Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Anyone else think Tony Blair is talking sense?

101 replies

Bleachedjeans · 27/05/2026 14:03

And I have read his full essay online (twice)not just the cherry picked headlines in the papers. and I watched the interview on Radio 4 today.
I doubt Keir Starmer could have performed as well in an interview.
He makes a lot of good points, especially the one that this government doesn’t have clear policies for improvement.

Can the man who led us all in the ‘weapons of mass destruction’ debacle be trusted?
I am very interested in hearing other people’s opinions.

OP posts:
FaceIt · 27/05/2026 23:11

Why would anyone want to listen to him.
He started an illegal war and has got blood on his hands.

HRTQueen · 27/05/2026 23:12

I agree with much of what he wrote and his old friend Alister Campbell has been saying much of the same

And if anyone believes and hopes that if Andy Burnham becomes PM he will move the party to the left they are going to be very disappointed. If he becomes leader he will go where the votes are the centre stories are failing at the moment many in the centre have moved to reform and many on the left will stick with Zack’s party as he is happy to ignore antisemitism and play identity politics

nearlylovemyusername · 27/05/2026 23:13

Funny thread

OP: anyone else think Tony Blair is talking sense?
Everyone else: no, he took us into war

To answer OP's question - his interview makes perfect sense to me, I wish Labour listened.

BIossomtoes · 27/05/2026 23:14

To be fair that war was voted for by parliament and Michael Howard who was leader of the opposition said he’d have done the same thing. We’d have gone to Iraq whoever had been PM at the time.

nearlylovemyusername · 27/05/2026 23:16

AllJoyAndNoFun · 27/05/2026 21:22

He’s 💯 and I say that as someone who never voted for him but no one will listen and we’ll be reform in 2029 and green in 2034 and uk will be uninvestible and all the rich people will have left but ya know, you were told!:

Edited

hello! did I change my username and posted this?

1000000% agree

Marmalademorning · 27/05/2026 23:16

gamerchick · 27/05/2026 14:48

Isn't he on trumps peace gang board or whatever it is? I wouldn't trust anyone a part of that as far as I could throw them.

Would you trust a man who claims he can hypnotise women so their breasts grow bigger?!

TirednessOnToast · 27/05/2026 23:20

StabiaGirl · 27/05/2026 14:12

His audacity is astounding.

Edited

Agreed. In no particular order:
He's had his shot at running the country and he took us into an illegal war when he was PM. He's part of Trump's hideous 'Board of Peace' with other war criminals, trying to skirt around the UN, all he cares about is enrichment of his family (Digital ID anyone?) He has been heavily involved in rhe Middle East for years, whilst everything got worse.
When I see him I think: 'one may smile and smile and be a villian'. Hideous creature.

BIossomtoes · 27/05/2026 23:24

Marmalademorning · 27/05/2026 23:16

Would you trust a man who claims he can hypnotise women so their breasts grow bigger?!

What’s that got to do with Blair?

Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 27/05/2026 23:26

He also said that going into Afghanistan would help Afghani women. He is not always right.

SapphOhNo · 27/05/2026 23:37

Blair has just been co-opted by the billionaire class and the 'think tank' that's getting £100 millions of funding and generally corrupted by his own hubris.

I've not seen any indication that Burnham is hard left - by the sounds of it he'd continue the same direction as Starmer whilst being a better communicator about the successes.

5foot5 · 27/05/2026 23:42

nongnangning · 27/05/2026 20:06

TB's intended audience is not anyone in the Labour Party. If he wanted to catch their ears he could do that privately.

But who he does think his intended audience is I'd be interested to know
Xi Jinping?
Donald Trump?
UK or global business interests? Tech bros?
UK centrist voters eg right wing Labour plus one nation Tories?
The Board of Trustees of the World Economic Forum?

Well I would count myself in this group:

UK centrist voters eg right wing Labour plus one nation Tories?

I voted for New Labour while TB was the Labour leader. I would say I am the classic floating voter. Over the course of my adult life I have swung between the Conservatives and Labour, generally going for whichever seemed to have the most centrist views at the time. For me, centre is good!

It was very difficult when Corbyn was leading Labour but the Conservatives had become a disaster, I think I went reluctantly Lib Dem. But it always feels as though when Labour are in power, if things didn't go well the party urge is to move further left, which never goes well with voters. Blair was the most successful Labour leader in history in terms of time in power. I really don't get the hate for him. I would still trust him more than the shit show who followed.

Twisterlollies · 27/05/2026 23:43

Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 27/05/2026 23:26

He also said that going into Afghanistan would help Afghani women. He is not always right.

I guess he thought the Afghan men would actually want to help the women.

nearlylovemyusername · 27/05/2026 23:50

SapphOhNo · 27/05/2026 23:37

Blair has just been co-opted by the billionaire class and the 'think tank' that's getting £100 millions of funding and generally corrupted by his own hubris.

I've not seen any indication that Burnham is hard left - by the sounds of it he'd continue the same direction as Starmer whilst being a better communicator about the successes.

have you read his interviews?

How much harder Labour left can be? moving into Green territory?

SapphOhNo · 27/05/2026 23:52

nearlylovemyusername · 27/05/2026 23:50

have you read his interviews?

How much harder Labour left can be? moving into Green territory?

What specifically? He's always struck me as centre left but not Corbyn or Green levels of thinking

JimBobsWife · 27/05/2026 23:55

Ritasueandbobtoo9 · 27/05/2026 23:26

He also said that going into Afghanistan would help Afghani women. He is not always right.

It did help Afghani women. For 20 years. But in the end, the withdrawal was botched and the Afghan army were not equipped to cope with the Taliban.

JimBobsWife · 27/05/2026 23:58

SapphOhNo · 27/05/2026 23:37

Blair has just been co-opted by the billionaire class and the 'think tank' that's getting £100 millions of funding and generally corrupted by his own hubris.

I've not seen any indication that Burnham is hard left - by the sounds of it he'd continue the same direction as Starmer whilst being a better communicator about the successes.

I wasn't a particular supporter of Blair at the time as I wasn't politically engaged but I read his essay and he talks a lot of sense. The policies should come before the politics. Andy Burnham challenging Starmer for leader is politics. If he doesn't have the policies to move the country in the right direction, he won't last long.

justasking111 · 28/05/2026 00:00

I shuddered when a picture of Gordon Brown outside Downing Street with Starmer. Ugh!

I don't have to like TB, But I acknowledge having read the essay that he's right.

nearlylovemyusername · 28/05/2026 00:00

JimBobsWife · 27/05/2026 23:58

I wasn't a particular supporter of Blair at the time as I wasn't politically engaged but I read his essay and he talks a lot of sense. The policies should come before the politics. Andy Burnham challenging Starmer for leader is politics. If he doesn't have the policies to move the country in the right direction, he won't last long.

So far his policies are to borrow more and increase taxation.
The main issue he wants to fix is inequality and he's going to do this by redistribution.
Don't think he shared more than this.

ETA: and nationalisation as well. Funded by borrowing and higher taxes.

SapphOhNo · 28/05/2026 00:00

JimBobsWife · 27/05/2026 23:58

I wasn't a particular supporter of Blair at the time as I wasn't politically engaged but I read his essay and he talks a lot of sense. The policies should come before the politics. Andy Burnham challenging Starmer for leader is politics. If he doesn't have the policies to move the country in the right direction, he won't last long.

But that's a different argument... I've yet to see why he's perceived as hard left

I suppose it's too early for him to be discussing policies but I've only seen that he'll likely continue down the same direction as Starmer but as a better communicator.

LadyWiddiothethird · 28/05/2026 00:07

Cannot stand the sight or voice of Blair…..took us into a catastrophic war.Remember those years well.So not interested in anything he has to say now.He only wants money for his family,slimy git.

JimBobsWife · 28/05/2026 00:25

SapphOhNo · 28/05/2026 00:00

But that's a different argument... I've yet to see why he's perceived as hard left

I suppose it's too early for him to be discussing policies but I've only seen that he'll likely continue down the same direction as Starmer but as a better communicator.

Hard left is a silly label along with far right and fascists. We never used to talk like this but I guess that's part and parcel of a fractured political landscape - something Tony Blair never had to deal with.

I am sick of all the vibes nonsense. I hope Burnham makes clear some of his ambition for the future of the country so the Makerfield electorate have something real to consider. Him being a better communicator isn't really the point. As Blair said on the News Agents podcast, he could have been the best communicator in the world, but if his policies were shite, it would have only got him so far.

WaryHiker · 28/05/2026 01:26

BIossomtoes · 27/05/2026 23:14

To be fair that war was voted for by parliament and Michael Howard who was leader of the opposition said he’d have done the same thing. We’d have gone to Iraq whoever had been PM at the time.

We know the Tories would have taken us into war alongside George Bush. But we had a Labour government at the time and should have been able to expect better.

Bleachedjeans · 28/05/2026 11:46

It has been interesting reading all these replies. Thank you. Tbh I think I’m politically naive which is why I am interested in other people’s opinions. I think one of the strongest qualities for a politician is disinterest. Unfortunately, there doesn’t seem to be a lot of it about. I absolutely cannot stand the hypocrisy of self interest masquerading as helpfulness. So maybe that is what TB was doing.

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 28/05/2026 11:51

WaryHiker · 28/05/2026 01:26

We know the Tories would have taken us into war alongside George Bush. But we had a Labour government at the time and should have been able to expect better.

Edited

I really don’t know why. It was put before parliament and a majority of MPs voted for it. It looks inevitable from where I’m sitting.

WildEnergySupplier · 28/05/2026 11:52

We need billionaires to pay more tax not warmongers like him to shit on poor immigrants.

Swipe left for the next trending thread