Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Mortgage cheaper than rent?

708 replies

limeandwater · 23/03/2026 10:12

On this forum and plenty of other social media sites to be fair - there are a number of people who state that a mortgage is often cheaper than the rent.

It's not true is it? In fact it is quite a long way from being true.

OP posts:
Ninerainbows · 23/03/2026 12:47

limeandwater · 23/03/2026 12:39

Because I have said the same thing multiple times.

What dictates rent is the market. You can't just choose to pass costs on to the tenant.

Yes, but why are you saying it? What difference does it make? Whether you think mortgages being cheaper is misinformation or not, you'll always have tenants because so many cannot raise a deposit or don't want to settle in one place.

babyproblems · 23/03/2026 12:49

Definitely cheaper mortgage than rent in our case!

Worriedaboutrayvon · 23/03/2026 12:49

We pay £500 a month mortgage. The house next to us rents for £1300. Absolutely no difference, both modernised to a similar standard. Same garden space. Same parking.

So they effectively pay three times what we pay to live in exactly the same space.

mustreadmorebooks · 23/03/2026 12:49

I could not buy the house I rent for less than what I pay in rent, even with a 10% deposit. Mortgage payments would be about £350 per month more. It depends very much on what you have to put in and where you live.

mustreadmorebooks · 23/03/2026 12:50

People who have mortgages of £500 per month did not buy at today’s prices so not a fair comparison.

cestlavielife · 23/03/2026 12:50

It depends. How are you factoring the deposit? Which region?
You can generally rent a £1.3 million london property for less that a 95% mortgage on that property .
Ie mortgage at 5% interest 7,000
Rent probably 3500 / 4000

catipuss · 23/03/2026 12:51

It was certainly true when we first bought, the mortgage company wouldn't give us a mortgage that cost less per month than we were paying in rent! So infuriating. You do have maintenance on your own house as well but just mortgage versus rent mortgage could well be cheaper.

Gothamcity · 23/03/2026 12:51

Massively depends on area and when you bought/how long you have left to pay it off. We own our house and pay £450 a month for our mortgage. All the houses on our row are absolutely identical, and the one a few doors down went up for rent 6 months ago at £1600 pm. But our neighbours who've recently moved in as first time buyers pay £1000 a month. We were lucky we bought our first hose when house prices were low, made a good profit and got a great rate when we moved again. I definitely think it's cheaperthe majority of the time, but there are a lot of factors at play, and I'm sure location plays a huge part. We're on the edge of the Cotswolds.

cestlavielife · 23/03/2026 12:52

Worriedaboutrayvon · 23/03/2026 12:49

We pay £500 a month mortgage. The house next to us rents for £1300. Absolutely no difference, both modernised to a similar standard. Same garden space. Same parking.

So they effectively pay three times what we pay to live in exactly the same space.

But how much was your deposit?
What is your ltv?

When did you buy it?

TwilightAb · 23/03/2026 12:52

A 3 bed semi in my area is around £1000 per month. My mortgage for a very similar house in same area is £700.

Isanyonereallyanonymous · 23/03/2026 12:53

I'd say there's a £50 difference between my mortgage and what I'd get in rent for my house.
That £50 doesn't mean much when I'm also responsible for all upkeep and repairs and had to put a deposit down first.

PrincessofWells · 23/03/2026 12:55

A £260000 flat costs £1450 a month to rent in my area.

If I bought it the mortgage would be around £1250 with a 25k deposit. It is more expensive to buy undoubtedly.

The service charges and ground rent cost a further £275 a month then you need to factor in maintenance.

However after five years or so it becomes cheaper to buy as inflation increases the rents and the value of your money depletes, and salaries increase.

If a landlord factors in a full refurbishment every 15 to 20 years there is very little profit depending upon increases of property prices and yields etc.

Worriedaboutrayvon · 23/03/2026 12:56

cestlavielife · 23/03/2026 12:52

But how much was your deposit?
What is your ltv?

When did you buy it?

Our deposit was £9000 our house was £180,000. We did a 5% deposit. Yes it’s more affordable than some areas but the house prices where I live haven’t gone up massively.

We have lived there for 8 years now.

PepsiBook · 23/03/2026 12:56

Absolutely for me.
The house next door is being rented out for more than double my mortgage.

FredaMountfitchet · 23/03/2026 12:56

My DS was paying £1600 a month rent for 1 bedroomed flat .
Hes recently bought a two bedroomed flat and mortgage is around £950 . Small deposit .

Berriesandcucumbers1 · 23/03/2026 12:56

Isanyonereallyanonymous · 23/03/2026 12:53

I'd say there's a £50 difference between my mortgage and what I'd get in rent for my house.
That £50 doesn't mean much when I'm also responsible for all upkeep and repairs and had to put a deposit down first.

When did you buy though, because eventually your mortgage payment and general maintenance will work out cheaper than renting the same house
12/13 years ago I would have been paying about the same in mortgage repayments as renting similar house, now rent for a similar house would be 2.5x what I pay in mortgage repayments which means even with additional maintenance still works out cheaper for me to have bought rather than rent

Qikiqtarjuaq · 23/03/2026 12:57

NemesisInferior · 23/03/2026 12:22

The point being it's not the norm, by far, for rental properties to be making a loss which was the original question being asked.

The vast majority of rental housing stock is on BTL, owned by people who have 1 single additional property to rent out and for whom covering the mortgage is the bare minimum they need to do.

What you are describing is the preserve of large property companies who can cover and are prepared to accept the risks of making a loss on rental income.

I agree with you about the balance of individual v multiple property owning landlords.

But I was responding to your generalisation to the OP (who I suspect rents out a number of properties):

NemesisInferior · Today 11:14
I'm sorry, what?
What landlords in any sort of sane mind are there that are happy to make a loss on renting out property?

There are plenty of circumstances where a short term loss is a sane decision. Nowhere has the OP argued that a long term overall loss is a sound business plan.

jackstini · 23/03/2026 12:57

Are you looking at costs of an interest only mortgage though, where you would walk away with no house at the end, same situation as renting

Or are you looking at costs of repayment mortgages where you would actually own a house at the end?

OooPourUsACupLove · 23/03/2026 13:01

PropertyD · 23/03/2026 12:36

So the landlords I know have sold last year. My colleague at work has just sold her flat. The last tenant didnt leave it in a good state. He then moved abroad so there was no real chance she could pursue him through the courts for the damage he had caused.

I have heard a few ex landlords doing things under the counter and making the rent cheaper. Taking cash etc. Not great especially for the tenants but I guess there will always be a black market.

Who did the ones who sold sell to?

There's an assumption that LL selling up reduces available housing but I'm not sure that holds.

A LL pulling out either sells to an owner occupier, so one fewer rental property available but also one fewer rental property needed, or they sell to another LL so the property is still available to rent.

The only way the new rules actually reduce property available is if LLs keep hold of properies but leave them vacant, which seems not likely in the long term (but may happen in the short term eg if they want to sell but are holding out for a higher price than they can get, or are working out how/if they can meet the regs before reletting).

CitizenofMoronia · 23/03/2026 13:02

not only can it be cheaper, but you eventurally pay it off and dont have to pay anymore

FarmGirl78 · 23/03/2026 13:02

limeandwater · 23/03/2026 10:25

Again not a fair comparison.

He has purchased 30% of the property upfront.

Surely if you're making this about fair comparisons and want to include deposit then you need to factor in the years and years of rent that tenants will continue to pay after their owner pays off their mortgage and fully owns their home?

Climbingrosexx · 23/03/2026 13:02

Surely that would depend on the area and the property. I know people who rent and I've never paid that much for a mortgage

Twooclockrock · 23/03/2026 13:04

It depends on your mortgage rates, deposit size and the property prices in the area, demand for rental properties in the area, loads of factors.

Womanofcustard · 23/03/2026 13:05

I gave my daughter money for the deposit. She’s now saving £400 a month paying mortgage rather than rent!

ThisZanyPinkSquid · 23/03/2026 13:06

In Scotland it absolutely is.

atleast half of what I would pay for renting