Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to stick with current buyer rather than sell to tenants?

104 replies

Whotosellto · 06/05/2026 23:50

I’m a landlord who currently selling a house. The tenants gave notice months ago and are due to move out soon. I received an offer on the house at asking price about 6 weeks ago which I’ve accepted. The tenants are now saying they would like to buy the house after the house they were buying fell through. They’re a family with 2 children and another baby on the way. They can’t match the offer already accepted, they’ve offered £10k less. They said they’re desperate. They’ve been ok tenants although they’ve missed rent a few times.

Would you stick with the existing buyer or accept the offer from the existing tenants? Would you feel more obligated to your tenants of a few years or to the buyer we have accepted an offer from already? Obviously the tenants could now refuse to move and cause issues which we need to bear in mind and they’ve offered less but we’ll save some costs by selling to the current tenants,
probably not £10k though.

Im thinking of sticking with the buyer we already have. AIBU?

OP posts:
RedRiverShore6 · 07/05/2026 09:32

Surely the tenants will just stay there with the new landlord

Ritaskitchen · 07/05/2026 09:33

It depends, do they have all ducks in a row - mortgage sorted etc?

Thistimearound · 07/05/2026 09:37

They said they’re desperate. They’ve been ok tenants although they’ve missed rent a few times. This would worry me - have they definitely been accepted for a mortgage?

But as others have mentioned, if you’re selling on the assumption that the tenants will have left by then, this might now be a worry. Your other buyer might not wait around forever for you to evict the tenants, who are unlikely to want to leave now.

stayathomegardener · 07/05/2026 09:46

Having sold to tenants previously the onerous paperwork is generally much reduced as they are deemed to already know the property, this was super useful in our position. They didn’t even need to have a survey and their bank was very supportive.

Imbusytodaysorry · 07/05/2026 09:46

@Whotosellto id sell to the tenants

stayathomegardener · 07/05/2026 09:49

We likely could have marketed it for more given a similar property over the road came up during the sale process £60k higher. Interestingly it remains unsold 7 months later now just £20k higher.

Damnloginpopup · 07/05/2026 10:25

I can think of ten thousand reasons not to sell to them.

Stompythedinosaur · 07/05/2026 10:27

You don't owe tenants a 10k price cut, and the moral thing to do is to honour the original deal.

Naddd · 07/05/2026 10:41

There is no way I'd be willing to drop 10k

Brightonkebab · 07/05/2026 10:49

madness that there's people on here who'd gift 10k effectively to people who already have shown themselves up as unreliable. It's a terrible idea and you should stick to the original sale.

MyCottageGarden · 07/05/2026 10:49

Existing buyer. It’s not personal, it’s business. I say that as a former private tenant of 19 years of many properties which were sold from under me!

1apenny2apenny · 07/05/2026 10:52

Don’t drop, stick with the current buyer. I Would be a bit worried that the tenants will refuse to move out until bailiffs.

TheBeaTgoeson1 · 07/05/2026 11:11

Of course I would. Their finances aren’t your problem.

LondonPapa · 07/05/2026 11:16

Whotosellto · 07/05/2026 00:27

Thanks. As far as we know, the buyer we have had an offer from is a landlord who plans to rent the house out so probably not excited about their new house in the same way someone who was buying it to live in would be, but yes I think everything else you’re saying is right.

Honestly, I’d sell to tenants in this situation. But it’s your house.

VikingsandDragons · 07/05/2026 11:47

If they wanted your house yours is the one they'd have offered on in the first place, there is a good chance they're just offering to buy time for them to find a house they really want before they pull out and you need to start all over again. If the original offer is proceeding I wouldn't mess around a committed buyer for one who isn't.

coulditbeme2323 · 07/05/2026 11:48

All these people saying they would sell to the tenants, I guarantee you they wouldn't when it actually came to it!

HobGobblynne · 07/05/2026 11:52

Doggymummar · 07/05/2026 07:27

It's highly unlikely it's t it. If the missed payments were within the last six years they will still be on the credit file. My friends mortgage was scuppered by a. SKY CREDIT of all things. Because they didn't know they had it it was just left on the account and showed adversely somehow. It took a long time to resolve and they lost the good mortgage. Op be very careful

Rental payments aren't on your credit file.

BIossomtoes · 07/05/2026 11:55

coulditbeme2323 · 07/05/2026 11:48

All these people saying they would sell to the tenants, I guarantee you they wouldn't when it actually came to it!

I would.

coulditbeme2323 · 07/05/2026 11:56

BIossomtoes · 07/05/2026 11:55

I would.

On what basis?

Cosyblankets · 07/05/2026 11:58

Blankscreen · 07/05/2026 06:50

Do the right thing and sell to your tenants.

The right thing for which party?
The buyer who has instructed solicitors? Organised a mortgage? Paid for searches? Paid for a survey?
It's not like the OP was kicking the tenants out. They, gave notice.

Nearly50omg · 07/05/2026 12:00

Derbee · 07/05/2026 03:24

Your update changes my opinion. Would rather sell to a family than a landlord. You’ll save estate agent fees etc, and won’t risk having tenants that refuse to move out, ruining the original sale. £10K seems worth eliminating the risk

A landlord that can rent the house out to another family who can’t afford to buy?

Nearly50omg · 07/05/2026 12:01

HobGobblynne · 07/05/2026 11:52

Rental payments aren't on your credit file.

They are on your finance history and do make a difference to your mortgage offer

PurpleThistle7 · 07/05/2026 12:02

I think selling to another landlord is icky when you have tenants who want to buy in almost any situation… except this one. They didn’t want the house and don’t want to pay market rates and I am guessing don’t actually have the money if they missed their rent payments regularly. I hate the idea of profiting off a young family like this but I don’t think they’ll actually buy it anyway. I also don’t think they’ll move out on the day they said for what it’s worth.

MontyDonsBlueScarf · 07/05/2026 12:36

All else being equal, I'd probably sell to the tenants. But that's not the situation you're in. You've already agreed to sell to someone else. If you believe in keeping your word I don't see how this is even an issue.

If the prospective buyer let me down in some way then I'd feel free to consider the tenats, but until then, no.

As an aside, if the tenants were found through an agency then check your agreement with the agency carefully. You may find you have agreed to pay them a fee if you sell to anyone they introduced, whether as a buyer or a tenant.

HobGobblynne · 07/05/2026 12:56

Nearly50omg · 07/05/2026 12:01

They are on your finance history and do make a difference to your mortgage offer

Rental payments generally aren’t reported anywhere unless you’ve signed up to a rent reporting scheme yourself. Private landlords don't report them as there’s no mechanism for them to do so.

Obviously if arrears became serious enough to result in court action/CCJ that would be reported.