Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think free birthing should be entirely banned

544 replies

StandFirm · 22/11/2025 11:13

I have come across this article earlier which made me feel so very angry at the cynical extremists who brainwashed a mum into an entirely avoidable tragedy: https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2025/nov/22/free-birth-society-linked-to-babies-deaths-investigation
If I'd listened to similar cretins, I would have died in childbirth aged 19 and none of my three DCs would have been born alive or at the very least without severe disabilities. 'Pearls of wisdom' which gave me the rage include:
-ultrasounds are not safe
-women’s “bodies do not grow babies that we cannot birth”
Such ignorant perfidious lies. I hope the cult leader gets sent down for a very long time. That poor little child was robbed of a healthy body and many more actually died. I really hate the internet's ability to spawn dangerous cults entirely unchecked.

Influencers made millions pushing ‘wild’ births – now the Free Birth Society is linked to baby deaths around the world

A year-long investigation reveals how mothers lost children after being radicalised by uplifting podcast tales of births without midwives or doctors

https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2025/nov/22/free-birth-society-linked-to-babies-deaths-investigation

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
manineed · 22/11/2025 19:29

Grammarnut · 22/11/2025 18:55

No, of course not. That is taking the argument to a ridiculous extreme which no-one would accept. But if you are in protracted labour and won't have forceps or a caesar what is anyone going to do? Do you want to die, have your baby die because you want to exercise your (non-existent at this point) bodily autonomy and not have forceps? How will you feel when you have exercised this right and your baby is either dead or damaged and you also are damaged? You can't sue because it was your choice - and other people had to watch the awful outcome when they could help if you would let them. Sometimes we have to give up this idea we have bodily autonomy for the sake of having a good outcome. Do I refuse to be carried out of a burning building because it infringes my bodily autonomy? No, I do not.

But needing intervention and consenting to it is not ‘giving up your autonomy’ the key bit is you have to give your permission for others to do it, even if it’s a situation you didn’t really want to be in and feel like you ‘have to’ do it to save your own life, you still have to agree and consent, and that’s having autonomy.

Grammarnut · 22/11/2025 19:30

puppymaddness · 22/11/2025 19:16

But it doesn't work when you are talking about choices around childbirth which have implications for both mother and child and which may result in one of them dying unnecessarily. Informed consent is needed, but choice is a bit of a luxury

what on earth are you talking about??!
What does informed
consent mean to you, if you want to remove a woman's right to make decisions about her medical care ?

As someone else has pointed out, we need informed consent. So the woman must understand what her choices are and what they mean. Which means explaining childbirth and what can go right and what might go wrong before labour starts. If you know that placenta previa can kill your child or cause serious harm then you won't refuse a caesarian - that's informed consent. No-one is talking of forcing procedures on women. We are talking of explaining why they may be needed and that uninformed 'free birthers' etc are dangerous.

And yet I am alive now because a doctor without my consent (because I was unconscious, which, I think, explains my extreme danger) removed the feotus and placenta from my body whilst I was miscarrying. I woke up during it and it was painful - but I stood a good chance of dying from bleeding out or from septicaemia had he not acted so and had I been conscious I would have consented.

StartingFreshFor2026 · 22/11/2025 19:32

Also, not all medical interventions which we supposedly have to give up bodily autonomy for are immediate life and death risks, often it's about balancing risks. An example could be that a baby is known to be breech just before due date. The vaginal breech birth death rate is approximately 2 per 1,000 births (0.2%), a planned C-section death rate is approximately 0.5 per 1,000 births (0.05%). If a mother is properly informed of the risks, she might still choose to attempt vaginal birth, because she has bodily autonomy.

Mrsnothingthanks · 22/11/2025 19:35

Absolutely not. Where draw the line? Banning home births?! Banning elective c-sections?

Lifeislove · 22/11/2025 19:38

Grammarnut · 22/11/2025 19:30

As someone else has pointed out, we need informed consent. So the woman must understand what her choices are and what they mean. Which means explaining childbirth and what can go right and what might go wrong before labour starts. If you know that placenta previa can kill your child or cause serious harm then you won't refuse a caesarian - that's informed consent. No-one is talking of forcing procedures on women. We are talking of explaining why they may be needed and that uninformed 'free birthers' etc are dangerous.

And yet I am alive now because a doctor without my consent (because I was unconscious, which, I think, explains my extreme danger) removed the feotus and placenta from my body whilst I was miscarrying. I woke up during it and it was painful - but I stood a good chance of dying from bleeding out or from septicaemia had he not acted so and had I been conscious I would have consented.

Yes of course explain it all but what if the woman has been literally brainwashed into believing everyone on the maternity unit at her local hospital is in an Anti Free birth conspiracy against her?
Most ratiomal women will listen.
Those down the FB rabbit hole won't.
Thats why it's described as a Cult.

edit typos

Grammarnut · 22/11/2025 19:44

StartingFreshFor2026 · 22/11/2025 19:17

Well, that doesn't happen to the vast, vast majority of women because most of them accept intervention if needed (like I did).

It's just pointless (and dangerous) saying women don't have autonomy (they do) and that intervention is sometimes needed (which is obvious). If you wouldn't hold women down and force them, then you are admitting that they do have bodily autonomy because they cannot be forced against their will.

Bodily autonomy is a good thing! In the vast majority of situations women will consent to intervention if needed. In a tiny minority of cases they won't which can (not always) lead to some horrible outcomes but the human right of bodily autonomy is not something that can be sacrificed.

The burning building example is just silly. Only an actively suicidal or psychotic person would refuse to be rescued from a burning building, at which point they wouldn't have capacity to consent. It's not even comparable to the idea of expecting pregnant women to 'get over' the idea of bodily autonomy because she has been told she must have medical intervention even if she wouldn't consent to it.

Edited

We don't have bodily autonomy. We are humans in a web of relationships and our acts do not affect us alone. We are not islands. But the point is that women who are pregnant need to know the options and that things can go wrong so that they can give informed consent. Some will withhold consent and some of those will have poor outcomes and it's sad - and mainly because they are not aware of the options they have, what is likely to happen, what might happen etc.
I suppose I am against the women who preach natural childbirth and no intervention and lead others into situations that are terrible and life-threatening. They have caused others to err and are therefore culpable and I would like women to be informed enough to recognise when they are being fed dangerous 'information' such as that you can easily deliver a breech baby without intervention. This always needs intervention and midwives are trained in how to manage the event, to say they are unnecessary is a lie.

Lifeislove · 22/11/2025 19:46

WhySoManySocks · 22/11/2025 19:17

The rate of stillbirth used to be around 4%, it is now 0.4%.

I say that as someone who refused several medical procedures during my 2 births.

Well lucky you. Your experience is not a reason to assume that everyone else will be ok should they not choose the interventions.

It's almost like a badge of pride 🙄.
Childbirth in humans is a dangerous thing. Full stop. Always was and always will be.

My grandson was still born and it was entirely preventable. But the FB movement skewed my DIL'd mind beyond rational thought. If she had been on this forum 13 months ago she would have read posts such as yours which would have affirmed her conspiracy theories.

Grammarnut · 22/11/2025 19:46

Lifeislove · 22/11/2025 19:38

Yes of course explain it all but what if the woman has been literally brainwashed into believing everyone on the maternity unit at her local hospital is in an Anti Free birth conspiracy against her?
Most ratiomal women will listen.
Those down the FB rabbit hole won't.
Thats why it's described as a Cult.

edit typos

Edited

Yes. Which is why it probably needs controlling - but I have no idea how you do it without interfering in people's freedom. Education, I suppose.

Grammarnut · 22/11/2025 19:48

manineed · 22/11/2025 19:29

But needing intervention and consenting to it is not ‘giving up your autonomy’ the key bit is you have to give your permission for others to do it, even if it’s a situation you didn’t really want to be in and feel like you ‘have to’ do it to save your own life, you still have to agree and consent, and that’s having autonomy.

I agree - but it doesn't seem to be what some people on here mean by bodily autonomy.

Lifeislove · 22/11/2025 20:16

Grammarnut · 22/11/2025 19:46

Yes. Which is why it probably needs controlling - but I have no idea how you do it without interfering in people's freedom. Education, I suppose.

I know.

RubySquid · 22/11/2025 20:30

InSlovakiaTheCapitalOfCourseIsBratislava · 22/11/2025 18:15

It’s what I’ve noticed from having a baby. Beforehand it’s all positivity and empowerment with the occasional horror story usually involving a premature baby (who is now fine) or a bit of blood loss , and a glib haha it’s called labour for a reason.
afterwards it’s like you’ve been inducted to a secret club, full of stitches and prolapse and incontinence and indignity, that had you known existed you might have thought twice about wanting to join ,( even if you do now have a whole human who you have some mind bending attachment to )

Some women not all .

RubySquid · 22/11/2025 20:33

outofofficeon · 22/11/2025 19:12

On a slightly different note, I saw Gloucester hospital has stopped doing home births as the midwives don’t want to experience a situation like the case a few weeks ago in Manchester where the mum and baby both had totally avoidable deaths.

So are the hospitals going to shut maternity units due to unavoidable deaths also

NeverDropYourMooncup · 22/11/2025 20:48

cheerfulaf · 22/11/2025 16:19

I get so frustrated that home births get brought into these discussions, it is nowhere near the same thing

free birthing in my view is a mad choice, there are so many variables in childbirth and I just can’t understand how a woman wouldn’t want medical assistance on hand

home birthing is simply choosing the right environment to give birth in, with medically trained professionals there if you need them. I’d personally feel uneasy if a hospital wasn’t nearby but that’s my take

childbirth has been made into something that many women suffer and survive, a lot of us come away from it feeling powerless and violated. Dismissing home births as “you’re not putting your baby first because you want candles” just shits on a great option for those who don’t want an overly medicalised birth

Before this, though, childbirth was, due to the lack of hospital care from the outset, more of a 'suffer even more and maybe one or both of you will survive - if you live, you can always have another one and if you don't, well, he'll just marry another one or perhaps his sister will take the baby in if it's not too damaged'.

Lifeislove · 22/11/2025 20:59

NeverDropYourMooncup · 22/11/2025 20:48

Before this, though, childbirth was, due to the lack of hospital care from the outset, more of a 'suffer even more and maybe one or both of you will survive - if you live, you can always have another one and if you don't, well, he'll just marry another one or perhaps his sister will take the baby in if it's not too damaged'.

Nowadays one can have the best of both worlds. Have scans, have medical insights into the birth that were unknown a century ago but choose a sensible holistic approach to the birth if you choose knowing that emergencies can be dealt with.

I believe Polygamy came from this as a wife could die during pregnancy, birth or afterwards. If you had 3 or 4 wives, I guess it minimised the disruption to the husband and there was another on hand to raise the baby should one die during delivery.

Im as guilty as the next woman in not being totally honest about the pain etc of giving birth to my own daughter and being all 'oh it's all going to fine' bla bla bla.

More honesty amongst women would help I think

Nanny0gg · 22/11/2025 21:05

ComtesseDeSpair · 22/11/2025 11:41

Broadly I think women should be able to take risks with their own bodies and those of their babies (because pregnant women are not just vessels for the unborn and shouldn’t have restrictions placed on their autonomy in favour of the baby) and if choosing to free birth is what they wish to do, that choice should be available and legal. But I do believe that all choice should be informed, and that’s the problem with free birthing as a natalist “movement”, that often the women who choose it are uninformed, or have actively been provided with misinformation. That’s where the law should become involved, with harsher penalties for those who position themselves as authorities on something whilst peddling untruths or failing to disclose accurate information or safety guidance.

Edited

So should you take risks with your own children and not vaccinate?

Nanny0gg · 22/11/2025 21:07

LauraNorda · 22/11/2025 11:42

If human birth required medical intervention, humans would have been extinct millions of years ago.

Let's just let the few die then?

SouthLondonMum22 · 22/11/2025 21:07

Nanny0gg · 22/11/2025 21:05

So should you take risks with your own children and not vaccinate?

Some people do and it is perfectly legal.

pumpkinscake · 22/11/2025 21:19

JinglingtoChristmas · 22/11/2025 11:37

I believe free birthing is madness but I also believe a women has the right to consent or not to consent to medical treatmemt.

Agree. You'd want to be mad to free birth, but forcing medical treatment is but the way to go

Ilovecakey · 23/11/2025 00:14

phantomofthepopera · 22/11/2025 12:43

My grandmother died in labour at home, while giving birth to her 11th baby (Irish catholics, in the days before contraception). The baby also died, and my grandfather decided that he couldn’t work and raise 10 children, so he put them all in an orphanage.

That is so sad! Did he never see his children again? Didn't he have any family who could help out?

TempestTost · 23/11/2025 03:33

You can't force people to accept medical treatment.

PollyBell · 23/11/2025 03:39

And who do they want to pick up the pieces when it all goes wrong?

It is dangerous and proves they dont care about the baby just themselves

XWKD · 23/11/2025 03:42

You can't ban stupid.

Timeforabitofpeace · 23/11/2025 07:13

Agreed. As should “influencers”, who in the main are only interested in influencing their bank accounts

PenelopeSkye · 23/11/2025 07:39

It’s horrific that the leader’s own baby was stillborn this year. But I do hope this makes other women who might be thinking about free birthing a lot more wary. They seem to brush all the others under the carpet and never mention them, but I think/hope it happening to her will make people think twice. I will also add, I agree there are some terrible units out there and improvements need to be made, but I had my three babies in hospital (3 different hospitals as it turned out) and had excellent birth experiences with all 3. Not at all taking away from those that have had awful experiences- just that it isn’t always the case.

CuddlyPug · 23/11/2025 07:42

Free birthing is Darwin's theory in action - weeds out the stupid.