Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

TeenToTwenties · 03/06/2026 17:29

Investment helps jobs, generates growth.

Sirzy · 03/06/2026 17:29

How much will it help bring to the Uk economy though? A lot more than that I would imagine

pointythings · 03/06/2026 17:31

It will pay for itself in jobs generated and tourism. If you want to grow, you have to invest. The UK and its people are so fixated on short termism that they've forgotten this.

Arlanymor · 03/06/2026 17:31

Sirzy · 03/06/2026 17:29

How much will it help bring to the Uk economy though? A lot more than that I would imagine

£50bn of economic growth the article says - plus 20,000 jobs during construction and a further 8,000 when it opens. 80% of which will go to local residents.

Backedoffhackedoff · 03/06/2026 17:31

That’s a bit simplistic isn’t it? 🤣 it ignores that a) countries will always be in debt and that b) investments generate positive returns ie more money than you put in.

people seem to know very little about what governement actually does

GingerBeverage · 03/06/2026 17:38

The only issue I have with it is the idea that 8.5 million people annually (23,000+ a day) will visit.

It rained on 40 consecutive days at the start of this year.

footbeds · 03/06/2026 17:56

We need investment if we want growth…

footbeds · 03/06/2026 17:57

We need investment if we want growth…

Octavia64 · 03/06/2026 18:00

The government money will be spent on upgrading transport links to the area - so roads and trains.

this is a good thing.

ColdAsAWitches · 03/06/2026 18:03

It's not like they are handing over cash to Comcast. They will be improving roads and rail, which they should be doing anyway. And they'll get a lot of the money back in taxes

WellWoman · 03/06/2026 18:50

The company would probably have located this new resort in another country without the pledge of govt support. And the UK will have to compete with offers from other potential “host” govts. As others have said, the investment should bring good returns in terms of job creation, economic growth, visitor spend while in the country or region and so on.

JenniElection · 03/06/2026 18:54

Not problem with investing in leisure and tourism. Just it always has to be in the south doesn’t it . Although I suppose northern seaside resorts got the gift of HMO’s

GeneralPeter · 03/06/2026 19:04

Building infrastructure is a pretty standard govt responsibility.

likelysuspect · 03/06/2026 19:11

Wouldnt it be nice if the government could support this but also support transport infrastructure throughout the country, bus routes, train services so that people can afford to get to work or even just actually get to work on public transport.

EmeraldRoulette · 03/06/2026 19:18

GingerBeverage · 03/06/2026 17:38

The only issue I have with it is the idea that 8.5 million people annually (23,000+ a day) will visit.

It rained on 40 consecutive days at the start of this year.

Surely it will mostly be under cover? Or indeed mostly indoors.

Northermcharn · 03/06/2026 19:26

Loads of jobs both in the building it, and in the future working there. It's a good thing - we need investment for economic growth.

MotherWol · 03/06/2026 19:31

It sounds like the funding is going on transport and local infrastructure rather than to private enterprise, so that's going to benefit people living locally or travelling through the area, not just people visiting the park. Transport infrastructure in this country has been neglected for years, so this sounds like a good thing?

gamerchick · 03/06/2026 19:34

I think it's a good thing in the long run. People will want to come here and as an added bonus, they might fix the roads

GingerBeverage · 03/06/2026 19:37

EmeraldRoulette · 03/06/2026 19:18

Surely it will mostly be under cover? Or indeed mostly indoors.

It’s a theme park, so I imagine rollercoasters etc but who knows, maybe it’s possible!

Harry Potter tour does 6,000 people a day undercover, for comparison.

NeedAnyHelpWithThatPaperBag · 03/06/2026 19:39

This is giving HS2 "value for money" investment vibes...

BillieWiper · 03/06/2026 19:41

The alternative would probably be no government investment in that area at all. The fact they've now got a big tourist attraction coming means a lot of jobs and tourism coming to somewhere otherwise thoroughly neglected.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 03/06/2026 19:46

Too bad we can’t turn HS2 into a rollercoaster.

MyThreeWords · 03/06/2026 19:54

The £1.3 billion of govt investment has been made in order to bring in £6 billion in US private investment. That's £4.7 billion of negative spending, in effect.

TurnAngerIntoHope · 03/06/2026 20:05

GingerBeverage · 03/06/2026 19:37

It’s a theme park, so I imagine rollercoasters etc but who knows, maybe it’s possible!

Harry Potter tour does 6,000 people a day undercover, for comparison.

Roller coasters can be built indoors. Universal is renowned for a lot of their indoor attractions some of which are coasters.

I don’t think our climate will hinder this, Comcast will have done enough research on this project to ensure that it’s a worthwhile investment for them, they’re not doing it as a favour to the UK. Whilst not every attraction in the park will be undercover, there will be enough there to not put people off when it’s raining, and outdoor rides don’t usually stop running in the rain only if there’s a thunderstorm nearby or it’s excessively windy.

I’m excited about this and think it will be a great income generator for the country, as well as creating thousands of jobs. Businesses in the surrounding area and even those further afield will benefit from the extra tourism too.

Wipeywipey · 03/06/2026 20:08

Isn't this because of the Trump visit? Like all of the AI centres we are going to have draining our limited water supplies?

Swipe left for the next trending thread