Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Government announcing doubling council tax double for band G & H

174 replies

spookymelon666 · 07/11/2025 07:51

I know it’s not yet set in stone. We can’t afford it. There’s an assumption that these are high value houses. My house is worth no more than 300K 3 bedroom detached 125m2 with no front garden or driveway or garage and a tiny back garden and we are band G in Scotland. I’m so frustrated by the cost of living. We already can’t afford any holidays. AIBU that this isn’t fair?

OP posts:
StrongLikeMamma · 07/11/2025 12:44

We already pay £300 a month here! It’s fucking ridiculous to double that.

spookymelon666 · 07/11/2025 12:59

randomchap · 07/11/2025 08:07

Any source to this rumour? First I've heard.

@randomchap it was on BBC news this morning. Nothing confirmed but being considered. Words they used were band G and H are high value properties. I’m band G and I work in property and know that my house is worth 300K. So not high value.

OP posts:
PocketsAndSedition · 07/11/2025 13:00

I feel like this proposal presupposes that people in higher band houses are putting lots into savings. Whereas I think the reality for many is that if council tax increases it just means that people will be putting less money into the economy elsewhere. If we're talking higher earners then it's probably cuts to discretionary spending which isn't going to make anyone feel sorry for them on an individual level, but lower spending on services can't be good for the economy overall?

spookymelon666 · 07/11/2025 13:03

RaspberryRipple2 · 07/11/2025 08:11

they are high bands - in England that’s properties that were worth more than £160k in 1991, maybe some quirks depending on area but in mine my large 4 bed detached house is band D. It would be very unusual if those bands covered any houses worth c£300k - around here house price inflation has been 2-400% over that 35 year period.

no idea what the bands are in Scotland, but as a pp notes it won’t be affected as it’s devolved.

My little 3 bed house indeed is band G! I have no space at all to the front or sides. Only a small rear garden a tiny kitchen (only space for 1 person) and 3 bedrooms! The other houses around are same tax band along with a factors fee so it’s not an easy sell.

OP posts:
silvercutlery · 07/11/2025 13:05

If this is true it’s v worrying. I work in the public sector and husband recently made redundant. I don’t earn enough to cover our basic bills myself but we’re scraping by with savings. Out CT is getting on for £4k per year. If it was doubled we’d lose our house. There’s no way we’d be able to afford it.

spookymelon666 · 07/11/2025 13:07

FenceBooksCycle · 07/11/2025 08:14

If you are band G then that means that the majority of properties in your area are smaller or less luxurious. Only about 6% of properties in Scotland are band G or higher. The number of bedrooms is misleading and insufficient to judge property size - my sister and I both live in 3-bed semis, but mine is a band B ex-council property, and each of the two larger bedrooms can just about fit a double bed with little room for much else, and the 3rd bedroom can barely fit a single bed and the landing at the top of the stairs is very cramped with just enoughspace fir the doors, whereas in her Band F three-bed-semi there's room for an armchair and dressing table along with the kingsize bed in the larger bedrooms, the 3rd bedroom is about twice the size of our third bedroom, and the upstairs landing has space for additional furniture too. You cannot have much idea of your privilege if you think that any property that must by definition be in the top 10% locally is somehow also very basic. Move to a band E or F property if you can't afford to live in a band G one.

I wish I could show you my house. I have a double bed and a small double and a single room. No front space or land to the side at all and the house is about 17 years old. My village is a new village about 20 years old and there are plenty of big houses near that have garages and driveways and front gardens and 4 beds with kitchen diners (mine is a small kitchen). The estate is all banded similar so I wouldn’t have a case but streets away are far bigger homes.

OP posts:
spookymelon666 · 07/11/2025 13:09

SpaceRaccoon · 07/11/2025 08:34

Honestly in Scotland a lot of houses that would be on the cheaper in in the south east seem to make it into F/G/H bands.
There's no way most of the people living in them could afford a doubling of their council tax - it's already a steep bill.

Indeed I’m Scottish Borders but only about 45 minutes drive from Edinburgh

OP posts:
randomchap · 07/11/2025 13:10

The government have not announced it.

The IFS has suggested raising it but nowhere is reporting that the government announced it.

spookymelon666 · 07/11/2025 13:10

HighLadyofTheNightCourt · 07/11/2025 08:48

And? There are ways which you can highlight this which don’t involve being patronising.

People are very worried about their finances so emotions are heightened.

Thanks
i told this person already it was BBC new this morning.

OP posts:
randomchap · 07/11/2025 13:15

spookymelon666 · 07/11/2025 13:10

Thanks
i told this person already it was BBC new this morning.

Why did you say the government has announced it, when they haven't.

Deliberately scaremongering? Pushing misinformation?

zeebra · 07/11/2025 13:20

Do you mean 125 metres squared? Is that just the house or the garden too? If that is correct- it is a large place.

Sesma · 07/11/2025 13:30

They will be announcing some of the tax rises that keep coming up, there is a big hole to fill, she didn't stand there the other day blah blahing away for nothing. This does seem to be an easy target and supposedly affects the 'wealthy' so it wouldn't be a surprise if it happened.

Sesma · 07/11/2025 13:32

randomchap · 07/11/2025 13:15

Why did you say the government has announced it, when they haven't.

Deliberately scaremongering? Pushing misinformation?

So do you think there will be no tax rises.

randomchap · 07/11/2025 13:36

Sesma · 07/11/2025 13:32

So do you think there will be no tax rises.

That's not what I said.

My point was that she said they are announcing it, when it's just speculation and rumour.

Pluto46 · 07/11/2025 13:38

Lasttraintolondon · 07/11/2025 09:18

Social care needs to be paid from central taxation. Making councils pay for it means councils are going bankrupt and all other essential services e.g. Road repairs, libraries, street lights, litter picking get cut. This has to be fixed.

Meanwhile raising high council tax based on valuation will ruin homeowners in the south east. Giant mortgages and no spare money!

Just to make it even more unpalatable, a good proportion - on average more than 20% of your council tax gets nowhere near essential services or even social care. It goes towards the pensions of the bloated public section

Coastingby · 07/11/2025 13:47

FGS stop with all the panicking.

These are things that have been considered. If you want decent services, they need to be paid for, but they're really not going to implement all the 'ideas' that the press would have you believe are already in place.

This is part of a project to have people believe taxes will/have increased much more than they will.

Calm down and worry about out it if/when it happens.

Sesma · 07/11/2025 13:49

But we are not going to get decent services out of it, the services won't improve at all.

Bruisername · 07/11/2025 13:52

Yeah these tax rises are going to be to keep heads above water

Coastingby · 07/11/2025 13:54

Bruisername · 07/11/2025 13:52

Yeah these tax rises are going to be to keep heads above water

Ok but my point was we're not going to see everything that people are panicking over implemented. The press are deliberately creating a "feeling" that Labour are going to tax you much more than they are. Some increases are to be expected, we know that, but it's really not going to be everything that's been talked about in the last few says.

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 07/11/2025 13:57

It’s truly pathetic to see the ‘right wing media’ being blamed for what is obviously pitch rolling by Labour.

This incompetent turd-fest of a government does it all the time.

Bruisername · 07/11/2025 13:59

Yes I don’t think this is the media - it’s Labour testing the water but very badly because they've killed the property market atm and everyone is just waiting to see what happens before deciding what to do

i get that they are in a difficult position but a lot has been self created.

I also don’t think for a lot of people this is right vs left as they feel let down by both sides!!!

Nameyname012 · 07/11/2025 13:59

RaspberryRipple2 · 07/11/2025 08:11

they are high bands - in England that’s properties that were worth more than £160k in 1991, maybe some quirks depending on area but in mine my large 4 bed detached house is band D. It would be very unusual if those bands covered any houses worth c£300k - around here house price inflation has been 2-400% over that 35 year period.

no idea what the bands are in Scotland, but as a pp notes it won’t be affected as it’s devolved.

There are many discrepancies though, for example in houses not built in 1991 or those that have had extensions.

For example, our own house is a five-bed (but only because that is the majority of our living space - we otherwise only have a tiny living room and kitchen/diner) mid-terrace townhouse in the SE that we bought for £310k in 2017.

It wasn't even built in 1991 and MSE calculations put it as being in band D, which I think is fair. However it's currently an E.

LakieLady · 07/11/2025 14:02

If my area is anything to go by, they could probably gain more by rebanding all the properties that have been massively extended. The houses here and in the adjoining 3 streets were originally built as either 2 beds/2 recs/upstairs bathroom (c/tax band C) or 3 beds/1 rec/ground floor bathroom (band D). The footprints are identical, regardless of number of bedrooms.

Most of the houses have now been extended, some several times, but the council tax bands are unchanged. Some of them are now more than twice the original size.

Over the years, a former 2-bed has had a full-depth, two-storey side extension, a full width single-storey rear extension, and a loft conversion. It is now a massive 5-bed, 3-bath, 3 reception room house but it's still banded C for council tax. It's worth approximately 75% more than it would have been without all the extensions.

There are 5 adults living there (parents and grown up kids) and they only pay 25% more in c/tax than I do, living alone in a house less than half the size.
And they piss off the whole street, because they have 6 vehicles between them, all but one of which are parked on the road, because they no longer have a garage and a drive!

And then there's the family that have had a self-contained "garden building" erected, which they let through airbnb or similar. It seems to have a very high occupancy rate, there are people staying there most weekends and often for a night or two in the week. The house is still banded C, despite having what is effectively a studio flat in the garden.

LakieLady · 07/11/2025 14:07

silvercutlery · 07/11/2025 13:05

If this is true it’s v worrying. I work in the public sector and husband recently made redundant. I don’t earn enough to cover our basic bills myself but we’re scraping by with savings. Out CT is getting on for £4k per year. If it was doubled we’d lose our house. There’s no way we’d be able to afford it.

I'm retired, so my income is state pension plus a small occupational pension. My monthly council tax is more than 10% of my income.

If it went up much more, I simply wouldn't be able to afford to stay here.

Araminta1003 · 07/11/2025 14:15

A fair council tax, would take into account all the income and all the wealth in a household (minus the debt and cost of depends) and then tax accordingly. As they have no way of doing that whatsoever, anything they do come up with council tax wise is a stab in the dark.
For people with lower incomes or high mortgages who passed affordability checks based on lower council tax, this could be quite bad. Especially those who have recently paid stamp duty. I would have thought it won’t apply to anyone who paid stamp duty at higher rates already, which many people did who have higher band houses purchased in the last X years.

Perhaps a system where you can elect whether to pay stamp duty or more council tax over a long time would be fairer? You need to keep younger people neutral as regards affordability checks for mortgages as otherwise you stall the entire housing market.

Swipe left for the next trending thread