Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask how to avoid 2nd home rate stamp duty

446 replies

Stampdutywoes · Yesterday 13:22

Hear me out before you attack.

Currently living in rental property after splitting with ex partner. We own the home he is living in jointly.
The landlord of my rental wants to sell and I would like to buy it but the additional 5% stamp duty rate for what would count as a second home is a killer.
Are there any conveyancing solicitors who could advise on how to avoid (not evade) this extra 5%?

OP posts:
LokiDoki75 · Yesterday 21:08

You’ve said that you don’t want to force a sale on “his” property, but what happens if you go through with this and then he decides at a later date that he needs his money back for whatever reason and wants to force you to sell “your” property? Would you be able to buy him out? Also, could jointly owning two properties potentially affect things like care home fees in the future?

Stampdutywoes · Yesterday 21:08

KidsDoBetter · Yesterday 21:02

Regardless - there would be nothing she could do if he got a new partner and she decided to do things differently re the house.

FWIW @Stampdutywoes - I had to pay the extra stamp duty when I bought a new house with my partner - in a place I will be moving to in 6 months. I still own my main residence but that will be sold. I am very aware of the 3 year deadline for getting rid of the first house when circumstances allow. I won't be giving up that large chunk of money thats for sure. But there was certainly no way to avoid it ...

You need to view it as a lost cost of structuring your affairs in this very unusual way.

I have the same rights as if I was living in the house with him, given that we own it 50:50. In theory, anyone could move a new partner into their shared home but it isn’t a realistic risk to stress over.

OP posts:
Stampdutywoes · Yesterday 21:11

LokiDoki75 · Yesterday 21:08

You’ve said that you don’t want to force a sale on “his” property, but what happens if you go through with this and then he decides at a later date that he needs his money back for whatever reason and wants to force you to sell “your” property? Would you be able to buy him out? Also, could jointly owning two properties potentially affect things like care home fees in the future?

I guess we would have to come to a joint solution like civilised human beings. How is that different to any decisions that need to be made when couples split?

OP posts:
MrsPernicious · Yesterday 21:13

Please get a solicitor, you don't sound very clued up on anything.

Stampdutywoes · Yesterday 21:14

MrsPernicious · Yesterday 21:13

Please get a solicitor, you don't sound very clued up on anything.

Thanks mate!

OP posts:
Applegram · Yesterday 21:17

Im a lawyer and your stamp duty point has been correctly answered but it’s moot: the bigger issue is no one (lawyer, friend, random in the street, their dog) would advise owing 1 let alone 2 properties with an ‘ex partner’. Who came up with this crazy idea?
if he can’t afford to buy you out the only reasonable solution is you sell your joint house and separately buy two homes (one each!)
what on earth has been happening for last 5 years while you’ve been renting? Has he being paying all the mortgage or paying you rent on your half?

Nopenousername · Yesterday 21:20

Could you call Angela?

nofacenonamenonumber · Yesterday 21:25

Gift the first property to one of your children.

Stampdutywoes · Yesterday 21:27

Applegram · Yesterday 21:17

Im a lawyer and your stamp duty point has been correctly answered but it’s moot: the bigger issue is no one (lawyer, friend, random in the street, their dog) would advise owing 1 let alone 2 properties with an ‘ex partner’. Who came up with this crazy idea?
if he can’t afford to buy you out the only reasonable solution is you sell your joint house and separately buy two homes (one each!)
what on earth has been happening for last 5 years while you’ve been renting? Has he being paying all the mortgage or paying you rent on your half?

Not true. It was our dog who suggested it and she’s usually pretty clued up on legal matters.

No mortgage and we’ve paid all costs 50:50 since I’ve been renting.

OP posts:
Stampdutywoes · Yesterday 21:28

Nopenousername · Yesterday 21:20

Could you call Angela?

She just said deny everything.

OP posts:
Stampdutywoes · Yesterday 21:28

nofacenonamenonumber · Yesterday 21:25

Gift the first property to one of your children.

They are more likely to evict him!

OP posts:
ExpectMore · Yesterday 21:29

Stampdutywoes · Yesterday 13:37

I want to maintain ownership of the existing property and we will buy the new one jointly too. Each live in one property

There’s cake and eating it. Can’t have both

Stampdutywoes · Yesterday 21:31

ExpectMore · Yesterday 21:29

There’s cake and eating it. Can’t have both

Can in this case but can’t avoid the higher stamp duty

OP posts:
timetochangethering · Yesterday 21:34

I think your answer is simple(ish) but would require you agreeing a value on the 1st house....

You value 1st house - lets say £2m, so £1m each
You value house 2 - lets say £800k, £400k each.
He transfers you £400k
You buy house 2 in your sole name
You place a charge of £600k on house 1 (£1m-£400k), payable on sale of house 1
House 1 gets put in his name.

So he owns £2m property but "owes" you £600k on sale = £1.4m
You own £800k property and have £600k charge = £1.4m

Then your existing wills continue and you leave everything to each other - although I'm struggling to understand why you would leave an ex-partner anything but anyhoo....

SylvanMoon · Yesterday 21:35

MeandT · Yesterday 20:55

How would you know? You're living in a different house & have been for 5 years already ffs!

I don't think she has been actually separated or divorced in a way that any of us would recognise. I think she's dropped enough hints to let us know that they are still a couple, but that she's been renting a separate smaller house for her to retreat to from time-to-time when she's feeling "ill". It's pretty clear that they share more than the stately house and she's said she wants the option of being able to live there when she wants and quite feasibly still does live there for most of her time. The fact that she's been renting the smaller house for 5 years just means that they have had this arrangement for some time now.

timetochangethering · Yesterday 21:37

SylvanMoon · Yesterday 21:35

I don't think she has been actually separated or divorced in a way that any of us would recognise. I think she's dropped enough hints to let us know that they are still a couple, but that she's been renting a separate smaller house for her to retreat to from time-to-time when she's feeling "ill". It's pretty clear that they share more than the stately house and she's said she wants the option of being able to live there when she wants and quite feasibly still does live there for most of her time. The fact that she's been renting the smaller house for 5 years just means that they have had this arrangement for some time now.

Is that you Camilla?

MrsPernicious · Yesterday 21:41

100 plus posts later... please get your own solicitor.

PauseButton · Yesterday 21:43

Why don't you build a separate dwelling for when you're "feeling ill" on the jointly owned estate?

Notonthestairs · Yesterday 21:46

SylvanMoon · Yesterday 21:35

I don't think she has been actually separated or divorced in a way that any of us would recognise. I think she's dropped enough hints to let us know that they are still a couple, but that she's been renting a separate smaller house for her to retreat to from time-to-time when she's feeling "ill". It's pretty clear that they share more than the stately house and she's said she wants the option of being able to live there when she wants and quite feasibly still does live there for most of her time. The fact that she's been renting the smaller house for 5 years just means that they have had this arrangement for some time now.

so it’s just a couple buying a second home together and trying to dodge the relevant tax.

Stampdutywoes · Yesterday 21:47

PauseButton · Yesterday 21:43

Why don't you build a separate dwelling for when you're "feeling ill" on the jointly owned estate?

That’s a good thought but would probably take a couple of years to plan and build so I’d need somewhere to live in the meantime. Wouldn’t want to have to deal with the sweaty tradesmen while it’s being built.

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · Yesterday 21:47

Notonthestairs · Yesterday 21:46

so it’s just a couple buying a second home together and trying to dodge the relevant tax.

Does dodge mean avoid or evade in this instance?

Stampdutywoes · Yesterday 21:48

SylvanMoon · Yesterday 21:35

I don't think she has been actually separated or divorced in a way that any of us would recognise. I think she's dropped enough hints to let us know that they are still a couple, but that she's been renting a separate smaller house for her to retreat to from time-to-time when she's feeling "ill". It's pretty clear that they share more than the stately house and she's said she wants the option of being able to live there when she wants and quite feasibly still does live there for most of her time. The fact that she's been renting the smaller house for 5 years just means that they have had this arrangement for some time now.

Not even close

OP posts:
daisymoo2 · Yesterday 21:54

timetochangethering · Yesterday 21:34

I think your answer is simple(ish) but would require you agreeing a value on the 1st house....

You value 1st house - lets say £2m, so £1m each
You value house 2 - lets say £800k, £400k each.
He transfers you £400k
You buy house 2 in your sole name
You place a charge of £600k on house 1 (£1m-£400k), payable on sale of house 1
House 1 gets put in his name.

So he owns £2m property but "owes" you £600k on sale = £1.4m
You own £800k property and have £600k charge = £1.4m

Then your existing wills continue and you leave everything to each other - although I'm struggling to understand why you would leave an ex-partner anything but anyhoo....

Edited

Yes, this illustrates what I was suggesting. @Stampdutywoes is there any reason you want to keep part ownership of property one? Transferring your share to your ex in return for first charge over 50% achieves the aim of property 2 being purchased without 2nd home tax.

Cyclingmummy1 · Yesterday 21:54

Stampdutywoes · Yesterday 20:22

I think we ascertained that a few hours ago but thanks for joining in.

You're welcome. It's given me a giggle.

Stampdutywoes · Yesterday 21:55

Cyclingmummy1 · Yesterday 21:54

You're welcome. It's given me a giggle.

Me too

OP posts: