‘You are very mistaken if you think there is financial gain to be had from having a neuro developmental disorder. ‘
That’s not what I said. Obviously I don’t think that. I said ‘ I also think lots [of diagnoses] are exaggerated for financial gain’. Which they are, no doubt. It’s one reason why the bulging benefit system needs an overhaul. This view has in no way suggested that genuine cases are for financial gain. Of course they are not. I’ve got a significant neurological disorder myself. So it pisses me off to see people gaming the system and making it worse for people who have genuine issues / diagnoses.
But that isn’t what this post is about really. I don’t think kids should all be so quickly and seemingly irreversibly labelled from a young age, some it may help, many it doesn’t. But some do seek labels - diagnoses- for financial gain, no question. Teachers for eg. Are asked to sign DLA forms etc, when they don’t want to. You see posts about this on mn.
It’s a shame that whenever this issue is brought up, people clamour to jump on the bandwagon of trying to silence anyone who raises a very real issue. A tax payers issue.