Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

'Mansion tax' - what if you just can't pay it?

1000 replies

shellinthesea · 26/11/2025 14:39

My elderly mum lives in a London house worth about 2million. She's been there for over 50 years, and is physically and mentally fragile. There is no way she would EVER want to move, the house and her neighbours are her whole world. She has no spare money - at all. (Neither do I, before anyone suggests this!) How is she supposed to manage this? It's not exactly her fault that the value of the property increased so much since my parents bought it all that time ago.

I also have a friend, also in London. Both parents sadly died in an accident about 15 years ago, and she used her inheritance to buy a family home which has also increased massively in value. It's probably also worth over 2 million now! She's a single mum on a lower income with 3 kids who very happy at their local school and within their community - what's she supposed to do?

It's just not as simple as 'you live in a high-value house, you can obviously afford to pay several grand a year' as RR seems to think. And for anyone who is about to say 'oh tiny violin, their houses are worth two million' - both of these situations are complicated and quite sad in many ways. Neither my mum nor my friend can simply just sell up and move...anyone have any thoughts on this?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Snowonground · 26/11/2025 22:52

MO0N · 26/11/2025 22:51

They have been sold the lie that anyone wealthy is just lucky and not hard working
@judgementday2 the wealthy who have worked hard are lucky that their efforts were richly rewarded. Many people work hard in stressful, dangerous & unpleasant jobs for low wages.
Many wealthy people get their income from the appreciation of assets, and so dont need to work.

Many wealthy people work hard and take personal risks to create the jobs that other people rely on.

MO0N · 26/11/2025 22:55

Hopefully this will have a significant chilling effect on the ever expanding property bubble🎈📌

Pandersmum · 26/11/2025 22:56

Glowingup · 26/11/2025 19:57

I would say it’s equally theft to expect to receive the entire value of the increase in property prices without being taxed on it. I’m guessing OP’s mum maybe paid 200k for her house when it was bought, yet if she sold, she’d get the massive massive windfall for free. I find that grossly unfair to be honest. It’s not like she’s worked for that money.

What about those with large mortgages on the property, who maybe bought the property last year.
Should they pay the same property tax as someone who owns the property outright? maybe the owners bought the property 30 years years ago and have the ‘gain’ you are talking about.

HopSpringsEternal · 26/11/2025 22:56

OneBadKitty · 26/11/2025 22:50

I would like to know how they can determine that a house is worth 2 million. Property is only worth what someone is prepared to pay for it - how can the gov. be valuing properties? Many houses are valued at one price when up for sale and then fail to sell at that price and have to be reduced before securing a sale. The value of houses is also not a fixed thing.

Presumably however they did it with the council tax bands in the first place.

OneBadKitty · 26/11/2025 22:56

Moving because of personal circumstances is one thing, having to move from your family home that you actually own because of random and unforseen circumstances created on the whim of a government which may turn out to be just a fleeting policy is ridiculous!

Rosscameasdoody · 26/11/2025 22:57

Hoardasurass · 26/11/2025 14:45

In your mums case if she truly can't afford it she can apply fir council tax benefit and if she doesn't qualify she will have to move

The mansion tax is payable as well as council tax.

Bramble01 · 26/11/2025 22:58

Sorry, but why should people now be forced to pay additional tax, just to live in their family home? Or be forced to sell their family home? These homes were already paid for from taxed income and stamp duty was paid on the purchase price so to now charge people for simply living in their family home is outrageous.

MO0N · 26/11/2025 22:58

Pandersmum · 26/11/2025 22:56

What about those with large mortgages on the property, who maybe bought the property last year.
Should they pay the same property tax as someone who owns the property outright? maybe the owners bought the property 30 years years ago and have the ‘gain’ you are talking about.

Yes, we need a disincentive to discourage the bidding up of property prices.

Thechaseison71 · 26/11/2025 23:02

TooBored1 · 26/11/2025 17:19

How are either of these situations different from someone who rents? They may well have lived in house for many years, raised families etc but if they now can't afford the rent/ running costs, they'll have to move.

Or people who own cheaper houses? If they can't afford the running costs, they'll just have to move too.

It's sad, and can be difficult, I agree, but if someone is living beyond their means, they will just have to make the change.

And if you are in a moulldy bedsit in a crappy part of the cheapest town?? Can't afford that get a cardboard box I suppose

People who rent then have no money can usually get help with the rent. Old people is social housing can get all the rent paid even if the place is too big for their needs.

MrsElijahMikaelson1 · 26/11/2025 23:03

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 14:48

Tough. Sell up.

Oh the humanity

Sexentric · 26/11/2025 23:03

Jugendstiel · 26/11/2025 15:31

Maybe because they live there! A home is a home, not just its monetary value. They have roots, routines, friends, schools. Why should they move somewhere they know no one just because their home has rocketed up in value due to successive governments inexcusable lack of regulation of house prices since Thatcher's era?

Mansion tax should be for mansions. Not ordinary homes in London.

OP, could your mother consider renting out bedrooms to lodgers? There is a very good tax break on doing so, as you help ease the housing crisis. And it's no bad thing to have people living in your home if you are increasingly fragile. there are some schemes where young people who need cheap accommodation are placed with elderly people who need company. Maybe nursing students or PhD students on shoestring bursaries. Worth considering.

2mln is not the price of an 'ordinary' home. Even in London. Are you mad?
I live in London and I can guarantee that even here a £2mln home is a luxury home in a very nice neighborhood. Sorry granny, I have very limited sympathy. Just like the rest of the population if you can't afford to live there you'll have to think about moving.

Phoenixfire1988 · 26/11/2025 23:03

Lots of people have to downsize when they dont want to she could buy a bungalow in a different area with the proceeds . Or are you more concerned thats your inheritance down the drain ?
Could you not move in and take over the costs and build her a granny flat or build her a granny flat at your home using proceeds from the house ?

AngelicKaty · 26/11/2025 23:08

shellinthesea · 26/11/2025 17:59

Fully aware of how ridiculous it all sounds. Yes of course 2 million is a lot of money and I know their are bigger priorities - the failing health service, children in poverty, people living on the streets who don't have homes to worry about.

But what I am saying is, in my mother's case - a move now would be very, very disruptive for her. I could go as far to say it could kill her, which may sound melodramatic, but she has complex problems and it's possible. Either way, it would massively risk her health and mental state.

If I were selfish I and my siblings would have been encouraging her to move years ago - bluntly, we would have all benefitted financially under the current IHT rules if she'd sold up, bought a cheaper place, gifted us the remaining money and lived for 7 more years. But we'd never ask that of her.

She doesn't have to move. She could release some of the equity in her home to cover the additional tax and this would be repaid (with interest, obviously) from the house sale after she dies.

Phoenixfire1988 · 26/11/2025 23:12

Thechaseison71 · 26/11/2025 23:02

And if you are in a moulldy bedsit in a crappy part of the cheapest town?? Can't afford that get a cardboard box I suppose

People who rent then have no money can usually get help with the rent. Old people is social housing can get all the rent paid even if the place is too big for their needs.

Actually no they can't they get bedroom taxed at 14% for one bedroom and 24% for 2 or more this is to encourage people to downsize when they no longer need a larger house .

AngryBookworm · 26/11/2025 23:13

Given that your mother won't have to pay any of this tax, at all, until she dies (at which time she won't need it), and your friend will be able to postpone the payment until she realises her house's massive increase in value, this is an entirely confected problem.

As PPs have said, we need to find the money from somewhere. Will this fix everything? No, but it's money we then don't have to take from people who are struggling to make ends meet or keep businesses going.

It doesn't sound like it will affect older people who are living in big houses in London and the southeast, but if it did give them an incentive to move somewhere smaller and free up a house to be used more efficiently, is that the worst thing? Most areas of London in particular have a mix of smaller flats and houses, so downsizing wouldn't necessarily mean moving to an unknown area.

LancashireButterPie · 26/11/2025 23:14

Could you help your mum to manage the house and make it work for her?
Rent off a room or two to a student? There are schemes that match students with elderly people. That should pay the council tax and it might be company for her.

Staringintothevoid616 · 26/11/2025 23:15

Labour is a party of jealousy - it hates people who are successful..

she did mention something about delaying paying.

it’s essentially a wealth tax - it’s a dry tax charge..

Total incompetence. Typical Labour spunking money up the wall.

Sexentric · 26/11/2025 23:15

TempestTost · 26/11/2025 19:47

It's stupid, it really doesn't benefit anyone.

People having to move when they are settled in a community for many years, because of a cancerous real estate sector and therefore taxes on the property, is just part of a sick economy. The houses themselves haven't changed, they weren't modest houses that magically transformed into "mansions". They are still modest houses, that are over-valued.

The people who benefit will of course be the rich, who continue to drive those with modest incomes out of the communities they have built.

Sorry but no. A 2mln house is not and never had been 'modest'. God. Check your privilege.

Staringintothevoid616 · 26/11/2025 23:16

LancashireButterPie · 26/11/2025 23:14

Could you help your mum to manage the house and make it work for her?
Rent off a room or two to a student? There are schemes that match students with elderly people. That should pay the council tax and it might be company for her.

I can’t imagine she will want to shared her home with a student.

shellinthesea · 26/11/2025 23:20

There’s so many spiteful attitudes on this thread. My mother will only be ‘living beyond her means’ because her house increased to such a crazy value - and now this government have decided that, despite her paying tax when she bought it, paying tax over her whole working life (not to mention the tax that will be paid when she eventually dies), that’s not enough.

Yes, I know she HAS a home and many don’t. I know that there are people living in poverty and it seems appalling that anyone with such an asset could struggle. But no, she can’t magic up more money to pay it (some people don’t seem to understand that), and yes - the move in itself (if it comes to that - hopefully not if one can indeed defer) would be massively, massively detrimental to her.

In her eyes, she’s not ‘sitting on 2 million’. She’s sitting in the only place she feels safe as she approaches the end of her life. It would be much better if the house were worth far, far less and she could remain there.

I understand her position is quite unique - but it sickens me how this government seem unwilling to levy taxes on the super rich (‘because they don’t want them to leave’) but will introduce policies like this one.

OP posts:
BananaPeels · 26/11/2025 23:20

Sexentric · 26/11/2025 23:15

Sorry but no. A 2mln house is not and never had been 'modest'. God. Check your privilege.

What is the size of a modest home? What square footage before it becomes a mansion?

Nicewoman · 26/11/2025 23:20

HPFA · 26/11/2025 22:51

There was a recent article in the Observer about pensioners who've never been able to afford a home who are now having to rent rooms in the private sector.

A situation that will become increasingly common.

Any tears for those people?

Not really. I know tons, literally tons of people who are either in well paid jobs or poorly paid jobs who are living it up spend for today, holidays, flash cars, constant treats. Living it up big style. They have the option of not having holidays, but saving instead, not constantly treating themselves, but sacrificing so they could afford to buy the cheapest property, or grafting, no chance, they have no intention as they all say “the state can look after me”. “Not being a wage slave” when you say “how about getting a 2nd job” “how about not having kids if you can’t afford them” “how about working hard?”. No planning for the future. Well, you live with the consequences. Renting when a pensioner is a sign of a hedonistic life you deliberately chose when younger.

Widow90210 · 26/11/2025 23:23

I can have empathy for both of those cases but ultimately they are sitting on a huge pot of equity which was made largely through luck...
I'm sorry your friend had an inheritance and chose to put it all into one property. Buying a smaller property and investing for an income would have given her freedom and support also but meant she was self reliant. Putting it all into one property Means she is now facing an upkeep bill she can't afford.
It's got to come from somewhere. The alternative is a huge Inheritance tax when they pass on to rebalanced the books.
I've seen so many posts on here today that say it's jealousy... its not... they are sitting on assets and it needs to pay its way.

ledmeup · 26/11/2025 23:26

She could afford it before the novel tax. And now she can't and may have to leave her home. In order that benefits be increased to non working people.

Benefits like the triple lock for pensioners….

ledmeup · 26/11/2025 23:29

@shellinthesea but if she can defer what is the issue? So the super rich should pay more but not the rich?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread