Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel that soon , dog ownership will just be for the well off? And thats not fair.

576 replies

Tunamelt · 16/01/2026 19:45

We had a family dog and as a child I really benefited from it . As did my own dc when we had our beloved dog.
When the dc had a hard day she cheered them up so much and it was such a good experience for them.
We have just adopted a dog.
She needed the vets in the first week due to upset tummy.
Ist vet appt £75 and then x2 meds.
She now needs a stool sample and a further vet appt to
check her health.
stool sample test alone will be over £100.
We had appt with behaviourist at £90 ph .
Her food is £60 pm.
the vet thinks she may need fluxotine for anxiety and those meds are around £80 pm
So thats come to a good amount and she has only been here a few weeks.
Its made me realise that these sort of costs are just not do able for
many - and a concern to us -and it seems so unfair that the joy of a dog may be beyond reach for many these days .

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
LighthouseLED · 17/01/2026 22:05

YeOldeGreyhound · 17/01/2026 22:02

For those of us who see pets as family, we live according to our means.
I am on benefits, but all of my dog's needs have been met. She has never gone without food or been neglected.
I grew up with dogs that didn't go to the vet often because so many things can be treated at home, and that is what we did.
If my dog had an upset tummy, I would put slippery elm in her food. If she had a wound, I would keep it clean. Dogs don't care about scars.
Again, my dog was not a luxury. She is not a possession like a bag or a holiday. She is family.

If you can afford a dog on benefits (and I’m glad for you that you can, as dogs seem to be important to you), then doesn’t that prove OP wrong that they’re only for the well off?

Perhaps the question is why people choose to spend so much money on their dogs / think that things are necessary to give dogs a decent life that really aren’t?

sprigatito · 17/01/2026 22:07

YeOldeGreyhound · 17/01/2026 22:02

For those of us who see pets as family, we live according to our means.
I am on benefits, but all of my dog's needs have been met. She has never gone without food or been neglected.
I grew up with dogs that didn't go to the vet often because so many things can be treated at home, and that is what we did.
If my dog had an upset tummy, I would put slippery elm in her food. If she had a wound, I would keep it clean. Dogs don't care about scars.
Again, my dog was not a luxury. She is not a possession like a bag or a holiday. She is family.

She certainly isn’t like a bag or a holiday, she’s a living creature who loves and fears and dreams…I’m not trying to diminish that in any way. But owning her is a luxury, one which you prioritise, and one which a great many families simply cannot afford. There are millions of dogs living badly in unsuitable homes with owners who cannot afford - financially or in terms of time and commitment - to do them justice, and that’s wrong in my view. Nobody is entitled to own an animal, and it’s better for dogs if people recognise that it’s something that should only be undertaken when you have the means to do it responsibly.

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 17/01/2026 22:08

Zov · 17/01/2026 21:56

Same here. As I said earlier.

Of course we have some people spouting the usual flannel ..... 'oh but the vet treatment is so much more sophisticated,' and such big advancements have been made, and they can have 'scans and MRIs and treatments that were never offered then.' Blah blah blah........ 🙄

Big deal. They don't offer all this shit for £350 do they? It's always £10K or more... Sometimes up to £20K, and then when the dog/cat has recovered, (if they don't die within a month or two of all this treatment) there is monthly ongoing meds and treatments, at the costs of £200 to £300 or so a month. Sometimes more.

Do me a favour. All these ADVANCEMENTS in veterinary care have done is cause the owners a whole shit load of new problems. The vets no longer decide euthanasia is the answer for a very sick, older pet... Noooooooooo, let's try all this revolutionary new treatment first Hmm And give me £17,000 for doing it.

Come on, PLEASE! You people defending this are fooling NO-ONE.

.

Edited

Providing vets explain the options I don’t see a problem. When my cat was diagnosed with heart failure he had a scan and we were given the option of euthanasia or medication. We chose medication to see how he was. His medication was expensive but was covered by his insurance, although even if it hadn’t been covered we’d have gone down that route. Those last 5 months with him were worth every penny.

YeOldeGreyhound · 17/01/2026 22:10

LighthouseLED · 17/01/2026 22:05

If you can afford a dog on benefits (and I’m glad for you that you can, as dogs seem to be important to you), then doesn’t that prove OP wrong that they’re only for the well off?

Perhaps the question is why people choose to spend so much money on their dogs / think that things are necessary to give dogs a decent life that really aren’t?

I guess so. I have been lucky with my dog. Apart from a couple of injuries, her biggest vet bill was a dental where she had lots of teeth removed.
Her second biggest bill is the one she has tomorrow. At home gentle euthanasia and individual cremation.
Some people just get unlucky and end up with lots of vet bills.

sprigatito · 17/01/2026 22:12

YeOldeGreyhound · 17/01/2026 22:10

I guess so. I have been lucky with my dog. Apart from a couple of injuries, her biggest vet bill was a dental where she had lots of teeth removed.
Her second biggest bill is the one she has tomorrow. At home gentle euthanasia and individual cremation.
Some people just get unlucky and end up with lots of vet bills.

I’m so sorry about your dog, and I’m genuinely sorry if my comments have been insensitive or hurtful. It’s obvious how deeply you love her.

MySweetGeorgina · 17/01/2026 22:14

It is

trufflesandolives · 17/01/2026 22:16

@LighthouseLED It’s not about declaring dog ownership a right above other things. It’s about noticing how things that used to be ordinary have become luxuries due to structural decisions — stagnant pay, privatised risk, rising costs, and wealth concentrating upwards. When that happens across housing, healthcare, childcare and things like pet ownership, it’s reasonable to question the system rather than individual affordability.

herefortheclicks · 17/01/2026 22:16

It does not make sense, does it, when so many poor kids live on less than these dogs expenses

YeOldeGreyhound · 17/01/2026 22:18

herefortheclicks · 17/01/2026 22:16

It does not make sense, does it, when so many poor kids live on less than these dogs expenses

Apples and oranges. I have a dog (until 12 in the afternoon tomorrow) and no kids.
Me spending money on my dog takes nothing away from kids out there.
I have actually seen someone on here argue that the existence of dog ice cream is detrimental to children.

LighthouseLED · 17/01/2026 22:18

@trufflesandolives I know far more people who have pets now than I did when I was growing up, so I question how “normal” the current level of pet ownership (certainly dog ownership) actually is.

It seems to be one of the many things that went crazy after COVID.

LighthouseLED · 17/01/2026 22:19

I have actually seen someone on here argue that the existence of dog ice cream is detrimental to children.

How the hell did they justify that argument? Surely nobody is stupid enough to actually feed their kids on dog ice cream, which is the only way I think it could be detrimental.

YeOldeGreyhound · 17/01/2026 22:23

LighthouseLED · 17/01/2026 22:19

I have actually seen someone on here argue that the existence of dog ice cream is detrimental to children.

How the hell did they justify that argument? Surely nobody is stupid enough to actually feed their kids on dog ice cream, which is the only way I think it could be detrimental.

They argued that dog ice cream should not exist when there are starving kids out there.
Another I have seen is that people that are dog groomers, walkers, sitters, should retrain and work in care, because there is a shortage due to people preferring to work with dogs. Which is shite.

cloudtreecarpet · 17/01/2026 22:26

Hmm, I get what you are saying, OP, but does your dog really need all that treatment or does the Vet do quite well out of recommending certain drugs etc? 🤔

YeOldeGreyhound · 17/01/2026 22:28

cloudtreecarpet · 17/01/2026 22:26

Hmm, I get what you are saying, OP, but does your dog really need all that treatment or does the Vet do quite well out of recommending certain drugs etc? 🤔

That was my thought too.
Tummy issues and anxiety is normal with newly adopted dogs.

MarvellousMonsters · 17/01/2026 22:30

That’s what insurance is for. Most adoption/rehoming centres include a months insurance when you adopt. All my dogs have been insured, and I’m on a low income, we just budget carefully and try to keep a bit of savings to pay for excess etc.

Don’t resort to meds for anxiety yet. It often takes a rehomed dog months to settle into a new home, and during this time you can do a lot to help reduce anxiety, staying calm, setting boundaries, basic obedience work. Dogs need to feel secure, and that takes a while.

To feel that soon , dog ownership will just be  for the well off? And thats not fair.
neonbluedog · 17/01/2026 22:34

I'm a vet, work for a corporate and I am under no pressure to upsell or meet targets. The most pressure I ever got about targets was when I worked for independents. I care about my patients deeply.

But what am I meant to do if a dog comes in with diarrhoea that's not resolving? Yes I offer tests. If I'm worried an animal is very sick yes I'll offer blood tests/xrays. It's always a discussion though about the risks/benefits/costs of everything and ultimately you can say no. I often give plan A, B, and C. Would you rather your vet ignore concerns and offer a cheap and cheerful option every time or just tell you not to bother to come in? What am I supposed to do if you come to me with a dog with severe separation anxiety where medication could help? Just say "deal with it" and ignore the problem? And I wouldn't offer it in OP's situation but I might if it's not getting any better.

People are often moaning on here that their GP doesn't take them seriously and people are begging for investigation of their health issues on the NHS. Meanwhile vets who want to investigate things with tests are just trying to inflate the bill? And yes sometimes tests will be normal - we don't know unless we look. Most people would rather have peace of mind than have their dog deteriorate and die because the vet didn't take concerns seriously. And that does happen.

It's part of our professional code of conduct to offer all options including referral and euthanasia. I don't think dogs should be getting £12k heart surgery but it's my obligation to tell you it exists and discuss the pros/cons. Also when talking about euthanasia - over the years I have had my head absolutely bitten off for suggesting it in some cases despite it being a serious option to avoid high ongoing costs with a poor prognosis. I've also had my head bitten off for suggesting things like amputation or removing an eye for example than more expensive specialist fracture repair or eye surgery. People's expectations have absolutely changed in the 20 years I've been practicing. What do you think pets' average life expectancies were in James Herriot's day?

That rant was disjointed because I'm exhausted and frankly tired of this career. Vets can do nothing right it seems. We are doing too much or doing too little. I stay hours beyond my finishing time frequently and don't see my kids at night to take care of your pets. And I don't earn as much as you probably think. I don't have pets because I can't afford
them.

MindYourUsage · 17/01/2026 22:37

Illbethereinaminute · 17/01/2026 18:12

Do you make it or buy it?

I buy my cat Nutriment, she costs a bit over a pound a day to feed since she's only 4kg and eats a quarter of a tub a day.

I considered making my own but I don't know where to source the ingredients. I priced up supermarket stuff and it's more expensive than Nutriment!

I buy it. Far too much faff making it in the correct proportions and I dont have a bone grinder.

I buy Bulmers or Durham Animal Feeds. Add a teeny bit of naturaw forage pure blend (thats the fish, veg and egg bit).

MountainofWashing · 17/01/2026 22:40

BettysRoasties · 16/01/2026 20:00

How do we even tell dogs are depressed. And if they are and as such big animal advocates surely you fix the problem I mean it’s a dog not a brain surgeon supporting a wife and 6 kids with a huge mortgage. Can’t be much to be depressed about 😅

For the first time ever I clicked to see if mumsnet had a laughing emoji to respond to a post...

YeOldeGreyhound · 17/01/2026 22:49

neonbluedog · 17/01/2026 22:34

I'm a vet, work for a corporate and I am under no pressure to upsell or meet targets. The most pressure I ever got about targets was when I worked for independents. I care about my patients deeply.

But what am I meant to do if a dog comes in with diarrhoea that's not resolving? Yes I offer tests. If I'm worried an animal is very sick yes I'll offer blood tests/xrays. It's always a discussion though about the risks/benefits/costs of everything and ultimately you can say no. I often give plan A, B, and C. Would you rather your vet ignore concerns and offer a cheap and cheerful option every time or just tell you not to bother to come in? What am I supposed to do if you come to me with a dog with severe separation anxiety where medication could help? Just say "deal with it" and ignore the problem? And I wouldn't offer it in OP's situation but I might if it's not getting any better.

People are often moaning on here that their GP doesn't take them seriously and people are begging for investigation of their health issues on the NHS. Meanwhile vets who want to investigate things with tests are just trying to inflate the bill? And yes sometimes tests will be normal - we don't know unless we look. Most people would rather have peace of mind than have their dog deteriorate and die because the vet didn't take concerns seriously. And that does happen.

It's part of our professional code of conduct to offer all options including referral and euthanasia. I don't think dogs should be getting £12k heart surgery but it's my obligation to tell you it exists and discuss the pros/cons. Also when talking about euthanasia - over the years I have had my head absolutely bitten off for suggesting it in some cases despite it being a serious option to avoid high ongoing costs with a poor prognosis. I've also had my head bitten off for suggesting things like amputation or removing an eye for example than more expensive specialist fracture repair or eye surgery. People's expectations have absolutely changed in the 20 years I've been practicing. What do you think pets' average life expectancies were in James Herriot's day?

That rant was disjointed because I'm exhausted and frankly tired of this career. Vets can do nothing right it seems. We are doing too much or doing too little. I stay hours beyond my finishing time frequently and don't see my kids at night to take care of your pets. And I don't earn as much as you probably think. I don't have pets because I can't afford
them.

Vets have a super high rate of suicide, and I can understand that.

MindYourUsage · 17/01/2026 22:49

I'm really sorry to hear about tomorrow for your dog @YeOldeGreyhound

It is very clear through your posts on MN that you love your dogs very dearly and you have a precious connection.

Will be thinking of you for your final act of kindness for your girl. Xxx

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 17/01/2026 23:02

herefortheclicks · 17/01/2026 22:16

It does not make sense, does it, when so many poor kids live on less than these dogs expenses

So what if people choose to spend their money on their pets? I don’t have children but have a cat so l spend my money on him. Or should I be spending it on some random kids?

HildegardP · 17/01/2026 23:04

Zov · 17/01/2026 15:16

You must know that this is not normal. I have lived in 10 different homes in my lifetime, in 4 different counties, rough towns, nice towns, nice suburbs, big cities, and countryside, and I have NEVER experienced people shitting in the streets!

I'm told that sheltered lives are indeed very agreeable.

YeOldeGreyhound · 17/01/2026 23:06

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 17/01/2026 23:02

So what if people choose to spend their money on their pets? I don’t have children but have a cat so l spend my money on him. Or should I be spending it on some random kids?

Ha, it makes no sense.
Must all childfree/childless people send funds to people with kids?

My dog was never a replacement for kids, as I never wanted kids.

Zov · 17/01/2026 23:09

InveterateWineDrinker · 17/01/2026 22:05

This is possibly because you can tell a human to lie still while they're being shuffled in and out of a metal tube.

A cat won't understand that, even if they listened. They need to be anaesthetised and that comes with risks which have to be priced in.

And then.... a hospital MRI machine for humans will be well-utilised. The capital costs are spread out over a lot of cases. An MRI scanner in PetsRUs will have the same capital costs but spend much of its life sitting empty. The capital has to be allocated out over many fewer cases.

No.

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 17/01/2026 23:14

YeOldeGreyhound · 17/01/2026 23:06

Ha, it makes no sense.
Must all childfree/childless people send funds to people with kids?

My dog was never a replacement for kids, as I never wanted kids.

Same with me, I’ve never wanted kids and I’ve loved my cats (and dogs when I lived at home) for being cats, not replacements for children and I certainly won’t feel guilty about spending money on them!