I started a new job 4 weeks ago, the journey to work is fairly long and the only way I can make it is to use a notoriously accident prone high B road and a single track country lane. Due to where I live, childcare is limited and so I am restricted in terms of drop-off and collection.
I pointed this out when offered my current position, stating that if anything happened on the roads I would be cutting it fine to arrive at 8.45 and that I would need to leave at 4.40 but would shave the 20 mins off my 45 min lunch break. This was agreed by my manager and a director at interview.
On two days, at the start of the year, I was around 5 or 10 mins late due to snowy conditions and the B road being closed. On one occasion I was 10 mins late due to roadworks.
I was pulled up the other day - asked if I was going to have continuous problems getting to work on time as I had already shaved my lunch break down to 25 mins so would find it difficult to make the time up.
This week I have again been late due to the snow - monday 3 mins and this morning 37 mins as my car got stuck. When I finally got to work the comment was that they thought I wasn't coming and could I phone in if I was late again (I could have phoned but was preoccupied digging myself out and driving safely and it didn't occur to me). There was also a memo on my desk explaining that they were trying to avoid redundancies and could staff ensure that they were completely time efficient and help the company survive thereby safeguarding our positions.
I have never been pulled up over time keeping before and feel they are being unreasonable.
Is all this a sign of the times or am I justified in feeling a bit bloody harassed - especially as I raised concerns and compromises over hours at the interview before I accepted the position?