Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that West End shows are not all as overpriced as some on here say?

299 replies

Carla786 · 16/04/2026 14:46

I definitely think that people are being priced out by col and this is very unfair. But I also think some posts on here about how unaffordable West End theatre is are exaggerated.
The Globe offers standing room for as low as £5 or £6. OK, it's not ideal as most of us would rather sit down but it does at least mean a lot of Shakespeare & some others is affordable if you're prepared to stand.

Then as to West End musicals : I think an issue here is that pps who cite them as unaffordable are trying to take a whole family, 2-3 or maybe more kids, as well as them & DP. This will be a lot harder than going on your own or with one other person, especially if trying for an Xmas show (though booking in advance might slightly lessen). It does vary based on show too : the most popular will of course be more likely to be sky high.

COL has obviously increased a lot, but I also wonder how affordable West End was in the past for family trips. I was born early 2000s and my mum was able to get a lot of cheap tickets very high up just for me & her. As a child her family didn't really do musicals or plays. In the 70s-90s, were big shows a lot more affordable for family trips?

So I suppose I'd say that I agree prices are too high for a lot of families, and this is wrong : but I'd also caveat that I think there are lot more affordable options than some posts on here imply.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:14

nomas · 16/04/2026 22:51

I don’t mean to be dismissive. I’m just saying I would prefer to go to fewer shows and pay for better seats (at the £70 each mark, not crazy prizes like £300) rather than go to lots of shows and pay £30 if I can’t see the cast.

As Gertrude says, it’s a personal preference as to how people spend their money.

I waited ages for London Theatre Week to get the half price stalls seat tickets (view attached) and really enjoyed it. I’ve also attached the cheapest tickets view which is also pretty good but not what I wanted.

I don’t think you can see the full depth of the stage effectively from your ‘best’ seat. At best it’ll all be foreshortened. I really dislike the stalls

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:17

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 16/04/2026 23:19

@topcat2026The Royal Opera House has standing tickets too. I’d never pay £300 for any theatre seat. The reason prices get to this level is because they know there’s demand. Apart from my DD who lives in London, I don’t have any other friends who go to London. They like the local theatre. I prefer to see the best and go less frequently. I enjoy going a great deal and I’m less keen on touring shows that don’t have the original cast. My friends don’t care so they are happy with the local offering.

While seeing the original cast of a new musical is fun, don't dismiss recasts either for WE or touring productions. The level of talent is just as good.

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · 17/04/2026 12:18

topcat2026 · 17/04/2026 12:10

Supply and demand @IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth as well as covering costs and making profit. It’s called running a business. Those prices for those seats are fine.

@topcat2026 I've been working in the theatre industry, including six years in the WE, since 2005. I know how it works, thanks.

topcat2026 · 17/04/2026 12:21

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · 17/04/2026 12:18

@topcat2026 I've been working in the theatre industry, including six years in the WE, since 2005. I know how it works, thanks.

So why were you being slightly hysterical (“mad”)?

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:22

saraclara · 17/04/2026 00:35

I haven't got to the end of the thread yet, but many of the posts that I've read so far have been very London-centric. If you live outside London, the 'tickets on the day' recommendations are useless. And if, heaven forbid, you live a serious distance away, a trip to see a show is a big thing, involving transport, hotels, and a fair bit of excitement. Why would you do all that only to get there and find your view obstructed, or be so far away that, as a pp put it, you might as well be watching it on your phone?

So yes, all this 'it's perfectly accessible if you can be bothered to research the cheap seats' only works if you live in London, can get to a weeknight performance at the last minute, after work, and are happy to have a sub-optional view.

Edited

If you don’t live in London you book months in advance - I do as I live in Wales. That way you get the cheapest prices on everything including seats. I buy the cheapest I can find and ‘might as well be watching on your phone’ is nonsense. I check seat views on various websites to be sure but very, very few London theatre tickets have poor visibility of the stage. It’s about the live performance too and that’s powerful wherever you sit.

nomas · 17/04/2026 12:23

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:12

While I didn’t go to that show I have seen shows from the very back of the Theatre Royal. This is nonsense.

Sorry, but you are being very dismissive of my experience. It was unwatchable for me from up there. I would rather save up and have better seats.

nomas · 17/04/2026 12:26

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:14

I don’t think you can see the full depth of the stage effectively from your ‘best’ seat. At best it’ll all be foreshortened. I really dislike the stalls

I didn't say it was the best seat, but it was perfect for us and we only have ourselves to please.

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:28

greyweek · 17/04/2026 07:43

It does. But the question in the op is are the tickets overpriced and unaffordable for most and the answer is yes, of course they are.

I agree with everything @rockinrobinssaid and find it a bit funny people are arguing against that while going against their own interest.
In countries like Germany the theatre is supported heavily by public funding and they offer huge discounts to the unemployed, students, disabled, etc.
When you understand the benefit of that to the whole nation it is not hard to make it work.
It’s weird, in this day and age, that some people are so keen to justify it being only accessible to the rich.

As I’ve said to @rockinrobins earlier in the thread, if money is going to go in to support theatre and music - and I agree it should - then it shouldn’t go in at the end. We need to make music and drama education accessible to everyone - for example currently 42% of secondary schools in England don't even offer GCSE music. It’s cultural vandalism and unless it’s addressed there won’t be any theatre in a generation - or it will be exclusively staffed by rich kids - because none of the young performers will have had a chance to learn to sing, dance, act or play in the pit orchestra. It really needs some political attention and will.
That’s more important than subsidising tickets which can already be bought for around £30 if you book well in advance.

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:33

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · 17/04/2026 11:55

Here's an example of how pricing has and is going mad.

They've today announced Richard E Grant and Christine Baranski in Hay Fever at the Wyndham's in the autumn.

There is a row at the back of the circle which is being charged at £75/£80.

These same seats went on sale for Rosamund Pike in Inter Alia after it's sold out run at the National for £22.

It’s what happens when you employ film star actors. I mean, these two are great, but there are lots of actors who would do just as good a job and cost less. Plus the supply and demand issue comes into play.
I know it’s different with straight theatre rather than a musical, but if a musical ‘celebrity casts’ I avoid it until a recast.

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:34

nomas · 17/04/2026 12:23

Sorry, but you are being very dismissive of my experience. It was unwatchable for me from up there. I would rather save up and have better seats.

Edited

I’m not being ‘dismissive of your experience’. I’m saying I had the same experience and don’t recognise your description of it.

Miranda65 · 17/04/2026 12:35

SailingYachty · 16/04/2026 17:37

I just had a look at Paddington tickets, the ‘best’ ones are £270! Over a thousand pounds for a family of 4 for couple of hours show seems insane.

Edited

You don't have to buy the best seats in the house, tho. I got brilliant dress circle seats for Paddington for about £80 each (and I agree with others, dress circle is much better than the stalls where you end up looking at actors' feet!).

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:36

nomas · 17/04/2026 12:26

I didn't say it was the best seat, but it was perfect for us and we only have ourselves to please.

I didn’t say it was the best seat either, but the ‘better’ of your two examples. May have phrased it badly. Sure, everyone only has themselves to please but saying theatre is completely unaffordable or a very occassional treat because your tastes in it are expensive is a bit much. I’d be delighted with the cheaper of those two and wouldn’t like the more expensive.

nomas · 17/04/2026 12:36

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:34

I’m not being ‘dismissive of your experience’. I’m saying I had the same experience and don’t recognise your description of it.

And calling it nonsense, which is dismissive.

I completely check out from such high up seats. I would even rather watch it live from the cinema.

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:38

nomas · 17/04/2026 12:36

And calling it nonsense, which is dismissive.

I completely check out from such high up seats. I would even rather watch it live from the cinema.

Fine. Do that. I’ll continue having great fun, a great experience and seeing great performances live in the cheap seats 🤷‍♀️
It’s objectively not true they look like ants from there though, which is what I meant by ‘nonsense’. It was on factual, not opinion based grounds.

GertrudePerkinsPaperyThing · 17/04/2026 12:39

“It’s weird, in this day and age, that some people are so keen to justify it being only accessible to the rich.”

I couldn’t find this post scrolling back, but I think it spectacularly misses the point.

People are just trying to explain the realities.

And also point out that it isn’t only accessible to the rich at the moment.

nomas · 17/04/2026 12:39

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:36

I didn’t say it was the best seat either, but the ‘better’ of your two examples. May have phrased it badly. Sure, everyone only has themselves to please but saying theatre is completely unaffordable or a very occassional treat because your tastes in it are expensive is a bit much. I’d be delighted with the cheaper of those two and wouldn’t like the more expensive.

I appreciate your perspective. I don't think my tastes are expensive. £70 each was my upper limit for seats. Considering I don't smoke, drink, eat out much or have coffees out, it was reasonable for me.

imnotwhoyouthinkiam · 17/04/2026 12:39

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:33

It’s what happens when you employ film star actors. I mean, these two are great, but there are lots of actors who would do just as good a job and cost less. Plus the supply and demand issue comes into play.
I know it’s different with straight theatre rather than a musical, but if a musical ‘celebrity casts’ I avoid it until a recast.

The other issue with this is they aren't guaranteed to be in it on the night, so if you've paid a lot of money to see a certain celebrity then it can feel like you've been overcharged. This has happened a few times, although I don't think we've ever paid over the odds so to speak.
We have paid more than we usually would for JCSS, but that's partly because we left it too late for the cheap seats.

nomas · 17/04/2026 12:41

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:38

Fine. Do that. I’ll continue having great fun, a great experience and seeing great performances live in the cheap seats 🤷‍♀️
It’s objectively not true they look like ants from there though, which is what I meant by ‘nonsense’. It was on factual, not opinion based grounds.

It was meant as hyperbole to make a point, not to be factual.

rockinrobins · 17/04/2026 12:41

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:28

As I’ve said to @rockinrobins earlier in the thread, if money is going to go in to support theatre and music - and I agree it should - then it shouldn’t go in at the end. We need to make music and drama education accessible to everyone - for example currently 42% of secondary schools in England don't even offer GCSE music. It’s cultural vandalism and unless it’s addressed there won’t be any theatre in a generation - or it will be exclusively staffed by rich kids - because none of the young performers will have had a chance to learn to sing, dance, act or play in the pit orchestra. It really needs some political attention and will.
That’s more important than subsidising tickets which can already be bought for around £30 if you book well in advance.

Again - I'm not and never was talking about subsidising tickets. Are you actually reading my posts? I'm talking about capping profits. Different thing entirely that doesn't actually require the government to put any money in.

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:42

imnotwhoyouthinkiam · 17/04/2026 12:39

The other issue with this is they aren't guaranteed to be in it on the night, so if you've paid a lot of money to see a certain celebrity then it can feel like you've been overcharged. This has happened a few times, although I don't think we've ever paid over the odds so to speak.
We have paid more than we usually would for JCSS, but that's partly because we left it too late for the cheap seats.

And I’ve done the same for Lesley Odom Jr’s run in Hamilton. The most expensive seats I’ve ever bought in the West End at about £80. That was in the advance sale though, nit because I was late, and I was quite impressed that they hadn’t inflated the prices massively for him.

Silverbirchleaf · 17/04/2026 12:46

nomas · 17/04/2026 12:23

Sorry, but you are being very dismissive of my experience. It was unwatchable for me from up there. I would rather save up and have better seats.

Edited

Me too!

Miranda65 · 17/04/2026 12:47

IdentifyingAsAWoollyMammoth · 17/04/2026 11:55

Here's an example of how pricing has and is going mad.

They've today announced Richard E Grant and Christine Baranski in Hay Fever at the Wyndham's in the autumn.

There is a row at the back of the circle which is being charged at £75/£80.

These same seats went on sale for Rosamund Pike in Inter Alia after it's sold out run at the National for £22.

I can't wait to see this - I don't care what it costs!
But theatre is my hobby, so I invest in it.
I choose not to buy takeaways, go to pop concerts, buy expensive tech, designer clothes, manicures etc etc.
The point is, we all choose how we spend our money, and prioritise accordingly.

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:50

rockinrobins · 17/04/2026 12:41

Again - I'm not and never was talking about subsidising tickets. Are you actually reading my posts? I'm talking about capping profits. Different thing entirely that doesn't actually require the government to put any money in.

I get that. But it’s very risky putting on a new musical (and I don’t want theatre to be just sure fire revivals). It would need to be very carefully done as it’s often the apparently large profits that fund all the writing and workshopping and out of town openings etc for new shows (I know people who write musicals - it’s an expensive business to get off the ground). And we would still be better off putting any effort into the grassroots because theatre already is accessible. There are lots of seats in the West End and regional theatre under £40 and many of those are under £30. I’m not too bothered if some people get charged £300. It’s entirely up to them. They didn’t have to pay that.

SixtySomething · 17/04/2026 12:54

Those $350 (pounds) tickets do exist, but they're only a small number at particular West End theatres. I assume they're bought for corporate events, by wealthy tourists or a few very wealthy Brits.
I grew up in outer London but the first time I went to a West End theatre was as part of a school trip in the sixth form.
Just because luxury things exist, it doesn't mean everyone should expect to afford them.
Many people I know are starting to go to some of the smaller theatres like Hampstead Theatre, Marylebone Theatre, etc where I think top prices are about $60. I've been to a couple and enjoyed them more than the West End.
There are some brilliant provincial theatres, like the ones in Leicester, Sheffield, Manchester, Chichester. They are much nicer to visit and prices also top. out at $60, I think.
I think prices have gone up because of government cuts to the Arts?

rockinrobins · 17/04/2026 12:54

cardibach · 17/04/2026 12:50

I get that. But it’s very risky putting on a new musical (and I don’t want theatre to be just sure fire revivals). It would need to be very carefully done as it’s often the apparently large profits that fund all the writing and workshopping and out of town openings etc for new shows (I know people who write musicals - it’s an expensive business to get off the ground). And we would still be better off putting any effort into the grassroots because theatre already is accessible. There are lots of seats in the West End and regional theatre under £40 and many of those are under £30. I’m not too bothered if some people get charged £300. It’s entirely up to them. They didn’t have to pay that.

No mate. The profit margins on many of the big shows are larger than they need to be. I am talking about capping profits after overheads, for huge shows like Les Mis and The Lion King. I'm not talking about grassroots productions.

Some West End theatre owners are billionaires, and they really don't need to be. The government do not need to allow it. Ticket prices were not so inflated in the past, as has been pointed out on this thread.

The solution is not to accept that you can't afford the good seats at the good times, but for the government to stop allowing the commercialisation of theatre, and to stop allowing it to be a way that people make billions. No ticket needs to cost £300, ever.

Swipe left for the next trending thread