Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think 'academic freedom' and whistleblower punishment are misused in those protesting the suspension of Nathan Cofnas

152 replies

keepcounsel · 23/08/2026 11:22

Many posters have cited 'academic freedom' and 'freedom of expression' as well as 'witch-hunt' in terms of Nathan Cofnas being suspended from the University of Ghent. They've also represented the suspension as punishing a whistle-blower due to his being one of the first to publicly communicate concerns about Jason Arday and plagiarism/academic standards. 200+ academics have signed a letter of protest about the suspension and the American ambassador to Belgium as well as Trump have called for him to be re-hired.

The grounds for his appointment seem to be to work as a post-doc on a Professor's project, so not overseen by the University HR department or a committee in the way a lecturer/professorial appointment would happen.
The work/activities of the Professor in question - Bouke De Vries - had been subject to complaints from his colleagues. When colleagues and students protested about Cofnas being hired Ghent's Rector said dissenting opinions should be allowed in the University.

Ghent have now said the grounds for suspension are due to:

a. He didn't conduct the research he was hired for
[they said 'The projects you publicly and repeatedly associate with your affiliation at Gent University, most notably your
'Guide for the Hereditarian Revolution' which advocates for racial barriers and segregation, fall entirely outside the scope of your official research mandate.']

b. He violated the University's ethics code
['prohibits spreading ideas of racial superiority or inciting racial segregation.']

c. He made statements that violate Belgian anti-discrimination legislation

d. He made remarks about Jason Arday that violate Belgian Criminal Code concerning offences against a person's honour or reputation

e. He caused significant unrest in the workplace by advocating a purge of those academics he thought ideologically wrong

My position as an academic invited to sign the letter of protest against his suspension is that academic freedom/freedom of speech is not unlimited, for example if it involves slander or seeks to assert racial supremacy.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
TheCastleRascal · Today 06:15

Duplicate ppst

TheCastleRascal · Today 06:16

Yes, and I think he's wrong about that, because it is based on racial differences in mean IQ in the US; those differences are not shown to the same extent elsewhere, and, even if they were, his argument turns on the assumption that high IQ=fitness for a high-profile role, which is clearly ridiculous.

In any event, you might be right that he really believes that no black people are worthy, but chose his words to give him wriggle-room. So, with reference to e.g. any particular black professor asking if they deserve to be there, he can say that maybe they are in that group he accepts would have been recruited on merit.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page