Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think raising NMW is a good thing

334 replies

Kilot · 26/11/2025 12:13

The poorest in society will earn more. Companies will have to pay more, benefits will drop.

OP posts:
TangoWhiskeyAlphaTango1 · 26/11/2025 13:24

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 12:15

God forbid those of us on low wages earn a somewhat liveable amount!

The difference between NMW and those in skilled work (newly qualified nurses for eg) is closing. My worry is that fewer people will be putting themselves through uni because the pay gap is minimal. Not saying folk don’t deserve more but there is knock on affect.

People are generally paid more for skill but if that gap closes what then?

TeenageSu1cideDontDoit · 26/11/2025 13:24

Linenpickle · 26/11/2025 12:19

I haven’t had 19 pay rises since 2000.

Then clearly you're lucky enough to have earned above MW.

randomchap · 26/11/2025 13:24

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 12:14

Companies will employ fewer people…

Companies will always employ the fewest people they can get away with.

Shoecamp · 26/11/2025 13:24

Kilot · 26/11/2025 12:33

Care homes and the like are often absolutely raking it in. They won’t pay their staff more than they have to. Same with hospitality.

Large chains of care homes, maybe. Smaller care homes are often absolutely on their knees and desperately short of extra cash. I don’t know why people think business in this country are all rolling in it

LoveItaly · 26/11/2025 13:25

Goalpace · 26/11/2025 13:07

A lot of comments from people seemingly gleeful that many, many businesses may go bust as a result of this.

Where do these people expect the people who sadly lose their jobs to do?

I know, it’s very depressing.

WhitegreeNcandle · 26/11/2025 13:25

RedTagAlan · 26/11/2025 13:17

The debate is not settled though. You appear to be stating outcomes as fact, when they actually are not.

This link has some data. Maybe not the best, but first result, and appears non biased.

Minimum Wage Increases: Do They Create Jobs or Cause Unemployment? - The Money Question

In general, job losses no, but less new low wage jobs coming on the market. If the raise is incremental. Large lumps in minimum wage look to be bad.

The bit that I think matters is item 2 on the link. Increased consumer spending.

Because of course, people on minimum wage are more likely to be living hand to mouth. So any extra they get is much more likely to go straight back into the economy, so the local economy is lifted . The more they have to spend, the more stuff is bought.

And if more stuff is bought, the less shops and businesses have to raise prices to cover their increased wage bill.

I know that last bit sounds a bit like a perpetual motion machine, but when you think about it, it does make sense.

That's my thinking anyway.

But they’re not spending in the local economy. They are buying all their clothes from SHEIN and Temu. Their household stuff from Amazon. They’re not spending it in the indie coffee shop on the posh high street.

SpaceRaccoon · 26/11/2025 13:26

Fleetheart · 26/11/2025 12:26

small businesses still have a responsibility to pay staff a living wage. Or do you think the government should support those people ?

Why not? They seem to support every other fucker.

CoraLea · 26/11/2025 13:26

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 12:27

I genuinely don’t care that some businesses can’t afford to pay their workers.

Why are we more bothered by protecting business owners than the working class?

Who do you think employs the working class??

The level of stupidity on this thread is quite astounding.

Not every business is coca-cola level, and they aren't the businesses that are going to be hit. Its the local micro/small businesses that are going to go bust 🙄

usedtobeaylis · 26/11/2025 13:27

Raising minimum wage is always a good thing in principle. In reality, early years and social care are fucking fucked.

Silverbirchleaf · 26/11/2025 13:27

out of curiosity. Looked to see the impact if the increase NMW and NI, and came up with this.

“The extra cost of increasing the National Minimum Wage (NMW) and National Insurance (NI)
falls on employers, and can be significant. For example, one calculation for a 35-hour-per-week employee aged 21+ on minimum wage shows a combined annual increase of £2,367 in wages and employer's NI contributions, according to Consilium Chartered Accountants. The exact total cost depends on the employee's salary, but it will increase staff costs and could lead employers to reduce hiring, offer smaller pay rises to other staff, or increase prices for customers, notes the BBC and Price Bailey Chartered Accountants. “

ie. £2000+ per year per person so if you employ five people, that’s £10000 + a year extra you have to find. And that’s profit, not turnover.

The cost of employment: Consilium CHartered Accountants look at the increases in the National Minimum wage, Employers' National Insurance contributions and more coming in April 2025.

The cost of employment is going up. Is your business ready? | Consilium Chartered Accountants

Ahead of April 2025 changes to Employers' NI and the Minimum Wage, how can businesses mitigate against the increased cost of employment?

https://consiliumca.com/news/business-ready-increased-cost-of-employment/

OmNomShiva · 26/11/2025 13:28

Imissgoldengrahams · 26/11/2025 12:18

100%
I manage a team, suppose to be 7 of them
There is currently 3. Which leaves me having to step up and do a job I wasn't employed for
"No money left in the budget for more staff" is their answer.

So your company is loss making ?

usedtobeaylis · 26/11/2025 13:28

CoraLea · 26/11/2025 13:26

Who do you think employs the working class??

The level of stupidity on this thread is quite astounding.

Not every business is coca-cola level, and they aren't the businesses that are going to be hit. Its the local micro/small businesses that are going to go bust 🙄

Edited

The government should be more focused on subsidising SMEs that struggle to pay wages. Not the suits at multi million pound retailers that ideologically refuse to pay decent wages.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 26/11/2025 13:29

CoraLea · 26/11/2025 13:26

Who do you think employs the working class??

The level of stupidity on this thread is quite astounding.

Not every business is coca-cola level, and they aren't the businesses that are going to be hit. Its the local micro/small businesses that are going to go bust 🙄

Edited

The thing is though no one wants Coca-Cola to go under either.

Just imagine the job loses.

The sheer hatred of everyone providing, or trying to provide jobs is so misguided.

Inthebleakmidwinter1 · 26/11/2025 13:31

In theory I agree with everyone being paid a wage they a reasonably live on. One problem I have is that the pay gap between people with low responsibility roles and those with high responsibility and more
demanding roles is getting smaller and smaller as there is no corresponding increase in the upper pay scales (public sector). Who wants to take on more responsibility and stress for a tiny pay increase.

WestwardHo1 · 26/11/2025 13:31

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

A massive issue is the creeping upwards of the minimum wage and people in "middle" positions' income barely moving, and people in graduate jobs. And there are a lot of them. Graduates who have spent three or four years studying and emerge with a degree and a ton of debt earning barely any more than the people with no skills and qualifications.

I don't think people in general have a problem with poor people becoming less poor. What they are debating is whether the crude attempts to fix poverty by the government will fix anything at all. Because when more people can afford things, prices tend to go up. And when businesses are being asked AGAIN to spend more on pay and NI increases, prices will go up. People on NMW aren't suddenly going to be able to afford to buy lots of lovely things because they are suddenly better off.

You cannot just blame everything on greedy business owners.

Anyway, I own a small business and employ three people part time. Damn right I want to be paid more than they are. I take literally ALL the risk and don't get any benefits at all. People can call me names if they wish.

TheNoonBell · 26/11/2025 13:31

AutumnLeavesandKnittedJumpers · 26/11/2025 12:17

Bollocks. Utter bollocks. If your business isn’t making enough to pay a liveable wage, it’s not a sustainable business

The cost of employing someone on minimum wage was has gone up by over 40% in just 5 years. That's a huge change for many businesses.

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 13:31

Shoecamp · 26/11/2025 13:24

Large chains of care homes, maybe. Smaller care homes are often absolutely on their knees and desperately short of extra cash. I don’t know why people think business in this country are all rolling in it

People ALWAYS like to think there’s an easy answer to increasing the tax take that doesn’t involve them paying more tax. See ‘tax the millions of £ companies make’. These companies already pay 25% tax. That’s not the answer. Increase the basic rate of tax if we need more money it. Everyone has to pay for better public services.

WestwardHo1 · 26/11/2025 13:33

usedtobeaylis · 26/11/2025 13:28

The government should be more focused on subsidising SMEs that struggle to pay wages. Not the suits at multi million pound retailers that ideologically refuse to pay decent wages.

I think business owners would prefer a more favourable and more healthy business environment which pays for itself rather than being given subsidies. Making businesses reliant on subsidies won't fix anything.

Megifer · 26/11/2025 13:34

The increase for 18-20 year olds is insanity. Anyone thinking thats a good thing, just as the most contentious change to employment rights in a generation is being thrashed out which will tank the job market on its own, is very, very naive.

AlaskaThunderfuckHiiiiiiiii · 26/11/2025 13:34

Littlebitpsycho · 26/11/2025 12:29

The problem is that constantly raising NMW (particularly for unskilled work) is that those wages are then getting closer to those of skilled work. If those skilled workers don't also get a pay rise (as they should if they're doing a job not just anybody can do) why would they bother?

On a societal level it makes it not worthwhile to study or train, if you end up no better off than someone working in Tesco. I am NOT saying there is anything wrong with working in Tesco, I am saying if NMW keeps rising, a Tesco worker will end up on similar wages as someone who has trained for years and is really making a difference (social work for example).

Why would anyone work a stressful, skilled job if they can take home the same money working in Tesco?

I don't know what the answer is, but constantly lifting the minimum wage isn't it 🤷‍♀️

100% this, I’ve just done 4 years degree level to become a nurse I’m on £17 per hour, pay rises are pitiful and as you have pointed out the minimum and national wage keeps going up and up, coupled with debts for student nurses in England and no jobs I honestly do wonder why I’ve bothered and many more will start to think the same

usedtobeaylis · 26/11/2025 13:35

WestwardHo1 · 26/11/2025 13:33

I think business owners would prefer a more favourable and more healthy business environment which pays for itself rather than being given subsidies. Making businesses reliant on subsidies won't fix anything.

In reality society depends on many businesses that don't turn profits. Social care providers for example provide a de facto public service and many should never be expected to self sustaining.

usedtobeaylis · 26/11/2025 13:37

Constantly raising the minimum wage might not be the answer but neither is refusing to when we're in the middle of a cost of living crisis and have an ideological social opposition to benefits in full swing, including in-work benefits.

shuddacuddadidnt · 26/11/2025 13:39

Fleetheart · 26/11/2025 13:09

I don’t think anyone wants any business to go bust. But neither do we think it’s fair that people slave away like they did in Dickens’ time for an exploitative employer.

Emotive image, but where exactly in the UK do people "slave away like they did in Dickens’ time for an exploitative employer."

Are working time regulations no longer applicable, or have huge numbers of workers chosen to opt out?

edited for typo

RedTagAlan · 26/11/2025 13:39

WhitegreeNcandle · 26/11/2025 13:25

But they’re not spending in the local economy. They are buying all their clothes from SHEIN and Temu. Their household stuff from Amazon. They’re not spending it in the indie coffee shop on the posh high street.

Good point.

But what do people living hand to mouth spend most of their extra wage on?

Food.

And yes, maybe a coffee from the coffee shop, instead of a Tesco own brand instant at home.

And of course, more mail order might mean more delivery drivers, more staff at the warehouses etc.

It's like I said in my post, the debate is not settled.

ScholesPanda · 26/11/2025 13:39

YANBU. Broadly a good thing, although it does hit labour intensive businesses in hospitality and social care hardest.

Governments of all colours will always put up the NMW. For the most part, the predictions of economic collapse made when it was introduced haven't happened and unemployment is lower now than it was in 1997. The costs are pushed on to private industry, and the taxpayer benefits twice- from a decrease in the welfare budget, and an increase in the tax take.

Maybe Reform won't put it up. But the huge cuts to immigration and possible repatriation policies demanded by it's core supporters will shrink the labour force and cause wage rises anyway.

Swipe left for the next trending thread