Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

I’ve never had a smear test and I don’t want one either

958 replies

Seventeenstars · 13/01/2026 18:18

Controversial I guess, I’m 36.
I don’t think it’s necessary, as I’ve read about my risk factors and I don’t meet the criteria. All the men I’ve slept with (without protection) were virgins and yes I know they were for sure.
I also have no family history of any cancer.
My partner has prostate cancer in both sides of his family, his dad has it currently and he’s not even been offered a screening test for this.
I find this so frustrating and contradictory when women and men are treated so differently and if you refuse smear or breast screening you’re seen as an awful person, and those who do are morally superior.
Men aren’t coerced into invasive internal examinations.
I have an aversion to having things inserted in me internally and feel I have a right to that decision regarding my body.
There are home tests for HPV available, which I have done myself in the past - all clear.
My question is why do they persist with this archaic procedure when there are other options available?

I keep getting phone calls from my GP surgery trying to persuade me to book a test. I don’t understand why they’re always pushing it, but just totally dismiss other medical issues, which has been my experience several times.
Do they get extra commission for this or something?
There are even pop up ‘clinics’ and drop in sessions going ahead near me.

Of course I know I’ll be bombarded with replies saying I’m selfish, stupid and uneducated. I’ve even read other women saying that those who refuse should be denied any medical care!
But I have done my research and I am more than aware of the implications.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
SpiritAdder · 13/01/2026 22:19

MadAsAMongoose · 13/01/2026 22:16

Money. There's not enough of it

99.7 % of cervical cancers are caused by HPV. The NHS has made a reasonable cost based decision on risk v reward. By not looking at the cells, they free up the money from pathology labs, equipment and staff to be used elsewhere in the system. I worked in a hospital pathology lab 20 years ago. A massive room of people looking down microscopes all day, stacks of slides to check. And the room next door for the processing of the samples onto those slides. The wage cost of that alone! The NHS couldn't justify continuing to spend millions every year to look at cell changes under microscopes in order to catch 0.3% of cervical cancers, it's not reasonable. That money can be used elsewhere in healthcare to greater effect

It’s not 99.7% any more
The HPV vaccine preventing loads of HPV caused cervical cancers means that the % share of HPV independent cancers has gone up to around 8-12% depending on the study.

Jennajenjen · 13/01/2026 22:19

I never did either

Does anyone know if you have to do smear test if you’ve never been sexually active?

Uhghg · 13/01/2026 22:19

KatsPJs · 13/01/2026 22:12

But if you don’t have HPV they do not look at your sample, so they wouldn’t catch the other 10% (not sure if this is an accurate figure?) anyway. That’s the problem. Once again, women are being shortchanged.

I think living in a country where we are 90% less likely to have cervical cancer go undetected is pretty amazing.

I just wish they could do the same for other types of cancer too.

And of course roll it out for free worldwide.

Hopefully in our lifetimes we’ll have more tests like smear tests that can detect early signs and less people will die from the horrible disease that is cancer.

WhereIsMyJumper · 13/01/2026 22:21

MadAsAMongoose · 13/01/2026 22:16

Money. There's not enough of it

99.7 % of cervical cancers are caused by HPV. The NHS has made a reasonable cost based decision on risk v reward. By not looking at the cells, they free up the money from pathology labs, equipment and staff to be used elsewhere in the system. I worked in a hospital pathology lab 20 years ago. A massive room of people looking down microscopes all day, stacks of slides to check. And the room next door for the processing of the samples onto those slides. The wage cost of that alone! The NHS couldn't justify continuing to spend millions every year to look at cell changes under microscopes in order to catch 0.3% of cervical cancers, it's not reasonable. That money can be used elsewhere in healthcare to greater effect

Oh ok, you make a very good point. I must admit, I didn’t consider that. Thank you for countering my point respectfully 🙂

PortSalutPlease · 13/01/2026 22:21

I mean, you’re extremely stupid, but it’s entirely your prerogative. My friend died in 2022. She was 38. Her children were 2 and 4. She missed a smear test during COVID, and now she’s dead.

SpiritAdder · 13/01/2026 22:21

Sorry I have a typo.
earlier I said
“So a negative test is proof you have never caught HPV.”

that should be ISNT proof.

Uhghg · 13/01/2026 22:22

Jennajenjen · 13/01/2026 22:19

I never did either

Does anyone know if you have to do smear test if you’ve never been sexually active?

Edited

You don’t need to do anything you don’t want to do.

But your risk increases if you’ve been sexually active.

If you’ve never been sexually active in your life, then your risk would be very low and it probably isn’t worth it.

KatsPJs · 13/01/2026 22:22

Uhghg · 13/01/2026 22:19

I think living in a country where we are 90% less likely to have cervical cancer go undetected is pretty amazing.

I just wish they could do the same for other types of cancer too.

And of course roll it out for free worldwide.

Hopefully in our lifetimes we’ll have more tests like smear tests that can detect early signs and less people will die from the horrible disease that is cancer.

That’s not how statistics work. If the NHS is not testing my sample because I don’t have HPV then I have not been screened for cervical cancer. Because again, a smear test is no longer a cancer screening.

Jakadaal · 13/01/2026 22:23

Because it’s been proven to save lives - young woman below screening age have died because they have not been offered screening tests. If you don’t want them just inform your GP practice and they will remove your name from the screening list. Out of interest will you have the same thoughts about bowel screening and breast screening as and when you are the right age group?

ContentedAlpaca · 13/01/2026 22:24

SpiritAdder · 13/01/2026 22:16

Yes that is a problem, but you’re looking at it in a glass half full way.
The HPV test catches 90% of cervical cancers, refusing the test means 0% cervical cancers caught. I know which option I would choose from a pure statistical standpoint.

Hell, mammograms don’t even catch 100% of breast cancers. You wouldn’t skip that because it’s also not perfect would you?

Offering women a do it yourself swab while keeping the option open for a smear would result in more women taking up the screening.

For me, it makes sense to offer women the choice.

Like the op, to I don't do smears any more but have paid for my own screening and should soon be offered it for free.

Thenakedwineglass · 13/01/2026 22:24

No idea why less invasive procedures aren’t used nor the comparison to prostrate screening for men

I had abnormal cells picked up years ago and had treatment and many colposcopies. I hate smears and find them very uncomfortable

however I am grateful - very grateful - that screening is available and the 1-2 mins discomfort is a tiny price to pay for privilege of having access to screening and follow up treatment if it’s needed

HRTQueen · 13/01/2026 22:25

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

KatsPJs · 13/01/2026 22:27

fashionqueen0123 · 13/01/2026 22:19

That’s what we keep being told yet this thread is full of people saying they had no HPV and abnormal changes were picked up. This is what worries me.

Plus I was on a thread on Facebook where this was being discussed a little while back and it’s been even more worrying for those women who had cells removed in the past but now their samples won’t be tested despite their history because they don’t have HPV. The system will basically just spit their result back out and no cells checked even if someone makes a note about it

Exactly this. It’s a computer says no approach to women’s healthcare where they guilt trip millions of women to take part in an invasive procedure and then not even bother to conduct the cancer screening. And we just accept it.

Rosieposy89 · 13/01/2026 22:27

My sister died at 32 years old from cervical cancer. She was too scared to have her smear done. Needless to say, she endured much more traumatic procedures once she was diagnosed
I will spend the rest of my life wondering if that smear test would have saved her life. No real history of cancer in our family either.
You don't have to have one done..it's a strange thing to be angry about. Me? I feel fortunate there is a screening procedure available that might prevent me dying like my sister. Cervical cancer is a horrible way to die btw. My sister spent the last 10 weeks with a catheter and tubes in her kidneys as it spread there and she had no bladder control. There was no dignity

Uhghg · 13/01/2026 22:28

KatsPJs · 13/01/2026 22:22

That’s not how statistics work. If the NHS is not testing my sample because I don’t have HPV then I have not been screened for cervical cancer. Because again, a smear test is no longer a cancer screening.

It tests for HPV - which can cause cancer.

If HPV is detected then the sample is screened for abnormal cells.

They are unable to test every sample for abnormal cells, that would be insane and just not possible.

But if you want more in depth tests then I’m sure you can go private and have a smear test that way and pay for them to test for abnormal cells at the same time.

SpiritAdder · 13/01/2026 22:29

ContentedAlpaca · 13/01/2026 22:24

Offering women a do it yourself swab while keeping the option open for a smear would result in more women taking up the screening.

For me, it makes sense to offer women the choice.

Like the op, to I don't do smears any more but have paid for my own screening and should soon be offered it for free.

Edited

It doesn’t make sense to me. It’s not that we can’t find our vaginas and do a HPV swab, it’s that it’s not like an ancestry DNA kit. The swab could be mishandled and contaminated. The swab also needs to get to a lab within 24hrs of collection, it also has temperature requirements to keep the sample stable. I think that many DIY swabs will not give accurate test results. So women will have a false sense of security or they do the DIY and then have to go in anyway because it didn’t get to the lab within the 24hrs of collection deadline. It just doesn’t logistically check out as the best and most accurate way to test.

WhereIsMyJumper · 13/01/2026 22:29

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

With smear tests??

katepilar · 13/01/2026 22:29

TheHumanRepresentative · 13/01/2026 18:42

Well, there's isn't a comparable screening because men don't have cervixes. You would be better off campaigning for more prostate cancer screenings, if you really feel that it's so unfair.

What a stupid reply. Obviously men dont have a cervix but have their own bodyparts and organs. Which they dont have a specialist doctor like women do.

HRTQueen · 13/01/2026 22:30

WhereIsMyJumper · 13/01/2026 22:29

With smear tests??

Oh my sorry posted on wrong thread shall get it deleted
sorry genuine mistake 😧

katepilar · 13/01/2026 22:30

Mobysdick · 13/01/2026 18:43

Exactly why don’t you want one? Is it because you are embarrassed, or just because you are low risk? If the former then having a baby will be a shock, even straight forward pregnancies have some prodding and poking. Having just had a full hysterectomy for an ovarian cancer scare (and I was low risk !!) the fanny wands were uncomfortable but welcome. Maybe both you and husband get your checks out of solidarity. But if not then just say no. It’s not mandatory.

Proding and poking during pregnancy is not neccessary. More over its fairly risky to have internal exams in pregnancy.

silverwrath · 13/01/2026 22:31
Big Brother What GIF by Big Brother After Dark

You're an adult. You've made a choice. You're the one who will have to live with the potential consequences of your decision.

Do you need a cheer squad? 🤔

KatsPJs · 13/01/2026 22:31

SpiritAdder · 13/01/2026 22:16

Yes that is a problem, but you’re looking at it in a glass half full way.
The HPV test catches 90% of cervical cancers, refusing the test means 0% cervical cancers caught. I know which option I would choose from a pure statistical standpoint.

Hell, mammograms don’t even catch 100% of breast cancers. You wouldn’t skip that because it’s also not perfect would you?

No because a mammogram is actually a cancer screen. Whereas a smear test is now a HPV screen.

YouChair · 13/01/2026 22:31

HRTQueen · 13/01/2026 22:30

Oh my sorry posted on wrong thread shall get it deleted
sorry genuine mistake 😧

Well it gave me a laugh anyway!

TheDenimPoet · 13/01/2026 22:33

Shmee1988 · 13/01/2026 18:34

Id genuinely love to hear you have this discussion with the 36 year old woman I am friends with at work. 3 beautiful children, the youngest only 3. Currently on stage 3 cervical cancer, no hair, no energy to play with her kids, cant work. All because she missed ONE cervical smear. Prevention is better than treatment. I respect its your decision but it makes me so sad that young women are willingly playing roulette with their health when so many others would kill to have the choice of prevention like you.

See, this is the kind of fear mongering that is incredibly unhelpful.
These days, smear tests primarily test for HPV, and only if that's positive do they check for cell changes.
OP says she gets HPV tests. So that is just as good as the current smear test.

There is a currently a clinical trial of home HPV tests with the view to replace the traditional smear, and early indications are that it's a good alternative - particularly with so many now having had the vaccinations.

1 in 142 people get cervical cancer. 98% of those had an active HPV infection, so OP's at home HPV test is all that is actually required.

KatsPJs · 13/01/2026 22:33

Uhghg · 13/01/2026 22:28

It tests for HPV - which can cause cancer.

If HPV is detected then the sample is screened for abnormal cells.

They are unable to test every sample for abnormal cells, that would be insane and just not possible.

But if you want more in depth tests then I’m sure you can go private and have a smear test that way and pay for them to test for abnormal cells at the same time.

They used to test every sample for abnormal cells so it very much is and was possible. I’m not arguing against the science, I’m making the argument that calling a smear test a cancer screening is now factually incorrect and disingenuous. It’s a HPV test first and foremost.

Swipe left for the next trending thread