Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Resentment at 100k

797 replies

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 00:49

Theres a lot of vitriol spilt towards people being “high earners” at 100k and over. As net contributors, and most likely having made sacrifices, stresses and difficult life decisions, there’s many judgements about life choices , expectations and living within one’s means. What is the motivation to push forward in a career and to try and be as successful as one can if there’s no personal gain? It’s all well and good saying those with the broadest shoulders should take on the most - but to what end?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 11:00

Ednafrommooneyponds · 28/11/2025 10:56

No one is forcing you to pay that. You've chosen to have the children and to work the hours you do. Same way I accepted I'm going to spending all my take home pay on fees whilst my child is in nursery.

Ok so I should have no career ambitions and just find a man to look after me

OP posts:
Benjithedog · 28/11/2025 11:01

KarmenPQZ · 28/11/2025 10:49

I don’t get the 100k moaners and I have no sympathy towards them.

and to be clear my partners salary has yo-yoed between 90k and 110k for the last few years. Ironically was 100k+ when the kids were in nursery then down to 90k when they started school. This was by choice so partner could do more family commitments in a slightly less stressful job.

when you earn that much the difference between it didn’t have that much affect in our lifestyle - perhaps because we generally lived quite frugally albeit in the expensive south.

based on my experience I’d say most of the 100k moaners don’t actually realise how frivolous they’re living including mortgage costs and frittering money away on ‘essentials’ that are actually luxuries.

You have NO idea about other people’s financial lives and just because you’re okay doesn’t mean everyone else I was or is. And if they pay tax they can say whatever they want about it.

Baldylovingbeard · 28/11/2025 11:01

@SleeplessInWherever what’s your opinion on this? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 11:01

19lottie82 · 28/11/2025 10:56

I wonder if all these high earners who are complaining now were doing so when the government paid their wages during covid? Hence one of the reasons why the country is in the state it is in now.
I doubt it.

I worked throughout Covid and the government never paid my wages

OP posts:
19lottie82 · 28/11/2025 11:01

FlatusParticles · 28/11/2025 10:58

Government never paid wages in our family. We just were all working online and remotely.

Fair enough, but plenty of people did get 80% of their wages paid for being off.

AlltheHedgehogsontheWall · 28/11/2025 11:02

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 10:44

I’m not saying it’s a marker of success, surely happiness is? I also find it strange to say anyone who has a well paying job has achieved it solely down to luck. Is it lucky that a neurosurgeon just happens to have the intuition to perform brain surgery? Or have they spent years training and specialising?

It's both.

It's lucky to be born on the NHS with high intelligence in a family which prioritises your development and education enabling you to achieve your potential. It's lucky that you were vaccinated against many childhood illnesses and when you did get sick you could see a doctor. It's lucky if you went to a good state school and were supported to apply for University. It's lucky that you came from a country with world class Universities training neurosurgeons. It's lucky that the infrastructure in the UK enabled you to travel to University and then to work without significant issues. It's even lucky that neurosurgery is even a thing- it's not something that you'd expect to be able to access in the developing world.

It's also a lot of very hard work and dedication.

Is it harder work than a child who dragged themselves up in poverty, parents unable or unwilling to provide the necessities for optimal brain development in the first 100 days, in an area with extremely poor state options, leaving school at 16 and working as a labourer? Or an immigrant who walked many miles to school in their home country to get an education and managed to qualify as a dentist only to come to the UK and find that the course they completed was nowhere near at the standard needed to work as a dentist here, due to the lack of equipment available?

Franpie · 28/11/2025 11:03

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 01:28

thanks for your feedback, I take it onboard and I do agree with what you say and appreciate your way of looking at it. I too, have had an enjoyable career and as I mentioned before I don’t resent paying tax. I just find it jarring reading comments about how obviously how dare you think you need support, how dare you mention your tax burden etc etc.
how are we in a system where is would make more financial sense for me to go part time than strive to achieve in my career?

What a strange way to look at it. There is a weird pinch point between £100-£125k where you don’t take home as much as you’d like from any pay rise but you need to just keep working and push through that £125k barrier. Then pay rises start to feel more meaningful.

Most people setting pay reviews understand this.

But at the end of the day, I’d much rather earn £110k than the UK average of £35k any day.

Baldylovingbeard · 28/11/2025 11:03

I AGGREE with you OP! No incentive to want to work hard and earn better wages. There is incentive to invest in stocks though! 😆

Benjithedog · 28/11/2025 11:04

Ednafrommooneyponds · 28/11/2025 10:56

No one is forcing you to pay that. You've chosen to have the children and to work the hours you do. Same way I accepted I'm going to spending all my take home pay on fees whilst my child is in nursery.

So have the people who choose to have children but can’t afford to raise them. That too is also a choice.

Ednafrommooneyponds · 28/11/2025 11:05

@Arseholeneighbours I mean there's a wide gulf between no career aspirations and working 90 hour weeks.

GnomeDePlume · 28/11/2025 11:06

Im 59, it is literally only in the last 4 years that I can say I am comfortable with my financial situation. A combination of things but the big one is that DCs are now fully grown adults in work so no more supporting them through school, uni etc.

Until DCs become independent it feels like you are constantly throwing money at problems to try and solve them. There are always more problems than money.

Ednafrommooneyponds · 28/11/2025 11:06

Benjithedog · 28/11/2025 11:04

So have the people who choose to have children but can’t afford to raise them. That too is also a choice.

I didn't say it wasn't. The OP is however here complaining about the costs of her life choices.

FlatusParticles · 28/11/2025 11:06

At some point. It's just jealously and politics if envy. "Oh look at these people with their high salaries. How dare try enjoy a modicum of their earnings. We should all have it".

We are high earners. Additional rate (just about). We don't see people on 300k, 400k etc and et jealously or angry at them. Personal responsibility.

Baldylovingbeard · 28/11/2025 11:09

19lottie82 · 28/11/2025 10:56

I wonder if all these high earners who are complaining now were doing so when the government paid their wages during covid? Hence one of the reasons why the country is in the state it is in now.
I doubt it.

Sorry let me get this right…. The state of the country right now is because high earners rinsed the government when Covid hit??? 😂😂😂😂😂
The state of this country is because we are letting any Tom dick and harry into our country using our already battered NHS, British people using benefits as a way of living not wanting to work, teaching their kids to do the same, the government has done us over on both parties Labour & Conservatives.
It is a mess!!! Covid was the icing on the cake !

FlatusParticles · 28/11/2025 11:09

AlltheHedgehogsontheWall · 28/11/2025 11:02

It's both.

It's lucky to be born on the NHS with high intelligence in a family which prioritises your development and education enabling you to achieve your potential. It's lucky that you were vaccinated against many childhood illnesses and when you did get sick you could see a doctor. It's lucky if you went to a good state school and were supported to apply for University. It's lucky that you came from a country with world class Universities training neurosurgeons. It's lucky that the infrastructure in the UK enabled you to travel to University and then to work without significant issues. It's even lucky that neurosurgery is even a thing- it's not something that you'd expect to be able to access in the developing world.

It's also a lot of very hard work and dedication.

Is it harder work than a child who dragged themselves up in poverty, parents unable or unwilling to provide the necessities for optimal brain development in the first 100 days, in an area with extremely poor state options, leaving school at 16 and working as a labourer? Or an immigrant who walked many miles to school in their home country to get an education and managed to qualify as a dentist only to come to the UK and find that the course they completed was nowhere near at the standard needed to work as a dentist here, due to the lack of equipment available?

We're immigrants from the "3rd world". Guess our educational success and high income is all done to luck and not hard work. We grew up with less that what UK council estate people have right now. But yeah. All luck.

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 11:10

Ednafrommooneyponds · 28/11/2025 11:06

I didn't say it wasn't. The OP is however here complaining about the costs of her life choices.

Crazy that I chose to get a job and procreate!

OP posts:
RedTagAlan · 28/11/2025 11:10

Baldylovingbeard · 28/11/2025 11:03

I AGGREE with you OP! No incentive to want to work hard and earn better wages. There is incentive to invest in stocks though! 😆

Yeah. Then the AI bubble or whatever bursts, and all the threads appear from investors demanding government cover their losses.

:-)

MidnightPatrol · 28/11/2025 11:10

19lottie82 · 28/11/2025 11:01

Fair enough, but plenty of people did get 80% of their wages paid for being off.

Furlough was capped at 80% of £2,500 a month.

So no, higher earners weren’t getting 80% of their salaries paid on furlough.

Ednafrommooneyponds · 28/11/2025 11:13

@Arseholeneighbours yeah so did I. Yet here you are complaining about the cost of childcare. Do I enjoy paying a couple of grand a month for childcare? No. Do I accept that it's what I have to do in order to work. Yes.

AlltheHedgehogsontheWall · 28/11/2025 11:13

MidnightPatrol · 28/11/2025 10:51

“The concept of the cliff edge is silly. You still take home more at £105k than you do at £99k, it just goes up a bit more slowly.”

Incorrect with childcare. You lose it in full if you earn over the threshold. Which means your effective net pay can decrease by thousands of pounds for earning over it.

With one baby in nursery you are
probably worse off earning £120k vs £100k with the 30 free hours and tax free childcare.

That's only for a short period of time- and childcare is a mess and unfair for everyone. If you're on UC you get 85% of it paid for, so anyone just below the UC threshold is also on "a cliff edge". If your baby is born on the 1st April, they don't get free hours until September, whereas a baby born on 31st March gets a whole extra term of free hours before starting school. Childcare is also ruinously expensive.

I'm not at all against reforming the childcare system but the unfairness doesn't only affect £100k earners and I would also say they are much less likely to be finding it a real struggle to cope! Many people have to leave work because childcare is more than their wage. I suppose you consider them scroungers.

MidnightPatrol · 28/11/2025 11:13

Franpie · 28/11/2025 11:03

What a strange way to look at it. There is a weird pinch point between £100-£125k where you don’t take home as much as you’d like from any pay rise but you need to just keep working and push through that £125k barrier. Then pay rises start to feel more meaningful.

Most people setting pay reviews understand this.

But at the end of the day, I’d much rather earn £110k than the UK average of £35k any day.

Not easy to just sail from £100k to £200k though is it. It might take several years - if the industry you are in has salaries up to that amount.

I mean going from £100 to £125k is a 25% increase in salary. Thats a couple of promotions - and just keeps you in ‘break even’ territory.

RedTagAlan · 28/11/2025 11:14

FlatusParticles · 28/11/2025 11:06

At some point. It's just jealously and politics if envy. "Oh look at these people with their high salaries. How dare try enjoy a modicum of their earnings. We should all have it".

We are high earners. Additional rate (just about). We don't see people on 300k, 400k etc and et jealously or angry at them. Personal responsibility.

Except this thread is not really about that.

OP wants their high wage, AND government benefits.

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 11:15

AlltheHedgehogsontheWall · 28/11/2025 11:13

That's only for a short period of time- and childcare is a mess and unfair for everyone. If you're on UC you get 85% of it paid for, so anyone just below the UC threshold is also on "a cliff edge". If your baby is born on the 1st April, they don't get free hours until September, whereas a baby born on 31st March gets a whole extra term of free hours before starting school. Childcare is also ruinously expensive.

I'm not at all against reforming the childcare system but the unfairness doesn't only affect £100k earners and I would also say they are much less likely to be finding it a real struggle to cope! Many people have to leave work because childcare is more than their wage. I suppose you consider them scroungers.

No I don’t consider them scroungers, I think it’s a dreadful barrier to getting women back in the workplace and having independence.

OP posts:
FlatusParticles · 28/11/2025 11:16

RedTagAlan · 28/11/2025 11:14

Except this thread is not really about that.

OP wants their high wage, AND government benefits.

That everyone else gets below that income threshold.

Arseholeneighbours · 28/11/2025 11:17

RedTagAlan · 28/11/2025 11:14

Except this thread is not really about that.

OP wants their high wage, AND government benefits.

Well no, I just don’t want to work for free

OP posts: