He'd happily jettison it.
It's a Porsche 911 and they have two smaller seats in the back. We've had this same argument before - while we were still together - in relation to another type of car with a similar seat layout.
I thought it was the law for a child below 12 years/a certain height to travel in a car seat. End of.
I can see XP's point, in that these rear seats were designed for children and are therefore smaller, with a shorter shoulder-to-clip seatbelt distance. He thinks DS is uncomfortable and less safe with his car seat being squeezed into one of these smaller seats.
Personally, I just thought it wasn't an option, and find XP's taking-the-law-into-his-own-hands attitude infuriating and worrying. If it doesn't fit in the back, the car seat should be fitted properly in the front, not abandoned - surely?
Am I being unreasonable? Overreacting? What is the bloody car seat law in relation to these cars and their funny child-size rear seats?
TIA