I'm sorry to hear about the pressure your mother felt OBM. I can see how that must have been unbearable for you.
AbstractMouse, this struck such a chord with me: 'My Mum was dead within 3 weeks of being diagnosed with lung cancer, we still got the "it must be such a relief" thing blah blah blah. Erm no actually it was horrific and traumatic and basically the worst thing ever. I may be selfish but I would rather have my Mum forever in a semi-ill state than her being gone.'
Because my mother's lung cancer was so advanced when she was diagnosed, this was pretty much what we were given to expect. The day of her diagnosis (completely unexpected) was unbelievably traumatic and horrific - exactly the right words. As it turned out we were incredible lucky that she survived for some time afterwards. I have often thought that, horrible as her death has been for us, it would have been much worse if she had died shortly after diagnosis. I really feel for you.
ThingOne, the emphasis on breast cancer research, almost to the exclusion of other sorts of cancer, is a real bugbear of mine. Of course it's magnificent that there have been so many steps forward in breast cancer treatment, but - as you say - colorectal and lung cancers (as well as others) kill more people yet have fewer resources devoted to their research. My mother's oncologist told me that lung cancer research accounted for just 2 per cent of the money devoted to cancer research in the UK. I can't see how this can be justified.
edam, did you hear Ben Goldacre's programmes about the placebo effect on R4? (Can't remember whether you're a fan of his or not.)
Sorry to pick out individual posts like this - these were just things that struck me as I was reading through.