Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

School illness rules

84 replies

Bazingaaa · 26/10/2025 11:55

My children's school have changed the rules regarding illnesses, are these now the normal rules for all schools now?

"The 48-hour rule, which required children to stay off from school for 48 hours after symptoms of vomiting or diarrhea has stopped, will no longer be in place."

"Please be reminded that if your child has a high temperature and is well they should still attend school"

Alot of people are now worried about it causing a rise in illnesses in the school.

Aibu for thinking that the rules are absolutely ridiculous especially getting rid of the 48hour rule

OP posts:
Sgustin · 27/10/2025 18:18

ShesTheAlbatross · 27/10/2025 17:44

Are there other rules that apply to staff that you think should apply to the small children? Or does it maybe make sense to treat adult employees different to 5 year olds.

Yes, now you mention it, I think all children should be paid a full time working wage for attending school and they also should be teaching the lower years by Y3....😂

When it comes to spreading illnesses, I don't think the rules are usually vastly different for adults and children though. However, whether you SHOULD send your kid into school is up to parents. I just don't think a 48 hr absolute rule for any instances of sickness is necessary. Most parents have some common sense, although after being on Mumsnet for as long as i have, I am beginning to question that a bit 🤔

Megifer · 27/10/2025 18:31

So many times I had to keep DC off for 2 days when they were absolutely fine and their virus had already likely got to the other kids too (if they are indeed as contagious as often stated).

Secondary school definitely seem a lot less bothered about parents who dont keep them off 2 days. One of the teachers on the absence line encouraged me a few times to send them back after just a day as long as they were better, which they usually were.

RafaistheKingofClay · 27/10/2025 18:59

Bazingaaa · 26/10/2025 12:25

It's been replaced with the school will encourage hand washing and teachers will monitor the child during the day if the parent let's them know the child is poorly. The school is understaffed as it is and age ranges from 3-9 years. Unfortunately schools aren't able to check a child's temperature unless it's an emergency situation.

With 3-9 year olds I’d imagine this policy will last until local public health inspectors shut them down for deep cleaning. The first child with noro will take most of the children and staff out.

Sassylovesbooks · 27/10/2025 20:00

My son's secondary school doesn't have the 48 hour rule, for sickness/diarrhoea - they changed it to 24 hours. However, they do still say if a student has a temperature, then they should stay home until they are better. Personally, I ignore the 24 hour rule, and stick to the 48 hour rule, and I just make that plain when I email the absence staff member! My son's school have never pulled me up on it!

Bazingaaa · 28/10/2025 08:07

Thankyou everyone for your thoughts and opinions, I now know that it's something that we need to try get changed but unfortunately I don't see it being changed as they're adamant alot of schools no longer authorise time off for hight temperatures.

I understand that some parents find it frustrating having the 48hour rule in place but I'd rather have 24-48hours of my child being at home after they've been sick rather then sending them in school a few hours later just incase them being sick once turns out to be a bug.

Also we will be continuing to keep her off if she has a high temperature as it doesn't seem fair to send her in and everyone knows how fast a high temperature can turn into something serious if not properly monitored.

OP posts:
ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 28/10/2025 08:21

PotteringAlonggotkickedoutandhadtoreregister · 26/10/2025 12:27

The rule doesn’t exist in the workplace, it doesn’t exist in secondary schools. In real life you stop being ill and, if you feel well enough, crack on. You don’t need to be at home twiddling your thumbs if you feel fine.

It existed in my child’s secondary school.

ThankYouNigel · 28/10/2025 10:09

Bazingaaa · 28/10/2025 08:07

Thankyou everyone for your thoughts and opinions, I now know that it's something that we need to try get changed but unfortunately I don't see it being changed as they're adamant alot of schools no longer authorise time off for hight temperatures.

I understand that some parents find it frustrating having the 48hour rule in place but I'd rather have 24-48hours of my child being at home after they've been sick rather then sending them in school a few hours later just incase them being sick once turns out to be a bug.

Also we will be continuing to keep her off if she has a high temperature as it doesn't seem fair to send her in and everyone knows how fast a high temperature can turn into something serious if not properly monitored.

I agree with you. I kept my youngest off school for a few days recently with an extremely high temperature. Awful, painful sore throat, she couldn’t eat. She is 4 years old, not even statutory school age. Her GP agreed and said I needed to monitor her breathing, temperature and fluid intake very closely, I can do this far better 1:1 in the comfort of our own home.

The school previously made a mistake and under dosed my eldest with a medicine needed to be given in school, so that’s made me even more distrustful that these things are not done properly.

My friend who teaches in another school told me the office stopped her calling a mum about her child being ill because of attendance, told her to leave the child on the beanbag all day. My friend is a very experienced teacher and mum herself, she doesn’t call home lightly, and was completely overridden by the office. I would be extremely unhappy if one of my DCs teachers was prevented from communicating with me about their health. I’d remove them actually.

lizzyBennet08 · 28/10/2025 10:24

PotteringAlonggotkickedoutandhadtoreregister · 26/10/2025 12:27

The rule doesn’t exist in the workplace, it doesn’t exist in secondary schools. In real life you stop being ill and, if you feel well enough, crack on. You don’t need to be at home twiddling your thumbs if you feel fine.

This
I think the blanket rule was ridiculous particularly when kids can puke for lots of reasons car sickness, too much junk at a party and having them stay for 2 days as a given was nuts. I think parents should be the judge and absolutely in the main don't believe most parents would send genuinely unwell kids to school and if they do, they weren't the type to obey the 48 hour rule anyway.

Mydonkeyisred · 20/01/2026 19:00

Both schools my children attend still have the 48 hour rule.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page