Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Irritated that families on UC get heavily discounted entry

1000 replies

happybug1234 · 09/04/2026 17:54

feel very aggrieved this afternoon to find out that people on UC get heavily discounted entry to popular attractions:

London Zoo
London transport museum
science museum wonderlab
Cutty Sark
kew Gardens
St Paul’s cathedral

As a mum with a professional career, with both husband and I working full time, paying a mortgage, paying a fortune in childcare for 2 under 4’s I seriously despair! From experience of people I see around me, families on UC seem to have more disposable income than us as their rent is paid, have no childcare costs and all their costs subsidised on social tariffs etc.

why is the government getting away with this and why are more middle class/income people not up in arms about it! At the moment I can’t see how us working hard and being self sufficient has benefited us as a family.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 19:25

JoiseeeEileennnn · 09/04/2026 19:24

Because it’s true…just in the same way that someone complaining they were skint and jobless would be told to get a job.

It sounds like OP has plenty of options.

Just to add, if people didn’t do lower paid, less “skilled” jobs then the country would grind to a halt. So what if they have a UC top up…they also may not have had the same opportunities has had in life.

There are so many arguments as to why OP is BU.

UC top up is fine but why does that qualify them for subsidised zoo entry when your average working family cannot afford this?

Pinkypoo123 · 09/04/2026 19:25

Im about to be in that position applying for universal credit after 28 years in a relationship and married,marriage has broken down and im terrified! I work part time and have 2 sons at home still,1 having complex medical needs, we cannot afford to live in the family home after 28 years and im looking for a cheaper smaller place to rent.I will have to work longer hours, cut down on literally everything and of course universal credit will penalise me for working harder to keep our heads above water.I work,do not smoke or do drugs etc not everyone asking for help are bums who cannot string a sentence together or never wash lol,your post 🫣

superchick · 09/04/2026 19:25

DoosDoos · 09/04/2026 19:21

Be grateful that we worked hard at school to develop marketable skills that make as valuable assets in the work place?

I always told my children to work hard at school and study well, so they could get decent jobs and not just coast life on minimum wage.

I have 2 degrees, professional qualifications and work in a respected role as a civil servant. But I'm still entitled to universal credit. Working hard at school doesnt guarantee that you won't suffer any difficult circumstances.

Usernamechanging · 09/04/2026 19:26

DoosDoos · 09/04/2026 19:21

Be grateful that we worked hard at school to develop marketable skills that make as valuable assets in the work place?

I always told my children to work hard at school and study well, so they could get decent jobs and not just coast life on minimum wage.

Thousands of people on minimum wage work bloody hard. For little recognition. For society to function effectively, we need people who are proficient at all levels, doing all kinds of jobs with very different skill sets. It's not rocket science. You're not an inherently bad or stupid or disgusting person because you earn minimum wage. Anyone working full time deserves respect, regardless of their job title.

mugglewump · 09/04/2026 19:26

All these indignant people! Annoyed at a government that has nothing to do with private companies' charging policies!

What about retired people with big fat pensions getting reduced price entry? Are you angry about them too? Or are they OK because they don't dress in leisurewear?

ChocolateBasket · 09/04/2026 19:26

I'd much rather be in your position and have a mortgage than be paying dead money for rent.

HotRootsAndNaughtyToots · 09/04/2026 19:27

DoosDoos · 09/04/2026 19:14

Another thing someone else can pay for. Typical

Taxpayers don't pay for it. These discounts are not governmental

Greebosmum · 09/04/2026 19:27

My daughter has a Masters Degree, 2 children and works full time in her profession. She has worked since she got a paper round aged 14. Unfortunately her partner cleared off with someone else. He pays no maintenance and CMS don't seem to be able to track him down even though she has told them where he lives. Consequently she is eligible for, and claims, Universal Credit. I'm.sorry this offends you, your attitude offends me.

RudolphTheReindeer · 09/04/2026 19:27

Merkins · 09/04/2026 19:05

I’m sure your almost word for word repetition of Jenrick’s posts from this morning is nothing more than a coincidence and you’re not just being obtuse.

And it's not the people paying full price funding the difference at London Zoo as Reform are trying to claim. It's funded via a grant from the National Lottery

Irritated that families on UC get heavily discounted entry
JoiseeeEileennnn · 09/04/2026 19:28

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 19:25

UC top up is fine but why does that qualify them for subsidised zoo entry when your average working family cannot afford this?

Because of the COL in this country.

Minimum wage plus a UC top up barely covers the essentials. These people can work incredibly hard in lower paid roles essential to our society.

Why should they and their children miss out because they weren’t presented with the same opportunities in life.

It’s hardly a 5* all inclusive, they are museums and other educational venues. Children should all have cultural experiences available to them.

gamerchick · 09/04/2026 19:28

WimbyAce · 09/04/2026 19:16

"I want to be in a society that treats all children as equal".

Amen to that, but currently it most definitely does not. I often feel that my children are penalised by growing up in a "normal home" eg 2 parents, no benefits, no SEN.

You would prefer kids who will need care all of their lives and never leave home. Just so it feels fair?

littleorangefox · 09/04/2026 19:29

Monty36 · 09/04/2026 19:21

I think one issue is that more middle class people claim benefits. Or credits whichever you prefer. And have no qualms about doing so either.

Employers have been hit but still tax credits are the biggest employer subsidy going.

If you mean the tax credits system then it isn't a thing anymore. It ended last year and people were migrated to UC.

Idrathertalktomycat · 09/04/2026 19:30

Would you resent me getting free entry as carer to my severely disabled son who is non verbal with complex needs?

Ochtawa · 09/04/2026 19:30

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 19:25

UC top up is fine but why does that qualify them for subsidised zoo entry when your average working family cannot afford this?

You literally need to ask the zoo. Or theme park, or castle, or whatever.

They've calculated that the slightly increased footfall and associated spend from the groups qualifying for free entry is worth it, for them. If you ask how they've worked that out, maybe they'll tell you.

JoiseeeEileennnn · 09/04/2026 19:30

gamerchick · 09/04/2026 19:28

You would prefer kids who will need care all of their lives and never leave home. Just so it feels fair?

I’m a single parent, so my household isn’t “normal” by your standards. I’m also low income but don’t qualify for any help.

So, no, your children are not being penalised. It sounds as though your children are very lucky and you should appreciate that.

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 19:30

JoiseeeEileennnn · 09/04/2026 19:28

Because of the COL in this country.

Minimum wage plus a UC top up barely covers the essentials. These people can work incredibly hard in lower paid roles essential to our society.

Why should they and their children miss out because they weren’t presented with the same opportunities in life.

It’s hardly a 5* all inclusive, they are museums and other educational venues. Children should all have cultural experiences available to them.

And what about your working family who is left with exactly the same disposable income at the end of the month (after bills and no hand outs) but has to forgo the zoo trip because they can’t afford it but a family on UC gets to go in for next to nothing?

please answer the question.

Zanatdy · 09/04/2026 19:30

Let it go. I’ve been on benefits and i’ve also been (am) a higher rate tax payer. Life can change in the blink on an eye. Do I care that a family got subsidised entry to the zoo? UC is also an in work benefit. This could be a parent working as a nurse, not enough to get by without a UC top up. Life is expensive, especially with the current COL.

Richer people use the services of those on lower wages, nhs, hairdressers / beauty, cleaners, delivering their multiple deliveroo orders. Yet complain if they get UC top ups and discounts on some days out. Give it a rest.

Sammyspurs · 09/04/2026 19:31

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

TooBigForMyBoots · 09/04/2026 19:31

If you get irritated by poor kids accessing fun stuff, you need to take a long hard look at yourself and your own life.

That's not normal or healthy.

Sonato · 09/04/2026 19:31

Northernlights19 · 09/04/2026 19:14

I think anyone who has a problem with CHILDREN benefitting from something is absolutely pathetic tbh.

Again a strawman argument.

It is the principle.

Reduced attraction rates
Reduced Gym memberships from council schemes
Free prescriptions
Free or subsidised dental

This country is simply too generous.

Its not a safety net. Its a sustainable lifestyle.

Tacohill · 09/04/2026 19:31

families on UC seem to have more disposable income than us as their rent is paid, have no childcare costs and all their costs subsidised on social tariffs etc.

My mind boggles how you’ve managed to have a professional career but otherwise seem as thick as mince.

HotRootsAndNaughtyToots · 09/04/2026 19:32

Sonato · 09/04/2026 19:31

Again a strawman argument.

It is the principle.

Reduced attraction rates
Reduced Gym memberships from council schemes
Free prescriptions
Free or subsidised dental

This country is simply too generous.

Its not a safety net. Its a sustainable lifestyle.

You are so ignorant

cadburyegg · 09/04/2026 19:32

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 19:25

UC top up is fine but why does that qualify them for subsidised zoo entry when your average working family cannot afford this?

Single parents, who make up a large proportion of UC claimants, already face higher costs proportionally.

Our local wildlife park charges £15.95 per adult and £13.95 per child.

So, say for example, if I go with my work colleague who earns the same as me, and her higher earning husband, and we take our children (2 for each family).

They pay £59.80 for their entry, so obviously more, but if they split the cost, the cost to each of them is £29.90. The cost to me is £43.85.

Also don’t get me started on the 25% council tax discount.

DreamyJade · 09/04/2026 19:33

Lucytheloose · 09/04/2026 19:00

I'd argue that anyone who begrudges a child a day out at the zoo is deficient in the milk of human kindness and should not be having children whether they can afford them or not.

I agree. What next? “How is it fair that this charity is sending terminally ill children on a holiday of a lifetime to Florida. My children don’t have cancer, but we’d never be able to afford to take them to Disney!”

”Why do nurses get a blue light card? I work full time and I don’t get 10% off at Nando’s! Fucking scroungers!”

Imagine being that bitter and twisted that you can’t stand the thought of a child having a cheap day out. It might blow their mind to learn that CHARITIES (which these establishments are) have to actually perform charitable acts to be able to keep their charitable status.

JoiseeeEileennnn · 09/04/2026 19:34

PeonyPatch · 09/04/2026 19:30

And what about your working family who is left with exactly the same disposable income at the end of the month (after bills and no hand outs) but has to forgo the zoo trip because they can’t afford it but a family on UC gets to go in for next to nothing?

please answer the question.

There has to be a cut off some point, sadly.

I was a mum of twins, childcare cancelled out my salary so I didn’t go back to work. Husband earned £55k so we didn’t qualify for child benefit even though a couple earning £45k each would.

The system isn’t ideal, it would be great if it was all case by case but that doesn’t mean children should miss out on the meantime.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.