Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

EMPIRE- did you know this history?

211 replies

Needacupofteaandcrackers · 15/11/2025 07:50

Just watched Empire on BBC….. I didn’t realise the timelines of how long it was tolerated. I’ve been to a few trust sites and only now I’m made to connections on wealth. 🥹

OP posts:
OnlyOnAFriday · 15/11/2025 09:58

RhaenysRocks · 15/11/2025 08:13

Didn't you learn about it at school? We did loads on the Empire, the slave trade triangular route, East India Company.

I learnt nothing. We did Industrial Revolution, origins of ww1 and Spanish peninsula war.

ViragoHandshake · 15/11/2025 09:58

MidnightPatrol · 15/11/2025 09:53

If everyone thought the UK’s influence was a terrible thing in NI, we wouldn’t see an ongoing conflict as to which country the land was part of.

I believe in self-determination. If people in NI want to be British, who am I to say no you can’t you must be part of the Irish state because you’re on the same land mass.

Scotland, Wales and Ireland involve several hundred years of history. Some of it is bad yes - but I don’t think you can say all of it is.

Some reading needed.

A lot of reading needed.

MidnightPatrol · 15/11/2025 10:00

pumpkinscake · 15/11/2025 09:57

I'm not sure you understand the concept of the plantations. You seem to think some Irish people just randomly decided that it was cool to be British.

I have studied the empire extensively, I probably know far more than the average person.

As I have said - many reprehensible things happened during the period of Empire. Thousands of things. But it wasn’t necessarily all bad, and was over a course of centuries - and yes, some countries value their relationship with the UK as a result of empire and felt it brought some positives to their countries.

Your analysis is based on one issue - mine is on the broader history of the empire. There was more to the empire than plantations.

MidnightPatrol · 15/11/2025 10:02

ViragoHandshake · 15/11/2025 09:58

Some reading needed.

A lot of reading needed.

Analysis of history isn’t binary ‘good’ or ‘bad’.

Its usually more complex than that.

ViragoHandshake · 15/11/2025 10:02

MidnightPatrol · 15/11/2025 10:00

I have studied the empire extensively, I probably know far more than the average person.

As I have said - many reprehensible things happened during the period of Empire. Thousands of things. But it wasn’t necessarily all bad, and was over a course of centuries - and yes, some countries value their relationship with the UK as a result of empire and felt it brought some positives to their countries.

Your analysis is based on one issue - mine is on the broader history of the empire. There was more to the empire than plantations.

Respectfully, your take on Ireland seems spectacularly under-informed.

MidnightPatrol · 15/11/2025 10:03

ViragoHandshake · 15/11/2025 10:02

Respectfully, your take on Ireland seems spectacularly under-informed.

We were discussing Northern Ireland not Ireland, but ok.

Thats the thing about analysing history - it’s subjective, people will have different views.

SharonEllis · 15/11/2025 10:07

RampantIvy · 15/11/2025 08:35

Same. I'm going to watch David Olusoga's series though. He is such a good presenter.

Of the stately homes near me, the wealth of one was built on coal mining, another on iron works and another was built on slavery. The estate built on slavery is very open, and apologetic about it.

But what do the others say? The Trust and others barely touch on the horror of working class life and yet fall over themselves to issue trite apologies and trigger warnings about slavery and empire. Why are they apologising? Their job is to educate. There is some really great research about empire and slavery and some sites and exhibitions do it really well, and its important. But its not the only exploitation story in history. Do the other sites apologise about exploitation in mining and industry?

Genevieva · 15/11/2025 10:07

MidnightPatrol · 15/11/2025 10:00

I have studied the empire extensively, I probably know far more than the average person.

As I have said - many reprehensible things happened during the period of Empire. Thousands of things. But it wasn’t necessarily all bad, and was over a course of centuries - and yes, some countries value their relationship with the UK as a result of empire and felt it brought some positives to their countries.

Your analysis is based on one issue - mine is on the broader history of the empire. There was more to the empire than plantations.

One of the things that is fascinating - possible unique - about the British empire is that for the entirety of its existence British people were actively debating whether it should exist, what purpose it could morally exist for, how to disband it and hand it over to the peoples of each colony etc. Gladstone was very anti-Empire, yet it continued to expand u see his premiership. It had a momentum of its own. Almost like the laws of physics, it had to run its course before it could be disbanded.

Sausagenbacon · 15/11/2025 10:10

Will other empires be covered in this series? Or is it a BBC series?
Of course not!
I'm amazed that adults, with their school years well behind them, blame those schools for their lack of knowledge.
Life is about learning stuff, grow up and accept responsibility for your ignorance.

RhaenysRocks · 15/11/2025 10:13

BlueEyedBogWitch · 15/11/2025 08:28

Depends on your exam board. I did history up to A level, and a little bit at undergrad before I changed courses, and we didn’t touch slavery, apart from a bit on the abolition of serfdom in Russia.

It’s not an age thing.

At every school I've taught in for the last thirty years it's covered in Y9 before options. As for Austen, I don't think we should be judging what were perfectly normal attitudes at the time of writing through a modern lens.

ThreeSixtyTwo · 15/11/2025 10:13

It's funny how many people feel it is just something bad in past, but don't understand the consequences for today.

It made the UK significantly wealthy, and significantly wealthier than other countries (especially those colonised and those not colonising). It is the lead cause of the fact that if you get a minimal wage pay for 1 hour work in the UK and minimal wage pay for 1 hour of work in other countries to the theorerical world market, you will buy there much more there for the british wage.

As the world is slowly evening out (without the forced wealth transfer of The Empire) the UK is losing this advantage, the gap is slowly closing. And it means that the UK's life style inevitably suffers. In the end there is no real reason why a cleaner in UK should be able to buy more (on that virtual world market) than a cleaner in Poland or cleaner in Morocco.

MrsBuntyS · 15/11/2025 10:15

Bungle2168 · 15/11/2025 09:16

I’ll raise your Belgians with my VOC! For sheer wanton entrepreneurial bastardry, the Dutch had no peer. They instigated a genocide of the Spice Islands just to drive a bull run on cloves in the Amsterdam bourse!

My ancestors were part of the VOC. I studied colonial history for my degree. When the British gave them compensation for their lost ‘chattels’, they endowed x 2 schools and a university as the ones who were left were mega evangelical Christians. No money has made it into the twenty first century thank God. The educational institutions are still going though!
The Dutch behaved appallingly and still do in lots of places, it is wrong to think it was just the British doing the exploiting. If anyone thinks that global trade and slavery are over, they’re wrong. It’s happening right now. Let’s concentrate on that.

Dontlletmedownbruce · 15/11/2025 10:15

I'm not British but from a former colony which sees the British rule as a dark and brutal thing. I don't think anyone from any former empire should be made apologise or feel guilty for the sins of their fathers. I do however feel education is really lacking among British people. Not just history which to be fair is vast, but contemporary knowledge, as in what is or is not part of the commonwealth. What I think people don't get is if you know the horrors your people went through gaining independence and then meet someone who assumes you are still part of Britain it is extremely hurtful and disrespectful. That other person may simply be uneducated but it comes across as they are racist or bigoted and is really damaging to international relationships.

Theyreeatingthedogs · 15/11/2025 10:17

ViragoHandshake · 15/11/2025 09:19

What did he mean about south Asians ‘exploiting the UK system’? Did you ask him to clarify?

No I didn't. I didn't want to get into a political discussion/argument. I think I know what he meant, as you probably do.

pumpkinscake · 15/11/2025 10:24

Dontlletmedownbruce · 15/11/2025 10:15

I'm not British but from a former colony which sees the British rule as a dark and brutal thing. I don't think anyone from any former empire should be made apologise or feel guilty for the sins of their fathers. I do however feel education is really lacking among British people. Not just history which to be fair is vast, but contemporary knowledge, as in what is or is not part of the commonwealth. What I think people don't get is if you know the horrors your people went through gaining independence and then meet someone who assumes you are still part of Britain it is extremely hurtful and disrespectful. That other person may simply be uneducated but it comes across as they are racist or bigoted and is really damaging to international relationships.

I don't feel angry at current Britons. I am aware other Europeans were colonialists too. And also I know history is very complex. Irish people participated in Empire and have things to be ashamed of there themselves. Also, criticising colonialism doesn't mean ignoring all the other forms of exploitation, many continuing to this day. But if we try to understand colonialism properly, it helps us understand the present. If we don't know why things are the way they are, we can't really fix them. History is the present as well as the past, and that's why it matters that we are honest and objective about it, as best we can be.

SharonEllis · 15/11/2025 10:28

ThreeSixtyTwo · 15/11/2025 10:13

It's funny how many people feel it is just something bad in past, but don't understand the consequences for today.

It made the UK significantly wealthy, and significantly wealthier than other countries (especially those colonised and those not colonising). It is the lead cause of the fact that if you get a minimal wage pay for 1 hour work in the UK and minimal wage pay for 1 hour of work in other countries to the theorerical world market, you will buy there much more there for the british wage.

As the world is slowly evening out (without the forced wealth transfer of The Empire) the UK is losing this advantage, the gap is slowly closing. And it means that the UK's life style inevitably suffers. In the end there is no real reason why a cleaner in UK should be able to buy more (on that virtual world market) than a cleaner in Poland or cleaner in Morocco.

I think everyone realises that empire made the UK wealthy. This really isn't news. Your analysis is very simplistic though. The transfer of wealth was not all one way. Power and financial networks were complex and often co-dependant. But the idea tjat some countries, organisations and individuals have more power in the market is not rocket science and isn't just a result of the british empire either.

OneBookTooMany · 15/11/2025 10:35

MsAlignment · 15/11/2025 09:52

In the mid-1970s I was the only Black pupil at my selective independent girls’ school. Across the entire curriculum the existence of Black people in the world was never once referred to - not in literature, or cookery, or religion, or science - until it came to The Slave Trade in History.

History happened to be one of my best subjects and I got on well with the History teacher. To this day I can remember the anxious glances she shot in my direction during those lessons, and the way her hands twisted nervously as she led us through the textbooks …

Poor cow. I wonder if her black counterpart in Africa would have felt the same if she had one white child in her class.

Ddakji · 15/11/2025 10:37

MrsBuntyS · 15/11/2025 10:15

My ancestors were part of the VOC. I studied colonial history for my degree. When the British gave them compensation for their lost ‘chattels’, they endowed x 2 schools and a university as the ones who were left were mega evangelical Christians. No money has made it into the twenty first century thank God. The educational institutions are still going though!
The Dutch behaved appallingly and still do in lots of places, it is wrong to think it was just the British doing the exploiting. If anyone thinks that global trade and slavery are over, they’re wrong. It’s happening right now. Let’s concentrate on that.

Niall Ferguson once made the point that one of the better things about the British Empire was that it wasn’t the French Empire.

Haiti is such a poor country because they were paying reparations to the French for ending slavery well into the second half of the 20th century, I believe.

MsAlignment · 15/11/2025 10:40

It’s difficult to assess tone in a brief post, @OneBookTooMany- I’m not sure of the point you’re making?

IAxolotlQuestions · 15/11/2025 10:40

Disco2022 · 15/11/2025 08:18

Yeah I'm 41 and was super shocked when I took a post colonial module in 2003 at uni. Then quite angry that we spent so much time on bloody Henry VIII!

We essentially only ever did the world wars. T’was truly dull.

MrsBuntyS · 15/11/2025 10:42

I did my dissertation on Haiti, this was 30 years ago and the books in library hadn’t been touched since the 1970’s. Now everyone is interested and it’s a hot topic. For me one of the stand out parts of the TAST was that the Catholic colonies ‘allowed’ slaves to marry and believe that they would go to heaven, where the Protestants did not and taught them that they were barred from heaven as ‘beasts’. The whole thing is wild and no TV program will ever manage to convey the absolute horror of it all.

TheNinkyNonkyIsATardis · 15/11/2025 10:44

Disco2022 · 15/11/2025 08:18

Yeah I'm 41 and was super shocked when I took a post colonial module in 2003 at uni. Then quite angry that we spent so much time on bloody Henry VIII!

Henry VIII, done properly, is Brexit and the dismantling of the welfare state into royal possession.

IAxolotlQuestions · 15/11/2025 10:45

MidnightPatrol · 15/11/2025 08:28

It was a different time.

I think yes there were regrettable things that happened… but, you can’t judge the Victorian era by the standards of today.

And - it wasn’t all bad. Look at the commonwealth, many countries actually like the links to the UK.

And it wasn’t just us - all the Europeans were at it…!

The Koreans have a 1600 year history of slavery. The Chinese frankly continue theirs today. The Romans were at it, the Middle East, the many African countries…

Humans don’t live harmoniously together, they stick to their tribes and generally enslave or exploit the ‘others’.

Thanks for the recommendation OP. I’ll look it up.

OneBookTooMany · 15/11/2025 10:48

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

parietal · 15/11/2025 10:51

I did history gcse in 1993 and we only did WW1 and WW2 and a bit of Henry VIII. It was still the attitude that history was only the bits where the British were the good guys.

everything I’ve learned since has been my own reading.