Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to think that renters get a raw deal

153 replies

Catza · 28/02/2026 08:40

I am in a quite an interesting position as I am currently buying a house but need to rent in the meantime.
I noticed that the treatment of renters by EAs is vastly different from buyers. Nothing about my circumstances changed: my earnings are the same, my savings are the same, I have the same job and I am the exactly same person. Yet.. when I contact EA to view a property, they are polite and helpful. When I contact one to enquire about a viewing of rental, they treat me with high suspicion, write almost confrontational emails with a long list of demands and generally make me feel like a second class citizen.
OpenRent which I have used many many time in the past has done downhill massively as well. Landlords who book viewings but don't provide property address and then disappear. Many are "away next week" and promise to get back to me, then ghost even after chasing. This morning, I had to report yet another landlord to OpenRent for failing to respond.

If anyone has been in a similar situation, did you feel this too? Or am I being a bit too sensitive due to normal house buying stress?

AIBU = I have never experienced this myself
AINBU = yes, I also feel like I am being treated poorly as a renter by EA at the enquiry stage.

OP posts:
Itsmetheflamingo · 28/02/2026 13:32

ChamonixMountainBum · 28/02/2026 13:25

Actually no, a rental property is not for living as you wish (including damaging it). When you sign a tenancy agreement you are agreeing to a raft of conditions including not destroying it. Tenants can be charged with criminal damage under the Criminal Damage Act 1971 if they intentionally or recklessly destroy or damage a landlord's property.

Which doesn’t happen.

Whatever technicality you think you can find, there is a reality, which is they can cause damage well in excess of the deposit, and they can indeed stop paying rent.

if this is, in fact, not a problem at all, then what are we actually talking about ?

EA could therefore recommend any renter, references and checks are indeed a waste of time.
When they damage the house you can just get them prosecuted under the criminal damage act 1971 and I’m sure that’ll somehow remedy the damage.

terms and conditions in a tenancy agreement still have to be legally enforceable, and most that landlords make up aren’t (see: you’re responsible for burst pipes)

Echlefecker · 28/02/2026 13:33

The letting agent works for the landlord. They're vetting you on the phone, everything you say they're looking to see if you are a good fit for the house. Money and income are obviously extremely important, but it's not the only thing, they also want to know if you are going to look after the house, are you clean and tidy,well presented,.are you looking for long or short term. Pets, previous problems with rentals. Everything you say is noted.There are not enough rental properties,.so it's a landlord's market definitely.

redboxer321 · 28/02/2026 13:36

Sounds like you've had a bad experience with a rogue or overly worried LL @Itsmetheflamingo because you're just LL bashing now. Or maybe you're the tenant from hell.

Tenants don’t have to pay excessive deposits now - I suggested that following your statement that LLs should expect tenants to not pay rent and destroy their property.
Undergo excessive checking - I think you would find corporate LL would carry out plenty of checks and be less flexible than small scale LL.
LLs have a right to check their properties. Why do you think the corporates would not?

PrincessofWells · 28/02/2026 13:39

ContentedAlpaca · 28/02/2026 12:17

You are of course, right

No she isn't right. If my tenants leave my property unoccupied for more than 28 days they are contracted to inform me and to mitigate any possible issues by turning off the water and draining the pipes. If they fail to do so and damage occurs it is the tenants liability not mine. Hopefully my tenants aren't stupid and read the contract before they signed it.

Katemax82 · 28/02/2026 13:41

My husband and I have owned houses and rented. Not once in 26 years has a mortgage or rent payment been missed. Due to being train driver affected by the strikes of the early 2020s we took out an IVA on all our debts then got evicted a month later (unrelated, the landlords wanted to give the place a lick of paint and re rent it for £500 a month more)
Trying to rent without good credit is hell. We had to provide a guarantor and a few weeks before the move in date of our new place the guarantor failed checks due to a really old 200 quid debt. We thought we would be made homeless! Luckily a friend was able to do it but now we need a bigger place 3 years later we really can't face going through that again. Our only other option is pay about 3k to a guarantor company

Dorisbonson · 28/02/2026 13:43

GasperyJacquesRoberts · 28/02/2026 08:57

From the estate agent's point of view, if you're a buyer then you're a customer. If you're a renter then you're not the customer, you're the product the estate agent is selling to their actual customer - the landlord.

The estate agents customer is always the property owner.

Itsmetheflamingo · 28/02/2026 13:52

PrincessofWells · 28/02/2026 13:39

No she isn't right. If my tenants leave my property unoccupied for more than 28 days they are contracted to inform me and to mitigate any possible issues by turning off the water and draining the pipes. If they fail to do so and damage occurs it is the tenants liability not mine. Hopefully my tenants aren't stupid and read the contract before they signed it.

I am right and your contract isn’t legally enforceable.

can I ask what you even think it will even do? The water pipe bursts and you refuse to fix it until the tenant pays? Or you fix then invoice them? What do you anticipate happens when they don’t pay for it?

Itsmetheflamingo · 28/02/2026 13:52

redboxer321 · 28/02/2026 13:36

Sounds like you've had a bad experience with a rogue or overly worried LL @Itsmetheflamingo because you're just LL bashing now. Or maybe you're the tenant from hell.

Tenants don’t have to pay excessive deposits now - I suggested that following your statement that LLs should expect tenants to not pay rent and destroy their property.
Undergo excessive checking - I think you would find corporate LL would carry out plenty of checks and be less flexible than small scale LL.
LLs have a right to check their properties. Why do you think the corporates would not?

No, I am a housing professional 😁 so I know lots about what corporate landlords do and don’t do

ChamonixMountainBum · 28/02/2026 13:54

Echlefecker · 28/02/2026 13:33

The letting agent works for the landlord. They're vetting you on the phone, everything you say they're looking to see if you are a good fit for the house. Money and income are obviously extremely important, but it's not the only thing, they also want to know if you are going to look after the house, are you clean and tidy,well presented,.are you looking for long or short term. Pets, previous problems with rentals. Everything you say is noted.There are not enough rental properties,.so it's a landlord's market definitely.

I use an agency to find tenants as they have access to zoopla/right move etc but I carry out all my own viewings as I want to meet any future tenant, talk to them and just a get a general feel for them. I have been presented with people who look amazing on paper but were just awful individuals in person. Nothing is guaranteed of course but I certainly trust my judgement over an estate agents.

Disneycharacters · 28/02/2026 14:04

Januaryasnowhite · 28/02/2026 08:51

Yes I agree.
Also if you are a tenant I noticed different behaviour from various handymans, or anyone who comes to do some repair, even British Gas etc.
They treat me as renter always poorly with high disrespect , rude attitude like I m not important enough to be taken seriously.
One handyman who came to fix shower even told me the loose tiles don’t need a new grout as it is only rented property so no big deal.
Plumbers not really interested in repairs and fixing or just botched jobs and or just poorly patched up.
However if I m owner as I was in the past before I sold my flat, any engineer or handyman treated me ok.

I have never had a handyman ask if I rent or own. Is this a new thing?

SmudgeButt · 28/02/2026 14:09

If you've told them you need to rent for a few months while looking for a place to buy that is likely to put off a lot of landlords/EAs. That means that rather than have someone move in for the next 5 or 10 years they are going to have to go through the whole pain of finding a tenant later this year. Why would they want that aggro?

Disneycharacters · 28/02/2026 14:16

SkylarkKitten · 28/02/2026 10:56

This is because the references are the only way to lower the risk to the landlords asset. In addition, certain items within the references are required for landlord insurance.

There is nothing that is asked of a tenant, that you would not be asked by a mortgage company for example. Its all about stability, identity and affordability.

It can take up to 18 months to evict a non paying tenant, average in my area is now 14 months. After RRA, this will get worse.
Therefore, I suspect the referencing will get even more stringent.

All the red tape and the landlord can still get tenants who refuse to pay. What a waste of time for both parties.

Why not enforce rent payment. Take the money directly from tenant if they miss a payment.

ChamonixMountainBum · 28/02/2026 14:20

Itsmetheflamingo · 28/02/2026 13:52

No, I am a housing professional 😁 so I know lots about what corporate landlords do and don’t do

Edited

What is a 'housing professional'?

redboxer321 · 28/02/2026 14:25

Itsmetheflamingo · 28/02/2026 13:52

No, I am a housing professional 😁 so I know lots about what corporate landlords do and don’t do

Edited

I wouldn't normally quote Michael Gove but in this instance I have to agree that we've had enough of experts.

Housing professional could mean any number of things but your bias against small scale LL is clear.
You also argue against yourself. You're right when you say that in reality, LL would more often than not have to take the hit for tenants destroying their property no matter what clauses they put in the ASTs but similarly B&Q would 'clean up' someone taking a dump in one of display loos. Can't see the police rushing down to a store in that circumstance, not B&Q bringing a prosecution.

ContentedAlpaca · 28/02/2026 14:45

PrincessofWells · 28/02/2026 13:39

No she isn't right. If my tenants leave my property unoccupied for more than 28 days they are contracted to inform me and to mitigate any possible issues by turning off the water and draining the pipes. If they fail to do so and damage occurs it is the tenants liability not mine. Hopefully my tenants aren't stupid and read the contract before they signed it.

I just got bored.

Onmytod24 · 28/02/2026 14:46

Itsmetheflamingo · 28/02/2026 13:09

They should expect that, yes

Alternatively, they could exit and leave the rental market to professionals corporate landlords who can afford to take the risks

Be careful what you wish for. they can afford to take the risks because the rents will be much higher. But you’re right the new rent act rewards the huge corporations and penalises the the small business person. Go Labour.

Floogal · 28/02/2026 14:47

WaryCrow · 28/02/2026 10:30

It’s a shame all the lower class serfs who can tell the stories of damp mouldy properties as standard and a few death trap wiring issues have all felt themselves barred from this website. Because we are there and still in the majority, but have no voice any more.

Mumsnet generally hates poorer people I've noticed.

ContentedAlpaca · 28/02/2026 14:49

SmudgeButt · 28/02/2026 14:09

If you've told them you need to rent for a few months while looking for a place to buy that is likely to put off a lot of landlords/EAs. That means that rather than have someone move in for the next 5 or 10 years they are going to have to go through the whole pain of finding a tenant later this year. Why would they want that aggro?

I think the renters rights act will sort this out.
No more fixed term tenancies and a tenant can walk away having given 2 months notice.
Maximum deposit is a month's rent.

Crikeyalmighty · 28/02/2026 14:50

ChamonixMountainBum · 28/02/2026 09:30

It is a fact that tennents do not treat the properties they live in as well as home owners. I used to work in lettings many moons ago in a former lifetime and I can say with some confidence that (anecdotally at least) that for every crap neglectful landlord who tries to keep entire deposits or levy additional chargers for spurious reasons there is an equally crap tenant who skips town owing rent and leaving the place in state that can only be described as outright vandalism. As a business we did not want to deal with either crap tenants or landlords and avoided most like the plague once identified. Most private landlords did give a shit about the fabric of the building and would not just casually allow leaks or serious defects to cause long term very expensive damage. Most also wanted a happy tenant as they stay longer (fewer voids and change over costs) and the last thing they (or we as a business) wanted was being called up several times a day due to an unaddressed broken boiler or washing machine. Most of the landlords I dealt with owned a single rental property that more often or not used to be their own home before they got married/had kids/moved for work etc and were planning on using their property as an income during retirement given the collapse of final salary pension schemes and the uncertainty on relying underperforming stocks and shares. A balanced supply of both private and social housing rentals underpinned with strong protections for both parties is required.

I rent fairly posh houses and treat them exactly as an owner would, if not better as I’m conscious of my £4K deposit!! It’s a mixed picture.

Disneycharacters · 28/02/2026 14:54

Crikeyalmighty · 28/02/2026 14:50

I rent fairly posh houses and treat them exactly as an owner would, if not better as I’m conscious of my £4K deposit!! It’s a mixed picture.

Good to hear. Can I ask why you choose to rent?

Itsmetheflamingo · 28/02/2026 14:56

Onmytod24 · 28/02/2026 14:46

Be careful what you wish for. they can afford to take the risks because the rents will be much higher. But you’re right the new rent act rewards the huge corporations and penalises the the small business person. Go Labour.

They’re not at all. The majority of corporate landlords in the uk are housing association. They’re not even profit making. It’s actually laughable that you think even someone like legal and general would charge more than MrSmith who sunk all his savings into a second home.

Itsmetheflamingo · 28/02/2026 14:57

ChamonixMountainBum · 28/02/2026 14:20

What is a 'housing professional'?

A professional who works in the housing sector

Floogal · 28/02/2026 14:58

I whole heartedly agree with OP and the majority of posters. Like low waged workers, PRIVATE renters aren't treated very well(social tenants have more protection and generally pay lower rates).
I used to work for an estate agent and it was one of the worst places I've worked for, due to the human misery and desperation alongside my boss being a creepy nitpicking bully.
However, despite the fact I sympathise with private tenants (as I was one myself), many prospective tenants were quite entitled, often to the point of delusional. Often DSS tenants wanting houses or garden flats for bargain prices, and expecting first refusal. Without realising how much competition there was. Other tenants seemed to treat the agency as a drop in centre and expected us to help with benefit claims etc and that we were social workers.

Onmytod24 · 28/02/2026 15:01

Itsmetheflamingo · 28/02/2026 14:56

They’re not at all. The majority of corporate landlords in the uk are housing association. They’re not even profit making. It’s actually laughable that you think even someone like legal and general would charge more than MrSmith who sunk all his savings into a second home.

Well, that’s not what’s happening in the Southeast. I wasn’t thinking of housing associations.

ChamonixMountainBum · 28/02/2026 15:02

Itsmetheflamingo · 28/02/2026 14:57

A professional who works in the housing sector

In what capacity, it just seems like a very nebulas title.

Swipe left for the next trending thread