1...the old narrative was that Epstein had a large "client" list, people (all men?) who also sexually abused young females. I've read a lot about how the victims have a long list of specific named men who abused them but they are too afraid to name (no idea if a single word of that sentence is true). The FBI has repeatedly over many years said that there is no evidence to support narrative 1.
2.... the new narrative is that Epstein had "enablers" : people who knew or should have known about his crimes, and didn't challenge/try to stop him. Again, long list of named individuals the victims say they are too afraid to name. All you need to do to be called an enabler is have had a friendly relationship with JE, especially if you're also a wealthy male.
3... As part of the narrative 2, people are being persecuted for being friends with JE before and after he became a convicted criminal. A lot of the potential names in this group are basically now in public domain, because of the big document releases.
4... n UK, people are being investigated for actually passing unauthorised govt. information to Epstein.
Many people are still convinced narrative 1. is true, OP too, I guess.
I wonder if mafioso typos orchestrated JE's apparent suicide. If they were powerful enough to do that, what other awful crimes have they covered up? Revelations about how JE got so rich and if organised crime had a part in his death, those things would be actual news.