Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think most people could save a small amount regularly if they prioritised it?

92 replies

BoldRubyShaker · Today 10:50

Obviously there are people in genuinely difficult situations who simply don’t have anything left to save and that’s not who I’m talking about. But for many workers, I do wonder whether saving even a small amount regularly is more achievable than it’s sometimes made out to be. Even something like £50 a month builds up over time - around £3,000 over 5 years (plus interest) and much more over the long term.

AIBU? I think that for a lot of people it’s more about prioritising than possibility.

OP posts:
XenoBitch · Today 14:26

Itchthescratch · Today 13:57

Only if you can afford to treat yourself. Some people can't afford to have this balance and it's important to acknowledge this. Treats aren't an entitlement.

Personally, I would treat myself over stashing my last fiver. But that is me.

Katypp · Today 14:27

anonhop · Today 14:16

@Dollysleftnipwhat about horrendously expensive childcare?

Well that's your generation's issue and you do get some help with that generally. My generation's issue was high mortgage rates, short maternity leave and no childcare subsidy.
Every generation has problems, just not the same ones.
As an aside, i walk past a nursery in my extremely down-at-heel town every morning, and am constantly amazed at the size of the new SUVs being used to drop the children off. So high childcare AND high car costs.

tiramisugelato · Today 14:37

Itchthescratch · Today 13:57

Only if you can afford to treat yourself. Some people can't afford to have this balance and it's important to acknowledge this. Treats aren't an entitlement.

Right, but life is pretty fucking shit if you can never treat yourself with something as basic as a takeaway coffee, some fish and chips or a haircut occasionally.

Lavendersmell · Today 14:41

Fish and chips stopped being a "treat" when they crossed 15 quid imho🙈 fucking big spend now

tiramisugelato · Today 14:43

Lavendersmell · Today 14:41

Fish and chips stopped being a "treat" when they crossed 15 quid imho🙈 fucking big spend now

Around here you can get a large fish and chips for £8 Grin

Lavendersmell · Today 14:48

tiramisugelato · Today 14:43

Around here you can get a large fish and chips for £8 Grin

Google Pout GIF

.

tiramisugelato · Today 14:51

Lavendersmell · Today 14:48

.

😂excellent GIF usage.

cbbo · Today 15:02

im desperately trying to focus on paying off credit card and loans. That’s a priority to me over savings, currently

latetothefisting · Today 15:03

TheLoneliestSnail · Today 13:58

I said I could save.
Those examples like going on holiday were to show that we don’t live extravagantly, not that we are “on the breadline”. We aren’t by any means.
I was trying to say that I just don’t think it’s worth the stress and giving up the small day to day luxuries I do have in order to save enough for a few days away or half a washing machine etc.
We budget for emergencies as best we can, pay into pension and insurance so really what’s the point in saving?

How do you "budget for emergencies as best you can" without saving?

If you mean you deliberately make sure theres some money left aside every month then, um....thats what savings are!

If your boiler broke today, how would you pay for it?

XenoBitch · Today 15:11

Lavendersmell · Today 14:41

Fish and chips stopped being a "treat" when they crossed 15 quid imho🙈 fucking big spend now

Tell me about it...
DM and me recently had a beef curry and chips each from a takeaway and it cost £20. I remember when it was about £5 (which just goes to show how long ago I had one).

Cornishclio · Today 15:20

Saving is never pointless and everyone should have emergency savings of some sort plus ideally budget for things like Xmas, holidays, car repairs and broken washing machines etc.

MadMumOfTwoHorrors · Today 15:27

I put a big chunk of my salary in my savings account when my direct debits have gone out straight after pay day, and take a chunk of it back out by the end of the month, but for that time it's in my savings account it's earning nearly 4% interest. In my current account it's earning nothing. What I don't take back out gets left in there and becomes savings. Some months it's only a bit, but some months it's a couple of hundred pounds. If the money is not in my current account, I find it easier not to spend it on stuff I don't need because the money is not instantly available - I have to think about moving it first - but when I do need it, with phone banking apps it takes seconds to move money between accounts, so to me it's a dead easy way of saving. If I need it for a new washing machine or an unexpected bill, the money is there, but while it's not being used, it's earning decent interest. We generally have enough in there each year to pay for a holiday for the 4 of us. I don't earn lots, but it's amazing how it adds up when I'm not frittering it away on amazon stuff I don't need.

TheDevilFindsWorkForIdleMums · Today 15:30

Yanbu. I've always been a saver though......even when we ended up on benefits for a short time I'd manage to squirrel a little away every week. Back in the day I'd have to physically go into the bank to pay in the £3 or whatever it was. It's never pointless and it always builds up. I've never been a high earner and never will be but I'm damn sure I'll do everything I can to make sure I never have a safety net of money to tide me over.

Jellycatspyjamas · Today 15:52

Katypp · Today 13:42

I think one of the issues is the wide variety of things regarded as essential today and the justification for spending large sums of money every month on things that are not needed. See also the justification on this very thread that £50 a month - £10-12 a week - is 'not worth' saving because 'all' you will end up with is £3,000.
So on the one hand, people are evidently so stretched they cannot possibly find £10 a week, yet on other hand, £3000 is nothing. Which is it??
If MN is to be believed, it is entirely normal to drive big new cars (safer for the children), eat out regularly, entertain the children with 'experiences' like soft play and theme parks routinely (I work so hard i should be able to afford these,) have regular holidays (family time is so important), and so it goes on.
Like the OP, i absolutrey agree some people are stretched. But not all.

It can be £50 isn’t worth it to get £3000 in 5 years time if that £50 means always saying “no” to an ice cream at the park, having one pair of decent shoes, never meeting a friend for coffee. I don’t know that I’d feel 5 years of only buying essentials was worth £3k.

While I do think the expectations of expensive cars and days out are unrealistic, many, many people aren’t doing that and have little left at the end of the month. To take the little that is left and never buy anything not deemed essential is a hard life to live.

tiramisugelato · Today 15:58

Jellycatspyjamas · Today 15:52

It can be £50 isn’t worth it to get £3000 in 5 years time if that £50 means always saying “no” to an ice cream at the park, having one pair of decent shoes, never meeting a friend for coffee. I don’t know that I’d feel 5 years of only buying essentials was worth £3k.

While I do think the expectations of expensive cars and days out are unrealistic, many, many people aren’t doing that and have little left at the end of the month. To take the little that is left and never buy anything not deemed essential is a hard life to live.

Exactly.

£3000 in 5 years is well, nothing really. I certainly wouldn't give up all my fun monthly treats for it, anyway.

EarthlyNightshade · Today 16:03

Jellycatspyjamas · Today 15:52

It can be £50 isn’t worth it to get £3000 in 5 years time if that £50 means always saying “no” to an ice cream at the park, having one pair of decent shoes, never meeting a friend for coffee. I don’t know that I’d feel 5 years of only buying essentials was worth £3k.

While I do think the expectations of expensive cars and days out are unrealistic, many, many people aren’t doing that and have little left at the end of the month. To take the little that is left and never buy anything not deemed essential is a hard life to live.

Agreed.

Also, I think the people suggesting that others should live like that are not living like that themselves

tiramisugelato · Today 16:11

EarthlyNightshade · Today 16:03

Agreed.

Also, I think the people suggesting that others should live like that are not living like that themselves

Yep, they never are.

It's really easy to say "save your last £50 after you've paid your essentials" but actually living like that, month after month, year after year, is really fucking shit.

Morepositivemum · Today 16:18

Itchthescratch
I just feel lots of us in the developed world feel we have entitlement to nice things. We are being marketed to constantly and can't really believe that some people have to live within their means and that could mean no luxuries. We find that almost cruel and unacceptable.

But what is life for? Why do we work? Are you saying only certain people deserve to have holidays or own pets or do experiences? Should the rest of us work our thirty nine hours but after do the most basic food shopping and not spend any additional money while others working the same hours don’t get judged because they’re earning more?

Because been there done that for seven years, not a holiday, not a Christmas fair, pretending the kids were sick when birthday parties came up because we couldn’t afford petrol or declining wedding invitations …. If people need to get into some debt or use up the only possible savings well maybe that’s what they have to do to put one foot in front of each other and smile instead of cry.

Rocknrollstar · Today 16:26

BoldRubyShaker · Today 10:50

Obviously there are people in genuinely difficult situations who simply don’t have anything left to save and that’s not who I’m talking about. But for many workers, I do wonder whether saving even a small amount regularly is more achievable than it’s sometimes made out to be. Even something like £50 a month builds up over time - around £3,000 over 5 years (plus interest) and much more over the long term.

AIBU? I think that for a lot of people it’s more about prioritising than possibility.

You have obviously never gone round a supermarket adding up the shopping as you go to make sure you don’t embarrass yourself at the till. I can assure you that there were times when we could’t save £10 pm and I;m sure a lot of people will agree with me.

BudgetBuster · Today 16:30

Rocknrollstar · Today 16:26

You have obviously never gone round a supermarket adding up the shopping as you go to make sure you don’t embarrass yourself at the till. I can assure you that there were times when we could’t save £10 pm and I;m sure a lot of people will agree with me.

Did you completely miss the very first line of the thread....

mindfulmoaning · Today 16:34

I agree. Same as trying to overpay a loan or mortgage by a small amount each month. It does add up.

sprigatito · Today 16:34

BudgetBuster · Today 16:30

Did you completely miss the very first line of the thread....

I don’t think she missed it, I think she probably just understands that this is a far greater proportion of ordinary working people than OP realises. If you’ve never been below a certain level financially, it’s very easy to just pigeonhole “the poor” as a small and unfortunate minority who don’t really count, and everyone else as just a bit inefficient and able to save/afford necessities if they just tried a bit harder. If you’re in the sector of society that knows how ridiculous that is, it gets a tad frustrating sometimes.

BudgetBuster · Today 16:40

sprigatito · Today 16:34

I don’t think she missed it, I think she probably just understands that this is a far greater proportion of ordinary working people than OP realises. If you’ve never been below a certain level financially, it’s very easy to just pigeonhole “the poor” as a small and unfortunate minority who don’t really count, and everyone else as just a bit inefficient and able to save/afford necessities if they just tried a bit harder. If you’re in the sector of society that knows how ridiculous that is, it gets a tad frustrating sometimes.

But in fairness to the OP... they have blatantly started the entire thread to acknowledge that not everyone has leftover money and that this thread doesn't relate to those people. Obviously if people genuinely don't have £50 left over or aren't actually spending £50 on non-essentials then they won't be able to save or set aside that money. Those are all different cohort and the OP isn't being dismissive of that at all.

The OP is specifically referring to people who are spending £50 on non-essentials. Many of whom complain they are poor or on the breadline, but in reality they aren't and a small lifestyle change would mean they could build a little buffer.

XenoBitch · Today 16:41

BudgetBuster · Today 16:40

But in fairness to the OP... they have blatantly started the entire thread to acknowledge that not everyone has leftover money and that this thread doesn't relate to those people. Obviously if people genuinely don't have £50 left over or aren't actually spending £50 on non-essentials then they won't be able to save or set aside that money. Those are all different cohort and the OP isn't being dismissive of that at all.

The OP is specifically referring to people who are spending £50 on non-essentials. Many of whom complain they are poor or on the breadline, but in reality they aren't and a small lifestyle change would mean they could build a little buffer.

There have been several threads like this in the last week, so why start another one?

footbeds · Today 16:42

My generation's issue was high mortgage rates,

Lol!

I’ll swap for those rates and house prices and wages