Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to very nervous about what Reeves is doing to the economy?

1000 replies

ProudAmberTurtle · 07/04/2026 11:05

The data for the last financial year is out and, for the first time in British history, the benefits bill (£333 billion) was higher than income tax receipts (£331 billion).

This didn't even happen during financial crises like when the banks were bailed out in 2008-09, or during Covid when the government paid private sector staff's wages.

What's worse is that the government did not predict this and the benefits bill is projected to rise significantly over the next three years to about £390 billion.

In fact, from what I can understand, income tax receipts have always been significantly higher than the benefits bill, and there's always been an understanding between the two main parties since the 1940s that that needs to be the case for an economy to function properly.

I've worked very hard for more than a quarter of a century and always plan for the future, ie paying the maximum in NI so that my partner and I will receive the full state pension. For the first time in my life, this year the amount I'm earning in savings is going up at below the rate of inflation, even though I've got the highest interest rate available, because I've hit an income tax threshold (£50k) which means 40% of everything I gain in interest goes to the Treasury. This means my savings are actually depreciating in value.

AIBU to think this is just the start? That it's inevitable that taxes will have to rise even further and the state pension will be cut?

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/04/04/labour-welfare-bill-income-tax-revenue/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
WimbyAce · 13/04/2026 21:32

Chocaholick · 13/04/2026 21:20

So we need to cap benefits completely - ‘listen up, you will never ever receive more than 25k (or whatever) in benefits, so please think carefully about your family size and remember contraception is free and highly reliable’.

Agreed, 25k per year is actually pretty decent for doing nothing.......more than fair I would say.

PandoraSocks · 13/04/2026 21:33

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

What the hell is wrong with you?

RachelReevesFringe · 13/04/2026 21:33

Chocaholick · 13/04/2026 21:31

They wouldn’t be working if they were a carer.

You can work and be a carer.

RachelReevesFringe · 13/04/2026 21:34

Papyrophile · 13/04/2026 21:32

Sorry to disagree @RachelReevesFringe but I think your life is probably worth more than the squirrel I shot this morning.

I don't know what you mean by that but it sounds personal, and there is no reason to be like that

RachelReevesFringe · 13/04/2026 21:35

WimbyAce · 13/04/2026 21:32

Agreed, 25k per year is actually pretty decent for doing nothing.......more than fair I would say.

Being a carer is not doing "nothing"

Chocaholick · 13/04/2026 21:35

PandoraSocks · 13/04/2026 21:33

What the hell is wrong with you?

What the hell is wrong with our economy? Has it escaped your attention we are sliding into second world status and the benefits will be removed by harsh and unavoidable means eventually if we don’t do something to address this issue? We can’t ignore it forever

Papyrophile · 13/04/2026 21:39

@RachelReevesFringe I was telling you that I think your opinion is very worthwhile, but that I don't agree. I live in the country, where we control vermin by shooting it. It's not often a popular view on MN which seems to prefer (ineffectual) humane traps.

Chocaholick · 13/04/2026 21:39

RachelReevesFringe · 13/04/2026 21:35

Being a carer is not doing "nothing"

Indeed it isn’t. But equally, you simply can’t expect working people to subsidise others to the extent that they receive more than the working person. It breeds resentment and is deeply unfair and puts people off socialism.

RachelReevesFringe · 13/04/2026 21:41

Papyrophile · 13/04/2026 21:39

@RachelReevesFringe I was telling you that I think your opinion is very worthwhile, but that I don't agree. I live in the country, where we control vermin by shooting it. It's not often a popular view on MN which seems to prefer (ineffectual) humane traps.

My post was a quote from Animal Farm.
If you did not get that, that is ok!

RachelReevesFringe · 13/04/2026 21:42

Chocaholick · 13/04/2026 21:39

Indeed it isn’t. But equally, you simply can’t expect working people to subsidise others to the extent that they receive more than the working person. It breeds resentment and is deeply unfair and puts people off socialism.

Imagine being resentful of someone with disabilities.

Chocaholick · 13/04/2026 21:43

RachelReevesFringe · 13/04/2026 21:42

Imagine being resentful of someone with disabilities.

Imagine trying to make out it’s about ‘being resentful of people with disabilities’ rather than a massive financial problem which is slowly heading toward disaster.

RachelReevesFringe · 13/04/2026 21:44

Chocaholick · 13/04/2026 21:43

Imagine trying to make out it’s about ‘being resentful of people with disabilities’ rather than a massive financial problem which is slowly heading toward disaster.

You alright Jack?

WimbyAce · 13/04/2026 21:45

RachelReevesFringe · 13/04/2026 21:35

Being a carer is not doing "nothing"

I think part of the problem is what is the definition of "carer" and "disability" ? As in my opinion the waters have become muddied. Are all carers actually doing more than non carer parents?

Chocaholick · 13/04/2026 21:50

WimbyAce · 13/04/2026 21:45

I think part of the problem is what is the definition of "carer" and "disability" ? As in my opinion the waters have become muddied. Are all carers actually doing more than non carer parents?

I’ve heard of people claiming carers for their child while their spouse claims carers for them 😬😬😬 (no doubt someone will rush in to justify this in a second, but I wasn’t born yesterday)

Papyrophile · 13/04/2026 21:54

Being a carer is hard graft. Nobody would disagree with that. Carers do valuable work and are under rewarded. But we also need a shed load more carers who want to be underpaid and overworked, because medical advances mean more 'marginal' cases (AKA humans) are possibly more viable than 20 years ago. I really don't have an answer for this.

ForWittyTealOP · 13/04/2026 21:54

Aren't people funny, that when they descend into their foaming, frothing orgies of hatred they lose all sense? They're so scared of disabled people that they must dehumanise them to the extent of making them monsters! No shades of grey there.
I imagine half these posters are bots anyway. Humans don't tend to think like that unless there's something quite seriously the matter with them so they can't help blurting out what decent people don't think and the rest wouldn't dare to say.

Chocaholick · 13/04/2026 21:56

ForWittyTealOP · 13/04/2026 21:54

Aren't people funny, that when they descend into their foaming, frothing orgies of hatred they lose all sense? They're so scared of disabled people that they must dehumanise them to the extent of making them monsters! No shades of grey there.
I imagine half these posters are bots anyway. Humans don't tend to think like that unless there's something quite seriously the matter with them so they can't help blurting out what decent people don't think and the rest wouldn't dare to say.

Stop being so ridiculous.

Gdnddn · 13/04/2026 21:57

Chocaholick · 13/04/2026 20:01

Yes but is it a surprise? Just look at posts here - the response to virtually anything is ‘claim benefits! Claim benefits!’ ‘Can you see what benefits you are entitled to?’ ‘Apply for PIP/DLA’ it’s relentless

A woman local to me ended up in the newspaper boasting about how she gets 50k in benefits a year. She has 4 kids, all ‘neurodiverse’ to varying degrees, the moment the youngest turns 2 or 3 she pops out another. All of them end up ‘on the spectrum’ and in receipt of DLA with her as their ‘carer’. She’ll have more no doubt.

Absolute piss take. We need the cap to apply to all benefits households, no ifs, no buts, no exceptions. Nobody should take home more in benefits than they would get if they worked on the minimum wage

Apparently we aren't allowed to even question it because "they are entitled to it".

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s Minimum Income Standard says a single working-age adult needs about £30,500 gross to have a decent standard of income.

This is 47 hours a week at nmw . So a bit more than 40 but perfectly doable.

Kirbert2 · 13/04/2026 21:57

WimbyAce · 13/04/2026 21:45

I think part of the problem is what is the definition of "carer" and "disability" ? As in my opinion the waters have become muddied. Are all carers actually doing more than non carer parents?

You can only claim carers allowance as a parent if your child gets middle rate or high rate DLA.

Chocaholick · 13/04/2026 21:59

Gdnddn · 13/04/2026 21:57

Apparently we aren't allowed to even question it because "they are entitled to it".

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s Minimum Income Standard says a single working-age adult needs about £30,500 gross to have a decent standard of income.

This is 47 hours a week at nmw . So a bit more than 40 but perfectly doable.

And it means we ‘hate disabled people’ even though I am disabled (in a way that nobody would argue with)

Papyrophile · 13/04/2026 22:05

Not a bot. Not part of your foaming froth either. And nor am I scared of disabled people. I just don't buy all the politically correct crap.

My DC is getting by on NMW plus £1000 parental subsidy to do an apprenticeship in the SE. Not much hope for anyone whose parents can't help out.

Papyrophile · 13/04/2026 22:08

That is correct. We are subsidising DC £12,000 (the rent in Guildford).

RachelReevesFringe · 13/04/2026 22:16

WimbyAce · 13/04/2026 21:45

I think part of the problem is what is the definition of "carer" and "disability" ? As in my opinion the waters have become muddied. Are all carers actually doing more than non carer parents?

To be claiming carers under UC, the person you are caring for needs to be on DLA or PIP.
Also, look up what you actually get for being a carer. It is a pittance.

RachelReevesFringe · 13/04/2026 22:20

Gdnddn · 13/04/2026 21:57

Apparently we aren't allowed to even question it because "they are entitled to it".

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation’s Minimum Income Standard says a single working-age adult needs about £30,500 gross to have a decent standard of income.

This is 47 hours a week at nmw . So a bit more than 40 but perfectly doable.

Yet a PP wants the cap to be £24k. For families.

Gdnddn · 13/04/2026 22:26

Papyrophile · 13/04/2026 21:32

Sorry to disagree @RachelReevesFringe but I think your life is probably worth more than the squirrel I shot this morning.

And the chicken I ate today in my tikka masala.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.