Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

What’s with the influx of posters researching others?

76 replies

NCso · 16/02/2026 18:11

I’ve seen this a lot recently. Someone asks for advice (normal MN type post) and someone miles down in the comments will say ‘looking at all your other posts you need to sort out this and that’ - mostly a snide comment alluding to someone’s marriage being in the shit or concluding the poster has some sort of MH issue. I’m not surprised people NC every post. I might have been oblivious to this but do people generally do due dil on others here or is this new? Excluding times when a poster makes a couple of threads within days of each other and they’re recognised of course.

AIBU to think some of these posters are a bit OTT, and purposefully trying to “dig up dirt” to stir the pot?

OP posts:
DyslexicPoster · 16/02/2026 19:04

Nothing new unfortunately. Neither are posters who try trip you up because they can not belive your version of reality. I said under another name that my dc was a persistent school refuser, got A's at A level and went to a top uni. They presumably wanted to point out it's a shit uni because that fits the narrative that only hard working diligent kids get into Russel Group top five unis. I am neither proud or delighted on my dc path to uni. But regardless it happened. Fair or not. People like to trip people up I guess? Plus if you have a mistake you need to wear it like a cross forever?

Who has the time? So many people have picked my posts apart. We are a imperfect family, MN isn't a criminal court. Engage at your own risk or don't. I come here open minded that most posts aren't 100% true or one sided. It's not a big deal in the grand scheme of my day.

Mum1216 · 16/02/2026 19:08

You’ve got to be pretty lonely and bored to bother with doing it. It’s actually quite sad.

LightYearsAgo · 16/02/2026 19:09

Mumtobabyhavoc · 16/02/2026 18:40

It's a bullying tactic.

Whats bullying about referring to something a particular poster has posted in the past?

In some instances you may be correct but absolutely not a given

ShowmetheMapletree · 16/02/2026 19:09

NCso · 16/02/2026 18:17

I get those to an extent - when the thread is so wild it prompts someone to check. But today I’ve seen at least three threads where it was a regular thread, nothing out of the ordinary and someone’s decided to do a background check 😂

Haha, wonder how much these MN private investigators get paid?! God, how could you even be bothered.

Georgiepud · 16/02/2026 19:31

I don't think it's bullying if a poster brings up something another poster has mentioned in the past. It happens quite often. Everything is out there somewhere waiting to be recalled, but I can't be bothered to spend time trawling around.

NCso · 16/02/2026 20:00

I come here open minded that most posts aren't 100% true or one sided.

Isn’t it an unwritten best practice that people change a few details anyway? So it’s not “outing”.

OP posts:
OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 16/02/2026 20:07

Looking at previous posts saves a lot of wasted time and effort when people constantly post variations of the same thing for years and years ‘is my man BU by being out 24/7 with his work wife, or am I too sensitive’

DyslexicPoster · 16/02/2026 20:11

NCso · 16/02/2026 20:00

I come here open minded that most posts aren't 100% true or one sided.

Isn’t it an unwritten best practice that people change a few details anyway? So it’s not “outing”.

Edited

Yes definitely. I change details so looking back my posts will never quite add up. Hopefully

NCso · 16/02/2026 20:21

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 16/02/2026 20:07

Looking at previous posts saves a lot of wasted time and effort when people constantly post variations of the same thing for years and years ‘is my man BU by being out 24/7 with his work wife, or am I too sensitive’

Thats interesting. So would people think oh that’s familiar and go look it up, or will people routinely just check to see if that poster did it already?

OP posts:
UnhappyHobbit · 16/02/2026 20:24

I agree it’s a bit creepy on some threads. On some, I understand as it might be a poster reposting the same story but in others it’s strange as they’ve gone back to threads from ages ago. It’s not too easy to search either.

SwanRivers · 16/02/2026 20:31

Some people are such bullshitters though.

I'm sure you wouldn't sit there in real life listening to someone going on about something that was untrue, if they'd told you the complete opposite a couple of weeks ago.

Of course you're going to question them on it.

Skinpert · 16/02/2026 20:38

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

NCso · 16/02/2026 20:41

SwanRivers · 16/02/2026 20:31

Some people are such bullshitters though.

I'm sure you wouldn't sit there in real life listening to someone going on about something that was untrue, if they'd told you the complete opposite a couple of weeks ago.

Of course you're going to question them on it.

I think it’s never occurred to me to not believe a post 😂 unless I see replies calling them out. I have once looked someone up because someone pointed out OP had an unhealthy relationship with make up and it added a whole new dimension to the thread

OP posts:
Mumtobabyhavoc · 17/02/2026 01:25

LightYearsAgo · 16/02/2026 19:09

Whats bullying about referring to something a particular poster has posted in the past?

In some instances you may be correct but absolutely not a given

The other option is being overly invested. There's no reason to back check a poster unless you work for MN. It's just a chat forum.

DrCalLightman · 17/02/2026 01:37

NCso · 16/02/2026 18:22

There was one about drinking someone else’s drink (the comment that made someone do a check got deleted because it was clearly trolling), there was a relationship one where someone was talking about an argument and then someone checked their username and said something along the lines of ‘you have a lot more going on in your relationship than this’ etc

Quite often they do.

"My partner of 5 years called me a name"

"Is this the one you've been posting about who's been using you as a punchbag last month?"

This is why

GarlicBound · 17/02/2026 02:06

Mumtobabyhavoc · 16/02/2026 18:40

It's a bullying tactic.

It can work both ways, though. During a long-ago MN 'war', somebody kept on posting that I'd said things I was unlikely to have said. Thanks to AS, I was able to prove I hadn't and this person was ... mistaken.

Savonette480 · 17/02/2026 02:11

Sidebeforeself · 16/02/2026 18:26

I’ll share my story. Many years ago I posted that a Royal baby didnt seem happy and cute in a photo (in response to a lighthearted thread) and somebody “researched” me and said I had previously said that all babies are cute including my own.

This was perplexing as Ive never had a baby so concluded they had mixed me up with someone with a similar username. But what an odd thing to try to catch me out on!

Let’s just say that the RF threads are a law unto themselves 😔😁

WallaceinAnderland · 17/02/2026 03:18

People lie. When something feels a bit off about a post some people look for the reason. That's why.

PrettyFlowersInTheGarden · 17/02/2026 03:34

There are so many trolls here now due to mumsnet’s way of moderating that it’s not surprising that posters are suspicious and use advanced search. I don’t think it matters and the only time I’ve seen people bothered by it is when they’ve been shown to be lying. It’s a forum, you can’t believe most of it.

PrettyFlowersInTheGarden · 17/02/2026 03:38

Mumtobabyhavoc · 17/02/2026 01:25

The other option is being overly invested. There's no reason to back check a poster unless you work for MN. It's just a chat forum.

But mumsnet must secretly love the drama and clicks generated as they wouldn’t provide an advanced search function. And a function that allows as many name changes as you want.

tuvamoodyson · 17/02/2026 03:45

I have used it before. I am neither bored or lonely.

Beekman · 17/02/2026 04:41

I’ve noticed an uptick in it lately too, OP. It has always happened, I was here in the early days under a different names and the bullying was off the scale. I didn’t really understand that’s what it was then but now I am older and far more internet savvy, I see it for what it is/was.

Of course there are some cases where the OP is coming out with very unlikely stuff when it is perhaps warranted but generally it is just bullying. Some of the old Mumsnet “Royalty” could write the book on passive/ aggressive internet bullying.

Glitchymn1 · 17/02/2026 04:43

I wonder how many posts are genuine and how many actual users there are. When mn introduced the ‘eye’ that showed how many posters were viewing a post, there weren’t ever that many.
I’ve used the function usually where they’ve posted part 2, part 3 etc and I can’t find the links.

PrettyFlowersInTheGarden · 17/02/2026 04:46

Glitchymn1 · 17/02/2026 04:43

I wonder how many posts are genuine and how many actual users there are. When mn introduced the ‘eye’ that showed how many posters were viewing a post, there weren’t ever that many.
I’ve used the function usually where they’ve posted part 2, part 3 etc and I can’t find the links.

Threads with parts 2, part 3 etc, are often the unbelievable ones ime.

Zanatdy · 17/02/2026 05:17

I find it pathetic and can’t believe that some posters have time and energy to do this. Get a hobby!