Why is it seen as a negative to suggest the op (who has themselves independently from this parents evening already had suspicions around ND) go to the school and suggest they monitor and make note of ND traits they might see with the idea they can help start interventions and have support in place to help the child. If the child isn’t ND then this will become clear relatively quickly, and the support and interventions created specifically for an ND child will be withdrawn and there would be no negative impact from having had them for a brief amount of time. If, however, it’s noted that actually the child is really benefiting from this support , and the school start to see ND behaviour, then they can help the parent through the process of having the child referred and then diagnosed. That’s an if though. Just mentioning your concerns around suspected ND doesn’t mean that’s the final say, your child is now diagnosed and is ND and nothing will change from that point on. The process of referral and assessment and diagnosis is a long, complex road, that has multiple stages and factors. The amount of evidence needed to support a diagnosis is substantial and it’s not one that’s made overnight because of a handful of Mumsnet comments.
Early intervention is so important, I cannot comprehend why people with your mindset would rather ignore there may be potential signs that point to ND, an instead opt to just wait and if at some point it becomes too much to ignore , then you take the steps to get support. At that point the child has already been struggling, and there will be significant consequences to the lack of support and help and being made to struggle on and to conform in an environment not built for their brain to access easily. The idea we wait and see until the person or child is significantly struggling is why we have such a large amount of adults now mainly women being diagnosed later on in life, because situations like these arose, and they were ignored and ND was never considered. By the time we are adults and diagnosed our lives have been changed permanently from the decades of struggle and masking and lack of help and support. Not to mention the ingrained lack of self worth and confidence we now have due to a lifetime of never being able to live up to society’s expected way of behaving.
If a child is ND then asking for help as soon as you can is imperative, and if you do that and it turns out the child is NT and just settling in, then it won’t have any impact on them whatsoever, and they can quite easily fall back into the school routine with other NT kids and won’t need to continue the support.
If later on it’s discovered a child is ND, and early on in life , their parent tried to force them to sit still, not talk loud or out of turn and to conform to the neurotypical way of living and behaving, then you have actively contributed to the negative mindset and lack of self worth this child will have within themselves now. It is impossible to force a ND child to behave in this way, their brain is not doing it in the fist place because it physically can’t, and it will cause them genuine physical pain and burnout to act in a way that’s deemed by society as acceptable.
OP’s child May be a neurotypical child, settling in to a new school routine and just taking awhile to adjust to a new environment. The child may also be ND and taking both of these things into account and acting in a proactive way to support regardless can only be beneficial. By assuming they aren’t and waiting until breaking point to then ask for help is harmful and is the reason we have such a problem with ND in society currently.
There is a reason the life expectancy of undiagnosed people with ADHD is 7-9 years lower than those who are NT, to get ahead and to implement support because the signs show their MIGHT be neurodivergence can only be positive.