Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Irritated that families on UC get heavily discounted entry

1000 replies

happybug1234 · 09/04/2026 17:54

feel very aggrieved this afternoon to find out that people on UC get heavily discounted entry to popular attractions:

London Zoo
London transport museum
science museum wonderlab
Cutty Sark
kew Gardens
St Paul’s cathedral

As a mum with a professional career, with both husband and I working full time, paying a mortgage, paying a fortune in childcare for 2 under 4’s I seriously despair! From experience of people I see around me, families on UC seem to have more disposable income than us as their rent is paid, have no childcare costs and all their costs subsidised on social tariffs etc.

why is the government getting away with this and why are more middle class/income people not up in arms about it! At the moment I can’t see how us working hard and being self sufficient has benefited us as a family.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Jamontoastandtea · 09/04/2026 21:16

Coffeeandbooks88 · 09/04/2026 21:12

🤣

We have done Marwell zoo twice using the UC tickets. Might do it again at some point!

TWICE! Yet a lot of families who aren’t on UC wouldn’t even be able to afford it once a year - even with all the discounts!
This is where the unfairness lies.

SpryTaupeTurtle · 09/04/2026 21:16

Deleted

PyongyangKipperbang · 09/04/2026 21:17

DannyDeever · 09/04/2026 21:04

I don't know but giving people with the equivalent income to £113k a year free entry on the basis they are "poor" is a bit mental.

How about, anyone who is the equivalent of a higher rate tax payer or above doesn't get free entry?

Most of the money claimed on UC doesnt go direct to the claimant, it goes to their landlord.

UC doesnt give people a huge amount of money, it gives people who cant afford to pay their rent, thanks to BTL profiteering landlods, a roof over their heads.

Its not their fault that there is no such thing as affordable housing anymore (thank you boomers), not their fault that is hardly any social housing anymore (thank you Thatcher), not their fault that despite most working just as hard as non clamaints they can barely touch the sides of their costs.

I claim UC and I work and I am a carer. I can barely make ends meet, I dont live in an expensive area and luckily paid off my mortgage before this all began, I would really struggle if I had to make rent top up payments.

I save the state a lot more than I cost them in terms of what I do with caring responsibilities. I get paid less than £2.50 an hour for being a carer (at carers allowance levels) maximum. How much would carers cost for a minimum 37 hours week? A hell of a lot more!!

DreamyJade · 09/04/2026 21:17

Jamontoastandtea · 09/04/2026 21:04

What?! The person I have been referring to is a Teacher so obviously works term time with family support and has no childcare issues yet chooses to work part time.
I am a TA and have chosen this to work around family life and not worry about childcare as I have it covered. Maybe I should drop my hours and see if I can claim anything?!

If you’re a TA, you’d probably get UC. I know TAs with children who qualify. Unless you have a high earning partner, it’s worth checking your entitlement.

LilyBunch25 · 09/04/2026 21:17

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 18:23

Exactly. My husband and I were looking to go to a National Trust place last week, it would’ve set us back £90 after tickets and parking!!! We didn’t go as we couldn’t afford it!!!!

Or get a £14 a month subscription like we did 🙄

Coffeeandbooks88 · 09/04/2026 21:18

Jamontoastandtea · 09/04/2026 21:16

TWICE! Yet a lot of families who aren’t on UC wouldn’t even be able to afford it once a year - even with all the discounts!
This is where the unfairness lies.

Two visits over two years. We wouldn't have been able to afford it either otherwise. What's your point?

DannyDeever · 09/04/2026 21:18

JoiseeeEileennnn · 09/04/2026 21:07

i think the £113k example does not represent a majority of the UC demographic.

If anyone under the higher rate bracket got free entry then a majority of attractions would close.

Plus would that be anyone in the household in that tax bracket or the household income or if two adults earned that?

Well to be consistent let's make it one individual to match the policy on Child Allowance.

And I was suggesting equivalent of higher rate tax payers as the absolute upper limit. I'm happy for it to be much lower than that. What I'm less happy about is to give it to people who are in UC but not to people who with the same or lower incomes but don't qualify for UC.

Isn't this hilarious. People are describing people on the equivalent of £100k plus salaries as underprivileged or poor and then describing giving free entry to working people on half that as unsustainable. Says it all.

thepariscrimefiles · 09/04/2026 21:18

happybug1234 · 09/04/2026 18:01

Those in benefits will get pension credit to top them up and also my property will be used for care fees where as someone with no home will get theirs paid for. So at the end of the day no better off….

Stop working then and lead a life of luxury on UC. Sell your house, spend all the money and present yourself to the council as homeless.

Alternatively, stop being so bitter about people who are much worse off than you and begrudging children from low-income families being able to have a day out at a London attraction.

JustAnotherWhinger · 09/04/2026 21:18

Kirbert2 · 09/04/2026 21:16

Chester only did it for a limited period too. Set days over the Christmas holidays.

The thread about it was spectacular.

Amazing that so many couldn’t see it for what it was and thought Chester (and tbh the other places) suddenly decided poor children were deserving of a zoo trip, rather than a money and funding earner for them.

DoosDoos · 09/04/2026 21:20

JoiseeeEileennnn · 09/04/2026 20:45

I hope that’s sarcasm.

Some people don’t have the qualifications for lower paid jobs, some people don’t have the capacity for higher paid jobs.

The brain is neuroplastic. They can learn new skills.

DannyDeever · 09/04/2026 21:20

Most of the money claimed on UC doesnt go direct to the claimant, it goes to their landlord.

Most of the money earned by people who don't get UC goes to their landlord or mortgage lender.

Kirbert2 · 09/04/2026 21:21

Jamontoastandtea · 09/04/2026 21:16

TWICE! Yet a lot of families who aren’t on UC wouldn’t even be able to afford it once a year - even with all the discounts!
This is where the unfairness lies.

pp and I both have disabled children.

You can have my discounted zoo tickets but your child can have my child's disability which is the reason why I get UC.

Only fair, right?

DreamyJade · 09/04/2026 21:21

Nimonion · 09/04/2026 21:15

Where does subsidising people who earn less end? Should they get a subsidy when they buy a house / eat out / take a holiday? I suppose what sits badly with me is that I was brought up to believe that if you wanted nice things you worked hard at school etc, got a high paying job and earned them. This doesn’t seem to be the case any more.

What do we tell our kids? Do we tell them that if you work hard and get a good job you’ll earn nice things, or do we tell them that if you work hard you’ll get to subsidise others to have nice things when you can’t afford them? It’s a really confusing message.

Ludicrous. “Don’t bother with qualifications, Noah. Just claim UC. You’ll only get £80 a week to live on, but you’ll get free entry to the Tower of London, so that’s worth it”

SpryTaupeTurtle · 09/04/2026 21:21

DannyDeever · 09/04/2026 21:09

Unlikely. I bet your rent alone was more than £400 a month.

My rent still isn't 400 pounds a month. It's 380. I live in Scotland. My personal UC allowance was 400. Are you trying to call me a liar. You know everyone's circumstances on here just because you don't like people on benefits - you don't. I can assure you of that

Thechaseison71 · 09/04/2026 21:22

JoiseeeEileennnn · 09/04/2026 20:58

Where do you think the cut off should be?

I've no idea but it seems you get UC if you get a certain amount but earn £1 more then nothing. Making the person who earns too much for UC worse off

DannyDeever · 09/04/2026 21:23

Stop working then and lead a life of luxury on UC.

Which is exactly what people are doing. Or moving abroad.

SpryTaupeTurtle · 09/04/2026 21:23

DannyDeever · 09/04/2026 21:20

Most of the money claimed on UC doesnt go direct to the claimant, it goes to their landlord.

Most of the money earned by people who don't get UC goes to their landlord or mortgage lender.

No it doesn't. Around a quarter of my brothers wage goes to his mortgage - which is 500 pounds a month

ChefsKisser · 09/04/2026 21:23

These threads are always split into:

  • people on UC or wealthy enough to afford it otherwise who are indignant, accuse all other posters of being cruel and wanting poor people ‘locked away’ or offer repeatedly to trade their disabled children for theirs which is just gross.
  • those in the middle who on paper should be doing ok but are watching every penny, saving for what would have been a standard thing (meal at pizza express, takeaway, day out etc). but because their joint income seems a huge amount to people on low income/UC they get no sympathy and people ‘can’t believe’ they’d be struggling.

it’s tedious. Those tiny discounts, subsidies, credit payments etc add up. I’m a nurse and band 7, my HCA on a band 3 salary income and her partner on similar income have more disposable income than us due to benefits (albeit they’re claiming falsely that they live together but I know loads of people personally and professionally that do that so assume it’s just ‘a thing). It’s really depressing to be honest

JoiseeeEileennnn · 09/04/2026 21:23

DannyDeever · 09/04/2026 21:18

Well to be consistent let's make it one individual to match the policy on Child Allowance.

And I was suggesting equivalent of higher rate tax payers as the absolute upper limit. I'm happy for it to be much lower than that. What I'm less happy about is to give it to people who are in UC but not to people who with the same or lower incomes but don't qualify for UC.

Isn't this hilarious. People are describing people on the equivalent of £100k plus salaries as underprivileged or poor and then describing giving free entry to working people on half that as unsustainable. Says it all.

Who is on £100k?
Not those on UC?

Jamontoastandtea · 09/04/2026 21:24

Coffeeandbooks88 · 09/04/2026 21:18

Two visits over two years. We wouldn't have been able to afford it either otherwise. What's your point?

Edited

I think I made it!

SpryTaupeTurtle · 09/04/2026 21:24

JoiseeeEileennnn · 09/04/2026 21:23

Who is on £100k?
Not those on UC?

I'm disabled and currently on an equivalent salary of around 20k. Not 100k

JoiseeeEileennnn · 09/04/2026 21:24

DoosDoos · 09/04/2026 21:20

The brain is neuroplastic. They can learn new skills.

Not everyone can…people do have different capabilities, and the circumstances around them can impact learning ability too.

You sound very ignorant.

Kirbert2 · 09/04/2026 21:25

ChefsKisser · 09/04/2026 21:23

These threads are always split into:

  • people on UC or wealthy enough to afford it otherwise who are indignant, accuse all other posters of being cruel and wanting poor people ‘locked away’ or offer repeatedly to trade their disabled children for theirs which is just gross.
  • those in the middle who on paper should be doing ok but are watching every penny, saving for what would have been a standard thing (meal at pizza express, takeaway, day out etc). but because their joint income seems a huge amount to people on low income/UC they get no sympathy and people ‘can’t believe’ they’d be struggling.

it’s tedious. Those tiny discounts, subsidies, credit payments etc add up. I’m a nurse and band 7, my HCA on a band 3 salary income and her partner on similar income have more disposable income than us due to benefits (albeit they’re claiming falsely that they live together but I know loads of people personally and professionally that do that so assume it’s just ‘a thing). It’s really depressing to be honest

and complaining about unfairness to parents of disabled children isn't gross?

JackieLeeOhmyDarlinNsoul · 09/04/2026 21:26

@PyongyangKipperbang all of what you say is correct particularly Rtb and BTL.
Kind of in the same boat as yourself regarding being a carer.
I used pension money to try and avoid the benefits system .I applied for hundreds of jobs but age was against me (55+) and had to admit defeat and apply for UC.
My disabled wife still does 16 he cleaning but it's getting harder for her osteoarthritis and will have to see a way for her to stop work.
It's not what we envisaged or wanted from life.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread