Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think people on here seem to save a lot more than average?

56 replies

MellowMintBeaker · Yesterday 14:15

I’ve noticed when reading threads on here that a lot of people seem to be saving quite significant amounts. It’s made me wonder whether this is representative or whether it’s just that people who are more financially focused are more likely to post.

AIBU?

OP posts:
KmcK87 · Yesterday 21:03

I take most things people say on here with a pinch of salt. People lie, especially on social media.

MrsOni · Yesterday 21:17

You have to remember that at least 50% of the posts on here are utter bullshit.

HotLikePapaJohns · Yesterday 22:24

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · Yesterday 20:24

How exactly do you know a) who is lying and b) how many people are lying?

I have a friend who earns six figures, part time WFH as a freelancer. She earns so much she was recently in an article about contributions to pensions putting in 60k per year. She just put a six figure sum into investments in dividends from her business.

She exists, I promise. She could be on this thread. In fact, of that particular friend group of eight, all but one of us are HRT, and three earn over six figures. At least as far as I know.

In another friend group, a friend sent me a job link because she thought it would really suit me. It paid 15k less than my current salary, and she thought it would be a step up for me.

So again, how do you know who/how many fantasists there are? And does it matter?

It's pretty easy to get figures for how many people in the UK earn enough to pay higher rate tax, over £100k etc. And pretty unlikely that all of the top 0.01% of earners are posting here.

PissedOff2020 · Yesterday 23:24

Age!
I probably save more than average now - (I’m 44), and my husband (46) saves a large amount too. 10 years ago I barely saved at all. It was occasionally, when I could - now it’s every month & I have investments.
Our household income has jumped 80% in the last 10 years too.

We also no longer have crippling childcare costs, so can save. 10 years ago we had 3 kids in full time childcare and money was tight. The mortgage has upped massively in this time, but with the loss of childcare costs and increase in salaries we are considerably more comfortable than we were before.

VividPinkTraybake · Yesterday 23:26

MellowMintBeaker · Yesterday 14:15

I’ve noticed when reading threads on here that a lot of people seem to be saving quite significant amounts. It’s made me wonder whether this is representative or whether it’s just that people who are more financially focused are more likely to post.

AIBU?

I say this with all respect...never believe one word of anything that is said on here

VividPinkTraybake · Yesterday 23:27

namechange3651 · Yesterday 14:28

People who save more are more likely to reply. You can google average saving rates and it’s way off what MN would have you believe.

Because people lie on anonymous forums, not because people on here are wealthy

VividPinkTraybake · Yesterday 23:29

HoskinsChoice · Yesterday 18:14

No, it really isn't! The typical MN demographic is people making stuff up. The vast majority of 'high earners' snd big savers on here are not real. To be a high earner/big saver, you have to have a brain. The level of intelligence on here is way below average!

Absolutely

BeFunnyBiscuit · Yesterday 23:30

I live off my husband's wage and save mine entirely

BeFunnyBiscuit · Yesterday 23:33

I posted somewhere I cannot take a man who does not pay up. Whatever this means, it means

A man should marry a woman knowing he is to provide for her and the future offspring. The whole idea of family finances should be the aim to protect the wife and the children's futures because in the majority of cases the man dies first. This was the classic for ages. Now is all sorts of modern deviations to which I do not subscribe, therefore did not chose a man who cannot pay or is stingy

VividPinkTraybake · Yesterday 23:34

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · Yesterday 20:24

How exactly do you know a) who is lying and b) how many people are lying?

I have a friend who earns six figures, part time WFH as a freelancer. She earns so much she was recently in an article about contributions to pensions putting in 60k per year. She just put a six figure sum into investments in dividends from her business.

She exists, I promise. She could be on this thread. In fact, of that particular friend group of eight, all but one of us are HRT, and three earn over six figures. At least as far as I know.

In another friend group, a friend sent me a job link because she thought it would really suit me. It paid 15k less than my current salary, and she thought it would be a step up for me.

So again, how do you know who/how many fantasists there are? And does it matter?

It matters because there is Thread after thead of

Ahy don't you buy a 6 room house

Why don't you take 3 holidays a year

Why dont you get a nanny

The advice matters and a lot of the time it is divorced from reality

BeFunnyBiscuit · Yesterday 23:35

About people saving tens of thousands, I do believe it. In my market town the big houses are MUCH MORE IN NUMBER than the small ones and the flats. Therefore there are many more rich people in the UK than average

mjf981 · Yesterday 23:36

People saying that a lot of people lie on here - why would/do they? Whats the point? Do they actually feel better about themselves by lying?!

I don't get it. I guess it could be true, but I don't understand the reasoning for it.

Itsahardknocklifeforus · Yesterday 23:53

I've always thought half the posts on here are BS. Time after time, there are posts about how MN attracts high earners and upper middle class women is either a marketing ploy or people aspiring or saying they fit this category. However repeatedly insisting on declaring this is the typical user profile doesnt mean its true for a website attracting 8 million monthly users!

VivaciousCurrentBun · Today 00:05

I have never written how much I have saved but I have posted on money threads with some advice. I’m no money professional but do have above average savings for my age demographic. Did well investing, have a solidly middle class life now but was raised without much at all, family experienced periods of real poverty.

HoskinsChoice · Today 00:52

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · Yesterday 20:24

How exactly do you know a) who is lying and b) how many people are lying?

I have a friend who earns six figures, part time WFH as a freelancer. She earns so much she was recently in an article about contributions to pensions putting in 60k per year. She just put a six figure sum into investments in dividends from her business.

She exists, I promise. She could be on this thread. In fact, of that particular friend group of eight, all but one of us are HRT, and three earn over six figures. At least as far as I know.

In another friend group, a friend sent me a job link because she thought it would really suit me. It paid 15k less than my current salary, and she thought it would be a step up for me.

So again, how do you know who/how many fantasists there are? And does it matter?

Erm. I actually explained how I came to that conclusion in the post you responded to!

It's not rocket science. Wealth usually comes as a result of a good job and you usually only get a good job if you're intelligent. The amount of stupid/low intelligence on here is incredibly high. It simply isn't possible for so many stupid people to be so wealthy.

LiviaDrusillaAugusta · Today 02:56

Only if you believe what you read.

InterIgnis · Today 03:31

Itsahardknocklifeforus · Yesterday 23:53

I've always thought half the posts on here are BS. Time after time, there are posts about how MN attracts high earners and upper middle class women is either a marketing ploy or people aspiring or saying they fit this category. However repeatedly insisting on declaring this is the typical user profile doesnt mean its true for a website attracting 8 million monthly users!

”Time after time, there are posts about how MN attracts high earners and upper middle class women is either a marketing ploy or people aspiring or saying they fit this category.”

Because it’s true. It was created by women that fit into that category, and attracted more of the same (conversely, netmums was the ‘working class’ alternative). It has grown and diversified, but there is still a sizable contingent that fit that profile.

https://medium.com/@naiyanjones/online-political-campaigning-and-biscuits-the-case-of-mumsnet-4b4c64dbce5a

Additionally, not all users are UK based (I’m not), or have wealth and savings from employment.

I may be completely wrong, but I don’t tend to think there are as many liars as some seem to believe (or want to believe).

Usernamenotav · Today 07:34

They're more likely to reply. But also, I think all this cost of living crisis talk has made people think that literally everyone is struggling. I see people talk about their spending/savings and people seem absolutely flabbergasted that some people earn a lot of money. There are jobs out there that pay insane amounts but people get so shocked by it. Plenty of people are still well off. I wish I was one of them 😂😂

Itsahardknocklifeforus · Today 08:13

InterIgnis · Today 03:31

”Time after time, there are posts about how MN attracts high earners and upper middle class women is either a marketing ploy or people aspiring or saying they fit this category.”

Because it’s true. It was created by women that fit into that category, and attracted more of the same (conversely, netmums was the ‘working class’ alternative). It has grown and diversified, but there is still a sizable contingent that fit that profile.

https://medium.com/@naiyanjones/online-political-campaigning-and-biscuits-the-case-of-mumsnet-4b4c64dbce5a

Additionally, not all users are UK based (I’m not), or have wealth and savings from employment.

I may be completely wrong, but I don’t tend to think there are as many liars as some seem to believe (or want to believe).

No. Think critically. Eight million monthly users and the majority are wealthy. Statistically impossible.
Many users seem to feel better about themselves believing it though.

InterIgnis · Today 15:34

Itsahardknocklifeforus · Today 08:13

No. Think critically. Eight million monthly users and the majority are wealthy. Statistically impossible.
Many users seem to feel better about themselves believing it though.

I’d say that comes down to what you mean by wealthy? If there’s one thing financial threads mumsnet routinely demonstrate, it’s that opinions as to what wealthy constitutes vary dramatically. I don’t believe the majority of Mumsnet users are wealthy, and I didn’t claim that was the case, but I do believe that a significant number are above the UK average.

The ‘census’ results describe the average user in 2009 as being middle class, London centric, and relatively affluent. You can call a married couple, based in London, both average London earners with a combined income of £100k, ‘relatively affluent’, or even wealthy, by wider UK standards.

Waterwaterwaterwaterwatercycle · Today 15:39

There are definitely fantasists, all over the Internet, who make up new personas. Sometimes they are billionaires, beating men off with a stick, look really good for their age etc.

Yes those people do exist of course irl, but basically don't believe everything you read on here!

If it helps balance things out, my savings have taken several hits this year and are basically nothing now. I am saving aggressively (which involves me growling at my savings and swearing at them) now to make up for it

AnticsNShenanigans · Today 15:42

I honestly don’t know anyone who saves significant amounts.

Wealthier friends have investments and property. Middle earners have pension pots and might have saved a bit for their children (sometying towards a flat deposit or first car etc). Everyone else is too broke!

The only real ‘savers’ I know are older generation (70+), who never use credit, live frugally and have always ‘saved for a rainy day’.

Itsahardknocklifeforus · Today 16:09

InterIgnis · Today 15:34

I’d say that comes down to what you mean by wealthy? If there’s one thing financial threads mumsnet routinely demonstrate, it’s that opinions as to what wealthy constitutes vary dramatically. I don’t believe the majority of Mumsnet users are wealthy, and I didn’t claim that was the case, but I do believe that a significant number are above the UK average.

The ‘census’ results describe the average user in 2009 as being middle class, London centric, and relatively affluent. You can call a married couple, based in London, both average London earners with a combined income of £100k, ‘relatively affluent’, or even wealthy, by wider UK standards.

You are comparing apples and oranges.
2009?
The UK population increased by 12M between 2009 and 2025.
The white British population decreased by approx 15%.
Pre 2009 migrants were primarily from the EU. Since 2009 the migrant population are predominantly non EU. Humanitarian migrants are primarily from Africa and Asia.
Brexit affected EU migration further still.

WhereHasMyPlanetGone · Today 16:12

mjf981 · Yesterday 23:36

People saying that a lot of people lie on here - why would/do they? Whats the point? Do they actually feel better about themselves by lying?!

I don't get it. I guess it could be true, but I don't understand the reasoning for it.

I think often people post about the life they want to have, not the one they actually do have. A sort of fantasy/escapism I guess.

TheBeaTgoeson1 · Today 16:19

People always say people lie on here, but people do also save a lot of money.

The only reason we save a lot is because we both have a high income, no kids, and a very simple lifestyle!

Swipe left for the next trending thread