Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is it unreasonable for airlines not to provide wider seats for obese passengers?

531 replies

Kag13 · 04/05/2026 21:05

I have today spent a four and a half hour Jet2 flight seated next to a young man who was at least 20 stone, probably larger. I could not use the left hand armrest as his body (fat) buldged over it and into my personal space (which on a budget airline is not that large) and his leg was resting over part of my seat.
Luckily I am only 5’2” and not that big but what would happen if someone of the same size was seated next to him?
it made for a very uncomfortable flight for me. Am I being unreasonable to think this is not right?

OP posts:
wecangoupupup · 05/05/2026 11:14

Frumpiness · 05/05/2026 11:12

What clothes size would you actually need to be to need a seatbelt extender? I’m a size 18-20 in skirts (smaller on top), I count as obese according to BMI and I’ve never been even remotely close to needing a seatbelt extender. I always have plenty of extra room inside the belt.

Edited

I needed one when i was a size 32.

Tweetybye · 05/05/2026 11:16

Easy solution is airlines should simply treat people like suitcases.

If you're cabin bag can't fit into the predetermined size it must go in the cargo hold.

If people don't fit adequately into their seats they also most go in the cargo hold. Or into a bigger seat, whichever is more humane.

Tabla · 05/05/2026 11:23

Most obese people don’t want to be obese. Often it will have resulted from some struggles in life and bad things happening. Losing weight is not easy. Otherwise tell me why there are millions of people on WLI. So it isn’t.

I think airlines should book 2 seats for passengers over a certain weight or hip or waist or shoulder measurement / whatever and I think that their second seat should be free. It’s disgusting to stigmatise and charge people for their weight when they have enough to deal with. And it’s also wrong for people like the OP to be inconvenienced.

In our family we have an airline problem as we are so tall. Both DH and DS are over 6ft6inches and I am tired of having to pay £££ for extra leg room. It isn’t fair.

I wouldn’t have been able to sit next to the person the OP describes as I am 6 ft and built. I need my entire seat. Me and DH find it hard to sit together on flights as his shoulders are so broad that they encroach onto my seat. And I need my entire seat as I am tall and built.

It is on the airlines to provide seats that passengers can fit into and not to discriminate. Otherwise, why do children get cheaper seats? They are using a whole seat. So obese people ought to get 2 seats for the price of 1.

RollOnSunshine · 05/05/2026 11:27

Needspaceforlego · 05/05/2026 11:09

Thats why you do it as a extra wide seat, 3 normal seats becomes 2 extra wide.

Theyd all ways be someone whos willing to pay for a bit extra space on a flight, but can't afford the step up to business

Edited

I doubt very much that anybody is paying twice the amount for a bigger seat on short haul. Especially when the seat is still located in economy.

It's a money loser for the airline.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 05/05/2026 11:29

Problem nowadays is they've nowhere left to go to get width- the ultimate constraint is the internal diameter of the fuselage barrel...so more seat width means a whole new aircraft design or reducing to a 2/3 config in economy

I know, @notimagain, and it's a reconfiguration I was thinking of rather than a redesign of the entire aircraft

You're also spot on about it coming down to money, but this isn't going to get better and if it means some having to bear the extra cost which arises from their transportation that that may be what has to happen

Nobody's suggesting (well I hope not!!) that obese people should be shamed and jeered at while checking in, and with flexibility on all sides this could be sorted, but if some passengers are determined not to do that then yes, they may regrettably have to be refused boarding

notimagain · 05/05/2026 11:39

@Puzzledandpissedoff

Agreed.

TBH at the moment given there's probably a juggernaut headed the way of a lot of airlines the idea that somehow this dingle issue should be improved at no cost to the paying public seems a bit fanciful....

Frumpiness · 05/05/2026 11:39

notimagain · 05/05/2026 11:09

Airline dependent, those those airlines that do faciltate it usually need a phone call, it's often ot usually an option available on-line.

Well then surely this is part of the problem? I’m sure more people would book two seats if it was made easier to do so online in a straightforward way. It can feel very “othering” to expect people to make a special phone call which they might find awkward or embarrassing.

In this thread we’ve had:

At least two people who booked two seats that ended up not being next to each other.

Someone else who says their second seat actually got bumped onto another flight.

They shouldn’t have to make an extra phone call to stop this from happening.

If you want obese people to book two seats, you’ll need to come up with a practical solution as to how this can be booked normally online so as to give them the same online booking experience as other customers, without having to go through extra steps.

People are saying “just book a second seat” but it’s clear from the problems described in this thread that it isn’t always that easy to do so.

Tabla · 05/05/2026 11:40

I think that it would be pretty easy to design a portable and removable seat topper that would go over either 2 seats or over 1.5 seats. No reconfiguration necessary. And again, I would make the 1.5 seat or 2 seat the price of 1 seat. The world is a horribly fat-ist place. Someone in this thread has referred to “Mr and Mrs Obese”. Just horrible. Would you say “Mr Disabled” shouldn’t have any help or an accessible seat unless he pays double? After all this takes up staff time and admin time. Horrible.

my db is obese and he doesn’t fly at all. He’s obese because he spends his life and sanity helping other people. He is sad about it. He has diabetes and is in a big hole. Just hating people and kicking them when they are down like this is fucking filthy behaviour.

notimagain · 05/05/2026 11:51

@Frumpiness

Well then surely this is part of the problem? I’m sure more people would book two seats if it was made easier to do so online in a straightforward way.

So even though at least some airlines facilitate the process they get criticised becaise somehow that process isn't easy enough or is embarassing and is part of the problem.

Sorry but now we're getting into the realms of there's no pleasing some people.

ETA in case it wasn't clear if you do this you are usually just requesting an extra adjacent seat -if asked you can make up the reason why you want one.

Tweetybye · 05/05/2026 11:54

Tabla · 05/05/2026 11:23

Most obese people don’t want to be obese. Often it will have resulted from some struggles in life and bad things happening. Losing weight is not easy. Otherwise tell me why there are millions of people on WLI. So it isn’t.

I think airlines should book 2 seats for passengers over a certain weight or hip or waist or shoulder measurement / whatever and I think that their second seat should be free. It’s disgusting to stigmatise and charge people for their weight when they have enough to deal with. And it’s also wrong for people like the OP to be inconvenienced.

In our family we have an airline problem as we are so tall. Both DH and DS are over 6ft6inches and I am tired of having to pay £££ for extra leg room. It isn’t fair.

I wouldn’t have been able to sit next to the person the OP describes as I am 6 ft and built. I need my entire seat. Me and DH find it hard to sit together on flights as his shoulders are so broad that they encroach onto my seat. And I need my entire seat as I am tall and built.

It is on the airlines to provide seats that passengers can fit into and not to discriminate. Otherwise, why do children get cheaper seats? They are using a whole seat. So obese people ought to get 2 seats for the price of 1.

Let's be honest the majority of obese people aren't that way because of a medical condition or some trauma in their life.The majority of obese people are capable of losing weight but chose not to. Either becuase they're happy in their skin, or there are more temptations these days with limitless streaming and delivery services.

Certainly we shouldn't be encouraging normalisation of mass obesity by increasing the carbon footprint of airtravel.

intrepidpanda · 05/05/2026 12:03

There would be no harm in having a couple of extra large seats somewhere on board.
You could sell it as an upgrade and refund if anyone needs it.
How do you make someone buy 2 seats? How does someone who has not flown know they need 2 seats?
If you need the space so get 2 seats what about the seat belt and armrest?
Surely a single seat that fits is safer than someone perched between two.

Frumpiness · 05/05/2026 12:06

notimagain · 05/05/2026 11:51

@Frumpiness

Well then surely this is part of the problem? I’m sure more people would book two seats if it was made easier to do so online in a straightforward way.

So even though at least some airlines facilitate the process they get criticised becaise somehow that process isn't easy enough or is embarassing and is part of the problem.

Sorry but now we're getting into the realms of there's no pleasing some people.

ETA in case it wasn't clear if you do this you are usually just requesting an extra adjacent seat -if asked you can make up the reason why you want one.

Edited

They “facilitate” an unnecessarily complicated process by making people go through extra stages and make phone calls when other people don’t have to, and even then it clearly doesn’t always work. If you really want obese people to book an extra seat, you need to make it as easy to do so as any other customer booking a seat.

I assume the vast majority of flights these days are booked online. Making a phone call to an airline is an unusual thing to do unless you have an ongoing major complaint about something that’s gone wrong.

Secretseverywhere · 05/05/2026 12:07

notimagain · 05/05/2026 10:04

For that to work you'd have to weigh every passenger before boarding...

TBH the increase fuel burn for each extra kilo of pax or bag weight isn't that significant on a short flight (and there are other costs that have to be covered that are not weight dependent) but ATM it is becoming more significant.

Airlines have done it before to collect data, to be fair there was backlash. I think the way we measure weight can be changed. Supermarket can weigh a trolley of goods to check and see if it matches your self check out total. It doesn’t need to involve stepping on scales you could have a floor level pad in front of a checkout desk.

I do think there might be a bit of a push in coming years if the current ozempic wave keeps up. In the same way there is nobody quite as sanctimonious as an ex smoker, there might be no one quite as desirous of having their slender state lauded than formerly obese folk.

notimagain · 05/05/2026 12:09

@intrepidpanda

There would be no harm in having a couple of extra large seats somewhere on board.

Reducing a block of 3 to 2 means the airline potentially loses out on 1x passenger's revenue on every sector that aircraft flies.....and that adds up over multiple sectors.

That's why when/where it's done it usually always means paying a business class fare.

intrepidpanda · 05/05/2026 12:17

notimagain · 05/05/2026 12:09

@intrepidpanda

There would be no harm in having a couple of extra large seats somewhere on board.

Reducing a block of 3 to 2 means the airline potentially loses out on 1x passenger's revenue on every sector that aircraft flies.....and that adds up over multiple sectors.

That's why when/where it's done it usually always means paying a business class fare.

This is why they can sell them a bit dearer. With the provision they may be removed and refunded should a clinically obese person requires it.
Some will pay for extra space even on short flight.

user1464187087 · 05/05/2026 12:21

ObliviousCoalmine · 04/05/2026 21:11

You’re being unreasonable in your tone and wording, for a start.

Airlines have made seats smaller and smaller to get more people in, people are getting bigger, for a multitude of reasons (very few people are bigger because they chose that option).

You’re not going to get airlines making seats bigger, and you’re not going to get people booking two seats while money is tricker, so it’s a stalemate.

We all have to weigh up different social scenarios and whether we partake in them based on our various tolerance levels for things, if this is something that you can’t tolerate, then you can make that choice; just as others choose not to travel on the tube/go to big concerts etc based on how other humans occupy those spaces.

If you just came for a “fat people are gross” whinge, then crack on, but at least be upfront about it.

It is gross when a complete stranger is spilling out onto your body and overfilling your airplane seat. Sorry if you don't like that.

ThatCyanCat · 05/05/2026 12:23

notimagain · 05/05/2026 12:09

@intrepidpanda

There would be no harm in having a couple of extra large seats somewhere on board.

Reducing a block of 3 to 2 means the airline potentially loses out on 1x passenger's revenue on every sector that aircraft flies.....and that adds up over multiple sectors.

That's why when/where it's done it usually always means paying a business class fare.

Yes. Pricing is very complicated. It really isn't as simple as "knock a few seats together and charge more".

If enough people get big enough, the airlines will have to make changes just as the clothing industry did... and as with clothes, once the money starts drying up they'll move fast to stop themselves folding. But it's got to reach a critical point first and whilst it does seem to be an increasing problem, I don't think we are anywhere near that point yet.

Yellowchair1 · 05/05/2026 12:25

I answered YABU because I think passengers need to pay for bigger/2 seats not airline! But it's def not right that you need to suffer

TableTopTree · 05/05/2026 12:28

arethereanyleftatall · 04/05/2026 21:14

If tall people have to pay for more leg room, then it would be grossly unfair to give wider seats for free.

I do find it somewhat unfair that if I as a 50kg woman, am being charged more for my suitcase because it’s over 22kg, when combined we still weigh less than many adults who paid less than me and my suitcase combined.

not sure what the answer is though as people can’t be and shouldn’t be penalised due to nature. It’s impossible to be fair.

Completely agree. My job requires me to frequently fly in helicopters. We are all weighed as part of check in and are allocated a seat dependant on our weight.

This needs to be adopted as part of aviation general.

wecangoupupup · 05/05/2026 12:29

TableTopTree · 05/05/2026 12:28

Completely agree. My job requires me to frequently fly in helicopters. We are all weighed as part of check in and are allocated a seat dependant on our weight.

This needs to be adopted as part of aviation general.

No it doesn’t.

you’re weighed because of the safety requirements. Two people can carry the same weight very differently. I’m short, so I’m far and dumpy. But someone who’s five inches taller than me at my weight may look totally different.

notimagain · 05/05/2026 12:34

TableTopTree · 05/05/2026 12:28

Completely agree. My job requires me to frequently fly in helicopters. We are all weighed as part of check in and are allocated a seat dependant on our weight.

This needs to be adopted as part of aviation general.

Helicopters aren't 50 tonne plus plus plus up to 500 tonne airliners and as a result are much more sensitive to passenger/baggage weight deviations from the norm.

Going down the helicopter road of weighing everyone at somewhere like LHR or JFK at peak departure hours is a none-starter and if tried won't go down well with the on-line check-in last minute boarding cohort.

The current assumed weight method used in the airline world works fine if properly monitored and the weights used are subject to survey and sampling on an occasional basis.

HairMJ · 05/05/2026 12:40

Tabla · 05/05/2026 11:23

Most obese people don’t want to be obese. Often it will have resulted from some struggles in life and bad things happening. Losing weight is not easy. Otherwise tell me why there are millions of people on WLI. So it isn’t.

I think airlines should book 2 seats for passengers over a certain weight or hip or waist or shoulder measurement / whatever and I think that their second seat should be free. It’s disgusting to stigmatise and charge people for their weight when they have enough to deal with. And it’s also wrong for people like the OP to be inconvenienced.

In our family we have an airline problem as we are so tall. Both DH and DS are over 6ft6inches and I am tired of having to pay £££ for extra leg room. It isn’t fair.

I wouldn’t have been able to sit next to the person the OP describes as I am 6 ft and built. I need my entire seat. Me and DH find it hard to sit together on flights as his shoulders are so broad that they encroach onto my seat. And I need my entire seat as I am tall and built.

It is on the airlines to provide seats that passengers can fit into and not to discriminate. Otherwise, why do children get cheaper seats? They are using a whole seat. So obese people ought to get 2 seats for the price of 1.

wtf, why should it be free 😂

People are also sometimes just fat because they eat to much! If they can afford a holiday then they can afford WLI too! Maybe they should do that instead.

YourWildAmberSloth · 05/05/2026 12:40

ObliviousCoalmine · 04/05/2026 21:11

You’re being unreasonable in your tone and wording, for a start.

Airlines have made seats smaller and smaller to get more people in, people are getting bigger, for a multitude of reasons (very few people are bigger because they chose that option).

You’re not going to get airlines making seats bigger, and you’re not going to get people booking two seats while money is tricker, so it’s a stalemate.

We all have to weigh up different social scenarios and whether we partake in them based on our various tolerance levels for things, if this is something that you can’t tolerate, then you can make that choice; just as others choose not to travel on the tube/go to big concerts etc based on how other humans occupy those spaces.

If you just came for a “fat people are gross” whinge, then crack on, but at least be upfront about it.

I thought the OP's tone was actually quite measured and language respectful. I don't subscribe to the fat people are gross narrative, but I've been in OPs situation and it's unpleasant to say the least. On a train or bus, a relatively short journey, fine but on a plane, even short haul flights, there is little enough space as it is without someone taking over some of yours. I don't know what the answer is, but I've been there and hated it.

ScholesPanda · 05/05/2026 12:47

People say 'they should buy two seats'

The reality is that if you pay for an empty seat, the airline will resell it to someone else. Most airlines overbook all of their flights if they can and the T&C's often say they will fill any empty seats even if you have paid for them.

Airlines cram as many people on as possible and that is why flights are cheap (by historic standards).

notimagain · 05/05/2026 12:54

@ScholesPanda

People say 'they should buy two seats'
The reality is that if you pay for an empty seat, the airline will resell it to someone else.

As mentioned previously the actual reality is at some (mainly legacy) airlines at the booking stage you can buy a second, adjacent seat specifically for what is called comfort reasons and it will not be resold, even on a full flight.

Not sure if any of the popular Uk/Europe LoCos have such a scheme.

Swipe left for the next trending thread