Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think low house offers are always worth making?

220 replies

coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 10:55

Why do low house offers annoy Mumsnetters so much?

Surely a cheeky offer is always wort it.

OP posts:
coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:21

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:20

So you offer £400k and then go back and offer full asking with a deposit? Nah sorry, these are often people’s homes and they don’t want to deal with dishonest people who think it’s okay to offer a pathetically low price to start.

We get it Op, your agent lets you know which properties are owned by people desperate enough to take a much lower price and then you snap them up. I’m all for capitalism but giving someone less because they are desperate is not something to boast about.

Presumably the agent is also supposed to be acting in the best interest of the seller?

But even "less" still means the best offer on the table.

OP posts:
Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:21

coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:18

Refer back to my above post, if they are accepting my offer it means there hasn't been a better one.

And that they may be desperate to sell. I wonder what your agent is telling people about you?

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:22

coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:21

But even "less" still means the best offer on the table.

If they are desperate to sell then you are using privileged information to rip them off.

Just because it’s the current best offer doesn’t mean they aren’t being robbed blind

coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:23

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:21

And that they may be desperate to sell. I wonder what your agent is telling people about you?

Probably that they have checked us out, and we are procedable.

OP posts:
coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:23

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:22

If they are desperate to sell then you are using privileged information to rip them off.

Just because it’s the current best offer doesn’t mean they aren’t being robbed blind

Then they can say no!

OP posts:
GreatOffWhiteFalcon · 16/06/2026 13:23

coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:00

We do, not because we are anything special - but because the local agents we have worked with for 16 years and though know what properties to give us a nod and a wink on.

If they are really doing that, the agents should be reported. They are working for the seller not the buyer.

coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:24

GreatOffWhiteFalcon · 16/06/2026 13:23

If they are really doing that, the agents should be reported. They are working for the seller not the buyer.

Agents care about commission, this is choppy waters for agent - and it doesn't look to be turning a corner anytime soon.

OP posts:
Tryagain26 · 16/06/2026 13:24

It really depends on the circumstances.
If I was selling a house and had a lot of interest I would dismiss the low offer immediately not consider it again but concentrate on the higher offers. If my house had been on sale for a long time with little interest I would consider low offer and go back with a counter offer.
It also all depends how much you want the house and how much you can afford .
If you really want the house and offer a lot less than you can afford and what it's worth you are taking a gamble that you will lose the house

OrlandoTheMarmaladeCat · 16/06/2026 13:24

Your question was are low ball offers ALWAYS worth making. There are plenty of us who have replied saying no, not always and have given concrete real life examples why we disagree. I'm not entirely sure what the point of this post but I suspect that you might be bored and/or have been challenged as to your low-ball starting point. Happily there are plenty of fish in the sea - buyers and vendors - to suit us all

GasPanic · 16/06/2026 13:25

GreatOffWhiteFalcon · 16/06/2026 13:23

If they are really doing that, the agents should be reported. They are working for the seller not the buyer.

They actually work for themselves before they work for the seller.

GreatOffWhiteFalcon · 16/06/2026 13:25

coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:24

Agents care about commission, this is choppy waters for agent - and it doesn't look to be turning a corner anytime soon.

And they should put the seller's interest first.

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:25

coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:23

Then they can say no!

Not if they are desperate and you are taking advantage of that through information you shouldn’t be acquiring.

It’s dodgy (if not fraudulent) behaviour. If an offer is made in good faith then fine. But you are basically looking to gouge prices down only for people who are in some ways desperate.

LuckyHazelFox · 16/06/2026 13:26

It's a simple ethos really. Sellers want the best price, buyers want a bargain. There's nothing unethical about any of it.

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:27

GasPanic · 16/06/2026 13:25

They actually work for themselves before they work for the seller.

There is an ethical question if they are passing confidential information on to a third party. I do hope they are doing full disclosure to the sellers so that they are aware that the agent is encouraging people to make stupid low offers

coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:28

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:25

Not if they are desperate and you are taking advantage of that through information you shouldn’t be acquiring.

It’s dodgy (if not fraudulent) behaviour. If an offer is made in good faith then fine. But you are basically looking to gouge prices down only for people who are in some ways desperate.

But you are going around in circles.

If they "have" to sell and the best offer on the table is from us - then I can't think of anything morally wrong.

OP posts:
coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:28

LuckyHazelFox · 16/06/2026 13:26

It's a simple ethos really. Sellers want the best price, buyers want a bargain. There's nothing unethical about any of it.

Common sense.

OP posts:
Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:28

Apparently under property regulations, agents act for the seller. They can reveal the seller’s urgency—such as if they have already bought another house, are going through a divorce, or need a quick completion—if the seller authorizes them to do so.

If not then they are breaking the rules.

coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:29

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:27

There is an ethical question if they are passing confidential information on to a third party. I do hope they are doing full disclosure to the sellers so that they are aware that the agent is encouraging people to make stupid low offers

😂

OP posts:
Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:29

coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:28

But you are going around in circles.

If they "have" to sell and the best offer on the table is from us - then I can't think of anything morally wrong.

Of course you can’t. So why ask?

BrownBookshelf · 16/06/2026 13:29

TheHateUGive · 16/06/2026 13:21

Because the OP admits purposely seeking out those who have no choice but to sell. So people in desperate need. It isn't illegal but I wouldn't want friends who thought like that.

Again though how is that exploitation? Leaving aside legality and friendship. They evidently consider themselves to be better off selling for a lower price than the alternative, or they wouldn't do it.

thecuree · 16/06/2026 13:30

We put an offer in 40k under asking, it had been on the market over a year, not moving, we was then invited round by the lovely elderly couple for a coffee, we then mutually negotiated to 30k under asking, I type this in the garden of that house !

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:30

coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:29

😂

It’s fine if you think having a shit agent is hilarious as it helps you get your bargains.

If they are passing info without permission and someone finds out, they won’t be doing it for long

LuckyHazelFox · 16/06/2026 13:30

GasPanic · 16/06/2026 13:25

They actually work for themselves before they work for the seller.

My estate agent was being more driven by the buyer. He cost me a sale and I ended up reporting him. What a surprise, nothing came of it. I had a gut feeling about my buyer after I'd accepted his offer above the asking price. This was during the back end of covid though, when it was a seller's market. I should have gone with the young first time buyer girl who viewed with her father. Her offer was for just under the asking price. A lesson learned.

coulditbeme2323 · 16/06/2026 13:31

BrownBookshelf · 16/06/2026 13:29

Again though how is that exploitation? Leaving aside legality and friendship. They evidently consider themselves to be better off selling for a lower price than the alternative, or they wouldn't do it.

More common sense.

OP posts:
thecuree · 16/06/2026 13:31

Anarchy99 · 16/06/2026 13:28

Apparently under property regulations, agents act for the seller. They can reveal the seller’s urgency—such as if they have already bought another house, are going through a divorce, or need a quick completion—if the seller authorizes them to do so.

If not then they are breaking the rules.

One of the main questions I asked when house hunting was the reason for selling