I'm genuinely in two minds here. This is the situation. My dd, who is 13, saw an advert for auditions for a show that children could be in. She auditioned, and got a part in the ensemble. She was very happy about this as she loves performing. At the audition I discovered that it cost £200 for her to take part. As she really wanted to, I paid it and she's currently rehearsing for the show. I've since discovered that they essentially have four separate ensemble groups - they have four shows total, dd is in two of them, and only doing half the songs as the other ensemble does the other half (if that makes sense!). I've also had to buy tickets for us to see the show, at £25 a ticket.
So on one hand, I appreciate that dd is learning and gaining skills and experience from being in this show. Shows cost money to put on, and ultimately the production company is a business that needs to make a profit.
But on the other hand, I suspect that most of the audience of these shows will be parents of the children taking part. I also suspect that everyone who auditioned got a part! And they have four ensembles to maximise the money they get from all the children taking part!
So AIBU? A cynic? Or do I have a point? Genuinely happy to be told either way. I've paid now so can't change my mind!