Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Welfare spending to rise by £73.2bn to £406.2bn

1000 replies

topicalaffair · 23/01/2026 14:25

Over the next five years, the OBR is forecasting that UK welfare spending will rise by £73.2bn to £406.2bn.

How does everyone feel about this? I’m livid because I pay lots of tax. I don’t mind paying tax to maintain a civilised society - but this? This is surely taking the piss and will result in weaker and weaker services as the amount of £ available reduces day by day.

YANBU - it’s totally deranged. The every growing uk population can’t function effectively on such a benefits for all basis.

YABU - this welfare spending bill is truly representative of need.

Welfare spending to rise by £73.2bn to £406.2bn
OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Penelope23145 · 23/01/2026 18:45

Nevermind17 · 23/01/2026 18:40

This. If I hear another person say “It’s not ‘benefits’. I’m entitled to it, I’ve paid for it all my life!” my head will explode. In most cases, we’ll pay in a small fraction of what we get back. A person on an average wage will pay about £36 a week NI. We can’t carry on like this.

There's so many that have barely worked. I regularly see people approaching state pension age who aren't even going to reach the 10 years of NI contributions to qualify them even for a very low state pension. And this is taking long term disability out of the equation.

YesSirICanNameChange · 23/01/2026 18:46

Cappuccinodelight · 23/01/2026 18:45

It is about providing the basics. The money saved would mean the disabled are looked after.

We need to step away from incentivising welfare claimants.

No. You've suggested this, now you need to think this through.

How do these dormitories work? Families split up?

Are there uniforms to wear?

What do you do if you decide the dormitories aren't fixing the problem enough?

sequin2000 · 23/01/2026 18:47

Oopsylazy · 23/01/2026 14:42

🙄

Someone on a £100K salary in the UK pays 40% in taxes. Are you aware of this?

If you tax the rich so highly there’s no point in them being here they’ll move to another country - as is happening. Last time I checked the UK had lost 15% of high earners under the new Labour government.

Where did you check and find this statistic because my source would suggest the number is 0.3%. Of course the millionaires that own the media would have us believe they will all scarper! Taxing the rich suggests taxing those earning far more than 100k though
taxjustice.net/press/millionaire-exodus-did-not-occur-study-reveals/

Millionaire exodus did not occur, study reveals | Tax Justice Network

30 news pieces a day in 2024 on non-existent exodus A millionaire exodus widely reported by news outlets around the world in 2024, and credited for the UK Labour government’s decision to weaken tax reforms, did not occur, the Tax Justice Network reveal...

https://taxjustice.net/press/millionaire-exodus-did-not-occur-study-reveals/

Charlize43 · 23/01/2026 18:47

UserFront242 · 23/01/2026 18:43

Not too busy to post ignorance on MN though.

That is still thinly veiled cheap labour using people that are unwell instead of paying someone a proper wage to do the same thing.

So you think tax payers should pay for people to sit around on their arses all day?

If you can get to a day centre, you can probably do a part time cleaning job.

District66 · 23/01/2026 18:47

Oopsylazy · 23/01/2026 14:42

🙄

Someone on a £100K salary in the UK pays 40% in taxes. Are you aware of this?

If you tax the rich so highly there’s no point in them being here they’ll move to another country - as is happening. Last time I checked the UK had lost 15% of high earners under the new Labour government.

Someone on £100k is not rich

UserFront242 · 23/01/2026 18:47

YesSirICanNameChange · 23/01/2026 18:46

No. You've suggested this, now you need to think this through.

How do these dormitories work? Families split up?

Are there uniforms to wear?

What do you do if you decide the dormitories aren't fixing the problem enough?

Prison. They are suggesting prison basically.
Disgusting.

UserFront242 · 23/01/2026 18:48

Charlize43 · 23/01/2026 18:47

So you think tax payers should pay for people to sit around on their arses all day?

If you can get to a day centre, you can probably do a part time cleaning job.

Please educate yourself. I am truly embarrassed for you.

YesSirICanNameChange · 23/01/2026 18:49

Charlize43 · 23/01/2026 18:47

So you think tax payers should pay for people to sit around on their arses all day?

If you can get to a day centre, you can probably do a part time cleaning job.

You're being wilfully ignorant now, surely. No-one is actually this thick.

The vast majority of people attending day centres will be transported there and back by carers/official transport.

YesSirICanNameChange · 23/01/2026 18:49

UserFront242 · 23/01/2026 18:47

Prison. They are suggesting prison basically.
Disgusting.

I'm concerned that we're moving beyond the suggestion of prison and into "camp" territory here.

Kirbert2 · 23/01/2026 18:50

Cappuccinodelight · 23/01/2026 18:45

It is about providing the basics. The money saved would mean the disabled are looked after.

We need to step away from incentivising welfare claimants.

'looked after' is very vague. What would looking after them look like for you?

District66 · 23/01/2026 18:50

Nevermind17 · 23/01/2026 18:40

This. If I hear another person say “It’s not ‘benefits’. I’m entitled to it, I’ve paid for it all my life!” my head will explode. In most cases, we’ll pay in a small fraction of what we get back. A person on an average wage will pay about £36 a week NI. We can’t carry on like this.

My daughter earns minimum wage works a few hours around uni and pays more than that in NI

bathsmat · 23/01/2026 18:50

@topicalaffair

Pensioners haven’t paid enough tax for a state pension (as a collective), someone has to pay for them to retire in comfort.

And you would remove housing benefits for younger people who have less opportunity for social housing?

Cappuccinodelight · 23/01/2026 18:52

UserFront242 · 23/01/2026 18:47

Prison. They are suggesting prison basically.
Disgusting.

They have total freedom. In fact the set up would encourage them to fund their lifestyle. Opposite of prison.

Of course families would be kept together.

They look after themselves but have this as a fallback. It would not be compulsory.

Frequency · 23/01/2026 18:52

Cappuccinodelight · 23/01/2026 18:39

Rice, potatoes, in season fruit etc. Dormitory style accommodation.

Those that 'work' for the community would receive additional privileges, furnished room and food choices.
This way we look after the very needy but do not incentivise people to be state reliant.

If someone has severe disabilities they would receive medical assistance and care.

So, a workhouse? You want to bring back workhouses? Because they worked so well the first time around.

BalladOfBarryAndFreda · 23/01/2026 18:53

The 'dormitory' sounds like a Soviet labour camp. Psychotic.

UserFront242 · 23/01/2026 18:53

Cappuccinodelight · 23/01/2026 18:52

They have total freedom. In fact the set up would encourage them to fund their lifestyle. Opposite of prison.

Of course families would be kept together.

They look after themselves but have this as a fallback. It would not be compulsory.

So entire families would be forced to live in cramped dorms just because one of them is disabled?
How would this save money? Why would you tear people from their homes?

Would you personally be happy for this to happen to you or someone you love?

EasternStandard · 23/01/2026 18:53

Aus has a workfare system no matter which party is in. Going by the general take it wouldn’t be welcomed here. They keep it though as a bipartisan system.

Allseeingallknowing · 23/01/2026 18:54

SquashedSquashess · 23/01/2026 18:20

For balance, I’ll add our pensions bill also needs to be brought under control. We cannot maintain the triple lock, and I believe the state pension should be means tested (people like me should not be eligible, as I’m able to save for my own retirement)

I take it you refused or didn’t apply for a state pension then?

Kirbert2 · 23/01/2026 18:55

Cappuccinodelight · 23/01/2026 18:52

They have total freedom. In fact the set up would encourage them to fund their lifestyle. Opposite of prison.

Of course families would be kept together.

They look after themselves but have this as a fallback. It would not be compulsory.

Where would all of these dormitory's go?

Good luck dealing with all of the NIMBYs.

Fearfulsaints · 23/01/2026 18:55

Charlize43 · 23/01/2026 18:47

So you think tax payers should pay for people to sit around on their arses all day?

If you can get to a day centre, you can probably do a part time cleaning job.

Maybe you should visit a day centre and give the attendees a talk on employment opportunities in the local area, just to motivate them a bit. They might just not have thought if going to work?

Are you going to start at one for people with severe learning disabilities or the one for oaps with dementia.

Cappuccinodelight · 23/01/2026 18:56

UserFront242 · 23/01/2026 18:53

So entire families would be forced to live in cramped dorms just because one of them is disabled?
How would this save money? Why would you tear people from their homes?

Would you personally be happy for this to happen to you or someone you love?

Pain relief, doctors on hand. An improved version of the current set up. Funded by the saved money.

Roboxed · 23/01/2026 18:56

I’m always amazed that impacts of things in recent years aren’t considered e.g. increasing number of people with long covid is costing billions annually in England.

Charlize43 · 23/01/2026 18:56

YesSirICanNameChange · 23/01/2026 18:49

You're being wilfully ignorant now, surely. No-one is actually this thick.

The vast majority of people attending day centres will be transported there and back by carers/official transport.

Perhaps.

But frankly, like the majority of working people, I'm sick of paying. Welfare Reform is badly needed.

Kirbert2 · 23/01/2026 18:56

EasternStandard · 23/01/2026 18:53

Aus has a workfare system no matter which party is in. Going by the general take it wouldn’t be welcomed here. They keep it though as a bipartisan system.

There used to be a workfare system here too but it failed because companies would just get the free labour and when it came time to offer a job, why would they when they can say no, not pay them and get more free labour through the door next week?

UserFront242 · 23/01/2026 18:57

Cappuccinodelight · 23/01/2026 18:56

Pain relief, doctors on hand. An improved version of the current set up. Funded by the saved money.

Current set up? What would that be?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.