I’m sorry but the way this has escalated into “a 13-year-old babysitting is basically illegal” is genuinely unhinged 😭
I was out here at 8 walking three dogs at once, babysitting my own siblings by 9, and watching other people’s kids at 11and somehow none of us required a rescue operation or legal intervention. We survived. The children survived. The dogs, incredibly, also survived.
Meanwhile now it’s like:
“I’m not sure a 13-year-old can be trusted to supervise a goldfish without a risk assessment.”
Also the NSPCC recommends ≠ it’s illegal leap is doing acrobatics. A recommendation is guidance, not a criminal statute. No one is getting arrested because a teenager handed out snacks and put a kid to bed.
And the dog thing really sends me. Kids can compete in Junior Showmanship from nine years old —handling, presenting, controlling a dog in a judged environment—but walking a dog around the block at 13 is suddenly too dangerous unless there’s a chaperone hiding behind a hedge?
Be serious.
Same energy with the “12-year-olds need babysitters unless it’s daytime” discourse. At 12 they’re in middle school, have phones, can feed themselves, and somehow manage to exist for 7 hours a day at school without a personal bodyguard. But being in their own house for an evening? Immediate crisis.
And yes, I’ve let my 7-year-old stay home alone for short periods. Call the police, alert the press. He’s not performing open-heart surgery, he’s sitting on the couch with snacks.
Not everything is a catastrophe. Some of you have confused “basic, age-appropriate independence” with “endangerment,” and it shows. Kids don’t wake up on their 16th birthday with fully installed life skills like it’s a software update. They learn them gradually—by actually being trusted to do things.
But sure. Next up: 14-year-olds making toast unsupervised—straight to jail 🔥🍞🚨