Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be delighted PIP assessments are to be face to face?

464 replies

PAYE · 26/11/2025 14:04

The only good thing about the budget is that Rachel Reeves announced that face to face assessments for PIP and disability benefits are being brought back. AIBU to think that this is a great thing?

It will make sure that the money goes to those who need it. It is madness that such face to face assessments were ever stopped.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
dontletmedownbruce · 26/11/2025 16:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

OneNavyPoster · 26/11/2025 16:49

Completely unreasonable for assessments to be outsourced to a private company where they profit from this. Assessors routinely lie.

Over 70% of appeals go in favour of the disabled person making the PIP claim at enormous public cost. Private companies are not penalised for the additional cost of handling appeals - they are financially rewarded for turning claims down.

This is all about corporate greed at the cost of disabled people.

It is absolutely disgusting that anyone would be in support of a system that hands over so much taxpayer money to give a private company a huge profit.

The system is overwhelmingly biased against disabled people.

The cost of fraud is an absolutely minute fraction of the amount of profit made by private companies. Paying profit is a gigantic cost.

Zov · 26/11/2025 16:51

Everlore · 26/11/2025 16:36

Despite your protestations, having applied the duck hypothesis, I am happy with my initial assessment
In the vanishingly unlikely event that the situation is as you have described it, then, as previous posters have said, you may wish to think of notifying the DWP as UC should be stopped if one is out of the country for more than four weeks. However, if you are labouring under the misapprehension that someone's PIP claim must be bogus since you don't think disabled people can go on holiday then I will politely point out that you are mistaken. I have enjoyed many foreign holidays throughout my life, all while being completely blind since birth. So far, no amount of foreign travel has caused the eyeballs without which I was born to grow, so very much still disabled and still qualifying for PIP! Hope that puts your mind at rest.

💯

dontletmedownbruce · 26/11/2025 16:51

Everlore · 26/11/2025 16:36

Despite your protestations, having applied the duck hypothesis, I am happy with my initial assessment
In the vanishingly unlikely event that the situation is as you have described it, then, as previous posters have said, you may wish to think of notifying the DWP as UC should be stopped if one is out of the country for more than four weeks. However, if you are labouring under the misapprehension that someone's PIP claim must be bogus since you don't think disabled people can go on holiday then I will politely point out that you are mistaken. I have enjoyed many foreign holidays throughout my life, all while being completely blind since birth. So far, no amount of foreign travel has caused the eyeballs without which I was born to grow, so very much still disabled and still qualifying for PIP! Hope that puts your mind at rest.

I’m sorry to hear of your own disability and it’s great to hear this hasn’t held you back.

Also, I didn’t appreciate your suggestion that I’m a fantasist or a liar.

Zov · 26/11/2025 16:54

PropertyD · 26/11/2025 16:47

The Pip claims are spiralling out of control. The UK seem to have many many more people with MH issues, ADHD especially after COVID and of course there are the influencers out there who will tell you the key words to use.

I am staggered that assessments arent done face to face.

We cannot carry on approving more and more claims because it will end of spoiling it for the genuine claimant when a more realistic government is voted in.

Why on earth are you saying that assessments are not done face to face? Confused

Most are. What are you on about?

I am still waiting for the OP to come back and provide a link to this news story she has created a thread about.

Come on then @PAYE Show us a thread to this news from the budget today!

I won't hold my breath!

Zov · 26/11/2025 16:55

dontletmedownbruce · 26/11/2025 16:51

I’m sorry to hear of your own disability and it’s great to hear this hasn’t held you back.

Also, I didn’t appreciate your suggestion that I’m a fantasist or a liar.

Did you report this incredibly wealthy globe-trotting person on benefits then?

LadyKenya · 26/11/2025 16:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

So you reported them then, did you?

AutisticAndMore · 26/11/2025 16:57

Kirbert2 · 26/11/2025 16:44

It also completely discounts incredibly long hospital stays. My son was in hospital for so long that we applied for DLA when he was in hospital and he was still in hospital when his DLA was awarded.

To continue to receive child benefit, I had to prove that I was still providing for his needs even though he was in hospital. It was completely ridiculous and again, more stress when long hospital stays are already a huge financial strain.

Yes it’s utterly shit and people should not be penalised for being in hospital particularly as it’s more than likely that the stay is related to why they’re receiving PIP etc in the first place.
It also seems foolish because it encourages people to leave hospital before they have completed treatment in order to avoid having their benefits cut which is likely to mean their condition will deteriorate further and they’re likely to be hospitalised again which is ultimately going to cost the NHS and tax payers more money. It’s ultimately inefficient and foolish imo but I don’t expect anyone important to take it up as a cause any time soon.

dontletmedownbruce · 26/11/2025 16:58

Zov · 26/11/2025 16:55

Did you report this incredibly wealthy globe-trotting person on benefits then?

She isn’t incredibly wealthy. Where did you get that idea from? No savings, no assets, no property, no pension. In England she was incredibly poor, existing on benefits. In developing countries with no bills, her quality of life is good by comparison.

Andregroup · 26/11/2025 16:59

Anyone who is just faking, but who is so clever that they've managed to convince the doctors of it to get the relevant letters etc, is going to be able to convince the assessors too I'm afraid. All this will do is increase waiting times and make genuine claimants nervous and upset. I don't know what the answer is though.

Kirbert2 · 26/11/2025 17:01

AutisticAndMore · 26/11/2025 16:57

Yes it’s utterly shit and people should not be penalised for being in hospital particularly as it’s more than likely that the stay is related to why they’re receiving PIP etc in the first place.
It also seems foolish because it encourages people to leave hospital before they have completed treatment in order to avoid having their benefits cut which is likely to mean their condition will deteriorate further and they’re likely to be hospitalised again which is ultimately going to cost the NHS and tax payers more money. It’s ultimately inefficient and foolish imo but I don’t expect anyone important to take it up as a cause any time soon.

Exactly.

It makes no sense. I literally had to explain that just because my son is in hospital, it doesn't mean that he's stopped growing and magically won't need any new clothes.

sussexman · 26/11/2025 17:02

OneNavyPoster · 26/11/2025 16:49

Completely unreasonable for assessments to be outsourced to a private company where they profit from this. Assessors routinely lie.

Over 70% of appeals go in favour of the disabled person making the PIP claim at enormous public cost. Private companies are not penalised for the additional cost of handling appeals - they are financially rewarded for turning claims down.

This is all about corporate greed at the cost of disabled people.

It is absolutely disgusting that anyone would be in support of a system that hands over so much taxpayer money to give a private company a huge profit.

The system is overwhelmingly biased against disabled people.

The cost of fraud is an absolutely minute fraction of the amount of profit made by private companies. Paying profit is a gigantic cost.

The profit margin on all services provided by the largest health assessment provider is 9%. That's not "an enormous cost". It might be that TUPE'ing all the employees to the DWP and setting up a departmental management team to run the program costs a bit less than that 9%, but I wouldn't bet on it.

dontletmedownbruce · 26/11/2025 17:06

Everlore · 26/11/2025 16:36

Despite your protestations, having applied the duck hypothesis, I am happy with my initial assessment
In the vanishingly unlikely event that the situation is as you have described it, then, as previous posters have said, you may wish to think of notifying the DWP as UC should be stopped if one is out of the country for more than four weeks. However, if you are labouring under the misapprehension that someone's PIP claim must be bogus since you don't think disabled people can go on holiday then I will politely point out that you are mistaken. I have enjoyed many foreign holidays throughout my life, all while being completely blind since birth. So far, no amount of foreign travel has caused the eyeballs without which I was born to grow, so very much still disabled and still qualifying for PIP! Hope that puts your mind at rest.

Having made your initial assessment of my protestations (pompous, much?) you must believe what you want to believe, since I’m just a Mumsnet user on the end of a phone with no way to prove what I’m telling you. But it’s true.

RavenclawWitchy · 26/11/2025 17:06

LadyKenya · 26/11/2025 15:57

It is not 'so easy' to claim PIP.🙄 It is quite the opposite.

It actually is if you lie. If someone is playing the system it's not hard for them as it really makes no difference if they are awarded or not. If you have a genuine need for the assistance it is much harder as it actually has a serious impact whether ot not you are awarded.

Zov · 26/11/2025 17:06

dontletmedownbruce · 26/11/2025 16:58

She isn’t incredibly wealthy. Where did you get that idea from? No savings, no assets, no property, no pension. In England she was incredibly poor, existing on benefits. In developing countries with no bills, her quality of life is good by comparison.

What are you on about? 😆EVERYone's life in England is good in comparison to some other countries.

And why are you not answering everyone asking you if you have reported this globe trotting wealthy person on benefits? She MUST be quite wealthy doing all this travelling yes?

So..... did you report her? And if not, WHY not?

askmenow · 26/11/2025 17:07

dontletmedownbruce · 26/11/2025 14:11

How often though? And when will it start? As I’ve mentioned on another thread, I know someone travelling around south-east Asia. Claiming PIP and disability allowance and UC. Has a flat paid for by the state which has her stuff in it but is otherwise unoccupied.

She feels confident to continue her holiday / travelling, because her claim isn't reassessed until 2027.

Report her! Thats unconscionable conduct and fraud. Sooner we clamp down on PIP fraudsters the better because any system needs to be proven to be fair.

At the moment we have an evidently unfair benefits system, which is open to abuse.
We need a well advertised whistleblower website to clamp down on cheats.

Zov · 26/11/2025 17:07

RavenclawWitchy · 26/11/2025 17:06

It actually is if you lie. If someone is playing the system it's not hard for them as it really makes no difference if they are awarded or not. If you have a genuine need for the assistance it is much harder as it actually has a serious impact whether ot not you are awarded.

It is NOT easy to claim PIP, it is notoriously hard!!! FGS, this thread is infuriating!

LadyKenya · 26/11/2025 17:08

RavenclawWitchy · 26/11/2025 17:06

It actually is if you lie. If someone is playing the system it's not hard for them as it really makes no difference if they are awarded or not. If you have a genuine need for the assistance it is much harder as it actually has a serious impact whether ot not you are awarded.

A person can lie, all that they like, but if they have no medical evidence to support what they are saying, the assessors will not just take whatever they say, and run with it.

Cantbloodyrememberthenameonthread · 26/11/2025 17:10

Woollyguru · 26/11/2025 15:12

No it's not. It will hopefully put off some of the chancers from applying. Taxpayers money shouldn't just be handed out on the basis of a phone call.

Like no one on pip pays tax 🤣

dontletmedownbruce · 26/11/2025 17:10

Zov · 26/11/2025 17:06

What are you on about? 😆EVERYone's life in England is good in comparison to some other countries.

And why are you not answering everyone asking you if you have reported this globe trotting wealthy person on benefits? She MUST be quite wealthy doing all this travelling yes?

So..... did you report her? And if not, WHY not?

What “I’m on about” as you so charmlessly put it, is your assertion that the person I know is “an incredibly wealthy globe-trotter”. I was helping you to follow. This person has nothing. They have a state-funded rented flat. She has nothing at all except her benefits. Hope this helps.

Overthemhills · 26/11/2025 17:11

It’s so boring day after day of the increase in Pip claimants/ADHD/anxiety/free cars/taxpayers.
Ironically, the only benefit I can see that’s been reportedly changed is Universal Credit.
It hasn’t changed the amount or criteria for disabled benefits and yet still this OP has come out with a story to make sure people don’t forget that their are them disableds getting things for free you know

AutisticAndMore · 26/11/2025 17:12

Kirbert2 · 26/11/2025 17:01

Exactly.

It makes no sense. I literally had to explain that just because my son is in hospital, it doesn't mean that he's stopped growing and magically won't need any new clothes.

You’d think that would be obvious to anyone with half a brain cell but that just demonstrates exactly what a mess the benefits system is in many respects.

Zov · 26/11/2025 17:12

dontletmedownbruce · 26/11/2025 17:10

What “I’m on about” as you so charmlessly put it, is your assertion that the person I know is “an incredibly wealthy globe-trotter”. I was helping you to follow. This person has nothing. They have a state-funded rented flat. She has nothing at all except her benefits. Hope this helps.

Well she MUST have some wonga stashed away to be travelling as much as you say she is.

Hope that helps.

Zov · 26/11/2025 17:13

Also @dontletmedownbruce why are you not answering the question HAVE YOU REPORTED HER?!

Zov · 26/11/2025 17:14

Also @dontletmedownbruce how do you know so much about this person's outgoings and income and assets and benefits and travels? I don't know half as much as you do (about this random woman,) about my own best friends and adult children!

.