Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask if you were Prime Minister for a year, how would you combat the cost of living?

230 replies

MzGG · 27/11/2025 21:53

To ask if you were Chancellor of the Exchequer, how would you combat the cost of living?

OP posts:
MzGG · 28/11/2025 18:23

Friendlygingercat · 28/11/2025 16:46

Benefits for British Born citizens only.
Social housing for British born citizens only
NHS only free for British Born citizens. You must pay a fee to go to A&E, GP etc if not British.
Evict all faux asylum seekers from accommodation and cease supporting them.
Defund human rights lawyers
Scrap all overseas aid including Ukraine
Cut down allowances/perks/subsidesed bars for MPs – you get a studio flat and that’s it.

Yikes. Nigel Farage, is that you?

OP posts:
CrazyGoatLady · 28/11/2025 21:16

Genevieva · 28/11/2025 09:51

Your brother is British by descent not naturalisation, so was British from birth. The suggestion was very loose. More a general principle of if adults move to a country they shouldn’t expect that country to support them. If they can’t support themselves they should go home.

That system already exists because you can't bring dependents to the UK unless you can sponsor and support them financially for at least five years until they can apply for indefinite leave to remain. If you lose your job while on a visa that's tied to your employment, you either have to find a new employer to sponsor you or return home.

Asylum seekers are not permitted to work until they are given their decision, so they can't become net contributors until that point. And they can be sent home at any time.

It's generally recognised that once people become citizens or have ILR, they have put down roots and established connections in their new country to an equal or greater extent as their country of birth. Hence why we didn't think sending the Windrush generation "home" was morally right.

CrazyGoatLady · 28/11/2025 21:26

Ablushingcrow · 28/11/2025 16:15

And I'd get rid of the whining 'you can't say that, it's racist!' like you.

You can say what you like. Just don't expect that people will put up with it. As evidenced by the number of your nasty racist comments that get deleted.

LoyalMember · 29/11/2025 11:16

UserNumber56 · 28/11/2025 10:09

Do you not think though that it could be the lack of overseas aid that is the problem in many cases?

Surely a way to reduce the numbers of people fleeing their home countries and attempting to reach the UK (and other European countries) would be to improve the living conditions in those poorer countries, so that their populations wouldn't feel that emigration is their only option? Withdrawing aid just exacerbates the problem.

Okay, fine, they can step over our homeless and needy on the the way to their free accommodation.

bottleofredbottleofwhite · 29/11/2025 11:27

Make a 0.01 % charge on every transaction in the country. From a coffee to buying a house and use this money to build social housing.

222days · 29/11/2025 11:30

ElectoralControversy · 28/11/2025 09:13

I agree with a lot of this though I would have a less authoritarian approach to id cards/ cash working etv

Noone would ever vote for it though. Can you imagine trying to sell means-testing the state pension 😬

It would be fun to implement your 13 though - a lot of very rich people invested a lot of money convincing the plebs to vote Brexit so they didn't have to reveal their dodgy financial dealings. Mega lolz if they had to anyway...but the UK will never implement legislation like that🫤

I know, I totally agree: nobody will vote for what needs to be done and evidence-based policies that will actually raise livings standards so the doom loop will continue to accelerate, and become a fall at terminal velocity if the UK public decides to vote for a Reform Government.

Sadly, we lack any politicians with the vision or integrity even to attempt it, and lack an electorate with sufficient foresight and economic understanding to demand competent politicians who will do so. It is useful, however, to highlight that there are coherent policies that could reverse the current decline if implemented and that the claims of successive Governments that there is nothing they can do about it, and that they have to make “tough decisions” (by which they mean implementing policies that will actually make things worse, rather than doing the things I listed), is false.

222days · 29/11/2025 11:36

HelenaWaiting · 28/11/2025 09:14

I am actually Italian. I'm from Aosta. So please do feel free to point out the glaring grammatical errors that led you to conclude that I can't possibly be sufficiently qualified to command a six figure salary. I have a biology degree, a medical degree and a DPhil. I should point out at this juncture that I have been in the UK quite long enough to understand the vernacular.

You assumed, quite wrongly, that because I made a comment slighting those on high salaries (£100000 is high, not "moderate") I must be receiving benefits; as if it is completely inconceivable that I might be both extremely comfortable and aware that a decent salary conveys a certain privilege about which one should be mindful. Instead of taking my comment at face value you made certain assumptions about me, my likely income and my lifestyle. That is abundantly clear so you can stick your "metaphor" where the sun doesn't shine.

It wasn’t about your grammar, it was about your tone which didn’t appear to be how a professional person would usually write, and the fact that you’d made very emotional and divisive comments about the subject rather than analytical and rational ones with any suggestion of how to improve things, which was the subject of the OP.

Based on your later responses you seem to have misinterpreted the general third person plural “you” as a third person singular reference to you personally, which is understandable if English is your second language, alongside perhaps you being unfamiliar with metaphorical expressions in English such as “biting the hand that feeds you”, which does not imply that people are actually canines. This would explain why you took personal offence to my comment and incorrectly interpreted it as an insult directed at you personally, when it was not.

222days · 29/11/2025 11:38

whatsnewpussycat34 · 28/11/2025 11:27

How do I vote for you as prime minister @222days 😂

Ha! I would never be prepared to do that job. Shame somebody who wants to won’t adopt my list of policies, though. It’s really sad that things could be improved substantially for the vast majority of the population and future generations but we have nobody to vote for who is prepared to do it.

222days · 29/11/2025 11:39

222days · 29/11/2025 11:36

It wasn’t about your grammar, it was about your tone which didn’t appear to be how a professional person would usually write, and the fact that you’d made very emotional and divisive comments about the subject rather than analytical and rational ones with any suggestion of how to improve things, which was the subject of the OP.

Based on your later responses you seem to have misinterpreted the general third person plural “you” as a third person singular reference to you personally, which is understandable if English is your second language, alongside perhaps you being unfamiliar with metaphorical expressions in English such as “biting the hand that feeds you”, which does not imply that people are actually canines. This would explain why you took personal offence to my comment and incorrectly interpreted it as an insult directed at you personally, when it was not.

@HelenaWaiting that’s not a criticism by the way - I would not understand such things in Italian! It was helpful to understand how this misunderstanding came about.

HRTQueen · 29/11/2025 11:49

Tax extreme wealth higher especially on their assists and close the loopholes that allow wealthy to pay less tax and money to go towards all public services

create a cross party committee that deals with reforming the health service the NHS is not worth keeping just because it’s free at the point of service and look to France and Germany health case systems

Cap rents and increase home building

tax higher money made from property income

do something about putting laws into place so we decrease the millions of public money wasted on planning projects this has become a hugely profitable business in itself

BoredZelda · 29/11/2025 11:56

LoyalMember · 27/11/2025 22:26

Pull the plug on all overseas aid and spend it on the needy here. Not one solitary pound should go abroad while our own people are sleeping rough and homeless.

Very short sighted. The tiny amount of money we spend overseas would do little to combat issues here, and it serves a wider purpose. Global health initiatives like vaccination programs and healthcare protect the world from disease spreading. For example, the work we do on Ebola has stopped a global outbreak. Because we vaccinate at risk groups overseas from TB, we no longer need to vaccinate in the U.K.

The largest amount we spend on humanitarian aid is currently in Ukraine. Were it not for aid supporting people to remain in their country, they would be far more likely to come here where it costs way more to support them. The same is true of Syria and Afghanistan.

FalseSpring · 29/11/2025 14:00

The first thing I would do is increase the personal tax free allowance to around £20,000 or more, maybe link it to minimum wage x 30-35 hours.

Then I would amalgamate income tax and NI to make the system easier, so abolish NI but add the necessary % to income tax. I would get rid of employer's NI completely to boost the job market but put a couple of % on Corporation Tax.

I would also force a better balance between staff pay at different levels and incentivise more profit sharing schemes to make things fairer and reduce the inflated earnings of wealthy business owners.

Obviously to balance the books I would need to make huge cuts in spending but these would include abolishing a lot of tax credits for low earners as people should earn their own money. Means test all remaining benefits including the state pension and increase ongoing financial checks to cut down on benefit fraud. It shouldn't be an easy option to live on benefits. This would all need to be carefully planned to avoid critical cliff edges and allow people to earn a small sporadic income for a lower level of benefits to account for those trying to top up their income from self employment. Back in the 1980s, there was a weekly enterprise allowance (of limited duration) for the newly self employed to help them get started - something like this should be brought back to encourage people such as the out of work, the disabled and stay at home parents of young children to earn what they can working from home, etc.

Scrap the NHS and set up a European style (not US) insurance contribution based system. Introduce ID cards and ensure only those over 18 who have paid in (or are genuine emergencies) are treated unless they can pay the bill. The current free-for-all needs to stop. All health services should remain free for under 18s if they have British citizenship - everyone else needs insurance or to be entitled to contribution-based state pension based on years worked. We have an aging population so can't possibly pay for everyone in the future. Those that can afford it should be incentivised to go private by offering tax relief on private health insurance. I really don't care if it produces a two-tier system, there needs to be a safety net, but not to the extent that exists now.

Set up many more minor injury units/24 hour GPs in the community to remove the pressure on A&E which should be restricted to real life-threatening A&Es (or those referred from minor injury/GP) only. Also set up more separate mental health and addiction units as these issues need to be dealt with away from A&E. GPs need to invest in more equipment to reduce the need for hospital visits. Things like blood test analysis, ECGs and scans should be available at GP surgeries (they are in many other countries) to speed up the system of diagnosis and treatment.

Re-organise local councils to remove the postcode lottery that occurs in many aspects of local council services and standardise everything across the regions which would simplify the rules, and cut the need for so many staff. The ridiculous planning system needs a complete overhaul as do many other local services.

We should incentivise multi-generational living, not penalise people for building annexes on their homes. We should offer more tax incentives for carers of all types, whether it is care of young children or the elderly. An increase in the tax free allowance should be provided for anyone who has a dependant relative (child or elderly relative) living with them. We need to get away from the need for two full-time working parents - it is detrimental to parents and children alike and is increasing the need for social care. The Government currently pays for third-party organised childcare, but offers no incentive for families to look after their own children and I find that very wrong. Surely in most cases, the best care is given by a parent or close relative. Whilst I wouldn't want to see a return of the 1950s style housewife, I think in the early years should be made easier for either parent to reduce hours, or take time off work to look after their children.

Council Tax should also be abolished. Paying for things like education and social services on the basis of the value of your house (in 1991) is a crazy idea. Also, the fact that it is a local tax means that there are huge discrepancies across the country with Londoners paying much less than everyone else. Everyone needs to contribute and again I would prefer that these taxes were added to income tax. I do however approve of the new £2m mansion tax and think that is a better solution to shift some of the tax burden to the very wealthy. I also think an annual house tax like this would be preferable to the current system of stamp duty (which I also think should be abolished).

Services such as bin emptying should be on a much fairer 'per bin' basis. Road repairs should be paid for from fuel duties (including duties on electric car usage) so they are paid for by those that use them most - ie. per mile. Road tax is another whole unnecessary department that could be scrapped if we just put a higher tax on fuels.

Education is another problem area, but I could make a whole other long post about that so I won't go into it here as this post is already long enough!

I think we also need to substantially increase import taxes, including import taxes on food. We need to support British farmers and eat more local produce. Food flown round the world should be an expensive luxury, not a cheap alternative.

I believe that if taxes and benefits were much more transparent, people would have less issues paying them!

Vitriolinsanity · 29/11/2025 15:23

Introduce a surcharge, it can be called the TAT, on all orders made to Shein, Temu and Amazon. The TAT goes directly to HMRC.

GeneralPeter · 29/11/2025 15:23

Needs much more than a year but build lots more housing (/deregulate planning) and build a huge fleet of nuclear power stations. Scrap SDLT, scrap the absurd rent control law Labour seems to have passed by accident, to improve housing supply.

Reinstate the non-dom regime for new arrivals to attract high-tax paying, low service-using global rich to ease the tax burden on those already here.

Dmsandfloatydress · 29/11/2025 15:41

Social housing for UK citizens only. Government able to garnish the bank accounts of fathers who do not live with their kids. Unemployment benefit for non resident fathers limited to 6 months. Passports seized from absent fathers who do not pay child support. Onus on fathers to prove that the child is not biologically theirs.
Only palliative care to people over 80. We are all living too long and keeping people alive too long.
Massive social housing programme set up with NEETs required and paid to learn the construction trade and work to build said houses. If they refuse then benefits will be withdrawn. Anxiety and depression will not be an excuse.
It will be expensive and need to be costed but in the long run will save the country billions.

crossedlines · 29/11/2025 16:33

Agree with most of @FalseSpring’s suggestions. However, I think means testing the state pension would be a bad idea as people should be encouraged to pay into occupational / private pensions as much as possible (and indeed with auto enrolment this is clearly what the govt wants.)

the problem with means testing certain things is that people will game the system- why would I pay hundreds of pounds into an occupational pension if I’m going to then lose hundreds of pounds from my state pension?! It’s similar to the concept of people who have savings needing to use them on care homes whereas the guy down the road who frittered all his assets away on his lifestyle will end up likely in the same care home funded by the state.

There are already too many perverse incentives created by govt policies over the years; means testing the state pension would be disastrous

CrazyGoatLady · 29/11/2025 19:59

FalseSpring · 29/11/2025 14:00

The first thing I would do is increase the personal tax free allowance to around £20,000 or more, maybe link it to minimum wage x 30-35 hours.

Then I would amalgamate income tax and NI to make the system easier, so abolish NI but add the necessary % to income tax. I would get rid of employer's NI completely to boost the job market but put a couple of % on Corporation Tax.

I would also force a better balance between staff pay at different levels and incentivise more profit sharing schemes to make things fairer and reduce the inflated earnings of wealthy business owners.

Obviously to balance the books I would need to make huge cuts in spending but these would include abolishing a lot of tax credits for low earners as people should earn their own money. Means test all remaining benefits including the state pension and increase ongoing financial checks to cut down on benefit fraud. It shouldn't be an easy option to live on benefits. This would all need to be carefully planned to avoid critical cliff edges and allow people to earn a small sporadic income for a lower level of benefits to account for those trying to top up their income from self employment. Back in the 1980s, there was a weekly enterprise allowance (of limited duration) for the newly self employed to help them get started - something like this should be brought back to encourage people such as the out of work, the disabled and stay at home parents of young children to earn what they can working from home, etc.

Scrap the NHS and set up a European style (not US) insurance contribution based system. Introduce ID cards and ensure only those over 18 who have paid in (or are genuine emergencies) are treated unless they can pay the bill. The current free-for-all needs to stop. All health services should remain free for under 18s if they have British citizenship - everyone else needs insurance or to be entitled to contribution-based state pension based on years worked. We have an aging population so can't possibly pay for everyone in the future. Those that can afford it should be incentivised to go private by offering tax relief on private health insurance. I really don't care if it produces a two-tier system, there needs to be a safety net, but not to the extent that exists now.

Set up many more minor injury units/24 hour GPs in the community to remove the pressure on A&E which should be restricted to real life-threatening A&Es (or those referred from minor injury/GP) only. Also set up more separate mental health and addiction units as these issues need to be dealt with away from A&E. GPs need to invest in more equipment to reduce the need for hospital visits. Things like blood test analysis, ECGs and scans should be available at GP surgeries (they are in many other countries) to speed up the system of diagnosis and treatment.

Re-organise local councils to remove the postcode lottery that occurs in many aspects of local council services and standardise everything across the regions which would simplify the rules, and cut the need for so many staff. The ridiculous planning system needs a complete overhaul as do many other local services.

We should incentivise multi-generational living, not penalise people for building annexes on their homes. We should offer more tax incentives for carers of all types, whether it is care of young children or the elderly. An increase in the tax free allowance should be provided for anyone who has a dependant relative (child or elderly relative) living with them. We need to get away from the need for two full-time working parents - it is detrimental to parents and children alike and is increasing the need for social care. The Government currently pays for third-party organised childcare, but offers no incentive for families to look after their own children and I find that very wrong. Surely in most cases, the best care is given by a parent or close relative. Whilst I wouldn't want to see a return of the 1950s style housewife, I think in the early years should be made easier for either parent to reduce hours, or take time off work to look after their children.

Council Tax should also be abolished. Paying for things like education and social services on the basis of the value of your house (in 1991) is a crazy idea. Also, the fact that it is a local tax means that there are huge discrepancies across the country with Londoners paying much less than everyone else. Everyone needs to contribute and again I would prefer that these taxes were added to income tax. I do however approve of the new £2m mansion tax and think that is a better solution to shift some of the tax burden to the very wealthy. I also think an annual house tax like this would be preferable to the current system of stamp duty (which I also think should be abolished).

Services such as bin emptying should be on a much fairer 'per bin' basis. Road repairs should be paid for from fuel duties (including duties on electric car usage) so they are paid for by those that use them most - ie. per mile. Road tax is another whole unnecessary department that could be scrapped if we just put a higher tax on fuels.

Education is another problem area, but I could make a whole other long post about that so I won't go into it here as this post is already long enough!

I think we also need to substantially increase import taxes, including import taxes on food. We need to support British farmers and eat more local produce. Food flown round the world should be an expensive luxury, not a cheap alternative.

I believe that if taxes and benefits were much more transparent, people would have less issues paying them!

Multi generational living will happen in my family over my dead body! Though I agree we should pay carers of elderly and disabled folks properly, whether they are family or doing it as a job. Moving in a parent or relative doesn't always negate the need for paid care either.

Mrsgreen100 · 10/04/2026 23:46

Change legislation and start making it compulsory for companies like Amazon to pay tax in this country on the profits they earn

Saynototheinevitable · 11/04/2026 00:02

Close the tax loopholes that corporates and high net worth individuals with clever accountants use to avoid paying tax. The more tax wealthier firms & individuals pay, the less of a tax burden ordinary tax payers have to carry.

The poor and middle earners have been taxed too much & helped the mega wealthy avoid paying it by being taxed to the hilt. I actually can't afford to pay out on additional bills & tax anymore.

I have nothing more left to give, if Rachel Reeves is planning another tax hike then I can't afford to pay it. Amazon needs to pay the UK the tax it owes on the profits it makes because we can't afford to subsidise it anymore.

mjf981 · 11/04/2026 00:10

Higher rate of inheritance tax and close the loopholes the wealthy use to avoid it.

Find a way to tax the massive corporates more. There must be a way to do it, even though they'll scream bloody murder that they'll all pack up and leave (they won't).

Tax gains on share price gains/dividends at a much higher rate than employment income.

Reduce immigration by 80%. The country is bursting at the seams.

Less money spent on woke schemes. I'm a leftie but the pandering to every single person to be 'inclusive' is a massive waste of money and effort.

EveyHammond · 11/04/2026 00:15

MzGG · 27/11/2025 21:53

To ask if you were Chancellor of the Exchequer, how would you combat the cost of living?

instruct the intelligence services to fiddle the stock market as much as possible.
people want capitalism that does not equate with having price limits on cost of food etc

EveyHammond · 11/04/2026 00:16

also engage the process of universal basic income,

mjf981 · 11/04/2026 00:25

Oh and another - means test the pension.

Australia does it already without major issue.

EveyHammond · 11/04/2026 00:31

mjf981 · 11/04/2026 00:25

Oh and another - means test the pension.

Australia does it already without major issue.

and the bus pass

Vaxtable · 11/04/2026 00:35

Lower taxes and review tax bands to get money spending into the market
NHS full review of processes to streamline, sort out procurement, reinvest oartners into more nurses and doctors to get waiting lists down and people back to work rather than being signed off because they are in so much pain awaiting operations. Anyone not entitled to free healthcare to pay up front

stop HS2 and East West rail and reinvest part into existing network, rest into increasing social housing and increasing defence

Sort immigration, thus reducing amount spent of them whilst awaiting entry or deportation money to be reinvested in defence

MPs and House of Lords expenses to be reviewed, no allowance for houses in London and constituent area. They buy in constituent area and stay in a hostel in London. House of Lords reduced in numbers

all quangos stopped no civil servant is to earn more than the PM with the PMs salary capped

Remove triple lock ( and I say that as someone who gets the state pension )