baby sitter seems a bit much for out DS to be left behind.

So....for less than what we would have spent paying for just one night's accommodation (we would have been staying 2) i have gone to the Jimmy Choo sale and got a lovely pair of Mary Jane's for my anniversary present - woot woot!

Wedding, schmedding!

OP posts:
TheCrackFox · 24/07/2009 13:24

Would much rather have Jimmy Choos than go to a boring old wedding. Win, win situation all round.

Dizzyclarebear · 24/07/2009 13:34

Stigaloid,

are there other couples in similar situation? could you see if you can book a sitter between you? I went to a wedding about a year and a half ago that was no children allowed, but 4 couples had clubbed together and booked a CM for the day who was in one of the hotel rooms, Mums were popping out to visit kids now and then but it seemed a good solution. (I did feel sorry for the Bride and Groom, it turned out if they'd said yes to kids it would have nearly doubled their numbers)

meemarsgotabrandnewbump · 24/07/2009 13:35

What irks me about these weddings is that children are good enough to be 'showpieces' (i.e look pretty as flowergirls and pageboys for the photos) yet children of close friends are not welcome to attend as guests.

It's all a bit shallow, and a shame that someone has to miss out on seeing their friends get married because of it.

Blondeshavemorefun · 24/07/2009 13:37

could you both not go and get a local babysitter to come to your hotel and look after your child while you are there?

seems a shame that you miss out seeing friends

though i do understand the bride/groom not wanting children there (bridesmaids etc dont count )

madeindevon2 · 24/07/2009 15:01

im sry...u say no kids but have 8 child attendants!? how is that "no kids"
im my mind its bonkers.

Feelingforty · 24/07/2009 17:08

it's no kids, because those 8 she has chosen are part of the wedding party.

Goodness, stigaloids got some cracking shoes, can it now end ?!

off to google jimmy choo mary janes....

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread