I agree with Noonki's post.
Please bear in mind that not everyone who doesn't have savings are, by definition, reckless spendthrifts who've spent all their disposable cash on holidays, cars, big houses etc.
There are many, many families who've enjoyed none of that but who have always struggled to make ends meet (even when "times" were "good") and for whom saving - even a little - is a physical impossibility.
Those families may now be benefitting from lower mortgage rates but are extremely vulnerable should they lose their jobs because they have absolutely no safety net to fall back upon.
I do feel sorry for pensioners (or anyone else who can't work) who have seen their income reduce as a result of loss of interest on their savings, but when you are employed, and still able (albeit by being "careful") to put money aside, then you are already in a priviliged position simply because you literally don't have to spend that money (on utilities, housing, commuting to work, food).
I do appreciate that savers' money is required to keep the economy afloat, and that there must therefore be some incentive to do so (as opposed to putting it in a piggy bank) but surely a long term view of saving should be taken ...... and the average interest over a period of years is what really matters.