Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think cancelling the flight over a child was excessive

306 replies

MrsShawnHatosy · 10/08/2026 16:08

An airline cancelled a flight because a child refused to sit down and put their seatbelt on. AIBU to think they should have asked the parents to get off, rather than cancelling the flight and stranding the rest of the passengers?

https://www.mirror.co.uk/travel/news/flight-cancelled-passengers-stranded-due-37532204

Flight cancelled and passengers stranded due to child's actions

Flight PD444 from Victoria International Airport in B.C. to Toronto's Pearson International Airport did not take off on Thursday after a child passenger onboard refused to sit down

https://www.mirror.co.uk/travel/news/flight-cancelled-passengers-stranded-due-37532204

OP posts:
ShetlandishMum · 13/08/2026 03:59

notimagain · 11/08/2026 17:22

Main gripe I can really find about the comms (and it's a fair gripe) is that it was bad on the night ...TBH midnight cancellation at an outstation comms are never going to be great these days at most airlines..

Porter seem to have gone to ground and reality is they probably can't say much more due the rights to privacy the family have.

OTOH I've sensed a lot of the early efforts on-line and to some extent in the MSM have been attempts or hints at painting the airline as being unreasonable for cancelling the flight (classic case being the title of this thread and the whole AIBU as an example)

Bottom line here is the flight was cancelled as a result of the child's behaviour.

But of course it's inconvenient for some to admit that.

Edited

And the airline left people in the airport overnight. It seems like rights as a passager today are very random.

notimagain · 13/08/2026 05:40

Newname26 · 13/08/2026 03:35

The flight was already 6hours delayed.
So parents didn't book a last night flight.
It was a combination of factors that led to the delay. The child was probably getting wound up for hours by the airport as well.

Where has the 6 hour delay figure come from?

Press reports state the flight was the Porter (PD) 444, last Thursday night

According to timetables (available on line) that flight is normally scheduled to depart Victoria (i.e.pushback or first taxi) at 2230 local time.

According to sources such as Flightaware the PD444 that evening pushed back at 2303 local...so a 33 minute delay...

It never got airborne and (looking at other sources) returned to the terminal about 45 min later..and was then cancelled (Flightaware again)

So either Porter have been extraordinary unlucky with a couple of flights recently or the 6 hour figure is incorrect.

If you are quick the flight (or what there was of it) is still available for replay of flightradar, and the times will be on Flightaware for a while so you can check it for yourself.

notimagain · 13/08/2026 05:46

ShetlandishMum · 13/08/2026 03:59

And the airline left people in the airport overnight. It seems like rights as a passager today are very random.

Canadian rules so I don't know what the passenger rights were...in the real world especially at smaller airports (and sometimes bigger ones) the reality is that it's going to be tough for any airline to find accommodation for everyone, or even anyone at the drop of the hat, despite even basic duty of care requirements.

I'll accept service recovery doesn't sound at all great for the passengers but it mustn't be forgotten that from what we have heard the airline were not the reason for the cancellation.

TheignT · 13/08/2026 09:23

notimagain · 13/08/2026 05:46

Canadian rules so I don't know what the passenger rights were...in the real world especially at smaller airports (and sometimes bigger ones) the reality is that it's going to be tough for any airline to find accommodation for everyone, or even anyone at the drop of the hat, despite even basic duty of care requirements.

I'll accept service recovery doesn't sound at all great for the passengers but it mustn't be forgotten that from what we have heard the airline were not the reason for the cancellation.

Lots of delays aren't the fault of the airline, weather, air traffic controller strikes to name two.

Mumsntfan1 · 13/08/2026 10:14

ShetlandishMum · 13/08/2026 03:59

And the airline left people in the airport overnight. It seems like rights as a passager today are very random.

There are very few rights for passengers in Canada.

Newname26 · 13/08/2026 13:45

notimagain · 13/08/2026 05:40

Where has the 6 hour delay figure come from?

Press reports state the flight was the Porter (PD) 444, last Thursday night

According to timetables (available on line) that flight is normally scheduled to depart Victoria (i.e.pushback or first taxi) at 2230 local time.

According to sources such as Flightaware the PD444 that evening pushed back at 2303 local...so a 33 minute delay...

It never got airborne and (looking at other sources) returned to the terminal about 45 min later..and was then cancelled (Flightaware again)

So either Porter have been extraordinary unlucky with a couple of flights recently or the 6 hour figure is incorrect.

If you are quick the flight (or what there was of it) is still available for replay of flightradar, and the times will be on Flightaware for a while so you can check it for yourself.

My apologies I missed read the news paper article attached in the first post. It was another TUI flight where a similar incident happened which had a 6 hour delay.

But nobody really knows how a child will react to getting on a flight. The noise could be quite disturbing to children who aren't normally bothered by noise.

I do think the airline made the right decision but I also think better seatbelts / harnesses should be available for small children. Even if it is like a safety harness with the seatbelt threaded thought the back of it.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page