Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

If a wealth tax brought in zero revenue to the government, would people still support it? If yes, why?

598 replies

percypiggy200 · 23/11/2025 07:20

I’m curious and I’d love to know people’s reasoning.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Legolava · 23/11/2025 10:07

Marshmallow4545 · 23/11/2025 09:59

I agree completely.

Poverty isn't even mostly about about money. It's about having illiterate parents who don't know the basics regarding parenting and nutrition. It's an intergenerational cycle of dependency where nobody has a job or purpose. There is a lack of aspiration and belief that things can or should change. It's about a total disregard for education and for society in general.

Money can be used to tackle some of this but it absolutely isn't through handouts to poor families and assuming that this eradicates poverty and inequality. Only someone that hasn't experienced poverty or been around it would think that would work

🎯

EasternStandard · 23/11/2025 10:07

bottledboot · 23/11/2025 10:06

@EasternStandard so you haven’t actually told me anything and in the meantime what would you do with taxes?

I have told you what I’d focus on. What’s the issue?

bottledboot · 23/11/2025 10:08

s maddening. Building lots of housing would transfer wealth away from the rich but it a constructive, pro-growth

I agree and all that benefit money going to private landlords could go back to councils if there was more social housing.

Goldenbear · 23/11/2025 10:08

Marshmallow4545 · 23/11/2025 09:55

How exactly does giving these families money help the children? How will it positively impact outcomes?

The families are already making objectively terrible choices with the resources they do have. They don't devote their energy and time to getting their children to school or to do their homework. They don't spend their money or time on nutritious food. They don't even wash their children's clothes or make sure their kids are clean. Giving them more money won't change any of this. Inequality runs through our society like a stick of rock and it really isn't even mostly about money.

I would be supportive of direct intervention for these families but it would be a very tough nut to crack and would rely on parents feeling the 'pain' of their crap decisions. We need a way of doing this whilst protecting the children which is almost impossible to do.

You need money to provide services that help the children. Taking a fatalistic view of children in these circumstances is immoral and actually not beneficial to society.

AlertGoldDeer · 23/11/2025 10:09

Cornthin · 23/11/2025 07:24

Oh don’t be daft op

where would the money go?

I think you’re the one being daft. Or you don’t understand simple economics. Wealth is mobile. It leaves.

Ever heard of Laxmi Mittal? The guy, along with millions of other paying majority of taxes are leaving this country. Taking their wealth and taxes to other countries.

bottledboot · 23/11/2025 10:09

@EasternStandard I am specifically asking you about taxes as you were the one who responded to my post which mentioned that that they were inevitable now.

EasternStandard · 23/11/2025 10:10

GeneralPeter · 23/11/2025 10:05

It’s maddening. Building lots of housing would transfer wealth away from the rich but it a constructive, pro-growth way.

But the govt only seems to be able to look at problems from a “who can we tax for this” lens instead of “what actually needs to change to get growth going”. So disappointing after Starmer set out by saying growth was his top priority.

I’d argue that school fees VAT was the same. I’m not massively opposed, but that’s really not what needs to change to improve education.

Yes it’s the wrong question to start with. What can we tax v what should we change to get growth.

Start with a basic concept of how growth occurs not taxes.

AlertGoldDeer · 23/11/2025 10:11

Goldenbear · 23/11/2025 10:08

You need money to provide services that help the children. Taking a fatalistic view of children in these circumstances is immoral and actually not beneficial to society.

Yeah and money doesn’t grow on trees. You can tax, borrow or print. Borrowing and printing has made this country poorer already.

and the 1% paying 30% of taxes are leaving, taking their wealth with them. You can’t feed children platitudes.

bottledboot · 23/11/2025 10:14

It's why they should have never increased employer NI etc

I think this clearly demonstrates the huge issues we have though. This policy hasn’t worked but a lot of european countries have higher employer social security taxes which helps to fund better public services.

bottledboot · 23/11/2025 10:15

Start with a basic concept of how growth occurs not taxes.

If it’s so basic why did it elude the Tories for years?

Southernecho · 23/11/2025 10:17

Legolava · 23/11/2025 10:06

Exactly. To be fair they did give it a go. They reduced the higher rate tax from 50% to 45% and saw tax receipts increase. The private sector was starting to thrive again under Sunak. We now have job losses, hiring freezes and companies collapsing as a direct result of the last budget. Anyone who doesn’t know this is living in a public sector/welfare bubble.

The Tories kept that rate for 3 years, i don't know about any genuine increase in tax collected, it was on PAYE rates, so its almost impossible to avoid.

When was the private sector thriving? unemployment hit 8% in the mid 2010's

& it was increasing in the 1st and 2nd quarters in 2024, at 4.4%, its 5% now, still historically low.
Numbers in work are at record highs.

All tax rises have impacts, if not NI, which ones? or wouldn't you fund the NHS, public services, pay out PO and blood scandal compensations or increase defence?

As usually no one wants tax increase but everyone has their own pet thing that has to be funded eg SENDs mentioned up thread.

Fearfulsaints · 23/11/2025 10:17

Marshmallow4545 · 23/11/2025 09:55

How exactly does giving these families money help the children? How will it positively impact outcomes?

The families are already making objectively terrible choices with the resources they do have. They don't devote their energy and time to getting their children to school or to do their homework. They don't spend their money or time on nutritious food. They don't even wash their children's clothes or make sure their kids are clean. Giving them more money won't change any of this. Inequality runs through our society like a stick of rock and it really isn't even mostly about money.

I would be supportive of direct intervention for these families but it would be a very tough nut to crack and would rely on parents feeling the 'pain' of their crap decisions. We need a way of doing this whilst protecting the children which is almost impossible to do.

I think you are assuming people who think money would help think the money should go direct to individuals?

Im not sure thats what a lot of people are thinking. They might be thinking sure start on steroids, increased mental health services, improving transport in rural areas, incentives to good teachers to go to poorer areas, lots of schools already do good things with pupil premium that could be improved more. One school I work for has amazing results for its looked after children.

GeneralPeter · 23/11/2025 10:17

bottledboot · 23/11/2025 10:08

s maddening. Building lots of housing would transfer wealth away from the rich but it a constructive, pro-growth

I agree and all that benefit money going to private landlords could go back to councils if there was more social housing.

Yes. I personally don’t particularly care whether the new housing is socially or privately owned so long as there is lots of it.

I’m also a landlord and probably a rich person in terms of this debate. I’d be delighted if my wealth takes a hit becuase the govt is doing pro growth things like building housing, replacing SDLT with a property value tax, etc. But it’s pretty dismal to see the govt continuing to not fix the main thing they said they would address, repeatedly being surprised that they’ve run out of headroom again, and endlessly casting around for people to tax for it.

Goldenbear · 23/11/2025 10:17

AlertGoldDeer · 23/11/2025 10:11

Yeah and money doesn’t grow on trees. You can tax, borrow or print. Borrowing and printing has made this country poorer already.

and the 1% paying 30% of taxes are leaving, taking their wealth with them. You can’t feed children platitudes.

Edited

Are they? What's your source for this data?

AlertGoldDeer · 23/11/2025 10:18

Goldenbear · 23/11/2025 10:17

Are they? What's your source for this data?

There’s this thing called google……

with millions and millions of news sources.

You should try it sometime.

EasternStandard · 23/11/2025 10:19

bottledboot · 23/11/2025 10:15

Start with a basic concept of how growth occurs not taxes.

If it’s so basic why did it elude the Tories for years?

Why are suggestions met with looking backwards? Is it a pro Labour response

If people can look forward and agree on a basic concept then we might get out of this business hammering mindset.

Legolava · 23/11/2025 10:19

Southernecho · 23/11/2025 10:17

The Tories kept that rate for 3 years, i don't know about any genuine increase in tax collected, it was on PAYE rates, so its almost impossible to avoid.

When was the private sector thriving? unemployment hit 8% in the mid 2010's

& it was increasing in the 1st and 2nd quarters in 2024, at 4.4%, its 5% now, still historically low.
Numbers in work are at record highs.

All tax rises have impacts, if not NI, which ones? or wouldn't you fund the NHS, public services, pay out PO and blood scandal compensations or increase defence?

As usually no one wants tax increase but everyone has their own pet thing that has to be funded eg SENDs mentioned up thread.

Tell me you know nothing about the current jobs market without telling me.

WithDiamonds · 23/11/2025 10:20

@Marshmallow4545 You are writing about chaotic families as social services call them. Money will not save some families or help them make the right decisions.

Very occasionally a child makes it out of a chaotic family and does well. I am that child. I have cut huge swathes of my family off. When you live in it and manage to get out of it it gives you an unusual perspective. This isn’t about a poor family and that’s where MN generally just doesn’t understand because there are plenty raised poor but with families that support and parents that sacrifice and they are still ‘respectable ‘. This is alcoholism, abuse, drugs, crime, prison it’s their way of life. Why am I different ? academically I did very well, the rest just weren’t interested and if I’m totally honest they are all of low intelligence. Maybe I will get criticised for that but that is the big difference. Researchers conclude poor housing, chaotic environments, poor nutrition all contribute to poor academic performance. Certainly makes it harder and no disputing that but my siblings and I all grew up in that environment. They lack critical thinking skills. I did my absolute best with the sister that’s close in age to me when we were teenagers because I could see the road she was travelling down. She did once say you were right and I bet you are pleased, I wasn’t, it broke my heart. I cut her off many years ago I will not consort with criminals.

bottledboot · 23/11/2025 10:21

@GeneralPeter but why is there such a reluctance I don’t understand?

bottledboot · 23/11/2025 10:22

@EasternStandard I am just surprised you think it’s such an easy obvious fix? It’s nothing to do with partisan politics! Are you going to answer my question on tax?

Goldenbear · 23/11/2025 10:23

AlertGoldDeer · 23/11/2025 10:18

There’s this thing called google……

with millions and millions of news sources.

You should try it sometime.

Oh right so you don't know is your reply, you just believe everything you read on the internet, this is why we are screwed!

Legolava · 23/11/2025 10:25

Goldenbear · 23/11/2025 10:23

Oh right so you don't know is your reply, you just believe everything you read on the internet, this is why we are screwed!

To be fair, the latest stats on how many British nationals have left are recently published and widely available.

bottledboot · 23/11/2025 10:25

Personally I don’t think fixing UK productivity is going to be simple & easy. History suggests otherwise for one.

Imo it will take years and involve long term strategies and therefore need cross party solutions. As a result I think growth will continue to elude us and we are stuck in a doom loop of paying more for less

EasternStandard · 23/11/2025 10:25

bottledboot · 23/11/2025 10:22

@EasternStandard I am just surprised you think it’s such an easy obvious fix? It’s nothing to do with partisan politics! Are you going to answer my question on tax?

Nothing’s easy. It doesn’t mean you stop going for growth of SMEs or whack an extra tax in the form of NI which will hamper them.

At least decide on what is being aimed for and then work out the details which actually match, not do the opposite as the NI policy does.

I missed the tax question, what was it?