Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

How and why do people who aren’t actually well off pay for this stuff?

486 replies

Watersunscream · 05/07/2026 17:28

If I told you our income I would be told we are in the top percent of earners etc but I honestly couldn’t actually justify or financially manage these sorts of purchases.

Has anyone heard of the essentials brand? Literally hundreds for a tracksuit. I think another is Bergen? Expensive t shirts. Then there’s the usual like Fred Perry etc.

Obviously I know lots of wealthy people buy these things too but it’s mostly people from low income backgrounds. How do I know this? Because people I work with who live in deprived areas and not paid much are forever talking about these things! They actually buy the stuff for holidays or as gifts at Christmas etc. Is this a misguided attempt to gain status? An insecurity thing? I find it really bizarre, it wouldn’t ever cross my mind to spend this.

OP posts:
BeingATwatItsABingThing · 06/07/2026 07:27

LondonPapa · 05/07/2026 20:17

It isn’t just Ferrari. Pretty much every ultra high end brand has a system to filter the wrong people out before the right people are allowed to buy the exclusive items. Harrods, Selfridges et al. are not the exclusive places people think for example.

Oh I’m sure. I only know about Ferrari but the other super cars will do it too. Part of it will be because they don’t want the “wrong sort” driving their cars and the other will be that it will promote more brand loyalty because they’ve made the club!

suburburban · 06/07/2026 07:48

GodDamnitDonut · 05/07/2026 23:05

I think some of it is trying to compensate for low financial status and “pretend” that things are better than they actually are. My friend is a single mum on benefits and her 17 yo son recently got his first job to save for his driving lessons, university and so on. They are classed as poverty-line poor using the official classification. He recently purchased a £124 T-shirt and proudly showed it to me and told me how much it cost. She was very happy with it, not at all concerned.

Yes that would have paid for 2 or 3 driving lessons

Dragonscaledaisy · 06/07/2026 08:00

Travelfairy · 06/07/2026 00:10

I think wealthy people prioritise things like education and travel, ski holidays etc and experiences.
Less well off prioritise 'stuff' and think that wearing brands is a status symbol. You often find they value stuff like huge TV's too, game consoles etc
Also as others have said a lot are fakes.... or in some cases stolen goods 😱

To me, needing to 'prioritise' is a signifier of 'average middle' status. Wealthy people have no need to do that.

GarlicEverywhere · 06/07/2026 08:15

Jamesblonde2 · 05/07/2026 23:06

All fake. Embarrassing. That’s how the lower class live. They try to evidence they have more money than they do. Classless.

This is such a grossly déclassé remark, I assume it must be satirical?

Worthy of a Hyacinth Bucket Award 🏅

NormasArse · 06/07/2026 08:32

Housebashing · 05/07/2026 21:11

I bet he smells lovely though

😂

DancingNotDrowning · 06/07/2026 08:51

Dragonscaledaisy · 06/07/2026 08:00

To me, needing to 'prioritise' is a signifier of 'average middle' status. Wealthy people have no need to do that.

Edited

Yeah that’s the other truth. No one wealthy is choosing a Chanel handbag over a skiing holiday because they’re taking both without even thinking twice.

or to lean into the favoured MN stereotype of the wealthy allowing their wealth to whisper by investing it and maxing out their pension that is all well covered

Housebashing · 06/07/2026 09:13

suburburban · 06/07/2026 07:48

Yes that would have paid for 2 or 3 driving lessons

Short-term gratification versus long-term gain though I think we’ve had this conversation repeatedly on Mum’s net for at least 35 years
Hard to see the benefit of one or two driving lessons if it takes 20 to pass a test and then you can’t afford a car all the Insurance at the end of it

Icanseeasquirrel · 06/07/2026 09:22

My friend’s 23 year old daughter is living with her late 40s boyfriend. She showed me a photo and he is in a T shirt and cap both with LOEWE in the biggest possible letters. Tells me everything I need to know about someone who has got to that age and still feels the need to shout his status to the world around him. The T shirts are around £400.
I am sure he doesn’t care what I think though!
Most of us try and impress the people we want to be associated with.

PetulaGordeno · 06/07/2026 09:34

Thepeopleversuswork · 05/07/2026 19:44

Attention to “status brands” tends to correlate inversely with income and social capital.

Someone who is never going to be able to afford a Georgian townhouse or to send their children to private school could potentially afford designer gear. It is something they can control.

Also the lower down the traditional class ladder you are, the more clothes matter. A working class child who goes to school with unbrushed hair and ill fitting shoes will get proportionally much more of a status hit than a middle class one, for whom the social capital is sufficiently secure that the brand of their shoes is irrelevant. Middle class parents (and their friends and families) by and large don’t care if their kids are scruffy because its not going to impact their own social status. For a kid living in social housing it could be something that prompts a nosy neighbour to call social services.

For a person with less money and lower class status an investment in expensive clothing is actually quite a rational one.

I’ve worked in private schools and let me tell you they love their status. One mum asked me if I could cut short a lesson at lunchtime to bring my class to the front gate. It was Year 12 and close to lunch and we were intrigued.
And up rolls a truck with a new two seater Mercedes convertible for their 17 year old DC. She was mortified and the kids who were on scholarships felt uncomfortable.
The child in question burst into tears when she came in and stayed to talk to me - she had asked for a Ford Fiesta so she could pick up her friends in it.
I have lots of upper middle class friends (where I fit I’ve no idea) and I see them at play. It’s like a mini Kardashians - branded everything, girls using expensive skincare at 8, and not just Nike as a label Alo, Skims, expensive bags, it’s endless. They spend a fortune on their homes and holidays and believe me little Fenella and Tarquin are decked out in brands.
I do have a few middle class friends who don’t care and neither do their kids - yet they are rare to me.
And please don’t assume ‘the poor’ only want labels. I’ve seen it at the arse end, where they can’t afford basic uniforms and they are trying their best, often juggling several jobs.
Some people also love fashion - I have all my life. But I realised early doors that following trends isn’t needed so I left my wide legged jeans in the 90’s after I’d left them in the 70’s! I love them, but not in me.
It was interesting to see the Wales’ children yesterday in pics - very understated, although I spotted Adidas trainers on Charlotte.
By buying labels you just make the owners of those labels wealthy. Of course some are fantastic quality, but even brands like Chanel have been pulled over just how handmade their bags are now.
I do think places like Vinted and Vestaire are great because you can sell things on and also pick up a bargain.
If you are willing to be a season or so behind you can find some great pieces in the sales.
If it’s a classic coat it doesn’t really matter.
I wear things again and again I’ve never worn something once and binned it, that to me is such a waste.

dh280125 · 06/07/2026 09:55

People buy what they buy. Many save. Many use credit. Same reason you see so many nice cars outside ugly houses - if you can’t afford a holiday in Barbados then you might instead get yourself a nice shirt.

Skylarktree · 06/07/2026 10:05

CagedBirdInACage · 05/07/2026 20:53

Yeah, it sounds like she didn't understand your priorities. Lots of people would rather a smaller house with nice things than live in a larger house surrounded by broken tat.

There are loads of massive houses around me and whenever they are up for sale most of them are pretty grim inside. Unless someone has 5 kids I don't understand why someone would choose to live in a large grim space over a smaller, nicer space. It's just different priorities innit. I'd rather have nice surroundings others would rather big surroundings.

Yes we’ve got a large blended family, being together was a priority for us but an expensive one as meant on our joint household not eligible for the financial support got previously and we needed a large house, which was quite a stretch financially but better than being over crowded. Yes otherwise we would have definitely gone for a smaller house and enjoyed holidays, other nicer things etc.

Munchie1965 · 06/07/2026 10:17

I didn't realise that he "real" middle classes dressed so poorly.

I buy designer labels because I believe that they are better quality, will last longer and are vaguely in fashion.

I gave up buying clothes from charity shops when I stopped being a student.

LondonPapa · 06/07/2026 10:20

PetulaGordeno · 06/07/2026 09:34

I’ve worked in private schools and let me tell you they love their status. One mum asked me if I could cut short a lesson at lunchtime to bring my class to the front gate. It was Year 12 and close to lunch and we were intrigued.
And up rolls a truck with a new two seater Mercedes convertible for their 17 year old DC. She was mortified and the kids who were on scholarships felt uncomfortable.
The child in question burst into tears when she came in and stayed to talk to me - she had asked for a Ford Fiesta so she could pick up her friends in it.
I have lots of upper middle class friends (where I fit I’ve no idea) and I see them at play. It’s like a mini Kardashians - branded everything, girls using expensive skincare at 8, and not just Nike as a label Alo, Skims, expensive bags, it’s endless. They spend a fortune on their homes and holidays and believe me little Fenella and Tarquin are decked out in brands.
I do have a few middle class friends who don’t care and neither do their kids - yet they are rare to me.
And please don’t assume ‘the poor’ only want labels. I’ve seen it at the arse end, where they can’t afford basic uniforms and they are trying their best, often juggling several jobs.
Some people also love fashion - I have all my life. But I realised early doors that following trends isn’t needed so I left my wide legged jeans in the 90’s after I’d left them in the 70’s! I love them, but not in me.
It was interesting to see the Wales’ children yesterday in pics - very understated, although I spotted Adidas trainers on Charlotte.
By buying labels you just make the owners of those labels wealthy. Of course some are fantastic quality, but even brands like Chanel have been pulled over just how handmade their bags are now.
I do think places like Vinted and Vestaire are great because you can sell things on and also pick up a bargain.
If you are willing to be a season or so behind you can find some great pieces in the sales.
If it’s a classic coat it doesn’t really matter.
I wear things again and again I’ve never worn something once and binned it, that to me is such a waste.

Edited

I have a feeling you’re basing your experience on the nouveau riche of the upper middle class. Truly wealthy with nothing to prove do not bring the class to the gates to show off a Mercedes. Anything with an ostentatious logo, or made of polyester (clothing) is gauche.

angelos02 · 06/07/2026 10:32

If people really do have plenty of money, it just doesn't register with them that what they wear/handbag they carry will make an impression on someone.

Housebashing · 06/07/2026 10:41

LondonPapa · 06/07/2026 10:20

I have a feeling you’re basing your experience on the nouveau riche of the upper middle class. Truly wealthy with nothing to prove do not bring the class to the gates to show off a Mercedes. Anything with an ostentatious logo, or made of polyester (clothing) is gauche.

Oh, you’d be surprised.
Especially their children who are now having children, they are rebelling against the holy old jumpers and the clapped out Volvo they realise that they have money and they’d actually like to spend some of it. Can’t take it with you and all that.
And given that they’re having less children themselves, they’ve got less to pay out for in the long-term or pass on to
Like everybody else

Badbadbunny · 06/07/2026 10:44

So many possibilities...

Fakes are a huge thing
Illicit income, from drug dealing, money laundering, selling duty free fags, "cash in hand" work, etc.
Benefit fraud
Tax evasion
Buying stolen/fake stuff
Saving money by not taxing/insurance their car

Then legal things such as

Maxing out credit cards and store cards
Remortgaging their house
Inheritances
"Gifts" from parents
Buying a "top end" car which looks good but in reality has 250k miles on the clock and was actually very cheap because of the W&T and high mileage

Sartre · 06/07/2026 10:50

Debt usually. Either credit cards or buy now pay later through things like clearpay, klarna, very etc.

Sartre · 06/07/2026 10:51

Also should say my step-dad’s daughter has one child, she’s an awful human being for various reasons. Never had a solid job so had perpetually claimed benefits. She does OF and in the past stripped with extras for money. She’s a terrible parent but at least her son has designer tracksuits.

Needmorelego · 06/07/2026 10:54

@PetulaGordeno about Princess Charlotte wearing Adidas trainers.....
My daughter has a pair of Adidas trainers too.
They were £35 from Sports Direct 😂

TheWytch · 06/07/2026 11:13

Needmorelego · 05/07/2026 17:44

Because they want them.
It's that simple.

The question here is WHY do they want them?

Why do any of us want anything? I have a marketing degree and know some of the tricks used to create this "want" but ultimately it's a human trait to want to be similar to your peers, one of the group, and wearing designer brands is part of the bonding.

TFImBackIn · 06/07/2026 11:26

DameOfThrones · 05/07/2026 17:32

Also, your earnings are irrelevant because people tend to prioritise different things when it comes to spending their wages.

How can earnings be irrelevant?

DameOfThrones · 06/07/2026 12:08

TFImBackIn · 06/07/2026 11:26

How can earnings be irrelevant?

They're irrelevant in that the OP will spend her wages differently to others.

She may prioritise a big house and a huge mortgage for example, or an expensive car.

The people buying the clothes she mentions may prioritise clothing over those things.

PetulaGordeno · 06/07/2026 13:10

LondonPapa · 06/07/2026 10:20

I have a feeling you’re basing your experience on the nouveau riche of the upper middle class. Truly wealthy with nothing to prove do not bring the class to the gates to show off a Mercedes. Anything with an ostentatious logo, or made of polyester (clothing) is gauche.

Well the car one was very much new money.
I do understand some PWM don’t care but I think the dawn of social media has made their younger relatives care.
You only have to look at how women like Princess Diana dressed in their teens - frumpy cords and Laura Ashley blouses and see how a new era of those women dress now. Her Spencer nieces being a case in point, and their father is old school aristocracy.
I do think Princess Anne stands out as someone who does her own thing, though. She makes the headlines wearing things that are decades old. Good for her.
On the other hand, Lauren Bezos looks as cheap as chips wearing the best that money can buy. But it makes her happy and her husband looks pleased enough.

NegativeFreak · 06/07/2026 14:52

Needmorelego · 05/07/2026 17:44

Because they want them.
It's that simple.

It's more complicated than that.

I think what OP is getting at is why pay through the nose for basic cotton trackies and t-shirts when you can buy almost identical unbranded stuff for a fraction of the price.

What does buying an expensive brand of very basic clothing do for a person?

jamcorrosion · 06/07/2026 14:53

suburburban · 05/07/2026 17:57

I find it hard to understand. People are supposedly “poor” but they always afford to have their nails done, hair extensions or expensive clothes but want someone else to pay for their kid’s school trip

This is just the same old stuff I’ve seen over and over again on social media in slightly different forms. How do you knows actually the case? Have you met anyone who has spent extortionate amounts of money on these things and then requested someone else pay for a school trip? Or is this all just assumptions you’ve made? Along with everyone else who’s ever posted variations of the same sentence? Are poor people not allowed to treat themselves? You may see someone with their nails done, how do you know they’ve paid lots for them? Maybe they did them personally at home with cheap stuff? Maybe a friend is training and needs a model? Same with extensions and same with clothes. Brands aren’t always expensive especially if you buy from places like Vinted. It’s pretty impressive just how creative you can be with minimal disposable income. Being ‘poor’ doesn’t mean you have to try and present yourself in a way other people on higher incomes feel is acceptable. Talk about judgemental