Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

'Mansion tax' - what if you just can't pay it?

1000 replies

shellinthesea · 26/11/2025 14:39

My elderly mum lives in a London house worth about 2million. She's been there for over 50 years, and is physically and mentally fragile. There is no way she would EVER want to move, the house and her neighbours are her whole world. She has no spare money - at all. (Neither do I, before anyone suggests this!) How is she supposed to manage this? It's not exactly her fault that the value of the property increased so much since my parents bought it all that time ago.

I also have a friend, also in London. Both parents sadly died in an accident about 15 years ago, and she used her inheritance to buy a family home which has also increased massively in value. It's probably also worth over 2 million now! She's a single mum on a lower income with 3 kids who very happy at their local school and within their community - what's she supposed to do?

It's just not as simple as 'you live in a high-value house, you can obviously afford to pay several grand a year' as RR seems to think. And for anyone who is about to say 'oh tiny violin, their houses are worth two million' - both of these situations are complicated and quite sad in many ways. Neither my mum nor my friend can simply just sell up and move...anyone have any thoughts on this?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
rainbowsandraspberrygin · 26/11/2025 20:45

Slinketypokey · 26/11/2025 14:46

It’s hard and I’m sure I’ll get a kicking for saying this but…

we’re skint. As a country we’re skint. The NHS is on its knees. Schools are on their knees. Our armed forces are underfunded and Russia potentially marching in.

The money has to come from somewhere. And everyone agrees we have all these problems to solve but when it comes to them having to pay they don’t like it.

Reality is, if she can’t afford it she’ll either have to move or get a lodger. Both options suck, I agree. But people dying on stretchers outside A&E departments also suck. Violent offenders getting released early from jail because we can’t afford to keep them in sucks. A lot of things suck. And in the scheme of things people being pushed, via taxation, to vacate big properties and free them up for families is one of the things that suck less than other things, though I appreciate massively impactful if you are impacted.

For my part I hope this is the push for my elderly parents to move to a smaller more manageable home rather than rattling around a big house they don’t even go into parts of one year to the next.

Sadly I agree with this. The money has to come from somewhere and there isn’t an option that keeps everyone happy.

Applesonthelawn · 26/11/2025 20:47

We have to get people back to working full time and businesses back to hiring people. Otherwise we are only promoting the weak in society to the detriment of the industrious, and of course that can only end badly. Labour get into power once in a generation and then manage to remind everyone why they shouldn't vote for them. It'll be over in a year or two and hopefully we'll get something more sensible. I'm

Catladywithoutacat · 26/11/2025 20:47

Seriously BOOHOO

OverNotOver · 26/11/2025 20:49

WearyExLondoner · 26/11/2025 20:40

Notting Hill was a run-down hell hole in the 1970s. Houses were cheap and no one wanted to live there if they could afford somewhere else. Now those homes go for millions.

Poorer people don’t move house frequently - it’s too expensive with moving costs, solicitors fees, stamp duty etc. So they buy a house they can afford and work hard to make it into the house they wish they could afford. And they stay put. For years and years. Through working, bringing up a family, and finally in retirement.

Then some squeaky-haired half-wit comes along and states that because the homeowner hasn’t moved for 50 years, the insane increase in the value of their house over time is unearned wealth for which they should be eternally grateful. And taxed on it too. Taxed on the assumption that they are magically wealthy enough to afford to buy the house at its current price, even though they bought it when the area was little better than a drug and crime ridden slum.

Maybe if Hull suddenly became fashionable and desirable the residents would be happy to pay a surcharge on their unearned locality benefit? And if they don’t like it or can’t afford it, then they can simply move and downsize.

Edited

But they do have unearned wealth and in owning a £2m home they are wealthy enough to buy a £2m home were they to sell it.

I do get the point, but I don’t like this pretence that because they’ve lived there a long time it’s not a very considerable asset. If they sold it, would they be willing to accept what they paid for it plus inflation? Absolutely not, they’d want their £2m!

Lou7171 · 26/11/2025 20:50

Applesonthelawn · 26/11/2025 20:47

We have to get people back to working full time and businesses back to hiring people. Otherwise we are only promoting the weak in society to the detriment of the industrious, and of course that can only end badly. Labour get into power once in a generation and then manage to remind everyone why they shouldn't vote for them. It'll be over in a year or two and hopefully we'll get something more sensible. I'm

Honestly, previous Labour governments have done a hell of a lot more for working class people than the Tories. There's no doubt about that.

soupyspoon · 26/11/2025 20:50

I suppose OPs mothers house could be something akin to this, probably not so fancy done up, but basically just a titchy terrace

Still expensive even 25 years ago, not sure about 50 years ago as per someone saying Notting Hill was a hell hole 50 years ago

https://www.rightmove.co.uk/properties/168103601#/?channel=RES_BUY

Umbilicat · 26/11/2025 20:51

JohnofWessex · 26/11/2025 20:42

From the description of the house it seems bizarre that the house could be worth over £2 million

Are you really sure?

If you are then it shows how dysfunctional the UK Housing Market is

Glad at least one poster on here is beginning to see this is not quite as simple as it might first appear if you have no experience of the SE housing market – London in particular

CloudSky · 26/11/2025 20:52

Honestly, if I’d bought a house that had increased so massively in value so as to be worth 2 million, but I was on a “low” income, I’d use my financial sense and sell it, release the funds and invest them in a way to benefit me. There’s no point anyone owning a house they can’t afford to run. I wouldn’t want £2mil tied up in assets if I was struggling on a low income, that’s crazy.

Nofilter · 26/11/2025 20:52

so many of us having to make really hard decisions due to the state of the countries finances. You just have to do what’s best for your family and get on with it. I’m absolutely sick to my stomach at the thought of having to sell my lovely farm - my 9yr old loves so much, she wakes up to her ponies every day.

I just don’t think in this climate I can keep it going and will have to downsize so I can sleep at night. The worry is too much. I know it will be a move I’ll never get over but keeping us afloat and some sort of future for my DD is more important. People have it much worse. Times are definitely changing and I’m planning a lot more frugally as a result. Future less certain.

harrietm87 · 26/11/2025 20:53

@WearyExLondoner

Why should people pay tax on their income (that they work for) but not on their property gains (that they don’t)?

Why should your ability to buy a house in London be determined by whether your parents bought a house in London and so can gift you a huge deposit, rather than by the salary you earn or how hard you work?

Goldwren1923 · 26/11/2025 20:53

Where in London such small house will be 2m? Chelsea? It’s extremely rare case and you’ll have to figure it out

Sequinsoneverythingplease · 26/11/2025 20:53

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 14:48

Tough. Sell up.

The absolute spiteful cuntiness on MN just beggars belief sometimes 🙄

kittywittyandpretty · 26/11/2025 20:55

Applesonthelawn · 26/11/2025 20:47

We have to get people back to working full time and businesses back to hiring people. Otherwise we are only promoting the weak in society to the detriment of the industrious, and of course that can only end badly. Labour get into power once in a generation and then manage to remind everyone why they shouldn't vote for them. It'll be over in a year or two and hopefully we'll get something more sensible. I'm

One thing that the labour government are very good at doing is giving money to people who spend it rather than hoard it which then has a knock on effect with Small to medium businesses popping up.
They popped back down again when the conservatives come in Who take the money from the Small to medium size business and prop up their mates in corporate land By giving them an unfair Advantage over all of these small medium size businesses with the tax breaks they offer.

Joeninety · 26/11/2025 20:58

So many people in the 60's and more so the 70's had the foresight to buy well. Why don't people, especially the young, have that sort of foresight and dare I say fibre nowadays to jump on opportunities ?

soupyspoon · 26/11/2025 20:58

The main difference, or used to be anyway, between Tories and Labour was that the Toris socialise public losses and privatise public gains

So public services, outsource them to the private sector, get loads of public, tax payer money going into private pockets.

When a private business does badly or needs top ups, the tax payer can also do this as well

This has been seen across the board, NHS tendering, public services being run as private business which of course you cant do with public need and statutory services (childrens residential and foster care being a case in point) HS2 as someone said, not seen any beneefit from this, public transport, the covid PPI fiasco

DoBestIKnow · 26/11/2025 21:04

I’m in a similar situation, bought a big house for a fraction of £2m 25 years ago because, after I was first widowed I married a widower (used the insurance money) and we had to put two families together and I worked (still do) at home. But now they’ve all moved out and second husband too has died. But moving would
a) cost a fortune
b) I can walk from here to the station, the library, coffee shops, buses, churches, everywhere, so I want to live here, but there are no spare houses. I’d have to move away from everything I know and do.
I’d do a swap with the lovely young family next door to me but this house is probably too big for them. In the meantime, I have lodgers and they keep me company and their rent helps me run the house.

HillBetty · 26/11/2025 21:05

Yanbu and I am not right leaning at all.

Im not sure how they monitor this and how the value is determined. Surely its when you buy / sell eg) stamp duty

My db just bought a massive new build house mortgage free
. .. but its in the middle of nowhere in scotland and under 1m. I live in a 4 bed just short of 2m house in Sw london we bought for 700k ... its small compared to his.. he is by far wealthier than me but unaffected.

All for a wealth tax but needs to be applied differently l. And i dont mind paying to be clear if i had to

Thankyourose · 26/11/2025 21:05

Kittlewittle · 26/11/2025 19:18

A £2 million house is a 3 bed terrace in many parts of London, that an elderly person may have bought for under £100k, on a modest income.

These aren't mansions, and why should the elderly be forced to move?

I’d be okay with the 1.9 m profit to be honest.

FurbieFan · 26/11/2025 21:06

Sounds like it’s time for your mum to move and release equity

JohnofWessex · 26/11/2025 21:07

If I was to make an obvious comparison

If you have over £16K in savings then you cant get Universal Credit which most people seem to think is quite right

If however even by chance you end up with a £2 million house even if it was a sheer fluke AND you have a limited income why should you be exempt from paying tax on it

AND you may be allowed to roll over the tax so its not paid until death or sale

Please discuss

BIossomtoes · 26/11/2025 21:07

Joeninety · 26/11/2025 20:58

So many people in the 60's and more so the 70's had the foresight to buy well. Why don't people, especially the young, have that sort of foresight and dare I say fibre nowadays to jump on opportunities ?

Because there aren’t any?

latetothefisting · 26/11/2025 21:08

soupyspoon · 26/11/2025 20:17

Agreed, Im not strongly against this, I think that even if it does come in, its years away so people can plan and sell up if they need to, for people like OPs mother, she will just be able to defer the payment or equity release if she wishes (I wouldnt do this personally), she doesnt need to worry and neither does OP< it will be ok.

However the relish and glee and ageism again, swap age for ethnicity, disability and people would never talk like this and if they did the posts would be removed.

it's hardly ageism when the only reason we even know her mother's age was because OP was the one who brought it up in the first place to try and garner sympathy. Ultimately it's completely irrelevant how old her mother is or how long she's lived in the house - as is her race/ethnicity because she's be in the exact same position even if any of those elements changed.

There's no 'relishing' either because literally nothing is even going to happen to OP's mother - at most she'll accrue the unpaid tax until she dies or sells the house, and then OP (and, if she has any) her siblings, will have to pay it - after which they'll still inherit a fair whack of money they didn't earn.

No old ladies are going to be carted out of their homes and left on the streets to starve so nothing to be gleeful or sad about!

harrietm87 · 26/11/2025 21:08

Joeninety · 26/11/2025 20:58

So many people in the 60's and more so the 70's had the foresight to buy well. Why don't people, especially the young, have that sort of foresight and dare I say fibre nowadays to jump on opportunities ?

Ha ha ha

latetothefisting · 26/11/2025 21:10

CountryCob · 26/11/2025 19:01

Everyone saying suck it up richies doesn't seem to understand just how much money is leaving this country. People don't have to live in the UK. Many will take their assets to other systems and already are. Who will pay for the services then?

according to OP her mother is too infirm to move a few streets away so seems unlikely she'll be frolicking off to Dubai any time soon.

Glowingup · 26/11/2025 21:11

Joeninety · 26/11/2025 20:58

So many people in the 60's and more so the 70's had the foresight to buy well. Why don't people, especially the young, have that sort of foresight and dare I say fibre nowadays to jump on opportunities ?

They had zero foresight. They bought cheap family homes because they were available and affordable. Not available these days. If you have an example of opportunities that people are foregoing, please clarify. I’d jump on one if it existed. It doesn’t.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread