Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

AIBU to think banning social media for under-16s is a good idea?

388 replies

LizardLore · 15/06/2026 08:18

Just being announced now - social media banned for under-16s.

My instinct is it’s great, but I am interested in other views. My kids are very small so not an issue here yet.

YABU - the ban is bad
YANBU - the ban is good

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Changingplace · 18/06/2026 15:13

shinypen · 18/06/2026 14:56

Lock up your daughters!!

So instead of actually prosecuting pdfs, we're restricting kids and making ALL adults give up sensitive information to who knows where.

Edited

Nobody is being ‘made’ to do anything, I must’ve missed the memo where having social media accounts was mandated by the government by law 😂

Badbadbunny · 18/06/2026 15:38

FlappyDappyDoo · 17/06/2026 14:55

You are missing the point.

None of those restrictions make it necessary for UK adults to subsribe to digital ID and to share this ID with any social media platform they want to access.

The reason for the backlash is because this is about Digital ID through the back door using child 'mental health' as an excuse to push it through.

Edited

You already have digital ID if you drive or holiday abroad via photo driving licences and passports.

If you're a company director, then you now have to have digital ID proof, with your identification validated against your passport and/or driving licence.

If you've recently bought a house, rented a house, appointed a solicitor or accountant, opened a bank account, your ID will have needed to be checked, almost certainly via a digital ID checking service.

ArabellaScott · 18/06/2026 15:52

Changingplace · 18/06/2026 15:12

You make it sound like social media is the be all and and end all of life for everyone 😂

That’s my point, it’s not compulsory and hopefully doing this will make kids realise this and move away from this incessant obsession with over sharing every last detail of our lives online which so many adults currently have.

For many people social media is an essential part of earning a living.

shinypen · 18/06/2026 16:17

Changingplace · 18/06/2026 15:12

You make it sound like social media is the be all and and end all of life for everyone 😂

That’s my point, it’s not compulsory and hopefully doing this will make kids realise this and move away from this incessant obsession with over sharing every last detail of our lives online which so many adults currently have.

I think adults do have a right to free speech though. We've seen how mainstream media often do not report accurately. SM bridges this gap. If we start putting ID for adults, we're reducing certain cohorts of adults who are worried about anonymity (eg for their own safety). People will start self-censoring political opinions because they're worried the state will be watching. This is a slippery slope. The Internet is an adult space. Parents should supervise and teach their kids, simple as that. Just like they would when walking down a road.

That Labour left out banning Bluesky (lots of inappropriate/pdf material there) should tell you something.

Changingplace · 18/06/2026 16:18

ArabellaScott · 18/06/2026 15:52

For many people social media is an essential part of earning a living.

If you’re using a platform to earn a living you’ll already have shared banking and personal ID details with that company, they have to verify who they’re paying.

And if it’s your sole income you’ll also be submitting a tax return as a sole trader, so HMRC will know that’s who’s paying you, I don’t see what difference this makes?

Changingplace · 18/06/2026 16:22

shinypen · 18/06/2026 16:17

I think adults do have a right to free speech though. We've seen how mainstream media often do not report accurately. SM bridges this gap. If we start putting ID for adults, we're reducing certain cohorts of adults who are worried about anonymity (eg for their own safety). People will start self-censoring political opinions because they're worried the state will be watching. This is a slippery slope. The Internet is an adult space. Parents should supervise and teach their kids, simple as that. Just like they would when walking down a road.

That Labour left out banning Bluesky (lots of inappropriate/pdf material there) should tell you something.

Edited

BlueSky is included, that’s already been announced.

Nobody is really anonymous on SM now, there’s plenty of ways you can be traced if they really need to, the concept that is entirely anonymous is very naive.

shinypen · 18/06/2026 16:24

Changingplace · 18/06/2026 16:18

If you’re using a platform to earn a living you’ll already have shared banking and personal ID details with that company, they have to verify who they’re paying.

And if it’s your sole income you’ll also be submitting a tax return as a sole trader, so HMRC will know that’s who’s paying you, I don’t see what difference this makes?

The people opposed are thinking not just of what is being proposed, (of course they'll make it sound lovely) but what could easily be implemented AFTER. Once they have your details what's stopping them putting more and more restrictions in "in the name of good"?

The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

shinypen · 18/06/2026 16:26

Changingplace · 18/06/2026 16:22

BlueSky is included, that’s already been announced.

Nobody is really anonymous on SM now, there’s plenty of ways you can be traced if they really need to, the concept that is entirely anonymous is very naive.

So you're saying it should be made even less so? If you're tired of spam now, just wait until someone hacks the system, uses AI, and creates scams are even harder to tell are fake.

ArabellaScott · 18/06/2026 16:27

Changingplace · 18/06/2026 16:18

If you’re using a platform to earn a living you’ll already have shared banking and personal ID details with that company, they have to verify who they’re paying.

And if it’s your sole income you’ll also be submitting a tax return as a sole trader, so HMRC will know that’s who’s paying you, I don’t see what difference this makes?

You clearly have absolutely no idea what you're talking about.

shinypen · 18/06/2026 16:31

Changingplace · 18/06/2026 16:22

BlueSky is included, that’s already been announced.

Nobody is really anonymous on SM now, there’s plenty of ways you can be traced if they really need to, the concept that is entirely anonymous is very naive.

Oh ok that's new, must be due to all the backlash they're getting. Ok so they need to also ban whatsapp, Internet tv, crunchyroll, Google and bacon. OR they can put pdfs and rapists in jail, which they are not doing. They let them out to put whatever disgusting material online they want.

Changingplace · 18/06/2026 16:37

shinypen · 18/06/2026 16:31

Oh ok that's new, must be due to all the backlash they're getting. Ok so they need to also ban whatsapp, Internet tv, crunchyroll, Google and bacon. OR they can put pdfs and rapists in jail, which they are not doing. They let them out to put whatever disgusting material online they want.

Edited

Maybe they’ll ban MN, and in the age old words of Why don’t you… we can all go and do something less boring instead 😁

FlappyDappyDoo · 18/06/2026 18:46

Badbadbunny · 18/06/2026 15:38

You already have digital ID if you drive or holiday abroad via photo driving licences and passports.

If you're a company director, then you now have to have digital ID proof, with your identification validated against your passport and/or driving licence.

If you've recently bought a house, rented a house, appointed a solicitor or accountant, opened a bank account, your ID will have needed to be checked, almost certainly via a digital ID checking service.

The point is we are not routinely giving up this information to, in all likelihood, the cheapest bidder of the government contract for them to lose/sell our personal data.

The government and tech should be kept far apart. Anybody remember the Post Office Horizon scandal? And they were supposedly a well regarded IT company.

There are plenty of ways to deal with the issue of social media use in children. They do not need to go down the digital IT road.

Rather than the gov saying "you can't post on this site without proving who you are", they are putting it as "we were unable to verify that aren't under the age of 16, please upload your ID to prove that you are". Spot the difference? Those on here thinking this does not affect them are badly mistaken. All of us will have to upload their ID to post on forums and social media, because if you don't they we can't prove you're not a kid, and we can't have that because its 'illegal',

RhiannonEMumsnet · 22/06/2026 10:34

Hi there,

We thought users on this thread might be interested to know that we're hosting an AMA with Baroness Beeban Kidron tomorrow. She's been one of the most influential campaigners behind efforts to regulate tech platforms and strengthen protections for children online, and her new book USERS: How Big Tech Took Control and How to Fight Back is published this week.

If you'd like to ask a question, you can post on the AMA thread here.

Thanks,
MNHQ

MNHQ here: AMA with Baroness Beeban Kidron - leading digital rights campaigner, member of the House of Lords and former Hollywood film director, 23rd June, 7-9pm | Mumsnet

Hi there, We’re delighted to announce an AMA with leading digital rights campaigner, member of the House of Lords and former Hollywood film director...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/AMA/5543996-mnhq-here-ama-with-baroness-beeban-kidron-leading-digital-rights-campaigner-member-of-the-house-of-lords-and-former-hollywood-film-director-23rd-june-7-9pm

New posts on this thread. Refresh page