I'm bisexual myself (female) and studying history. Historical books on gay relationships often have a lot more info on men than women (given that women had a lot less say in who they had relationships with, and often less education). Anyway, Ancient Greece & Rome, China, Japan, India to some extent & some Arab countries are all places where there was a tacit understanding that some men would have relationships and/or sex with other men, and this wasn't hugely policed, as long as the men still ended up marrying and there were dynamics like older/younger, active/passive.
What doesn't get written in the books I what women thought about this. It made me think recently, when I was reading a MN thread where most posters said they wouldn't date a bisexual man. Maybe some women accepted it as less worrying since it was meant to cease upon marriage, or not disrupt marriage. Maybe some didn't know. Maybe some were OK with it (slash fiction fans show some women don't find it instantly unattractive, but arguably that's fantasy and their rl opinions might be different). Maybe large numbers were very upset by it but didn't have much choice. I suppose the emphasis in cultures like the Romans on it being unmanly to take the passive role may have partly been because they thought women would find this less attractive (or perhaps women's opinions were totally disregarded- the Romans weren't quite as sexist as the Greeks but that's a low bar...)
Just another of those things about women in the past that we're unlikely to find out much more about..
AIBU to wonder?