Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

David Walliams in the bin

203 replies

carlitaclarita · 25/02/2026 21:45

To throw all our David Walliams books out? I can’t even bear to take them to charity shops and I’m annoyed I even own them and annoyed they were so heavily pushed in schools.

OP posts:
IdentityCris · 25/02/2026 22:54

Yeah put in recycling. Idt charity shops will take them. Well they won't be able to sell them anyway.

Around 30K new copies of his books were sold in January, so I doubt charity shops would have much trouble selling them.

IdentityCris · 25/02/2026 23:00

Saffronyy · 25/02/2026 21:57

I think Roald Dahl books are shit too. I never understood why they are so popular and never read them for my children.

Perhaps if you had read them to your children you would have understood why they are so popular. Can you seriously claim that, for instance, Matilda is shjit? I've never come across a child who didn't love it.

OutTheWayOut · 25/02/2026 23:01

I also newly discovered Roald Dahl had an eleven year affair.

Saffronyy · 25/02/2026 23:03

IdentityCris · 25/02/2026 23:00

Perhaps if you had read them to your children you would have understood why they are so popular. Can you seriously claim that, for instance, Matilda is shjit? I've never come across a child who didn't love it.

I never read them to my children because I didn’t enjoy them as a child. I have a different opinion than yours.

HappyFace2025 · 25/02/2026 23:08

surrealpotato · 25/02/2026 22:10

If we start binning books because of our moral judgement of the authors, eventually there'll be nothing left to read.

Edited

That's a ridiculous statement. The vast majority of authors are nothing like Walliams, Dahl or Dickens (who was disgusting towards his wife).

Catlady007007 · 25/02/2026 23:11

Saffronyy · 25/02/2026 23:03

I never read them to my children because I didn’t enjoy them as a child. I have a different opinion than yours.

One of my kids adored RD. The other one who is less able didn't but absolutely enjoyed the films.

I'd hate to think the one who didn't get them would dismiss them entirely from their own future kid's library.

Papster · 25/02/2026 23:11

Find his address and send them to him one by one without a stamp

cerisepink889 · 25/02/2026 23:12

My kids absolutely adored DW books when they were young ... they both hated reading and after watching Mr Stink and Gangsta Granny they started reading all his books. Both now love reading,,,, I gave our old ones to my local primary school and they were happy to have them..... I have absolutely no idea what he has or has been accused of doing so I can't make a judgement until I have googled!!

Catlady007007 · 25/02/2026 23:13

IdentityCris · 25/02/2026 22:54

Yeah put in recycling. Idt charity shops will take them. Well they won't be able to sell them anyway.

Around 30K new copies of his books were sold in January, so I doubt charity shops would have much trouble selling them.

I'm not a fan of DW at all but my kid who isn't academic really enjoyed them and the were among the first books DC ever finished.
To develop a love of reading, it doesn't matter what the child is reading. Its the act of reading itself that matters.

Jinglealltheway92 · 25/02/2026 23:13

I could read Roald Dahl a million times over, he’s a genius story teller and it’s a pleasure to read his words. My children laughing over his books is the best sound. Imagine when his books were published, and parents found something so magical to read to their children?

Walliams is tripe. There’s no comparison. Even if he was a saint. It’s tripe.

FarmGirl78 · 25/02/2026 23:15

Servicesblended · 25/02/2026 21:47

I think YABVU because he has been found guilty of nothing and is therefore innocent.

Even if he was convicted I'd still say YABU because the books are not the author. Even if you couldn't bring yourself to appreciate the books because of their author, throwing them out would achieve nothing. Not buying any new ones would be less unreasonable.

Not being found guilty of something and being innocent of it aren't the same thing. That's exactly why juries state "not guilty" rather than innocent.

TrulyBluely · 25/02/2026 23:20

I gave all of ours to the local animal sanctuary fundraising shop.
I figured someone would buy them and raise money for the donkeys.
I too am cross that DS's primary school pushed these books. I'm even more cross that I bought them for him!
It felt great to hand the whole lot over. Thank God I won't have them in my home anymore.

ThatFairy · 25/02/2026 23:22

I love David Williams. He's so funny

RainsFall · 25/02/2026 23:24

They’re ghost written anyway, it’s not even his own work and he’s an awful man to boot so I’d have no hard feelings about recycling them myself.

Isittimeformynapyet · 25/02/2026 23:27

Servicesblended · 25/02/2026 21:47

I think YABVU because he has been found guilty of nothing and is therefore innocent.

Even if he was convicted I'd still say YABU because the books are not the author. Even if you couldn't bring yourself to appreciate the books because of their author, throwing them out would achieve nothing. Not buying any new ones would be less unreasonable.

So, not buying David Walliams books is unreasonable, just less so than throwing existing ones away?

I've never bought a David Walliams book because I was already grown up when he started churning them out. Am I being unreasonable?

domenica1 · 25/02/2026 23:28

Servicesblended · 25/02/2026 21:56

So bona fide vile anti semitism isn't enough to bin Ronald Dahl's books cos they're good whereas unproven allegations of inappropriate behaviour should get DW's books binned cos they're shit? Interesting moral code.

Yes. I can separate the work from the author you see. My kids have all loved these books and the books themselves (so far as I can see) contain no hint of his bigotry. This contradiction was explored brilliantly in the recent play Giant, (written by a Jewish playwright). I’d highly recommend it.

moto748e · 25/02/2026 23:30

I kinda hate to criticise George Orwell too much, on MN more than anywhere. He may not have been a perfect human being (who is?), but his prescience on the power of language, the concept of Newspeak, well, it rings like a bell, doesn't it? If he was around today, I think we all know where he'd stand. Putting someone was prepared to put his life on the line for what he believed in in the same category as a wanker like Walliams seems deeply unfair.

Lolabear38 · 25/02/2026 23:33

faithfultoGeorgeMichael · 25/02/2026 21:59

He's absolute shite - I sort and sell books for a charity and NO ONE WANTS THEM even the book scanning apps reject - don't even offer 1p!
Burn them all!

I bought one in a charity shop last year and dd loved it. I’d 100% buy more if I saw them there again.

I don’t condone what he’s alleged to have done in any way, but he’s already earned all his money from the book being sold in the first place, me buying it in a charity shop isn’t going to positively (or negatively) affect him in any way. If dd likes his books and is happy to keep reading them then I’m happy to keep buying them.

I think It’s wasteful and quite frankly bizarre that so many posters here feel so strongly that his books should be thrown away. You all know they’re not instruction manuals detailing how (not) to behave right? Seems like there are an awful lot of virtue signalers out today!

HelenaWaiting · 25/02/2026 23:35

BoudiccaRuled · 25/02/2026 22:28

Not being found guilty means not guilty, it does not mean innocent. A subtle but very important difference!

You are 100% wrong. Being found not guilty in a court of law means not guilty. Having not been charged with anything means you are innocent.

viques · 25/02/2026 23:37

I would tip out the pages , tear them up a bit and gradually add them to your compost bin. Compost worms can’t read so won’t be affected by the misogyny, poor plotting and general miasma of nastiness emanating from Walliams’ writing.

Kokonimater · 25/02/2026 23:40

Enid blyton wasn’t very nice either. Calm down everyone. The books won’t damage the children.
and btw what had he been charged with? I mean I know he’s a dick but just saying…

Purplebunnie · 25/02/2026 23:48

@Saffronyy I never rated Dahl either. There are quite a few modern children's authors that I'm not fond of either Jacqueline Wilson being one of them

ACynicalDad · 25/02/2026 23:49

PurpleNightingale · 25/02/2026 21:50

Take them to the charity if you don't want them surely- its not like they are giving him any more or less money now. Environmentally I couldn't be so wasteful. I was poor as a kid and got most of my books second hand from the charity shop... they aren't bad if they can still give joy to someone else. I've heard some not great things about Roald Dahl over the years but I still read the books with my kids.

Both of them make fun of people who are different, in Dahl's defence he was a brilliant story teller and wrote decades ago when nobody was really thinking this way, that Walliams is doing it in the last decade, plus his behaviour puts him in a very different place. We had a book clear out and loads went to school, including Walliams, I kind of hope school binned them, but there were plenty of good ones.

DeftWasp · 25/02/2026 23:49

faithfultoGeorgeMichael · 25/02/2026 22:00

As PP says, Roald Dahl was a terrible man but a truly brilliant author, genuinely.

And not just a Children's Author, but wrote thrillers, and screenplays, on top of which he was a WW2 fighter ace, and after being invalided out of that an intelligence officer.

So you could say he had a bit more substance than Walliams