Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be annoyed pensioners effectively now get a bigger personal allowance

446 replies

FlightBeforeXmas · 26/11/2025 14:07

So because of the fiscal drag from not increasing personal allowances the chancellor has announced basic state pension will not be taxable.
So if you earn this amount you pay tax on it despite having the extra costs of working.
Pensioners are also much more like to own their homes.
How on earth does this make any sense?

OP posts:
moderndilemma · 26/11/2025 17:10

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 16:53

Well let’s start with it being raised by another £550 from next April?

“Today I will maintain all income Tax and equivalent National Insurance thresholds at their current level for three further years from 2030, while ensuring that people only in receipt of the basic or new state pension do not have to pay small amounts of tax through Simple Assessment from April 2027.”

Meanwhile, young people who face higher than ever costs of living do not receive any consideration in order to reduce the effects of fiscal drag. The income tax bands have stayed frozen and will remain frozen until 2031. The costs of living at very disproportionately front loaded - buying a house, settling down, etc etc.

By pension age your living costs should be considerably lower. No mortgage, no childcare, less food etc.

Yet I do not get any benefit at all.

But that is for pensioners who ONLY receive state pension. Nothing more. Elderly people (who are also challenged by the cost of living increases, and who now have no opportunity to increase their income). These are people who are trying to survive on £12,500.

Anyone (like me) who also has a small personal pension will pay full tax on that. I would much rather do that than try to survive on a state pension.

ThePolarEspresso · 26/11/2025 17:10

I don't understand why the working population who will likely have no state pension are funding a sometimes over double pension (if their homeland gives a bigger pension so say £12k from here and £14k on top from theirhomeland) for the retired now.

British passport holders (if they lived here at some point for 5 years and obtained paperwork) abroad and migrant pensioners here who get a pension from their homeland. Where as the British pensioner who stayed here only gets one state pension.

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 17:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

TheignT · 26/11/2025 17:11

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 17:05

Good.

working people don’t get any help with their bills. In fact the pensioners of Mumsnet love to disparage young people if they can’t afford anything. I’ve been called a leech and a parasite for still living at home because I can’t afford to get on the housing ladder. Something changes when you hit 66 though apparently. Suddenly you become entitled to all of this extra money.

Doesn't a working person on a low income get universal credit to help them?

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 17:12

Katypp · 26/11/2025 17:10

Nailed it.
I saw this thread and my first thought was Here We Go Again.
Endless moaning and spite from posters who are absolutely convinced that no generation has ever had things as tough as they have. Today's much-despised boomers are laughing in their faces as they skip off on yet another cruise, apparently.
I am not quite a boomer (born in 1967) but by the time i retire at 67, I will have worked for 50 years. So - assuming retirement age does reach 70 by the time these moaners get there, they probably still won't have worked as long, assuming they entered the workplace at 21 or 22, which seems to be about normal now.
My generation had lower house prices, that's certainly true, but we had a lot harder working life as parents. I was certainly not counting my good fortune when i returned to work full time (no flex working) when my baby was 12 weeks (6 weeks 90% pay, 12 weeks SMP) and pating full nursery fees (no subsidies).
And before anyone says it, both parents working was certainly the norm in the 90s.
I get utterly fed up of reading how hard done-by young families are when the expectations are so much higher than they were even 20 years ago. Soft play, new toys, annual holidays, 'experiences', takeaways, beauty treatments, activities and lunches out were all very occasional treats when i was beinging up my first child i the 90s.
Yes. I am talking in cliches and attacking younger people, but honestly the bitterness shown towards older people on MN just sickens me.

I have worked in some capacity since age 13.

when you were working house prices were, on average, 3.5x the average wage. The cost of living was a lot lower. You could survive on one income.

house prices are now 10 times the average salary.

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 17:13

TheignT · 26/11/2025 17:11

Doesn't a working person on a low income get universal credit to help them?

As a working person on minimum wage, the grand total of help id be entitled to is £91 a month. Why am I less valuable than a pensioner sat in their mortgage free home?

Chersfrozenface · 26/11/2025 17:13

Say the basic state pension is £12,861 in 2027/28 - the least it will be if the triple lock is retained.

The personal allowance will still be £12,570.

So someone on just the basic SP would theoretically have to pay tax on £291, which would raise £58.20. It's not impossible that it would cost more than that to collect it.

Katypp · 26/11/2025 17:14

ThePolarEspresso · 26/11/2025 17:10

I don't understand why the working population who will likely have no state pension are funding a sometimes over double pension (if their homeland gives a bigger pension so say £12k from here and £14k on top from theirhomeland) for the retired now.

British passport holders (if they lived here at some point for 5 years and obtained paperwork) abroad and migrant pensioners here who get a pension from their homeland. Where as the British pensioner who stayed here only gets one state pension.

Edited

Who says there will be no state pension? This is another one of those statement that is trotted out without thought.
If we've established pensioners are untouchable, how exactly do you think the entire state pension will be abolished in the next 30 years? Engage critical thought.

Gladyssunny · 26/11/2025 17:14

Mumsknot · 26/11/2025 14:33

I guarantee when we are pensioners, the tide will turn and we will get totally shafted

On what are you basing this prediction?

FlightBeforeXmas · 26/11/2025 17:15

Chersfrozenface · 26/11/2025 17:13

Say the basic state pension is £12,861 in 2027/28 - the least it will be if the triple lock is retained.

The personal allowance will still be £12,570.

So someone on just the basic SP would theoretically have to pay tax on £291, which would raise £58.20. It's not impossible that it would cost more than that to collect it.

The current system would already collect it, they will have to introduce a new layer of bureaucracy to stop taking it.

OP posts:
123H · 26/11/2025 17:15

The personal tax threshold, for pensioners AND working people, is £12,750

The full basic State Pension is £9,175 per year.

Therefore, a person living only on the state pension will currently not pay tax - because their income is below the tax threshold. It’s not rocket science!

I find it rather sad that some folk on here appear to begrudge a pensioner getting £9,175 a year to live on - even though that pensioner may have worked, paid tax and NI, for over 50 years.

Whatever happened to empathy!

TheignT · 26/11/2025 17:15

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I dont think any pensioners with income other than state pension are complaining about paying tax on their total income. I haven't heard any.

TheRealMagic · 26/11/2025 17:15

moderndilemma · 26/11/2025 17:10

But that is for pensioners who ONLY receive state pension. Nothing more. Elderly people (who are also challenged by the cost of living increases, and who now have no opportunity to increase their income). These are people who are trying to survive on £12,500.

Anyone (like me) who also has a small personal pension will pay full tax on that. I would much rather do that than try to survive on a state pension.

But if just over £12,500 is such a pitiful amount to live off why is anyone paying tax on that income? Why would you say there's no need to pay tax if you get that in pension, but if it's wages then you should?

FlightBeforeXmas · 26/11/2025 17:16

@TheRealMagic if it is a pitiful amount for a pensioner why is a working person taxed on it?

OP posts:
AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 17:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

CheeseIsMyIdol · 26/11/2025 17:16

TwoOneEyedTigers · 26/11/2025 14:13

YANBU. I feel that, in general, government policies seem to be giving to older people and taking away from younger people.

Older people have worked and contributed longer; they should get the most generous breaks.

Pay some dues, young people. You can't expect to have the lifestyle of long-working 50-60 somethings when you are in your 20s, 30s and 40s.

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 17:16

FlightBeforeXmas · 26/11/2025 17:16

@TheRealMagic if it is a pitiful amount for a pensioner why is a working person taxed on it?

Because they need someone to pay for their cruises!

BadgernTheGarden · 26/11/2025 17:17

FlightBeforeXmas · 26/11/2025 14:07

So because of the fiscal drag from not increasing personal allowances the chancellor has announced basic state pension will not be taxable.
So if you earn this amount you pay tax on it despite having the extra costs of working.
Pensioners are also much more like to own their homes.
How on earth does this make any sense?

The bit over the tax limit will be tiny! Have you tried to live on that amount of money? With no real option of increasing your income. £12,548 and many pensioners do not own a house!

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 17:17

CheeseIsMyIdol · 26/11/2025 17:16

Older people have worked and contributed longer; they should get the most generous breaks.

Pay some dues, young people. You can't expect to have the lifestyle of long-working 50-60 somethings when you are in your 20s, 30s and 40s.

God forbid we want to have the equivalent lifestyles of previous generations?

TheRealMagic · 26/11/2025 17:17

Chersfrozenface · 26/11/2025 17:13

Say the basic state pension is £12,861 in 2027/28 - the least it will be if the triple lock is retained.

The personal allowance will still be £12,570.

So someone on just the basic SP would theoretically have to pay tax on £291, which would raise £58.20. It's not impossible that it would cost more than that to collect it.

But if you earn £12,861 they seem to find the tax worth taking?

spannasaurus · 26/11/2025 17:18

There's currently no system that allows tax to be deducted at source for the state pension. I imagine the cost of collecting tax on state pensions for people who only receive state pension outweighs the tax that would be collected.

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 17:18

BadgernTheGarden · 26/11/2025 17:17

The bit over the tax limit will be tiny! Have you tried to live on that amount of money? With no real option of increasing your income. £12,548 and many pensioners do not own a house!

Edited

Should’ve saved more. Like your generation always tell mine. Live without luxuries and get on with it.

CheeseIsMyIdol · 26/11/2025 17:18

FlightBeforeXmas · 26/11/2025 17:16

@TheRealMagic if it is a pitiful amount for a pensioner why is a working person taxed on it?

Because the working person probably isn't elderly, has the health and option to work two jobs if necessary, and is otherwise in the building stage of their working life, not the ending stage where options to augment income are far fewer.

Old people have paid taxes all of their lives.

breezyyy · 26/11/2025 17:18

TheWiseAmethyst · 26/11/2025 15:42

Bitterness and spite may see some off earlier?

Yes. Perhaps they could go around clubbing all the pensioners to death to ease the resentment.

TheRealMagic · 26/11/2025 17:18

FlightBeforeXmas · 26/11/2025 17:16

@TheRealMagic if it is a pitiful amount for a pensioner why is a working person taxed on it?

I'm not sure if you mistagged or misread me - I agree entirely with you!

Swipe left for the next trending thread