Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think being a reader doesn't make you better or smarter?

455 replies

OnceaReaderNeveraReader · 07/01/2026 16:25

Never been a reader. I have tried many times in my life and have enjoyed the odd book here and there but have never managed to actually become a regular reader and don't miss books ever. I was talking about this with some colleagues the other day and one of them made me feel a bit bad about this as if reading is a sign of better intellectual ability and superiority.
I am uni educated and enjoy a variety of other cultural hobbies such as art, theatre and dance but I just cannot understand what is so special about books!
How does one become a reader later in life and is it really that bad if I don't enjoy it?

OP posts:
usedtobeaylis · 09/01/2026 10:43

Slimtoddy · 09/01/2026 07:27

I used to read a lot. As a child I read a lot. As an adult I read more. I read a lot of what people might consider challenging and a lot that wasn't. I read anything. I couldn't get on a train or a tube without a book. Then I had kids and since then I struggle to read anything. I have this cynical voice in my head going - that's ridiculous. I can't immerse myself in a book.

I saw someone on social media suggest a few books that were factual but written like a novel and I thought I would read one. The cynical voice in my head is gone but I am still struggling to read.

It saddens me as I used to love escaping to a fictional world. I will keep trying

I know so many mothers including myself who went through this. I think it's just a case of persevering. I still don't read anywhere near as much as I used to and I don't feel as deeply engaged in what I read but I'm definitely getting there. I found audiobooks really helped for a while although it had to be non-fiction as I did used to zone out a lot. And putting the phone the hell away.

OMGitsnotgood · 09/01/2026 11:04

blubberball · 09/01/2026 05:17

I think it depends on the type of person you are as well. Reading is a pretty introverted, solo activity. Unless you're reading aloud to your mates, but who does that? So maybe if you're a more social person, you're likely to be reading less, and more interested in socialising and doing other activities.

Not a single person who knows me would describe me as introverted. Not one. My hobbies are mainly social activities and am usually the last one to leave a party. But I love reading too.

LittleBitofBread · 09/01/2026 12:30

MungoforPresident · 08/01/2026 17:24

Op, I am a literary (book) editor ... and I would never read books for pleasure! Never have. People always imagine that editors must love books/fiction, so they constantly bore me, telling stories of books they love.

It's in the same way that people constantly talk to me about cats, just because I have three.

My answer is, "I love Persian cats, not cats in general." And they look at me as if I'm crazy.

So, no, I just enjoy language, not books.

I can't name a single book I have read for pleasure and enjoyed, aside from kids' books. Reading or not reading says nothing about your intellect.

I'm an editorial professional too and I'm a huge reader for fun.
Almost everyone I've ever met in and around the publishing world is a voracious reader (not just editorial but people who work in sales, marketing, design, production etc too). I mean, no one is going to make their fortune working in publishing, so it stands to reason IMO that if you go into it it's got to be in large part because you love books.

Having said that, every now and then I get given a book to proofread that's supposedly been copy-edited already, and it looks as if the copy-editor has never read a book in their life and doesn't have any real understanding of the English language or of what a book is meant to be like (grammar, spelling and syntax all over the place, half-sentences that trail off or are non sequiturs, etc etc). Maybe this is the work of editors who don't read for fun or feel very engaged with books and reading.

EBearhug · 09/01/2026 14:06

MrsJeanLuc · 09/01/2026 09:51

Really?
We'll just get rid of teachers then shall we and let everyone learn by reading!

@OnceaReaderNeveraReader I don't think reading inherently makes you smarter. I probably lean more to the converse - if you are smart you read more (or better, maybe) books.

I do think reading can make someone more knowledgeable (depending on the books read of course), but then so can watching (the right sort of) tv programmes.

The trouble is that nowadays it's so easy to find something else to do - I could be reading my book now, but instead I'm posting on an Internet forum!

Of course we shouldn't get rid of teachers, but even subjects like maths assume you can read enough to work on questions like, "Jane has 4 apples and John has 6 apples. If they each give half their apples to Julie, how many apples will Julie have?" You have to be able to read what the English is saying before you can do the arithmetic.

Laurmolonlabe · 09/01/2026 14:50

When people used to say they were self-educated this is what they meant- that they had read a lot. It has it's limitations , but you can educate yourself this way.
It will not replace teachers however, at least 50% of the point of school is the child minding element, how would parents work if their children educated themselves by reading?

Gwenhwyfar · 09/01/2026 15:35

"Always disappointed by film adaptations. So much detail is lost, characters don’t look like they did in your head, storylines are completely altered at times!"

Yes, but I find that if a few years have passed since I read the book I can cope with these 'changes' better. It's not a good idea to see the film after having recently read the book.

MrsJeanLuc · 09/01/2026 15:36

EBearhug · 09/01/2026 14:06

Of course we shouldn't get rid of teachers, but even subjects like maths assume you can read enough to work on questions like, "Jane has 4 apples and John has 6 apples. If they each give half their apples to Julie, how many apples will Julie have?" You have to be able to read what the English is saying before you can do the arithmetic.

Yes of course, what you're saying is that reading is a gateway skill, or an enabling skill, to gain access to higher levels of education.

But op did already say that she is educated to degree level. She CAN read, but just doesn't do it for pleasure.

I think it's a pity, personally, because she's missing out on a world knowledge and enjoyment. But equally you could argue that it's possible to get those things from other media - theatre, concerts, tv, etc.

Gwenhwyfar · 09/01/2026 15:38

"General comprehension skills are massively declining. You only have to look at an internet comment section to see people are missing the point of a lot of content they are viewing online. "

That doesn't prove that comprehension skills are declining. It may have been worse a few decades ago.

Gwenhwyfar · 09/01/2026 15:44

godmum56 · 08/01/2026 11:30

yup and they were written as "soaps" Novel reading was at first derided as something that no decent woman should do and especially not "in the mornings" https://onehundredpages.wordpress.com/2014/06/30/4-bad-side-effects-of-reading-fiction-according-to-the-19th-century/#:~:text=Stories%20can%20leave%20you%20dissatisfied,passion%20and%20excitement%20was%20frightening.

Interesting article.
I think the prejudice about romance novels is still visible today, although mainly towards women reading it rather than men.
"Young men and ladies might identify with the characters so strongly, they would become obsessed with the promise of love and seek out better relationships rather than just learn to settle for whomever was available. "

Gwenhwyfar · 09/01/2026 15:50

LighthouseLED · 08/01/2026 20:16

Proving definitively that readers are not smarter than non-readers.

See also: 50 Shades of Grey

I think maybe the Merry Joker put that in there to highlight the book snobbery that would inevitably follow.
The Da Vinci Code is a good read and millions of people obviously think so.

Gwenhwyfar · 09/01/2026 15:55

"I much prefer the films as they cut out most of the extraneous detail that I skip through in the books. "

It depends. One of the Pride and Prejudice films cut one of the Bingley sisters out. That was a bit of a loss. On the other hand, the Thomas Hardy book I read in school had been very helpfully marked by one of the previous users of the book so that I could skip all the really boring descriptions of fields and the like.

Gwenhwyfar · 09/01/2026 16:00

"Really?
We'll just get rid of teachers then shall we and let everyone learn by reading!"

To be fair, there are many courses that are primarily reading and only limited teaching time.

ruethewhirl · 09/01/2026 17:04

LittleBitofBread · 09/01/2026 12:30

I'm an editorial professional too and I'm a huge reader for fun.
Almost everyone I've ever met in and around the publishing world is a voracious reader (not just editorial but people who work in sales, marketing, design, production etc too). I mean, no one is going to make their fortune working in publishing, so it stands to reason IMO that if you go into it it's got to be in large part because you love books.

Having said that, every now and then I get given a book to proofread that's supposedly been copy-edited already, and it looks as if the copy-editor has never read a book in their life and doesn't have any real understanding of the English language or of what a book is meant to be like (grammar, spelling and syntax all over the place, half-sentences that trail off or are non sequiturs, etc etc). Maybe this is the work of editors who don't read for fun or feel very engaged with books and reading.

Fiction editor here. Love reading, just wish I had more time to actually do it! I've been a bookworm since I first learned to read.

Tbf I did more or less stop reading for pleasure (apart from magazines) during much of my uni degree, but that was because I had literature modules for each of the 2 languages I was studying (and another one in my first year when I was studying English too!) and reading novels temporarily became a bit of a busman's holiday. Weirdly, being an editor now doesn't tend to have that effect - I think it's because I'm mostly working in different genres from the ones I tend to read in. Wish I could stop mentally copyediting books I'm supposed to be reading for relaxation, though. 😂

LittleBitofBread · 09/01/2026 17:10

ruethewhirl · 09/01/2026 17:04

Fiction editor here. Love reading, just wish I had more time to actually do it! I've been a bookworm since I first learned to read.

Tbf I did more or less stop reading for pleasure (apart from magazines) during much of my uni degree, but that was because I had literature modules for each of the 2 languages I was studying (and another one in my first year when I was studying English too!) and reading novels temporarily became a bit of a busman's holiday. Weirdly, being an editor now doesn't tend to have that effect - I think it's because I'm mostly working in different genres from the ones I tend to read in. Wish I could stop mentally copyediting books I'm supposed to be reading for relaxation, though. 😂

Weirdly, being an editor now doesn't tend to have that effect - I think it's because I'm mostly working in different genres from the ones I tend to read in. Me too, luckily! Well, fiction-wise anyway; I do sometimes work on the sort of non-fiction I like to read myself, but it doesn't seem to put me off.

Wish I could stop mentally copyediting books I'm supposed to be reading for relaxation, though I know Grin I regularly find myself puffing and ranting at glaring errors.

ruethewhirl · 09/01/2026 17:25

LittleBitofBread · 09/01/2026 17:10

Weirdly, being an editor now doesn't tend to have that effect - I think it's because I'm mostly working in different genres from the ones I tend to read in. Me too, luckily! Well, fiction-wise anyway; I do sometimes work on the sort of non-fiction I like to read myself, but it doesn't seem to put me off.

Wish I could stop mentally copyediting books I'm supposed to be reading for relaxation, though I know Grin I regularly find myself puffing and ranting at glaring errors.

Totally know the feeling! It's crazy the number of typos/spelling fails I've spotted in published books, often from major publishers.

Carla786 · 10/01/2026 00:50

usedtobeaylis · 09/01/2026 10:43

I know so many mothers including myself who went through this. I think it's just a case of persevering. I still don't read anywhere near as much as I used to and I don't feel as deeply engaged in what I read but I'm definitely getting there. I found audiobooks really helped for a while although it had to be non-fiction as I did used to zone out a lot. And putting the phone the hell away.

Why do you think this happens? I want kids but I hate the idea I might not be able to enjoy reading anymore...

Carla786 · 10/01/2026 00:53

blubberball · 09/01/2026 05:17

I think it depends on the type of person you are as well. Reading is a pretty introverted, solo activity. Unless you're reading aloud to your mates, but who does that? So maybe if you're a more social person, you're likely to be reading less, and more interested in socialising and doing other activities.

Book club? Or reading to your children? My mother read me a lot of more mature kids' books (eg. Watership Down) from a young age, as well as Dickens & Austen, and younger stuff. Ofc a lot goes over your head at that age but young kids still can appreciate an engaging story.

Carla786 · 10/01/2026 00:56

Slimtoddy · 09/01/2026 07:27

I used to read a lot. As a child I read a lot. As an adult I read more. I read a lot of what people might consider challenging and a lot that wasn't. I read anything. I couldn't get on a train or a tube without a book. Then I had kids and since then I struggle to read anything. I have this cynical voice in my head going - that's ridiculous. I can't immerse myself in a book.

I saw someone on social media suggest a few books that were factual but written like a novel and I thought I would read one. The cynical voice in my head is gone but I am still struggling to read.

It saddens me as I used to love escaping to a fictional world. I will keep trying

I hope you can regain your love of reading, and write if you want to.

Why do you think you got this cynical voice in your head after having kids?

Mothership4two · 10/01/2026 03:36

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 08/01/2026 09:15

"Ok sure" is usually used in a similar way to "whatever". You sound very determined that your husband is very intelligent and not accepting of the fact that you likely are in a different way.

'OK sure' can be meant positively or negatively depending on context. In the context of the previous comments I would also have taken it as a negative in place of 'whatever' (possibly accompanied by an eyeroll)

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 10/01/2026 06:33

Carla786 · 10/01/2026 00:50

Why do you think this happens? I want kids but I hate the idea I might not be able to enjoy reading anymore...

It's mum guilt. It's very weird but very real. You know, rationally that you are allowed half an hour to yourself to read. But you feel guilty for taking it.

It's a battle most mum's fight but you can win it. Taking time for yourself does in fact help you be a better mum. You just have to remind yourself of it regularly.

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 10/01/2026 06:34

Mothership4two · 10/01/2026 03:36

'OK sure' can be meant positively or negatively depending on context. In the context of the previous comments I would also have taken it as a negative in place of 'whatever' (possibly accompanied by an eyeroll)

Thank you. That PP did seem very defensive of her highly intelligent husband. Wonder why.

DeftGoldHedgehog · 10/01/2026 06:40

I think reading widely gives people a perspective, knowledge and vocabulary that it is difficult to obtain otherwise. It's easy to tell people who have disappeared up their own algorithims.

Natsku · 10/01/2026 07:03

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 10/01/2026 06:33

It's mum guilt. It's very weird but very real. You know, rationally that you are allowed half an hour to yourself to read. But you feel guilty for taking it.

It's a battle most mum's fight but you can win it. Taking time for yourself does in fact help you be a better mum. You just have to remind yourself of it regularly.

Oh, I never felt that guilt. I figure its good for my children to see me taking time to read so definitely not something to feel guilty about (that's what I think about it now, when my children were younger I didn't even think about it, I just wanted to read and they didn't need my undivided attention all the time. I loved reading while breastfeeding especially, and would sometimes read outloud)

Neurodiversitydoctor · 11/01/2026 04:53

ChocolateCinderToffee · 07/01/2026 21:07

I think reading improves your general knowledge because you absorb a lot of information. Most of the reading I do is in the form of novels, and most novels are well researched, so you pick up a lot of facts. For example, I've read a lot of Georgette Heyer's novels and nearly everything I know about the Battle of Waterloo comes from reading one of them. The danger nowadays is that you can go down an internet rabbit-hole and end up believing a great deal of rubbish if you're not careful. I wish children were taught how to discriminate between good sources of information and bad.

Another thing: if you're very intelligent and you don't read, where's the outlet for your mind? Writing?

My career, thinking of new ways of doing things, risk assesing, problem solving.

IpsyUpsyDaisyDoos · 11/01/2026 07:58

Neurodiversitydoctor · 11/01/2026 04:53

My career, thinking of new ways of doing things, risk assesing, problem solving.

I do that for work too. But it's work. Reading is more for relaxation, winding down, fun.